Abstract
This introduction frames the debate for the chapters that follow. It opens the discussion by providing brief insights into the relation between science and practice in several different fields before addressing specifically the urban landscape and the cases of researcher-practitioners whose work has been fundamental in the development of urban morphology. It reflects on the main challenges, strengths, difficulties and threats, that the research-practice relation currently faces, highlighting the main contribution of the book, and of each chapter, to the debate.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bagaric M, Fischer N, Wolf G (2017) Bringing sentencing into the 21st century: closing the gap between practice and knowledge by introducing expertise into sentencing law. Hofstra Law Rev 45:785–850
Barke M (2013) Some thoughts on the first output of the ISUF Task Force on Research and Practice in Urban Morphology. Urban Morphol 17:134–135
Barke M (2015) Further thoughts on research and practice in urban morphology: a British perspective. Urban Morphol 19:96–99
Broekkamp H, Hout-Wolters B (2007) The gap between educational research and practice: a literature review, symposium, and questionnaire. Educ Res and Eval 13:203–220
Brownson R, Kreuter M, Arrington BB, True W (2006) Translating scientific discoveries into public health action: how can schools of public health move us forward? Public Health Rep 121:97–103
ÇaliÅŸkan O, Marshall S (2011) Urban morphology and design: introduction. Built Environ 37:381–392
Caniggia G, Maffei GL (1979) Composizione architettonica e tipologia edilizia I: lettura dell’edilizia di base. Marsilio, Venice
Caniggia G, Maffei GL (1984) Composizione architettonica e tipologia edilizia II: il progetto nell’edilizia do base. Marsilio, Venice
Cataldi G (1998) Designing in stages. In: Petruccioli A (ed) Typological process and design theory. Aga Khan Program for Islamic Architecture, Cambridge, pp 159–177
Conzen MRG (1958) The growth and character of Whitby. In Dash GHJ (ed) A survey of Whitby and the surrounding area. Eton, pp 49–89
Conzen MRG (1960) Alnwick, Northumberland: a study in town-plan analysis. Institute of British Geographers Publication 27. George Philip, London
Conzen MRG (1966) Historical townscapes in Britain: a problem in applied geography. In: House JW (ed) Northern geographical essays in honour of GHJ Daysh. Newcastle upon Tyne, pp 56–78
Conzen MRG (1975) Geography and townscape conservation. In: Uhlig H, Lienau C (eds) Anglo-German symposium in applied geography. Giessen-WĂ¼rzburg-MĂ¼nchen, 1973. Giessener Geographische Schriften 1975, pp 95–102
Cooper A, Shewchuk S (2015) Knowledge brokers in education: how intermediary organizations are bridging the gap between research, policy and practice internationally. Educ Policy Anal Arch 23:1–4
Corsini MG (2009) Tradition and modernity in the Costa degli Ometti neighbourhood in Genova. Edizioni Kappa, Roma
Giovannoni G (1913) Vecchie città ed edilizia nuova. Nuova Antologia, 1–50
Goodman-Delahunty J, Das DK (2017) Conclusion: closing the Gap between Law in Action and Research. In: Goodman-Delahunty J, Das DK (eds) Trends in legal advocacy: Interviews with prosecutors and criminal defense lawyers across the Globe. Routledge, New York
Gould JB, Barclay S (2012) Mind the gap: The place of gap studies in sociolegal scholarship. Ann Rev of Law Soc Sci 8:323–335
Gubbins C, Rousseau DM (2015) Embracing translational HRD research for evidence-based management: Let’s talk about how to bridge the research-practice gap. Hum Resour Dev Q 26:109–125
Gyani A, Shafran R, Myles P, Rose S (2014) The gap between science and practice: how therapists make their clinical decisions. Behav Ther 45:199–211
Hanson J (1998) Decoding homes and houses. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hayward R, Samuels I (2018) Moving urban morphology from the academy to the studio: the use of urban tissues in teaching and continuing professional development. In: Oliveira V (ed) Teaching urban morphology. Springer, Cham, pp 281–296
Hillier B (1996) Space is the machine. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hillier B, Hanson J (1984) The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kazdin AE (2017) Adressing the treatment gap: A key challenge for extending evidence-based psychosocial interventions. Behav Res Ther 88:7–18
Kropf KS (1993) An inquiry into the definition of built form in urban morphology. Dissertation, University of Birmingham
Kropf KS (2017) Handbook of urban morphology. Wiley, London
Lagemann EC (2000) An elusive science: The troubling history of education research. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Maretto M (2013) Saverio Muratori: Towards a morphological school of urban design. Urban Morphol 17:93–106
Maretto M, Scardigno N (2016) Muratorian urban morphology: The walled city of Ahmedabad. Urban Morphol 20:18–33
McIntyre D (2005) Bridging the gap between research and practice. Camb J Educ 35:357–382
Muratori S (1959) Studi per una operante storia urbana di Venezia I. Palladio 3–4
O’ Connell D, (2013) Morphology and design: The developing dialogue. Urban Morphol 17:52–53
Oliveira V (2016) Urban morphology. An introduction to the study of the physical form of cities, Springer, Cham
Oliveira V (ed) (2019) JWR Whitehand and the historico-geographical approach to urban morphology. Springer, Cham
Oliveira V, Pinho P (2010) Evaluation in urban planning: advances and prospects. J Plan Lit 24:343–361
Oliveira V, Silva M, Samuels I (2014) Urban morphological research and planning practice: a Portuguese assessment. Urban Morphol 18:23–39
Penuel W, Allen A, Coburn C, Farrell C (2015) Conceptualizing research-practice partnerships as joint work at boundaries. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk 20:182–197
Ross AO (1985) To form a more perfect union: It is time to stop standing still. Behav Ther 16:195–204
Rousseau DM (2012) Designing a better business school: CHANNELLING Herbert Simon, addressing the critics, and developing actionable knowledge for professionalizing managers. J Manag Stud 49:600–618
Ruiz-ApilĂ¡nez B, SolĂs E, Ureña JM (2015) Urban morphological curricula in Spanish schools of architecture. Urban Morphol 19:146–156
Samuels I (2013) ISUF Task Force on Research and Practice in Urban Morphology: An interim report. Urban Morphol 17:40–43
Samuels I, Pattacini L (1997) From description to prescription: Reflections on the use of a morphological approach in design guidance. Urban Des Int 2:81–91
Sarat A (1985) Legal effectiveness and social studies of law: On the unfortunate persistence of a research tradition. Legal Stud Forum 9:23–31
Simon HA (1967) The business school: A problem in organizational design. J Manage Stud 4:1–16
Sobell LC (1996) Bridging the gap between scientists and practitioners: The challenge before us. Behav Ther 27:297–320
Stirman SW, Gutner CA, Langdon K, Graham JR (2016) Bridging the gap between research and practice in mental health services settings: An overview of developments in implementation theory and research. Behav Ther 47:920–936
Tkachenko O, Hahn HJ, Peterson SL (2017) Research-practice gap in applied fields: An integrative literature review. Hum Resour Dev Rev 16:235–262
Tucker BP, Schaltegger S (2016) Comparing the research-practice gap in management accounting: A view from professional accounting bodies in Australia and Germany. Account, Audit Account J 29:362–400
Van Buskirk K, Filliter G (2020) An examination of the effectiveness of Readers’ Theatre as a teaching strategy in legal education. The Law Teacher 54:129–148
Vanderline R, van Braak J (2010) The gap between educational research and practice: Views of teachers, school leaders, intermediaries and researchers. Br Edu Res J 36:299–316
Whitehand JWR (1981) Background to the urban morphogenetic tradition. In: Whitehand JWR (ed) the urban landscape: Historical development and management; papers by MRG Conzen. Institute of British Geographers/ Academic Press, London
Whitehand JWR (2000) From explanation to prescription. Urban Morphol 4:1–2
Whitehand JWR (2007) Urban morphology and policy: Bridging the gap. Urban Morphol 11:79–80
Whitehand JWR (2003) Urban morphological research and practice. Urban Morphol 17:3–4
Acknowledgements
The author is indebted to JWR Whitehand and Susan Whitehand for their detailed comments on an earlier version of this chapter. He is also grateful to Ivor Samuels for the reading of a draft version.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Oliveira, V. (2021). The Relation Between Research and Practice. In: Oliveira, V. (eds) Morphological Research in Planning, Urban Design and Architecture. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66460-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66460-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-66459-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-66460-2
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)