Abstract
Effective headwater protection and management requires community support and engagement. This requires an understanding of the attitudes and values of the host community (e.g. Pande and Pande 2020). This chapter examines environmental attitudes among undergraduate learners at a Hindi-medium university in the headwaters of the Uttarakhand Himalaya, India, in the aftermath of a major disaster. It uses the standard ‘New Ecological Paradigm’ questionnaire (Dunlap 2008; Dunlap et al. 2000) in its 15-item updated version (cf. Dunlap and Van Liere 1978). It also uses some additional items to explore how local university students in this headwater community think and feel about their environmental circumstances in the immediate aftermath of an environmental disaster involving catastrophic rainfall, flooding and landslides. It considers how these responses may be interpreted and how they are affected by the learner’s disciplinary course of studies. Then, more controversially, these response patterns are compared with NEP data recorded elsewhere beginning with data collected at the author’s home university and then NEP results collected in other parts of the world. Finally, it considers how differences in cultural attitudes to the environment affect the validity of NEP-style international questionnaires from Western traditions and how a more culturally sensitive questionnaire survey might be developed and employed to enhance environmental education in this Himalayan State.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, B.A., Romani, J.H., Phillips, H., Wentzel, M. and Tlabela, K. (2007). Exploring environmental perceptions, behaviors and awareness: water and water pollution in South Africa. Population and Environment, 28(3), 133–161, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-007-0038-5.
Bernstein, I.H. and Teng, G. (1989). Factoring items and factoring scales are different: Spurious evidence for multidimensionality due to item categorization. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 467–477, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.467.
Bird, D.K. (2009). The use of questionnaires for acquiring information on public perception of natural hazards and risk mitigation – A review of current knowledge and practice. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 9(4), 1307–1325, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-1307-2009.
Boyd, W., Healey, R., Hardwick, S., Haigh, M., Klein, P., Doran, P., Trafford, J. and Bradbeer, J. (2008). ‘None of Us Sets Out To Hurt People’: The Ethical Geographer and Geography Curricula in Higher Education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32(1), 37–50, https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260701731462.
Denis, H.D. and Pereira, L.N. (2014). Measuring the level of endorsement of the New Environmental Paradigm: A transnational study. Dos Algarves: A Multidisciplinary e-Journal 23, 4–26. http://www.dosalgarves.com/rev/N23/Completo23.pdf.
Dunlap, R.E. (2008). The new environmental paradigm scale: From marginality to worldwide use. Journal of Environmental Education, 40(1), 3–18, https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.40.1.3-18.
Dunlap, R.E. and Jones, R.E. (2002). Environmental concern: Conceptual and measurement issues. In: Dunlap, R.E. and Michelson, W. (Eds), Handbook of Environmental Sociology. Greenwood, London, pp. 482–524.
Dunlap, R.E. and Van Liere, K.D. (1978). The “new environmental paradigm”. Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4), 10–19, https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875.
Dunlap, R.E., Van Liere, K.D., Mertig, A.G. and Jones, R.E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442, https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176.
Erdoğan, N. (2009). Testing the new ecological paradigm scale: Turkish case. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4(10), 1023–1031, https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR; http://www.academicjournals.org/journal/AJAR/article-abstract/40CFE5F35449.
Haigh, M. (2017). Connective practices in sustainability education. Journal of Applied Technical and Educational Sciences (‘jATES’), 7(4), 6–30. [ISSN 2560-5429]. https://doi.org/10.24368/jates.v7i4.16. Open access from: http://jates.org/index.php/jatespath/issue/view/1/2017_4. (Accessed August 11, 2019).
Haigh, M. (2016). Using the Three Modes of Nature (Guṇa-s) in Invitational Education: Five levers for learning. Other Education: The Journal of Educational Alternatives, 5(1), 4–29, http://www.othereducation.org/index.php/OE/article/view/132/141.
Haigh, M. (2014). Gaia: ‘Thinking like a Planet’ as Transformative Learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 38(1), 49–68, https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2012.763161.
Haigh, M. (2009). The Sattvic Curriculum: A 3-Level, Non-Western, superstructure for undergraduate education. New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 118, 61–70, https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.353.
Haigh, M. and Rawat, J.S. (2011). Landslide Causes: human Impacts on a Himalayan landslide swarm. BELGEO: The Belgian Geographical Journal, 11(3–4), 201–219 (Published July 2012). Available open access from http://belgeo.revues.org/6311 (accessed July 26th, 2013); http://journals.openedition.org/belgeo/6311 (accessed 4, August 2018); https://doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.6311.
Haigh, M. and Rawat, J.S. (2012). Landslide disasters: seeking causes: A case study from Uttarakhand, India, Chapter 18. In: Křeček, J., Haigh, M., Hofer, T. and Kubin, E. (eds), Management of Mountain Watersheds. Springer, Dordrecht, NL, pp. 218–253, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2476-1_18.
Haigh, M.J., Rawat, J.S. and Bartarya, S.K. (1988). Environmental correlations of landslide frequency along new highways in the Himalaya: preliminary results. Catena, 15(6), 539–553, https://doi.org/10.1016/0341-8162(88)90005-7.
Hawcroft, L.J. and Milfont, T.L. (2010). The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), 143–158, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.10.003.
Helm, S.V., Pollitt, A., Barnett, M.A., Curran, M.A. and Craig, Z.R. (2018). Differentiating environmental concern in the context of psychological adaption to climate change. Global Environmental Change, 48, 158–167, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.012.
Jacobsen, K.A. (1999). Prakrti in Samkhya-Yoga: Material Principle, Religious Experience, Ethical Implications. Peter Lang, New York.
Jha, H.B. (2011). The Economics of Peace: A Nepalese perspective. Observer Research Foundation (New Delhi), Occasional paper, 29, 1–30. Available from: https://www.orfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/OccasionalPaper_29.pdf. (accessed: 01/05/2018).
Kumar, S. (2007). Spiritual Compass: The Three Qualities of Life. Totnes, UK, Green Books.
Lundmark, C. (2007). The new ecological paradigm revisited: Anchoring the NEP scale in environmental ethics. Environmental Education Research, 13(3), 329–347, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701430448.
Marcus-Roberts, H.M. and Roberts, F.S. (1987). Meaningless statistics. Journal of Educational Statistics, 12(4), 383–394, https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986012004383.
McIntyre, A. and Milfont, T.L. (2016). Who cares? Measuring environmental attitudes. In: Gifford, R. (ed), Research Methods for Environmental Psychology. UK, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 93–114.
Mishra, S., Mazumdar, S. and Suar, D. (2010). Place attachment and flood preparedness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), 187–197, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.11.005.
O’Connor, B.P. (2010). Cautions regarding Item-Level Factor Analyses. Access, 2010-02-22. Available from: https://people.ok.ubc.ca/brioconn/nfactors/nfactors.html. (accessed June 22, 2018).
Ogunbode, C.A. (2013). The NEP scale: Measuring ecological attitudes/worldviews in an African context. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 15(6), 1477–1494, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-013-9446-0; https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235955170_The_NEP_scale_Measuring_ecological_attitudesworldviews_in_an_African_context.
Pande, A. and Pande. L. (2020). Chapter 3: Community learning and resilience in the Himalayas, Uttarakhand, India. In: Pénzesné Kónya, E., Haigh, M. and Křeček, J. (eds). Environmental Sustainability Education for a Changing World: Inspiration for and by Practitioners. Springer, Cham, Switzerland & Capital Publishing Company, New Delhi.
Pandya, S.K.K. (1987) Hindu philosophy on pain: An outline. In: Brihaye, J., Loew, F., Pia, H.W. (eds), Pain. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum, 38. Springer, Vienna, pp. 136–146, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6975-9_25.
Pirages, D.C. and Ehrlich, P.R. (1974). Ark II: Social Response to Environmental Imperatives. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco.
Rideout, B.E., Hushen, K., McGinty, D., Perkins, S. and Tate, J. (2010). Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm in systematic and e-mail samples of college students. Journal of Environmental Education, 36(2), 15–23, https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.36.2.15-23.
Schultz, P.W. and Zelezny, L. (1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(3), 255–265, https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0129.
Scolobig, A., Thompson, M. and Linnerooth-Bayer, J. (2016). Compromise not consensus: Designing a participatory process for landslide risk mitigation. Natural Hazards, 81(suppl. 1), 45–68, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2078-y.
Sita Ramadas, Haigh, M. and Chauhan, S. (2014). Communicating sustainability within Britain’s Hindu Community. Sustainability, 6(2), 718–740, https://doi.org/10.3390/su6020718; http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/2/718).
Tiwari, D.N. and Misra, A. (eds) (2012). Environment Ethics: Indian Perspectives. Varanasi, India: Banares Hindu University. Department of Religion and Philosophy. [ISBN 13: 978-81-924291-0-6].
Truelove, H.B. and Gillis, A.J. (2018). Perception of pro-environmental behavior. Global Environmental Change, 49, 175–185, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.009.
Vikan, A., Camino, C., Biaggio, A. and Nordvik, H. (2007). Endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A comparison of two brazilian samples and one norwegian sample. Environment and Behavior, 39, 217–228.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Capital Publishing Company, New Delhi, India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Haigh, M. (2021). Influence of a Disaster on the Environmental Attitudes of University Students in Uttarakhand, India. In: Pénzesné Kónya, E., Haigh, M., Křeček, J. (eds) Environmental Sustainability Education for a Changing World. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66384-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66384-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-66383-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-66384-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)