Skip to main content

COVID-19 and Populism: A Sui Generis Crisis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Populism and the Politicization of the COVID-19 Crisis in Europe

Abstract

It is widely believed that populists benefit from crisis situations. This chapter discusses the literature on crises and populism from a theoretical perspective and provides a novel framework of analysis for addressing the study of the COVID-19 crisis in the light of its (de)politicization. This framework allows the study of the politicization of the COVID-19 issue by populists looking at the divide between the political and the non-political status of the issue, disputes about different stakes and their relative priority in managing the crisis, and issue-specific and policy-related contentions about COVID-19. The general research question is whether populists in Europe used the COVID-19 issue to gain centrality in the political field and/or to push forward new opposition lines. A further related question is to pinpoint whether populists reacted in a similar way across countries or whether they adapted their response according to their institutional role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aalberg, T., Esser, F., C. Reinemann, C., Strömbäck, J., de Vreese, C. (Eds.). (2017). Populist Political Communication in Europe. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albertazzi, D., & McDonnell, D. (2015). Populists in Power. Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arditi, B. (2007). Politics on the Edges of Liberalism: Difference, Populism, Revolution, Agitation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Betz, H. G., & Johnson, C. (2004). Against the Current—Stemming the Tide: The Nostalgic Ideology of the Contemporary Radical Populist Right. Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(3), 311–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumler, J. (2016). The Fourth Age of Political Communication. Politiques de Communication, 6(1), 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, R. (2017). Why Populism? Theory and Society, 46, 357–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy, Political Studies, 47(1), 2–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conti, N. (2018). National Political Elites, the EU, and the Populist Challenge. Politics, 38(3), 361–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vreese, C. H., Esser, F., Aalberg, T., Reinemann, C., & Stanyer, J. (2018). Populism as an Expression of Political Communication Content and Style: A New Perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(4), 423–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Wilde, P. (2011). No Polity for Old Politics? A Framework for Analyzing the Politicization of European Integration. Journal of European Integration, 33(5), 559–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wilde, P., Koopmans, R., Merkel, W., Strijbis, O., & Zürn, M. (Eds.). (2019). The Struggle Over Borders: Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D. (Ed.). (2007). The Global Justice Movement: Cross-National and Transnational Perspectives. Boulder: Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D., & Caiani, M. (2009). Social Movements and Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. (1957). An Approach to the Analysis of Political Systems. World Politics, 9(3), 383–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, P., Flinders, M., Wood, M., & Hay, C. (Eds.). (2017). Anti-politics, Depoliticization, and Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felstiner, W. L. F., Abel, R. L., & Sarat, A. (1980). The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming… Law & Society Review, 15(3/4): 631–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, W. (1990). The Strategy of Social Protest. Belmont: Wadsworth Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections From Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusfield, J. (1981). The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking-Driving and the Symbolic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1975). Legitimation Crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C. (1995). Narratives of the New Right and Constructions of Crisis. Rethinking Marxism, 8(2), 60–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C. (1999). Crisis and the Structural Transformation of the State: Interrogating the Process of Change. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 1(2), 317–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C. (2007). Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2017). Cleavage Theory Meets Europe’s Crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the Transnational Cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 109–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutter, S., & Kriesi, H. (2019). Politicizing Europe in Times of Crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(7), 996–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneuer, M. (2019). The Tandem of Populism and Euroscepticism: A Comparative Perspective in the Light of the European Crises. Contemporary Social Science, 14(1), 26–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, A. (1998). Populism and Neo-Populism in Latin America, Especially Mexico. Journal of Latin American Studies, 30(2), 223–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, R. (2006). Crisis. Journal of the History of Ideas, 67(2), 357–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H. (2015) Populism. Concepts and Conditions for Its Rise in Europe. Comunicazione politica, 16(2), 175–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H., & Pappas, T. (Eds.). (2015). European Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession. Colchester: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Dolezal, M., Helbling, M., Hutter, S., Höglinger, D., et al. (2012). Political conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., Frey & T. (2006). Globalization and the Transformation of the National Political Space: Six European Countries Compared. European Journal of Political Research, 45(6), 921–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (1977). Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory. London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (2005). On Populist Reason. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P. (2002). Populist Democracy vs Party Democracy. In Y. Mény & Y. Surel (Eds.), Democracies and the Populist Challenge. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1981). Capital Volume III (D. Fernbach, Trans.) London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, B. (2015). How to Perform Crisis: A Model for Understanding the Key Role of Crisis in Contemporary Populism. Government and Opposition, 50(2), 189–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, B. (2016). The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, Representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe C. (2005). On the Political. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government & Opposition, 39(4), 541–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. (2007). Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J. W. (2016). What Is populism?. Philapelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neveu, E. (2015). Sociologie des problèmes publics. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Orsini, M. (2002). The Politics of Naming, Blaming and Claiming: HIV, Hepatitis C and the Emergence of Blood Activism in Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, 35(3), 475–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostiguy, P. (2017). Populism: A Socio-Cultural Approach. In C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. Ochoa Espejo, & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism (pp. 73–97). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palonen, K. (2003). Four Times of Politics: Policy, Polity, Politicking, and Politicization. Alternatives, 28(2), 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palonen, K. (2005). The Politics of Conceptual History. Contributions to the History of Concepts, 1(1), 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappas, T. S. (2019). Populists in Power. Journal of Democracy, 30(2), 70–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pharr, S. J., & Putnam, R. D. (Eds.). (2000). Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries?. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (1995). On the Shores of Politics. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinemann, C., Stanyer, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., & de Vreese, C. (Eds.). (2019). Communicating Populism: Comparing Interactions Between Politicians, Media, and Citizens Across Europe. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, A. (2017). Four Crises of American democracy: Representation, Mastery, Discipline, Anticipation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. (1995). Neoliberalism and the Transformation of Populism in Latin America: The Peruvian Case. World Politics, 48(1), 82–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. (2015). Populism, Political Mobilizations, and Crises of Political Representation. In C. de la Torre (Ed.), The Promise and Perils of Populism (pp. 140–158). Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2012). The Ambivalence of Populism: Threat and Corrective for Democracy. Democratization, 19(2), 184–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C. (2008). The Concept of the Political (Expanded ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statham, P., & Trenz, H. J. (2012). The Politicization of Europe: Contesting the Constitution in the Mass Media. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stavrakakis, Y., Katsambekis, G., Kioupkiolis, A., Nikisianis, N., & Siomos, T. (2018). Populism, Anti-Populism and Crisis. Contemporary Political Theory, 17, 4–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stojarová, V. (2018). Populist, Radical and Extremist Political Parties in Visegrad Countries Vis à Vis the Migration Crisis. In the name of the people and the nation in Central Europe, Open Political Science, 1(1), 32–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. (1989). Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy Agendas. Political Science Quarterly, 104(2), 281–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, P. (2004). Populism and Representative Politics in Contemporary Europe. Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(3), 269–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, P. (2000). Populism: Concepts in the Social Sciences. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenz, H.-J., Ruzza, C., & Guiraudon, V. (Eds.). (2015). Europe’s Prolonged Crisis: The Making or the Unmaking of a Political Union. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbinati, N. (2019). Political Theory of Populism. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S. (1960). Political Behavior and Politics. World Politics, 12(2), 280–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weyland, K. (1999). Neoliberal Populism in Latin America and Eastern Europe. Comparative Politics, 31(4), 379–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a Contested Concept: ‘Populism’ in the Study of Latin American Politics. Comparative Politics, 34(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weyland, K. (2017). Populism: A Political-Strategic Approach. In C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. Ochoa Espejo, & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism (pp. 48–72). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, M., & Flinders, M. (2014). Rethinking Depoliticisation: Beyond the Governmental. Policy & Politics, 42(2), 151–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zittoun, P. (2014). Creating Social Disorder: Constructing, Propagating and Policitising Social Problems. In The Political Process of Policymaking: Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zürn, M. (2019). Politicization Compared: At National, European, and Global Levels. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(7), 977–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuliano Bobba .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bobba, G., Hubé, N. (2021). COVID-19 and Populism: A Sui Generis Crisis. In: Bobba, G., Hubé, N. (eds) Populism and the Politicization of the COVID-19 Crisis in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66011-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics