Skip to main content

Saving Sexual Science: Kinsey and American Religious-Conservative Politics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Histories of Sexology

Part of the book series: Global Queer Politics ((GQP))

  • 869 Accesses

Abstract

Sexual science has often been mobilized to advance progressive sexual rights agendas against conservative, religiously driven political agendas. This chapter explores a different dynamic, where religious-conservative activists used sexual science to advance their ‘anti-homosexual’ campaign. We focus on the attacks on Kinsey in the United States. While the historiography on religious conservatism has highlighted the centrality of religious/moralistic discourses, our analysis of textual sources (from archives of evangelical-political organizations and recently declassified FBI documents) shows that evangelical activists often foregrounded scientific arguments. Women activists played a particularly important role in this discursive battleground, as our political history of the attacks on Kinsey demonstrates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, J. A., Allinson, H. E., Clark-Huckstep, A., Hill, B. J., Sanders, S. A., & Zhou, L. (2017). The Kinsey Institute: The First Seventy Years. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alumkal, A. (2017). Paranoid Science: The Christian Right’s War on Reality. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bancroft, J. (2004). Alfred C. Kinsey and the Politics of Sex Research. Annual Review of Sex Research, 15(1), 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, M. (2004, December 14). Her Kinsey Obsession. Alternet. Retrieved November 22, 2017 from https://www.alternet.org/story/20744/her_kinsey_obsession.

  • Blumenthal, S. (1987). The Religious Right and Republicans. In J. Neuhaus & M. Cromartie (Eds.), Piety and Politics: Evangelicals and Fundamentalists Confront the World (pp. 269–286). Washington, DC: Ethics and Public Policy Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, D. S. (1954). The Kinsey Report on Females. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49(268), 696–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brekus, C. A. (2007). Introduction: Searching for Women in Narratives of American Religious History. In C. A. Brekus (Ed.), The Religious History of American Women: Reimagining the Past (pp. 1–50). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, D. (1994). Religious Right: The Assault on Tolerance and Pluralism in America. New York, NY: Anti-Defamation League.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capps, W. H. (1990). The New Religious Right: Piety, Patriotism, and Politics. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, T., & Mottier, V. (1998). Introduction. In T. Carver & V. Mottier (Eds.), Politics of Sexuality: Identity, Gender, and Citizenship (pp. 1–9). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clendinen, D., & Nagourney, A. (1999). Out for Good: The Struggle to Build a Gay Rights Movement in America. New York, NY: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W. G., Mosteller, F., & Turkey, J. W. (1953). Statistical Problems of the Kinsey Report. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 48(264), 673–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dershowitz, A. (2007). Blasphemy: How the Religious Right Is Hijacking Our Declaration of Independence. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericksen, J. A., & Steffen, S. A. (Eds.). (1999). Kiss and Tell: Surveying Sex in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, F. (2017). The Evangelicals: The Struggle to Shape America. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1978 [1976]). The History of Sexuality (Vol. 1, R. Hurley, Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, J. H. (2002). Kinsey: Totem in the Land of Taboo. In K. Plummer (Ed.), Sexualities: Critical Concepts in Sociology (Vol. 1, pp. 67–70). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, J., & Bull, C. (1996). Perfect Enemies: The Religious Right, the Gay Movement, and the Politics of the 1990s. New York, NY: Crown Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gathorne-Hardy, J. (1998). Sex the Measure of All Things: A Life of Alfred C. Kinsey. London: Chatto & Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, E. (2018, January 18). Science Is Giving the Pro-Life Movement a Boost. The Atlantic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heer, J. (2016, October 24). The Right is Giving Up on Democracy. New Republic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, D. (2008). Sex in Crisis. The New Sexual Revolution and the Future of American Politics. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankins, B. (2008). American Evangelicals: A Contemporary History of a Mainstream Religious Movement. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, C. (2007). American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiltzik, M. (2017, January 26). Trump Is at War with Science and Knowledge, and That Should Terrify You. Los Angeles Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hite, S. (1976). The Hite Report on Female Sexuality. New York, NY: Dell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, Z., & Lief, H. I. (Eds.). (1981a). International Research in Sexology: Selected Papers from the Fifth World Congress. New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, Z., & Lief, H. I. (Eds.). (1981b). Sexology: Sexual Biology, Behaviour and Therapy. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, R. (1996 [1964]). The Paranoid Style in American Politics and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. D. (1987). The Evangelical Worldview Since 1890. In J. Neuhaus & M. Cromartie (Eds.), Piety and Politics: Evangelicals and Fundamentalists Confront the World (pp. 19–53). Washington, DC: Ethics and Public Policy Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, J. M. (2005 [1990]). Disorders of Desire: Sexuality and Gender in Modern American Sexology (Revised and Expanded Edition). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewett, A. (2012). Science, Democracy, and the American University: From the Civil War to the Cold War. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. H. (1997). Alfred C. Kinsey: A Life. New York, NY: Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, M. D. (2011). Recruiting Young Love: How Christians Talk about Homosexuality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiger, J. C. (2000). Philanthropic Foundations in the Twentieth Century. West Port, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1998 [1948]). Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1998 [1953]). Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, M. D. (2007). Sexuality and Global Forces: Dr. Alfred Kinsey and the Supreme Court of the United States (Branigin Lecture). Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. 14(2), 485–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, P. (2000). Conspiracy Culture: From the Kennedy Assassination to the X-Files. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, E., Gagnon, J., Michael, R., & Michaels, S. (1994). A Political History of the National Sex Survey of Adults. Family Planning Perspectives, 26(1), 34–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, D. M. (2007). Faith in the Halls of Power: How Evangelicals Joined the American Elite. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luker, K. (2006). When Sex Goes to School: Warring Views on Sex—And Sex Education—Since the Sixties. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, T. (2009). Masters of Sex: The Life and Times of William Masters and Virginia Johnson, the Couple who Taught America How to Love. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, G. M. (2006). Fundamentalism and American Culture (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, W. (1996). With God on Our Side: The Rise of the Religious Right in America. New York, NY: Broadway Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattachine Society. (1956). American Law Institute’s Model Penal Code: Sodomy and Related Offenses. Mattachine Review, 2(5a), 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, C. (2005). The Republican War on Science. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mottier, V. (2008). Sexuality: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhaus, R. J. (1987). What the Fundamentalists Want. In J. Neuhaus & M. Cromartie (Eds.), Piety and Politics: Evangelicals and Fundamentalists Confront the World (pp. 5–18). Washington, DC: Ethics and Public Policy Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noll, M. A. (2001). American Evangelical Christianity: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, B. (2017, August 8). How Fossil Fuel Money Made Climate Change Denial the Word of God, Splinter News.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, S. A. (2017). Climate Change Denial: Evangelical Skepticism and Disbelief. In G. Magill & K. Aramesh (Eds.), The Urgency of Climate Change: Pivotal Perspectives (pp. 292–306). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rymel, T. (2016, December 6). The Christian-Political Machine Is Undermining Democracy. The Huffington Post.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shames, S. L., Kuo, D., & Levine, K. (2011). Culture War? A Closer Look at the Role of Religion, Denomination, and Religiosity in US Public Opinion on Multiple Sexualities. In D. Rayside & C. Wilcox (Eds.), Faith, Politics, and Sexual Diversity in Canada and the United States (pp. 29–48). Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. (2000). Christian America? What Evangelicals Really Want. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solovey, M. (2013). Shaky Foundations: The Politics-Patronage-Social Science Nexus in Cold War America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, M., & Victor, D. (2017, December 30). Trump Ends Terms of Remaining Members of HIV and AIDS Council. The New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry, J. (1999). An American Obsession: Science, Medicine, and Homosexuality in Modern Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, D. C. (2013). Foreword. Taboo Sex Research: Thinking Outside the Box. In T. K. Hubbard & B. Verstraete (Eds.), Censoring Sex Research: The Debate over Male Intergenerational Relations (pp. vii–xv). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, W. A. (1949). Statistics of the Kinsey Report. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 44(248), 463–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis, N. (1997). Gender & Nation. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Textual Corpus

  • Adams, S. (2004, December 1). Kinsey’s dirty secrets. Citizen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergler, E. (1948). The Myth of a New National Disease: Homosexuality and the Kinsey Report. Psychiatric Quarterly, 22(1), 66–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Court, J. H. (1990). Foreword. In J. A. Reisman & E. W. Eichel (Eds.), Kinsey, Sex and Fraud: the Indoctrination of a People (pp. vii–viii). Lochinvar-Huntington House: Lafayette, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falwell, J. (1987). An Agenda for the 1980s. In J. Neuhaus & M. Cromartie (Eds.), Piety and Politics: Evangelicals and Fundamentalists Confront the World (pp. 109–123). Washington, DC: Ethics and Public Policy Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • FBI (Federal Bureau of Intelligence). (2010a). Alfred Kinsey: 62-HQ-87563. Retrieved from https://vault.fbi.gov/.

  • FBI (Federal Bureau of Intelligence). (2010b). Alfred Kinsey: Cross-References. Retrieved from https://vault.fbi.gov/.

  • Harvey, L. P. (1998, Winter). Notes on History: Kinsey the Man, Kinsey the deviant. Mission: America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, L. (2004, April). Restoring Legal Protections for Women and Children: A Historical Analysis of the States’ Criminal Codes. The State Factor: Jeffersonian Principles in Action.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. M. (1989, April). The Case Against Kinsey. Fidelity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. M. (1993). Degenerate Moderns: Modernity as Rationalized Sexual Misbehavior. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisman, J. A. (1981, June). The Scientist as Contributing to Child Sex Abuse: A Preliminary Consideration of Possible Ethics Violations. Presented to the 5th World Congress of Sexology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisman, J. A. (1988, November–December). A generation Under Attack. AFA Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisman, J. A. (1995). Where Are the Arrests of Thousands of Men Who Give AIDS to Boys? Retrieved from https://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/.

  • Reisman, J. A. (1996, January). Draft of the Scientific Research Integrity Act of 1996. Retrieved from https://rsvpamerica.org/.

  • Reisman, J. A. (2003, August 18). The Sadomasochistic Roots of Justice Kennedy’s Opinion: Sodomy Decision Based on Fraudulent ‘Science’. Human Events.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisman, J. A. (2004, December 9). Kinsey’s Hidden Child Abuse. The New American.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisman, J. A. (2011, June 12). A Personal Odyssey to the Truth. Retrieved from https://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/.

  • Reisman, J. A. (2012 [1998]). Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences: The Red Queen & The Grand Scheme (4th ed.). Crestwood, KY: Institute for Media Education

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisman, J. A., & Eichel, E. W. (1990). Kinsey, Sex and Fraud: The Indoctrination of a People. Lafayette, LA: Lochinvar-Huntington House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisman, J. A., & McAlister, M. E. E. W. (2011, August 24). Sexual Anarchy: The Kinsey Legacy. Retrieved November 22, 2017, from https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/sexual-anarchy-the-kinsey-legacy.

  • Rich, F. (2004, December 12). The Plot Against Sex in America. The New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • RSVP America. (1996, October). A Campaign to Restore Social Virtue and Purity to America. Retrieved from https://rsvpamerica.org/.

  • RSVP America. (1997, February). The Campaign to Restore Social Virtue and Purity to America. Retrieved from https://rsvpamerica.org/.

  • RSVP America. (1998, August). Campaign Mission, Strategy & Tactics. Retrieved from https://rsvpamerica.org/.

  • US Congress. (1995). H.R.2749 (104th): Child Protection and Ethics I Education Act of 1995. Retrieved from https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/104/hr2749.

  • West, J. G. (2007). Darwin Day in America: How Our Politics and Culture Have Been Dehumanized in the Name of Science. Wilmington, DE: ISI Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Jesus College, Cambridge, the Institut des Sciences Sociales de l’Université de Lausanne, and the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 100011_153080), Grant Holders Cynthia Kraus (PI), Vincent Barras and Véronique Mottier for institutional and financial support of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Véronique Mottier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Paturel, A., Mottier, V., Kraus, C. (2021). Saving Sexual Science: Kinsey and American Religious-Conservative Politics. In: Giami, A., Levinson, S. (eds) Histories of Sexology. Global Queer Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65813-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics