Abstract
The current efforts to provide institutional and legal certainty around blockchain-based innovative solutions reflect the status of the technology as it appears in the market today, which emphasizes more the “disintermediation” properties of the DLTs and less the “decentralization” properties. With the improvement of the design architectures, the algorithmic efficiency of the smart contracts and the blending of DLTs with machine learning we expect “decentralized autonomous organizations” to become more efficient over time and reach more strategic industries. This will transform market structures, business and operational models and it is expected to have strong macroeconomic effects. This will pose significant challenges to the regulator. A principles-based approach is sine qua non for creating a sustainable competitive advantage in order for an economy to leverage the benefits of blockchain. European Union is a pioneer regulator in the space of distributed ledgers. It adopts a technologically neutral approach. We believe that this is an appropriate approach however technological neutrality should be coupled with business model neutrality. This is a requirement for making sure that the regulator will not be directed by short-term considerations and constraints. The European Parliament’s Blockchain Resolution is a text that reflected the views of how to approach, from a regulatory point of view, a technology which is still evolving. This text is the basis for the regulatory initiatives of the EU in blockchain-related topics and became a reference point for many other jurisdictions around the world. This chapter presents the views of the Rapporteur of the Blockchain Resolution and indicates the significance of creating demand for a new technology from a Political Economy point of view.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
COM (2020) 593: Regulation on Markets in Crypto-assets (MiCA).
- 2.
COM (2018) 109/2: Fintech Action Plan: For a more competitive and innovative European Financial Sector.
- 3.
COM (2020) 591: Communication from the Commission on a Digital Strategy for the EU.
- 4.
For an interesting account on Techno-nationalism, see at: MIT Technology Review: The techno-nationalism issue, September–October 2020, Vol. 123, No. 5.
- 5.
EP (2017) 2772: Distributed Ledger Technologies and Blockchain: Building trust with disintermediation.
- 6.
Directive 2002/21/EC of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive).
- 7.
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation).
- 8.
OECD (2011), OECD Council recommendation on Principles for Internet Policy Making (December 13).
- 9.
Obama, B. (2011), Executive Order No. 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review (January).
- 10.
COM(2020) 594.
Bibliography
Baldwin, R., M. Cave and M. Lodge (2013), Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy and Practice (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
COM (2018) 109/2: Fintech Action Plan: For a More Competitive and Innovative European Financial Sector.
COM (2020) 591: Communication from the Commission on a Digital Strategy for the EU.
COM (2020) 593: Regulation on Markets in Crypto-assets (MiCA).
COM (2020) 594: Regulation on a Pilot Regime for Market Infrastructures Based on Distributed Ledger Technology.
Deakin, S. (2018), The Evolution of Theory and Method in Law and Finance, at Moloney, N., Ferran, E. and Paynne, J. (2018), The Oxford Handbook of Financial Regulation (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
De Filippi, P. and A. Wright (2018), Blockchain and the Law: The Rule of Code (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
EP (2017) 2772: Distributed Ledger Technologies and Blockchain: Building trust with disintermediation.
Furlonger, D. and C. Uzureau (2019), The Real Business of Blockchain: How Leaders Can Create Value in a New Digital Age (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).
Hacker, P., I. Lianos, G. Dimitropoulos and S. Eich (2019), Regulating Blockchain: Techno-social and Legal Challenges (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
Lessig, L (2000), Code Is Law: On Liberty in the Cyberspace, Harvard Magazine, January 2020, https://harvardmagazine.com/2000/01/code-is-law-html.
Lessig, L. (2006), Code: Version 2.0 (Basic Books: New York, NY).
Maxwell, W. and M. Bourreau (2014), Technology Neutrality in Internet, Telecoms and Data Protection Regulation, Global Media Communications Quarterly (Autumn, 2014), Hogan Lovells.
Tasca, P. and R. Pisseli (2019), The Blockchain Paradox, at Hacker, P., Lianos, I., Dimitropoulos, G. and Eich, S. (2019), Regulating Blockchain: Techno-Social and Legal Challenges (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
Thaler, R. and R. C. Sunstein (2009), Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness (Penguin: New York, NY).
Werbach, K. (2018), The Blockchain and the New Architecture of Trust (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
Write. A. and P. De Filippi (2015), Decentralized Blockchain Technology and the Rise of Lex Cryptographia (SSRN Paper: March 2015).
Directive 2002/21/EC of 7 March 2002 on a Common Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications Networks and Services (Framework Directive).
OECD Council Recommendation on Principles for Internet Policy Making (December 13, 2011).
President of the USA, Executive Order No. 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review (January).
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of 27 April 2016 on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data, and Repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kaili, E. (2021). Regulating Blockchain in the EU: Building a Global Competitive Advantage. In: Kaili, E., Psarrakis, D. (eds) Disintermediation Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65781-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65781-9_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-65780-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-65781-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)