Skip to main content

Ableism in the Academy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Experiences of Students with Disabilities in U.S. Higher Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Justice and Education in the 21st Century

Part of the book series: Diversity and Inclusion Research ((DIRE))

Abstract

Students with disabilities are less likely than nondisabled students to graduate from institutions of higher education. The goal of this chapter is thus to provide a critical review of key ways in which people with disabilities have been, and may continue to be, underserved by higher education in the U.S. Adapting a social justice framework, this chapter first provides a social history that contextualizes people with disabilities as a socially disadvantaged and marginalized group. This review also describes the important social strides people with disabilities have made, emphasizing the dominant role of higher education in the struggle for equal rights and full social participation. Then, and working toward an understanding of contemporary obstacles to participatory parity for students with disabilities in higher education, the next section presents meta-analysis findings concerning current experiences of students with disabilities in higher education. We conclude with a summary of key issues that undermine a framework of inclusion and offer a set of recommendations toward the goal of participatory parity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barnes, C. (2000). A working social model? Disability, work and disability politics in the 21st century. Critical Social Policy, 20(4), 441–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braddock, B. L., & Parish, S. L. (2003). Social policy toward intellectual disabilities in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. The human rights of persons with intellectual disabilities: Different but equal, 83–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, S. E., & Eggleston, R. (1995). Reconsidering the stigma of physical disability: Wheelchair use and public kindness. Sociological Quarterly, 36(4), 681–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlton, J. I. (2000). Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley, NC: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, E. H. (1873). Sex in education, or, A fair chance for girls. Boston, MA: James R. Osgood and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forber-Pratt, A. J. (2019). (Re) defining disability culture: Perspectives from the Americans with Disabilities Act generation. Culture & Psychology, 25(2), 241–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2005). Reframing global justice. New Left Review, 36, 69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2007). Feminist politics in the age of recognition: A two-dimensional approach to gender justice. Studies in Social Justice, 1(1), 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N., & Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution or recognition?: A political-philosophical exchange. London, UK: Verso.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, H. G. (1985). FDR’s splendid deception. New York, NY: Mead and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawke, C. S. (2004). Accommodating students with disabilities. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2004(125), 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, J., Dunn, M., & Blank, A. (2018). Labor force characteristics of people with a disability. US Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/spotlight/2018/labor-force-characteristics-of-people-with-a-disability/home.htm.

  • Kudlick, C. J. (2003). Disability history: Why we need another “other”. The American Historical Review, 108(3), 763–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longmore, P. K. (2000). Disability policy and politics: Considering consumer influences. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 11(1), 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longmore, P. K. (2003). Why I burned my book and other essays on disability. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Open Med, 3(3), 123–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council on Disability. (1997). Equality of opportunity: The making of the Americans with disabilities act. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K. E. (2012). A disability history of the United States (Vol. 2). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, L. (2012). Points of access: Rehabilitation centers, summer camps, and student life in the making of disability activism, 1960-1973. Journal of Social History, 46(2), 473–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, Gerard, Theresia Degener, Anna Bruce, Christine Burke, Joshua Castellino, Padraic Kenna, Ursula Kilkelly, and Shivaun Quinlivan. 2002. Human rights and disability. United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E. V. (1980). The emergence of the disabled civil rights movement. Berkeley, CA: Disability Rights and Independent Living Movement Archive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, C., Newman, L., Wagner, M., Cameto, R., Knokey, A. M., & Shaver, D. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 6 years after high school: Key findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). NCSER 2011–3004. Washington, DC: National Center for Special Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, T. (1996). Disability, identity and difference. Pp. 94–113 in Exploring the Divide, edited by Colin Barnes and Geof Mercer. Leeds: The Disability Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, R. (2000). Disability policy framework: A guidepost for analyzing public policy. Washington, DC: Center for the Study and Advancement of Disability Policy and the Arc of the United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, T. D., Dillow, S. A., & Hoffman, C. M. (2009). Digest of Education Statistics, 2008. NCES 2009-020. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. M. (2018). Americans with disabilities: 2014. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Table 311.10. Number and percentage distribution of students enrolled in postsecondary institutions, by level, disability status, and selected student characteristics: 2007-08 and 2011-12. Digest of Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • UPIAS. (1974). Fundamental principles of disability. London, UK: UPIAS.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robyn Brown .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brown, R., Silny, M., Brown, J.T. (2021). Ableism in the Academy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Experiences of Students with Disabilities in U.S. Higher Education. In: Pearson Jr., W., Reddy, V. (eds) Social Justice and Education in the 21st Century. Diversity and Inclusion Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65417-7_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics