Abstract
This paper presents the expert survey results on e-participation development at municipal level in Saint Petersburg. The research was based on the institutional approach. The institutional model of e-participation functioning showing 6 communication channels between government and citizens was used in the research design: portals of urban issues, e-receptions, participatory budgeting technologies, e-voting, crowdsourcing platforms, and personal visits. 50 experts from the city administration, municipalities, house and communal services companies, and subordinated institutions took part in the survey. The survey revealed the most frequently used channels for communicating with citizens: responses to citizens’ requests and applications at Governor’s e-reception and portal “Our Petersburg”. According to the survey, the most effective channels for applying for various problems and solving them are “Our Petersburg” portal, as well as personal appeals of citizens to government bodies. The research results could be of interest for the development of practical recommendations for the municipal administrations for e-participation activities organization.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albrecht, S., Kohlrausch, N., Kubicek, H., Lippa, B.: eParticipation – Electronic Participation of Citizens and the Business Community in eGovernment. Institut fur Informations management Bremen (2008). https://www.ifib.de/publikationsdateien/study_e-participation_engl.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2020
Chugunov, A.V.: Electronic participation as a feedback channel between authorities and citizens: problems of institutionalization. Azimuth Sci. Res. Econ. Manage. 5(17), 453–459 (2016)
Chugunov, A.V., Karachay, V.A.: Electronic participation and participatory budgeting as feedback mechanisms in the smart city model. Adm. Consult. 11, 163–179 (2019). https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-11-163-179. (in Russian)
Delopous, H.N.: Barriers and opportunities for the adoption of e-governance services. Int. Scholary Sci. Res. Innov. 4(6), 883–886 (2010)
Donders, M., Hartmann, T., Kokx, A.: E-participation in urban planning: getting and keeping citizens involved. Inter. J. E-Plann. Res. 3(2), 54–69 (2014)
Drummond, W.J., French, S.P.: The future of GIS in planning: converging technologies and diverging interests. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 74(2), 61–174 (2008)
E-participation index UNPACS. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/About/Overview/E-Participation. Accessed 26 May 2020
European Commission: European e-Government 2005-2007: Taking stock of good practice and progress towards implementation of the i2010 eGovernment Action Plan. Research for the Directorate General for Information Society and Media (2007)
Janssen, M., Estevez, E.: Lean government and platform-based governance - doing more with less. Gov. Inf. Q. 30, 1–8 (2013)
Kafentzis, K., Goulandris, V., Alexopoulos, P.: E-dialogos: a holistic approach for enhancing e-Participation in local government. In: EuroSpace Group (ed.) E-Gov. 2.0: Pave the Way for e-Participation, pp. 162–171 (2009)
Kushchu, I., Kuscu, H.: From E-government to M-government: facing the inevitable. In: Proceedings of the 3rd European conference on E-Government (ECEG03), Trinity College, Dublin, pp. 253–260 (2003)
Lember, V., Kattel, R., Tônurist, P.: Technological capacity in the public sector: the case of Estonia. Int. Rev. Admin. Sci. 84, 214–230 (2018)
Macintosh, A.: Characterizing E-participation in policy-making. In: Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 5 (2004). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/1265300. Accessed 26 May 2020
Macintosh, A., Coleman, S., Schneeberger, A.: eParticipation: the research gaps. In: Macintosh, A., Tambouris, E. (eds.) ePart 2009. LNCS, vol. 5694, pp. 1–11. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03781-8_1
Meijer, A.J., Curtin, D., Hillebrandt, M.: Open government: connecting vision and voice. Int. Rev. Admin. Sci. 78(1), 10–29 (2012)
OECD Handbook on Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policymaking “Citizens as Partners” (2001). http://www.internationalbudget.org/wp-content/uploads/Citizens-as-Partners-OECD-Handbook.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2020
Pina, V., Torres, L., Royo, S.: Comparing online with offline citizen engagement for climate change: findings from Austria, Germany and Spain. Gov. Inf. Q. 1(34), 26–36 (2017)
Reddick, C., Norris, D.: E-participation in local governments: an examination of political-managerial support and impacts. Transf. Gov. People Process Policy 7(4), 453–476 (2013)
Revyakin, S.A.: On the effectiveness of electronic platforms for citizen participation in public administration. Issues State Municipal Adm. 2, 94–113 (2018)
Revyakin, S.A.: Functionality of e-participation platforms: why social networks? Issues State Municipal Gov. 3, 88–106 (2019)
Seltzer, E., Mahmoudi, D.: Citizen participation, open innovation, and crowd-sourcing challenges and opportunities for planning. J. Plann. Lit. 28(1), 3–18 (2013)
Smith, S.: Main benefits of eParticipation developments in the EU. In: Report prepared for Unit H2– first version, Deliverable 1.3a., eGovernment and CIP Operations, EuropeanCommission (2008)
The International Association of Public Participation (IAP2). https://iap2canada.ca/Resources/Documents/0702-Foundations-Spectrum-MW-rev2%20(1).pdf. Accessed 26 May 2020
Thiel, S.K., Lehner, U.: Exploring the effects of game elements in m-participation. In: Proceedings of the 2015 British HCI Conference (British HCI 2015), vol. 1, pp. 65–73 (2015)
van Veenstra, A.F., Janssen, M., Boon, A.: Measure to improve: a study of eParticipation in Frontrunner Dutch municipalities. In: Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., de Bruijn, H. (eds.) ePart 2011. LNCS, vol. 6847, pp. 157–168. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23333-3_14
Vicente, M.R., Novo, A.: An empirical analysis of e-participation. The role of social networks and e-government over citizens’ online engagement. Gov. Inf. Q. 31(3), 379–387 (2014)
Vidiasova, L., Cronemberger, F.: Discrepancies in perceptions of smart city initiatives in Saint Petersburg, Russia. Sustain. Cities Society 59, 102158 (2020)
Zheng, Y.: The impact of E-participation on corruption: a cross-country analysis. Int. Rev. Pub. Adm. 21(2), 91–103 (2016)
Acknowledgements
The study was performed with financial support by the grant from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project №19-311-90031): “E-participation in the city management: the case of Saint Petersburg”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Vidiasova, L., Vidiasov, E. (2020). E-Participation Mechanisms at Municipal Level in Saint-Petersburg: Expert Survey Results. In: Alexandrov, D.A., Boukhanovsky, A.V., Chugunov, A.V., Kabanov, Y., Koltsova, O., Musabirov, I. (eds) Digital Transformation and Global Society. DTGS 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1242. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65218-0_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65218-0_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-65217-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-65218-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)