Skip to main content

E-Participation Mechanisms at Municipal Level in Saint-Petersburg: Expert Survey Results

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Transformation and Global Society (DTGS 2020)

Abstract

This paper presents the expert survey results on e-participation development at municipal level in Saint Petersburg. The research was based on the institutional approach. The institutional model of e-participation functioning showing 6 communication channels between government and citizens was used in the research design: portals of urban issues, e-receptions, participatory budgeting technologies, e-voting, crowdsourcing platforms, and personal visits. 50 experts from the city administration, municipalities, house and communal services companies, and subordinated institutions took part in the survey. The survey revealed the most frequently used channels for communicating with citizens: responses to citizens’ requests and applications at Governor’s e-reception and portal “Our Petersburg”. According to the survey, the most effective channels for applying for various problems and solving them are “Our Petersburg” portal, as well as personal appeals of citizens to government bodies. The research results could be of interest for the development of practical recommendations for the municipal administrations for e-participation activities organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albrecht, S., Kohlrausch, N., Kubicek, H., Lippa, B.: eParticipation – Electronic Participation of Citizens and the Business Community in eGovernment. Institut fur Informations management Bremen (2008). https://www.ifib.de/publikationsdateien/study_e-participation_engl.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2020

  2. Chugunov, A.V.: Electronic participation as a feedback channel between authorities and citizens: problems of institutionalization. Azimuth Sci. Res. Econ. Manage. 5(17), 453–459 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chugunov, A.V., Karachay, V.A.: Electronic participation and participatory budgeting as feedback mechanisms in the smart city model. Adm. Consult. 11, 163–179 (2019). https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-11-163-179. (in Russian)

  4. Delopous, H.N.: Barriers and opportunities for the adoption of e-governance services. Int. Scholary Sci. Res. Innov. 4(6), 883–886 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Donders, M., Hartmann, T., Kokx, A.: E-participation in urban planning: getting and keeping citizens involved. Inter. J. E-Plann. Res. 3(2), 54–69 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Drummond, W.J., French, S.P.: The future of GIS in planning: converging technologies and diverging interests. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 74(2), 61–174 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. E-participation index UNPACS. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/About/Overview/E-Participation. Accessed 26 May 2020

  8. European Commission: European e-Government 2005-2007: Taking stock of good practice and progress towards implementation of the i2010 eGovernment Action Plan. Research for the Directorate General for Information Society and Media (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Janssen, M., Estevez, E.: Lean government and platform-based governance - doing more with less. Gov. Inf. Q. 30, 1–8 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kafentzis, K., Goulandris, V., Alexopoulos, P.: E-dialogos: a holistic approach for enhancing e-Participation in local government. In: EuroSpace Group (ed.) E-Gov. 2.0: Pave the Way for e-Participation, pp. 162–171 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kushchu, I., Kuscu, H.: From E-government to M-government: facing the inevitable. In: Proceedings of the 3rd European conference on E-Government (ECEG03), Trinity College, Dublin, pp. 253–260 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lember, V., Kattel, R., Tônurist, P.: Technological capacity in the public sector: the case of Estonia. Int. Rev. Admin. Sci. 84, 214–230 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Macintosh, A.: Characterizing E-participation in policy-making. In: Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 5 (2004). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/1265300. Accessed 26 May 2020

  14. Macintosh, A., Coleman, S., Schneeberger, A.: eParticipation: the research gaps. In: Macintosh, A., Tambouris, E. (eds.) ePart 2009. LNCS, vol. 5694, pp. 1–11. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03781-8_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Meijer, A.J., Curtin, D., Hillebrandt, M.: Open government: connecting vision and voice. Int. Rev. Admin. Sci. 78(1), 10–29 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. OECD Handbook on Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policymaking “Citizens as Partners” (2001). http://www.internationalbudget.org/wp-content/uploads/Citizens-as-Partners-OECD-Handbook.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2020

  17. Pina, V., Torres, L., Royo, S.: Comparing online with offline citizen engagement for climate change: findings from Austria, Germany and Spain. Gov. Inf. Q. 1(34), 26–36 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Reddick, C., Norris, D.: E-participation in local governments: an examination of political-managerial support and impacts. Transf. Gov. People Process Policy 7(4), 453–476 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Revyakin, S.A.: On the effectiveness of electronic platforms for citizen participation in public administration. Issues State Municipal Adm. 2, 94–113 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Revyakin, S.A.: Functionality of e-participation platforms: why social networks? Issues State Municipal Gov. 3, 88–106 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Seltzer, E., Mahmoudi, D.: Citizen participation, open innovation, and crowd-sourcing challenges and opportunities for planning. J. Plann. Lit. 28(1), 3–18 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith, S.: Main benefits of eParticipation developments in the EU. In: Report prepared for Unit H2– first version, Deliverable 1.3a., eGovernment and CIP Operations, EuropeanCommission (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. The International Association of Public Participation (IAP2). https://iap2canada.ca/Resources/Documents/0702-Foundations-Spectrum-MW-rev2%20(1).pdf. Accessed 26 May 2020

  24. Thiel, S.K., Lehner, U.: Exploring the effects of game elements in m-participation. In: Proceedings of the 2015 British HCI Conference (British HCI 2015), vol. 1, pp. 65–73 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. van Veenstra, A.F., Janssen, M., Boon, A.: Measure to improve: a study of eParticipation in Frontrunner Dutch municipalities. In: Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., de Bruijn, H. (eds.) ePart 2011. LNCS, vol. 6847, pp. 157–168. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23333-3_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Vicente, M.R., Novo, A.: An empirical analysis of e-participation. The role of social networks and e-government over citizens’ online engagement. Gov. Inf. Q. 31(3), 379–387 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vidiasova, L., Cronemberger, F.: Discrepancies in perceptions of smart city initiatives in Saint Petersburg, Russia. Sustain. Cities Society 59, 102158 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zheng, Y.: The impact of E-participation on corruption: a cross-country analysis. Int. Rev. Pub. Adm. 21(2), 91–103 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was performed with financial support by the grant from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project №19-311-90031): “E-participation in the city management: the case of Saint Petersburg”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lyudmila Vidiasova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vidiasova, L., Vidiasov, E. (2020). E-Participation Mechanisms at Municipal Level in Saint-Petersburg: Expert Survey Results. In: Alexandrov, D.A., Boukhanovsky, A.V., Chugunov, A.V., Kabanov, Y., Koltsova, O., Musabirov, I. (eds) Digital Transformation and Global Society. DTGS 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1242. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65218-0_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65218-0_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-65217-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-65218-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics