Skip to main content

Applying Hofstede’s Culture Theory in the Comparison Between Vietnam and Korean E-Government Adoption

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Data Science and Digital Transformation in the Fourth Industrial Revolution

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 929))

  • 1004 Accesses

Abstract

Due to the rapid development of information technology (IT), E-government has become a popular issue all over the world. E-government system has also become the standard to comparing the technical development background of many countries around the world. Keeping up with the trend, Vietnam Government has been focusing on developing E-Government system for years and E-government has become one of the most important priorities. Compared to Vietnam, which is at the beginning stage, Korean E-Government is one of the top systems in the E-Government World Ranking. Based on Hofstede’s National Culture theory, this study finds the difference of E-government system/service between Vietnam and Korea under the evaluations of citizens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Stoltzfus K (2005) Motivations for implementing E-government: an investigation of the global phenomenon. In: Proceedings of the 2005 national conference on digital government

    Google Scholar 

  2. Van HT, Kim B, Lee SY, Gim GY (2019) The difference of intention to use E-government based on national culture between Vietnam and Korea. In: 2019 20th IEEE/ACIS international conference on software engineering, artificial intelligence, networking and parallel/distributed computing (SNPD): 409–420

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yadav V (2011) Political parties, business groups, and corruption in developing countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ferro E, Sorrentino M (2010) Can intermunicipal collaboration help the diffusion of E-government in peripheral areas? Evidence from Italy. Gov Inf Q 27(1):17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin F, Fofanah SS, Liang D (2011) Assessing citizen adoption of E-government initiatives in Gambia: a validation of the technology acceptance model in information systems success. Gov Inf Q 28(2):271–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Muguti KP (2013) Mobile government adoption in Zimbabwe: lessons learnt from South Korea and South Africa. Global Information Telecommunications & Technology Program, School of Innovation

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schuppan T (2009) E-government in developing countries: experiences from sub-Saharan Africa. Gov Inf Q 26(1):118–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Khuong MV, West DM (2005) E-government and business competitiveness: a policy review. VNCI Vietnam Competitiveness Initiative

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tuan ND (2007) E-government in Vietnam: an assessment of province websites (Master thesis). Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  10. Delone WH, McLean ER (2003) The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manag Inf Syst 19(4):9–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schaupp LC, Carter L, McBride ME (2010) E-file adoption: a study of US taxpayers’ intentions. Comput Hum Behav 26(4):636–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Floropoulos J, Spathis C, Halvatzis D, Tsipouridou M (2010) Measuring the success of the Greek taxation information system. Int J Inf Manag 30(1):47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci 46(2):186–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Taylor S, Todd PA (1995) Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Inf Syst Res 6(2):144–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dourish P, Bellotti V (1992) Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In: Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work, pp 107–114

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hart P, Saunders C (1997) Power and trust: critical factors in the adoption and use of electronic data interchange. Organ Sci 8(1):23–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gefen D (2000) E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust. Omega 28(6):725–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tan M, Teo TS (2000) Factors influencing the adoption of Internet banking. J Assoc Inf Syst 1(1):5

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kumar V, Mukerji B, Butt I, Persaud A (2007) Factors for successful E-government adoption: a conceptual framework. Electron J E-gov 5(1)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13:319–340

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hofstede G (1984) Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values, vol 5. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  22. Islam N (2004) Sifarish, sycophants, power and collectivism: administrative culture in Pakistan. Int Rev Admin Sci 70(2):311–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Geert H, Jan HG (1991) Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. McGrawHill, USA

    Google Scholar 

  24. McCoy S, Galletta DF, King WR (2005) Integrating national culture into IS research: the need for current individual level measures. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 15(1):12

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ford DP, Connelly CE, Meister DB (2003) Information systems research and Hofstede’s culture’s consequences: an uneasy and incomplete partnership. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 50(1):8–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hofstede GJ, Minkov M (2010) Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. Revised and expanded, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Erumban AA, DeJong SB (2006) Cross-country differences in ICT adoption: a consequence of culture? J World Bus 41(4):302–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Srite M (1999) The influence of national culture on the acceptance and use of information technologies: an empirical study. In: AMCIS 1999 proceedings, vol 355

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bouaziz F (2008) Public administration presence on the web: a cultural explanation. Electron J E-gov 6(1)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Al-Somali SA, Gholami R, Clegg B (2009) An investigation into the acceptance of online banking in Saudi Arabia. Technovation 29(2):130–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Aida A, Majdi M (2014) National culture and E-government services adoption Tunisian case. Int J Bus Econ Strategy (IJBES) 1:4

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gracia DB, Ariño LVC, Blasco MG (2015) The effect of culture in forming e-loyalty intentions: a cross-cultural analysis between Argentina and Spain. BRQ Bus Res Q 18(4):275–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hung-Trong Van .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Van, HT., Gim, S., Lim, E., Vo, TTT. (2021). Applying Hofstede’s Culture Theory in the Comparison Between Vietnam and Korean E-Government Adoption. In: Kim, J., Lee, R. (eds) Data Science and Digital Transformation in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 929. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64769-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics