Skip to main content

Theoretical Aspects of Multi-criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Environmental and Civil Engineering

Part of the book series: Professional Practice in Earth Sciences ((PRES))

Abstract

Multi-criteria decision making is recorded as one among many thriving disciplines associate to settling thoughts and issues in relation to the multiple features of the alternatives. Decision is made in daily bases which is part of life. However, it could be associated to a particular person’s interest. In other words, decision is made during an intention to either do something or not. These decisions can be considered on intent on what to eat, wear or purchase or a career to choose as the case may be. However, this research centers on making a choice on having a specific character of interest. Many decision making issues have real contradictory objectives in life that are highly considered. Multi-criteria decision-making is considered among many fields that allow selection to take place. Material selection is one of the biggest features to consider in engineering and research. Furthermore, selecting a material to be used in a research or in decision-making area is a distinctive building technique that is important in solving selection problems. Technically, choosing a material or in other times replacing existing material may be as a result of in effectiveness of the first which can easily be replaced by the later. Multi-criteria decision making in other terms can be a qualitative and quantitative analysis. It is applicable incredibly in different areas (fields) of specialization. This work introduces multi-criteria decision making approaches in solving and analyzing the problem that tilts towards solving environmental engineering problems, understanding its strengths and weaknesses involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Behzadian M, Kazemzadeh RB, Albadvi A, Aghdasi M (2010) PROMETHEE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. Eur J Oper Res

    Google Scholar 

  • Behzadian M, Otaghsara S, Yazdani M, Ignatius J (2012) A state-of-the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Syst Appl 39(17):13051–13069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW (1961) Management models and industrial applications of linear programming. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. EJOR 2:429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konidari P, Mavrakis D (2007) A multi-criteria evaluation method for climate change mitigation policy instruments. Energy Policy 35(12):6235–6257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai S (1995) Preference-based interpretation of AHP. Int J Manage Sci 23(4):453–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozsahin I, Uzun B, Isa NA, Mok GSP, Uzun Ozsahin D (2018) Comparative analysis of the common scintillation crystals used in nuclear medicine imaging devices. In: 2018 IEEE nuclear science symposium and medical imaging conference proceedings (NSS/MIC), Sydney, Australia, 2018, pp 1–4. http://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2018.8824485

  • Podvezko V (2011) The comparative analysis of MCDA methods SAW and COPRAS. Inzinerine-Ekonomika-Eng Econ 22(2):134–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Yahya M, GökçekuĹź H, Ozsahin D, Uzun B (2020) Evaluation of wastewater treatment technologies using TOPSIS. Desalin Water Treat 177:416–422. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2020.25172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu PL (1973) A class of solutions for group decision problems. Manage Sci 19(8):936–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zionts S (1979) MCDM—if not a roman numeral, then what?. Interfaces 9(4):94–101. https://www.mcdmsociety.org

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Berna Uzun .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Uzun, B., Uzun Ozsahin, D., Duwa, B. (2021). Theoretical Aspects of Multi-criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Methods. In: Uzun Ozsahin, D., Gökçekuş, H., Uzun, B., LaMoreaux, J. (eds) Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Environmental and Civil Engineering. Professional Practice in Earth Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64765-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics