Skip to main content

A MATLAB App to Assess, Compare and Validate New Methods Against Their Benchmarks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
8th European Medical and Biological Engineering Conference (EMBEC 2020)

Abstract

Emerging technologies for physiological signals and data collection enable the monitoring of patient health and well-being in real-life settings. This requires novel methods and tools to compare the validity of this kind of information with that acquired in controlled environments using more costly and sophisticated technologies. In this paper, we describe a method and a MATLAB tool that relies on a standard sequence of statistical tests to compare features obtained using novel techniques with those acquired by means of benchmark procedures. After introducing the key steps of the proposed statistical analysis method, this paper describes its implementation in a MATLAB app, developed to support researchers in testing the extent to which a set of features, captured with a new methodology, can be considered a valid surrogate of that acquired employing gold standard techniques. An example of the application of the tool is provided in order to validate the method and illustrate the graphical user interface (GUI). The app development in MATLAB aims to improve its accessibility, foster its rapid adoption among the scientific community and its scalability into wider MATLAB tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bland, J.M., Altman, D.G.: Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 8(2), 135–160 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Serrao, M., Chini, G., Bergantino, M., Sarnari, D., Casali, C., Conte, C., Ranavolo, A., Marcotulli, C., Rinaldi, M., Coppola, G., Bini, F., Pierelli, F., Marinozzi, F.: Identification of specific gait patterns in patients with Cerebellar Ataxia, spastic paraplegia and Parkinson’s disease: a non-hierarchical cluster analysis. Hum. Move. Sci. 57, 267–279 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Marinozzi, F., Bini, F., Marinozzi, A., Zuppante, F., De Paolis, A., Pecci, R., Bedini, R.: Technique for bone volume measurement from human femur head samples by classification of micro-CT image histograms. Ann. I. Super. Sanità 49(3), 300–305 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pecchia, L., Castaldo, R., Montesinos, L., Melillo, P.: Are ultra-short heart rate variability features good surrogates of short-term ones? State-of-the-art review and recommendations. Healthc. Technol. Lett. 5(3), 94–100 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brisinda, D., Venuti, A., Cataldi, C., Efremov, K., Intorno, E., Fenici, R.: Real-time imaging of stress-induced cardiac autonomic adaptation during realistic force-on-force police scenarios. J. Police Crim. Psychol. 30(2), 71–86 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fleming, T.R., DeMets, D.L.: Surrogate end points in clinical trials: are we being misled? Ann. Intern. Med. 125(7), 605–613 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shapiro, S.S., Wilk, M.B.: An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52(3–4), 591–611 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Shapiro, S.S., Francia, R.S.: An approximate analysis of variance test for normality. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 67(337), 215–216 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lilliefors, H.W.: On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 62(318), 399–402 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson, T.W., Darling, D.A.: Asymptotic theory of certain “goodness of fit” criteria based on stochastic processes. Ann. Math. Stat. 23(2), 193–212 (1952)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Thode, H.C.: Testing for Normality. Marcel Dekker, New York (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Razali, N.M., Yap, B.W.: Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. J. Stat. Model. Anal. 2(1), 21–33 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ahad, N.A., Yin, T.S., Othman, A.R., Yaacob, C.R.: Sensitivity of normality tests to non-normal data. Sains Malays. 40(6), 637–641 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mukaka, M.M.: Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med. J. 24(3), 69–71 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hinkle, D.E., Wiersma, W., Jurs, S.G.: Applied Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bland, J.M., Altman, D.G.: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476), 307–310 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sedgwick, P.: Limits of agreement (Bland-Altman method). BMJ 346(1630) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nahm, F.S.: Nonparametric statistical tests for the continuous data: the basic concept and the practical use. Korean J. Anesthesiol. 69(1), 8–14 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Castaldo, R., Melillo, P., Bracale, U., Caserta, M., Triassi, M., Pecchia, L.: Acute mental stress assessment via short term HRV analysis in healthy adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 18, 370–377 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pecchia, L., Melillo, P., Sansone, M., Bracale, M.: Discrimination power of short-term heart rate variability measures for CHF assessment. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 15(1), 46 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Athavale, Y., Krishnan, S.: Biosignal monitoring using wearables: observations and opportunities. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 38, 22–33 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Melillo, P., Bracale, M., Pecchia, L.: Nonlinear heart rate variability features for real-life stress detection. Case study: students under stress due to university examination. BioMed. Eng. OnLine 10, 96 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. MathWorks. https://uk.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/13964-shapiro-wilk-and-shapiro-francia-normality-tests. Accessed 28 Dec 2019

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leandro Pecchia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ajo’, S., Piaggio, D., Taher, M., Marinozzi, F., Bini, F., Pecchia, L. (2021). A MATLAB App to Assess, Compare and Validate New Methods Against Their Benchmarks. In: Jarm, T., Cvetkoska, A., Mahnič-Kalamiza, S., Miklavcic, D. (eds) 8th European Medical and Biological Engineering Conference. EMBEC 2020. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 80. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64610-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64610-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64609-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64610-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics