Abstract
The study explores senior female executives’ views on supporting female subordinates in managerial careers (i.e., female solidarity). The chapter provides a distinctive approach to female managerial career development by contextualizing the study in Turkey, where several socioeconomic trends with competing influences on women’s place in society are observed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 Turkish senior executive women. Evidence of support for improving women’s representation in the boardroom was limited. Positive views were anchored where gender was most salient: on patriarchal norms that are imposed on most Turkish women and the senior executive women’s perceived need to fulfill a moral obligation. The great majority of participants referred to the meritocratic context of managerial careers, which renders gender irrelevant. The findings highlight the role of perceived gender salience of the context on which senior executive women anchor their views. The study also contributes to the current debates on the gendered nature of merit and has implications for policy and practice concerning women’s career development through HRM, most notably on standards of merits.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arvate, P. R., Galilea, G. W., & Todescat, I. (2018). The queen bee: A myth? The effect of top-level female leadership on subordinate females. The Leadership Quarterly, 29, 533–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.03.002.
Aycan, Z. (2004a). Key success factors for women in management in Turkey. Applied Psychology, 53, 453–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00180.x.
Aycan, Z. (2004b). Uç boyutlu cam tavan: Kadınların kariyer gelişiminde kim, kime, neden engel oluyor? Paper presented at the 2nd Summit of Women Managers, Istanbul, Turkey.
Banihani, M., & Syed, J. (2020). Gendered work engagement: Qualitative insights from Jordan. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31, 611–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1355838.
Bespinar, F. U. (2010). Questioning agency and empowerment: Women’s work-related strategies and social class in urban Turkey. Women’s Studies International Forum, 33, 523–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2010.09.003.
Broadbridge, A., & Simpson, R. (2011). 25 years on: Reflecting on the past and looking to the future in gender and management research. British Journal of Management, 22, 470–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00758.x.
Carkoglu, A., & Kalaycioglu, E. (2009). Turkiye'de dindarlık: Uluslararasi bir karsilastirma. Monograph. Istanbul: IPM (Istanbul Politikalar Merkezi), Sabancı University.
Derks, B., Van Laar, C., & Ellemers, N. (2016). The queen bee phenomenon: Why women leaders distance themselves from junior women. The Leadership Quarterly, 27, 456–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.12.007.
Derks, B., Van Laar, C., Ellemers, N., & de Groot, K. (2011). Gender-bias primes elicit queen-bee responses among senior policewomen. Psychological Science, 22, 1243–1249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417258.
Erkut, S., Kramer, V. W., & Konrad, A. M. (2008). Critical mass: Does the number of women on a corporate board make a difference? In S. Vinnicombe, R. J. Burke, D. Bilimoria, & M. Huse (Eds.), Women on corporate boards of directors: International research and practice (pp. 350–366). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Gabriel, A. S., Butts, M. M., Yuan, Z., Rosen, R. L., & Sliter, M. T. (2018). Further understanding incivility in the workplace: The effects of gender, agency, and communion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103, 362–382. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000289.
Gunduz-Hosgor, A., & Smits, J. (2008). Variation in labor market participation of married women in Turkey. Women’s Studies International Forum, 31, 104–117.
Hakim, C. (2002). Lifestyle preferences as determinants of women’s differentiated labor market careers. Work and Occupations, 29, 428–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888402029004003.
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193–206. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277628.
Hekman, D. R., Johnson, S. K., Foo, M. D., & Yang, W. (2017). Does diversity-valuing behavior result in diminished performance ratings for non-white and female leaders? Academy of Management Journal, 60, 771–797. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0538.
Ilkkaracan, I. (2012). Why so few women in the labor market in Turkey? Feminist Economics, 18, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2011.649358.
ILO. (2017). The gender gap in employment: What's holding women back? Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/infostories/en-GB/Stories/Employment/barriers-women#header.
Kabasakal, H., Aycan, Z., Karakas, F., & Maden, C. (2011). Women in management in Turkey. In M. J. Davidson & R. J. Burke (Eds.), Women in management worldwide: Progress and prospects (pp. 317–338). London: Gower.
Kabasakal, H., Karakas, F., Maden, C., & Aycan, Z. (2016). Women in management in Turkey. In R. J. Burke & A. M. Richardsen (Eds.), Women in management worldwide (pp. 226–246). New York, NY: Routledge.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Karaalp-Orhan, H. S. (2017). What are the trends in women’s labour force participation in Turkey? European Journal of Sustainable Development, 6, 303–312. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2017.v6n3p303.
King, N. (2004). Using templates in the thematic analysis of texts. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 256–270). London: Sage.
Korabik, K., & Abbondanza, M. (2004). New theory supplants queen bee notion of woman in management. Report by Almina Ali, Office of Research, Ontario Ministry of Education & Training.
Kumra, S. (2017). Really saying something: Exploring conceptions of merit in women’s experience of career based tensions inspired by my friend Ruth Simpson. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 32, 468–475. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-05-2017-0067.
Kumra, S., & Vinnicombe, S. (2010). Impressing for success: A gendered analysis of a key social capital accumulation strategy. Gender, Work & Organization, 17, 521–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2010.00521.x.
Lewis, P., & Simpson, R. (2010). Meritocracy, difference and choice: Women’s experiences of advantage and disadvantage at work. Gender in Management, 25, 165–169. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542411011036374.
Mavin, S. (2006a). Venus envy: Problematizing solidarity behaviour and queen bees. Women in Management Review, 21, 264–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420610666579.
Mavin, S. (2006b). Venus envy 2: Sisterhood, queen bees and female misogyny in management. Women in Management Review, 21, 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420610676172.
Mavin, S. (2008). Queen bees, wannabees and afraid to bees: No more ‘best enemies’ for women in management? British Journal of Management, 19, S75–S84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00573.x.
Mavin, S., Grandy, G., & Williams, J. (2017). Theorizing women leaders’ negative relations with other women. In S. R. Madsen (Ed.), Handbook of research on gender and leadership (pp. 328–343). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Ozbilgin, M., & Healy, G. (2004). The gendered nature of career development of university professors: The case of Turkey. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 358–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2002.09.001.
Rodriguez, J. K. (2013). Joining the dark side: Women in management in the Dominican Republic. Gender, Work & Organization, 20, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2010.00541.x.
Sheppard, L. D., & Aquino, K. (2017). Sisters at arms: A theory of female same-sex conflict and its problematization in organizations. Journal of Management, 43, 691–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314539348.
Simpson, R., & Kumra, S. (2016). The Teflon effect: When the glass slipper meets merit. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 31, 562–576. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-12-2014-0111.
Simpson, R., Ross-Smith, A., & Lewis, P. (2010). Merit, special contribution and choice: How women negotiate between sameness and difference in their organizational lives. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 25, 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542411011036400.
Sterk, N., Meeussen, L., & Van Laar, C. (2018). Perpetuating inequality: Junior women do not see queen bee behavior as negative but are nonetheless negatively affected by it. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1690. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01690.
Tabak, F. (1997). Women’s upward mobility in manufacturing organizations in Istanbul: A glass ceiling initiative? Sex Roles, 36, 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766240.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity of intergroup relations. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Tatli, A., Ozturk, M. B., & Woo, H. S. (2017). Individualization and marketization of responsibility for gender equality: The case of female managers in China. Human Resource Management, 56, 407–430. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21776.
Thornton, M. (2007). Otherness’ on the bench: How merit is gendered. Sydney Law Review, 29, 391–413.
Van den Brink, M., & Benschop, Y. (2012). Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs. Organization, 19, 507–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508411414293.
Veldman, J., Meeussen, L., Van Laar, C., & Phalet, K. (2017). Women (do not) belong here: Gender-work identity conflict among female police officers. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 130. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00130.
Vial, A. C., Napier, J. L., & Brescoll, V. L. (2016). A bed of thorns: Female leaders and the self-reinforcing cycle of illegitimacy. The Leadership Quarterly, 27, 400–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.12.004.
Watts, J. H. (2009). Leaders of men: Women ‘managing’ in construction. Work, Employment and Society, 23, 512–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017009337074.
Ye, R., Wang, X. H., Wendt, J. H., Wu, J., & Euwema, M. C. (2016). Gender and managerial coaching across cultures: Female managers are coaching more. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27, 1791–1812. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1075570.
Zeytinoglu, G. N., & Bonnabeauis, R. F. (2015). From Atatürk to Erdoğan: Women in modern Turkey. In S. Safdar & N. Kosakowska-Berezecka (Eds.), Psychology of gender through the lens of culture (pp. 93–112). Cham: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Okay-Somerville, B., Arman, G. (2021). Senior Executive Women’s Views on Female Solidarity: The Role of Perceived Gender Salience. In: Marques, J. (eds) Exploring Gender at Work. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64319-5_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64319-5_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64318-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64319-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)