Skip to main content

A Comparative Study of Yes/No Question Intonation in Chinese and English Speakers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Emerging Trends in Intelligent and Interactive Systems and Applications (IISA 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1304))

  • 1178 Accesses

Abstract

Chinese speakers produced twelve yes/no questions in English as well as in Chinese, and English speakers produced the same in English. Compared to the native English speakers, the Chinese speakers tended to use a flatter intonation in their English and showed smaller fluctuations of pitch. This can be explained by first language interference: the flatter intonation was influenced by the final character “ma” at the end of Chinese yes/no questions and the smaller pitch fluctuations in general are due to the fact that Chinese intonation is restricted by lexical tone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Samarin, W.J., Pike, K.L.: Tone languages: a technique for determining the number and type of pitch contrasts in a language, with studies in tonemic substitution and fusion. Language 21(4), 187 (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wells, J.: Sounds Interesting: Observations on English and General Phonetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Cruttenden, A.: Intonation, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Ladd, D.R.: Intonational Phonology, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Jones, D.: An Outline of English Phonetics. Forgotten Books, London (1922)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brown, G., Currie, K., Kenworthy, J.: Questions of Intonation. Croom Helm, London (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Duanmu, S.: The Phonology of Standard Chinese, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ellis, R.: Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boersma, P., Weenink, D.: Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. https://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/. Accessed 20 June 2020

  10. Baken, R.J.: Clinical Measurement of Speech and Voice. Taylor & Francis, London (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Valenzuela, M.G.: A comparative analysis of intonation between Spanish and English speakers in tag questions, Wh-questions, inverted questions, and repetition questions. Revista Brasileira de Lingüística Aplicada 13(4), 1061–1083 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gussenhoven, C.: The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qing Guo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Guo, Q., Wang, H., van de Weijer, J. (2021). A Comparative Study of Yes/No Question Intonation in Chinese and English Speakers. In: Tavana, M., Nedjah, N., Alhajj, R. (eds) Emerging Trends in Intelligent and Interactive Systems and Applications. IISA 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1304. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63784-2_38

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics