Skip to main content

The Politics of Electricity Access and Environmental Security in Mozambique

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Energy and Environmental Security in Developing Countries

Abstract

Electricity access is a key aspect of achieving Sustainable Development Goal 7. Alleviating poverty by increasing the availability of grid connections, system reliability and generation capacity is a key driver of economic growth. However, 2.7 billion people still rely upon unsustainable wood fuels (such as charcoal) for heating, lighting and cooking. A sustainable transition to low carbon energy has positive health and social benefits (e.g. reductions in air pollution, deforestation and carbon dioxide emissions); and secondary economic benefits from energy supply service jobs (such as installation and maintenance jobs), market disruption and innovation (from community decentralised systems, for example), and reduced labour and time costs (such as reducing costs associated with mobile phone-charging). However, representing electricity access in terms of numbers of grid connections over-simplifies the energy access challenge—hiding unreliability, community exclusion from planning processes, and potential socio-environmental damage from energy sources (e.g. from coal-use), and complex political-institutional and socio-technical system relationships. This two-part chapter examines first the benefits of electricity access provision for developing countries, and second focuses on resolving these challenges through examination of the case of Mozambique—a low income, high resource abundance nation that is undergoing rapid electrification. The chapter explores the colonial history of Mozambique and its influence upon energy technology socio-technical system development across the diverse physical and cultural geography of the country; the effects of internal political conflict and contestation; and the impact of large-scale foreign investments, especially in extractive resources. We conclude by discussing how the changing political economy of Mozambican energy production, distribution and use at the national and regional level has yet to significantly transform everyday energy practices in rural and urban areas. The majority of the Mozambican population remains dependent on environmentally insecure fuelwood (in rural areas) and charcoal (in urban areas), especially for cooking. The consumption of biomass is of concern to authorities because of rapid deforestation, particularly within the hinterland of major cities. Moreover, fuel supply chains remain disconnected from the electricity generation and distribution systems and the extraction of resources such as coal or natural gas. Recommendations for policy, technology implementation and development practice are discussed throughout.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adelmann P (2009) Mission report: access to modern energy services mozambique illerkirchberg: access to modern energy services mozambique—AMES-M project number: PN 56.3022.3-001.00

    Google Scholar 

  2. Afrane G, Ntiamoah A (2011) Comparative life cycle assessment of charcoal, biogas, and liquefied petroleum gas as cooking fuels in Ghana. J Ind Ecol 15(4):539–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aguirre J (2017) The impact of rural electrification on education: a case study from peru. Lahore J Econ 22(1):91–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aker JC, Mbiti IM (2010) Mobile phones and economic development in Africa. J Econ Perspect 24(3):207–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alstone P, Gershenson D, Kammen DM (2015) Decentralized energy systems for clean electricity access. Nat Clim Chang 5(4):305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Arthur MFSR, Zahran S, Bucini G (2010) On the adoption of electricity as a domestic source by Mozambican households. Energy Policy 38(11):7235–7249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Asongu S (2015) The impact of mobile phone penetration on African inequality. Int J Soc Econ 42(8):706–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Avila NI, Kammen DM (2018) The role of renewable energy in bridging the electricity gap in Africa. Curr Sustain/Renew Energy Rep 5(4):205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baker L (2015) The evolving role of finance in South Africa’s renewable energy sector. Geoforum 64:146–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Balasubramanian K, Thamizoli P, Umar A, Kanwar A (2010) Using mobile phones to promote lifelong learning among rural women in Southern India. Distance Educ 31(2):193–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Baptista I (2017) Serviço público de energia eléctrica de moçambique: perspectivas sobre o serviço prestado pela EDM, E.P. Oxford University, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baptista I (2015) ‘We live on estimates’: everyday practices of prepaid electricity and the urban condition in Maputo, Mozambique. Int J Urban Reg Res 39(5):1004–1019

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Baruah P, Coleman B (2019) Off-grid solar power in Mozambique: opportunities for universal energy access and barriers to private sector participation. Global Green Growth Institute, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bensch G, Peters J (2013) Alleviating deforestation pressures? Impacts of improved stove dissemination on charcoal consumption in urban senegal. Land Econ 89(4):676–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Berka AL, Creamer E (2018) Taking stock of the local impacts of community owned renewable energy: a review and research agenda. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 82:3400–3419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhatia M, Angelou N (2015) Beyond connections : energy access redefined. ESMAP technical report; 008/15. World Bank, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brew-Hammond A (2010) Energy access in Africa: challenges ahead. Energy Policy 38(5):2291–2301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bridge G, Özkaynak B, Turhan E (2018) Energy infrastructure and the fate of the nation: introduction to special issue. Energy Res Soc Sci 41:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Broto VC, Baptista I, Kirshner J, Smith S, Alves SN (2018) Energy justice and sustainability transitions in Mozambique. Appl Energy 228:645–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bungane B (2019) DBSA provides $81.30m for Mozambique’s power network upgrades. ESI Africa

    Google Scholar 

  21. Buur L, Salimo P (2018) The political economy of social protection in Mozambique. Manchester: ESID working paper No 103. Manchester: effective states and inclusive development research centre, The University of Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  22. Byrne R, Mbeva K, Ockwell D (2018) A political economy of niche-building: neoliberal-developmental encounters in photovoltaic electrification in Kenya. Energy Res Soc Sci 44:6–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cabecinhas R, Feijó J (2010) Collective memories of Portuguese colonial action in Africa: representations of the colonial past among Mozambicans and Portuguese youths. Int J Confl Violence (IJCV) 4(1):28–44

    Google Scholar 

  24. Casillas CE, Kammen DM (2010) The energy-poverty-climate nexus. Science 330(6008):1181–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Castán Broto V (2017) Energy sovereignty and development planning: the case of Maputo, Mozambique. Int Dev Plan Rev 39(3):229–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Broto C, Vanesa LS, Ackom E, Tomei J, Parikh P, Bisaga I, To LS, Kirshner J, Mulugetta Y (2017) A research agenda for a people-centred approach to energy access in the urbanizing global south. Nat Energy 2(10):776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Castel-Branco CN (2014) Growth, capital accumulation and economic porosity in Mozambique: social losses, private gains. Rev Afr Polit Econ 41(1):S26–S48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chaurey A, Ranganathan M, Mohanty P (2004) Electricity access for geographically disadvantaged rural communities—technology and policy insights. Energy Policy 32(15):1693–1705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chidumayo EN, Gumbo DJ (2013) The environmental impacts of charcoal production in tropical ecosystems of the world: a synthesis. Energy Sustain Dev 17(2):86–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cipriano A, Waugh C, Matos M (2015) The electricity sector in Mozambique: an analysis of the power sector crisis and its impact on the business environment. USAID Mozambique, Maputo

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cloke J, Mohr A, Brown E (2017)Imagining renewable energy: towards a social energy systems approach to community renewable energy projects in the global South.Energy Res Soc Sci 31:263–272

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cotton M (2019) Planning, infrastructure and low carbon energy. In: Davoudi S, Blanco H, Cowell R, White I (eds) Companion to environmental planning and sustainability. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 248–256

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cotton M (2018) Environmental justice as scalar parity: lessons from nuclear waste management. Soc Justice Res 31(3):238–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cunguara B, Hanlon J (2010) Poverty is not being reduced in Mozambique. London School of Eoconmics, London

    Google Scholar 

  35. Daka KR, Ballet J (2011) Children’s education and home electrification: a case study in northwestern Madagascar. Energy Policy 39(5):2866–2874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Day R, Walker G, Simcock N (2016) Conceptualising energy use and energy poverty using a capabilities framework. Energy Policy 93:255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. De Fatima M, Arthur SR, Cockerill A (2019)The roles of government and the public utility in achieving universal access to electricity.Econ Energy Environ Policy 8(1). https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.8.1.mart

  38. Dinesh H, Pearce JM (2016) The potential of agrivoltaic systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 54:299–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. EDM (2017) Relatorio anual de estatistica 2015/annual statistical report 2015. Electricidade de Moçambique, E.P, Maputo

    Google Scholar 

  40. EDM (2018) EDM strategy 2018–2028. Electricidade de Moçambique, E.P, Maputo

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ezzati M, Kammen DM (2002) The health impacts of exposure to indoor air pollution from solid fuels in developing countries: knowledge, gaps, and data needs. Environ Health Perspect 110(11):1057–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Fael B (2019) É necessário e urgente criar uma entidade reguladora do sector eléctrico. Servico de Partilha de Informacao, Centro de Integridade Publica—CIP

    Google Scholar 

  43. FUNAE (2019)Nossas actividades.FUNAE, 07 Oct 2019. https://www.funae.co.mz/index.php/pt/quem-somos/areas-actuacao

  44. Furuholt B, Matotay E (2011) The developmental contribution from mobile phones across the agricultural value chain in rural Africa. Electron J Inf Syst Dev Ctries 48(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Gregory J, Sovacool BK (2019) The financial risks and barriers to electricity infrastructure in Kenya, Tanzania, and Mozambique: a critical and systematic review of the academic literature. Energy Policy 125:145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Griffiths S (2017) Renewable energy policy trends and recommendations for GCC countries. Energy Transit 1(1):3

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. Hanlon J, Nuvunga A (2015) Gas for development, or just for money?. In: Servico de Parilha de Informação, No. 8. Centro de Integredade Pública, Maputo

    Google Scholar 

  48. IEA (2014) Africa energy outlook Paris: international energy agency.

    Google Scholar 

  49. IEA (2017a) Energy access outlook: world energy outlook special repor. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the International Energy Agency, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  50. IEA (2017b) Energy access outlook: world energy outlook special report. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the International Energy Agency, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  51. IEA (2018) Accelerating SDG 7 Achievement. Policy Brief autumn #01. Achieving Universal Access To Electricity Paris: International Energy Agency (IEA), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), In collaboration with The European Commission, UNESCWA, UNECE, UNECA, UNESCAP, EnDev, PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, World Bank and Norad

    Google Scholar 

  52. Igreja V (2013) Politics of memory, decentralisation and recentralisation in Mozambique. J South Afr Stud 39(2):313–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Jones D, Ryan CM, Fisher J (2016) Charcoal as a diversification strategy: the flexible role of charcoal production in the livelihoods of smallholders in central Mozambique. Energy Sustain Dev 32:14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. JRC (2019)EDGAR—emissions database for global atmospheric rsearchEuropean commission, joint research centre (JRC)/PBL Netherlands environmental assessment agency, 17 Oct 2019. https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu

  55. Kennedy SF (2018) Indonesia’s energy transition and its contradictions: emerging geographies of energy and finance. Energy Res Soc Sci 41:230–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Kimmel K, Mander Ü (2010) Ecosystem services of peatlands: implications for restoration. Prog Phys Geogr 34(4):491–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Kirshner J, Baker L, Smith A, Bulkeley H (2019) A regime in the making? examining the geographies of solar PV electricity in Southern Africa. Geoforum 103:114–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Kumar A (2018) Justice and politics in energy access for education, livelihoods and health: how socio-cultural processes mediate the winners and losers. Energy Res Soc Sci 40:3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Labarta RA, White DS, Swinton SM (2008) Does charcoal production slow agricultural expansion into the Peruvian Amazon rainforest? World Dev 36(3):527–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Labban M (2012) Preempting possibility: critical assessment of the IEA’s world energy outlook 2010. Dev Chang 43(1):375–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Lesutis G (2019) Spaces of extraction and suffering: neoliberal enclave and dispossession in Tete, Mozambique. Geoforum 102:116–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Levy JD (ed) (2006) The state after statism: new state activities in the age of liberalization. Harvard University Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  63. Luque-Ayala A, Silver J (2016)Introduction.In: Luque-Ayala A, Silver J (eds) Energy, power and protest on the urban grid: geographies of the electric city. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  64. Luz AC, Baumert S, Fisher J, Grundy I, Matediane M, Patenaude G, Zorrilla-Miras P (2015) Charcoal production and trade in southern Mozambique: historical trends and present scenarios.XIV World Forestry Congress, Durban, South Africa, 7–11 Sept

    Google Scholar 

  65. Makridis C (2013) Offshore wind power resource availability and prospects: a global approach. Environ Sci Policy 33:28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Mavhunga CC (2013) Cidades esfumaçadas: energy and the rural-urban connection in Mozambique.Public Cult 25(270):261–271

    Google Scholar 

  67. Mulder P, Tembe J (2008) Rural electrification in an imperfect world: a case study from Mozambique. Energy Policy 36(8):2785–2794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Mwampamba TH, Ghilardi A, Sander K, Chaix KJ (2013) Dispelling common misconceptions to improve attitudes and policy outlook on charcoal in developing countries. Energy Sustain Dev 17(2):75–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Mwampamba TH (2007) Has the woodfuel crisis returned? Urban charcoal consumption in Tanzania and its implications to present and future forest availability. Energy Policy 35(8):4221–4234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Namaalwa J, Hofstad O, Sankhayan PL (2009) Achieving sustainable charcoal supply from woodlands to urban consumers in Kampala, Uganda. Int For Rev 11(1):64–78

    Google Scholar 

  71. Navarra C, Udelsmann Rodrigues C (2018) Debt, aid and poverty in Mozambique: lessons learned from the Mozambican debt crisis: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet

    Google Scholar 

  72. Newell P, Mulvaney D (2013) The political economy of the ‘just transition.’ Geogr J 179(2):132–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Newitt M (1995) A history of Mozambique. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN

    Google Scholar 

  74. Nhamire B, Mosca J (2015) Electricidade de Moçambique: mau serviço, não transparente e politizada. ECIP, Centro de Integridade Pública Moçambique, Maputo

    Google Scholar 

  75. Nhete TD (2007) Electricity sector reform in Mozambique: a projection into the poverty and social impacts. J Clean Prod 15(2):190–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Oduori SM, Rembold F, Abdulle OH, Vargas R (2011) Assessment of charcoal driven deforestation rates in a fragile rangeland environment in North Eastern Somalia using very high resolution imagery. J Arid Environ 75(11):1173–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. OECD (2013) OECD investment policy reviews: Mozambique. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  78. Oxford Analytica (2016) Mozambican government faces unrest amid debt crisis. In: Emerald expert briefings, Emerald Publishing, Bingley

    Google Scholar 

  79. Parks L (2016) Reinventing television in rural Zambia: energy scarcity, connected viewing, and cross-platform experiences in Macha. Convergence 22(4):440–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Pérez Niño H, Le Billon P (2013) Foreign aid, resource rents and institution-building in Mozambique and Angola. WIDER working paper no. 102/2013. UNU-WIDER, United Nations University-World Institute for Development Economics Research, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  81. Pitcher MA (1996) Recreating colonialism or reconstructing the state? privatisation and politics in Mozambique. J South Afr Stud 22(1):49–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Power M, Kirshner J (2019) Powering the state: the political geographies of electrification in Mozambique. Environ Plan C: Polit Space 37(3):498–518

    Google Scholar 

  83. Action P (2017) Poor people’s energy outlook 2017. Practical Action, Rugby

    Book  Google Scholar 

  84. Practical Action (2018) Poor people's energy outlook 2018: achieving inclusive energy access at scale, Practical Action Publishing Limited

    Google Scholar 

  85. Pringle AM, Handler RM, Pearce JM (2017) Aquavoltaics: synergies for dual use of water area for solar photovoltaic electricity generation and aquaculture. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 80:572–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Reiche K, Covarrubias A, Martinot E (2000) Expanding electricity access to remote areas: off-grid rural electrification in developing countries.Fuel 1(12):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  87. Roe A (2018) Mozambique-bust before boom: reflections on investment surges and new gas. WIDER Working Papers, World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), United Nations University, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  88. Samad HA, Zhang F (2019) Electrification and women's empowerment. Evidence from Rural India. The World Bank

    Google Scholar 

  89. SDG Atlas (2017) No pverty.World Bank Group, 20 Mar 2019. https://datatopics.worldbank.org/sdgatlas/archive/2017/SDG-01-no-poverty.html

  90. Showers KB (2011) Electrifying Africa: an environmental history with policy implications. Geogr Ann: Ser B, Hum Geogr 93(3):193–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Siamanta ZC, Dunlap A (2019)Accumulation by wind energy: wind energy development as a capitalist trojan horse in crete, Greece and Oaxaca, Mexico.ACME: Int E-J CritAl Geogr 18(4)

    Google Scholar 

  92. Sidaway JD (2007) Enclave space: a new metageography of development? Area 39(3):331–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Sife AS, Kiondo E, Lyimo-Macha JG (2010) Contribution of mobile phones to rural livelihoods and poverty reduction in Morogoro region, Tanzania. Electron J Inf Syst Dev Ctries 42(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Smith H, Lorusso M, MacKillop F (2017) Powering the city in the global south: increasing energy access for all in a context of urbanisation and changing governance. EEG state-of-knowledge paper series. Oxford Policy Management, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  95. Sovacool BK (2013) Energy & ethics: justice and the global energy challenge: Palgrave Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  96. Sussman RW, Green GM, Sussman LK (1994) Satellite imagery, human ecology, anthropology, and deforestation in Madagascar. Hum Ecol 22(3):333–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Sustainable Energy for All and Power For All (2017) Why wait? seizing the energy access dividend. Sustainable Energy for All and Power For All, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  98. Uamusse MM, Tussupova K, Persson KM, Berndtsson R (2019) Mini-grid hydropower for rural electrification in mozambique: meeting local needs with supply in a nexus approach. Water 11(2):305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. UNDP (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York, NY, USA, Division for Sustainable Development Goals

    Google Scholar 

  100. Unruh GC (2000) Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28(12):817–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. van Vliet O, Krey V, McCollum D, Shonali Pachauri Yu, Nagai SR, Riahi K (2012) Synergies in the Asian energy system: climate change, energy security, energy access and air pollution. Energy Econ 34:S470–S480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Verbong GPJ, Geels FW (2010) Exploring sustainability transitions in the electricity sector with socio-technical pathways. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 77(8):1214–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. West HG, Kloeck-Jenson S (1999) Betwixt and between: ‘Traditional authority’ and democratic decentralization in post-war Mozambique. African Affairs 98(393):455–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Wilhite H (2017) Gender implications of energy use and energy access. Oxford Policy Management, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  105. Woollen E, Ryan CM, Baumert S, Vollmer F, Grundy I, Fisher J, Fernando J, Luz A, Ribeiro N, Lisboa SN (2016) Charcoal production in the Mopane woodlands of Mozambique: what are the trade-offs with other ecosystem services? Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci 371(1703):20150315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. World Bank (2015) Republic of Mozambique: Mozambique energy sector policy note (Report no: ACS17091). World Bank, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  107. World Bank (2018a) Poverty and shared prosperity 2018: piecing together the poverty puzzle. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  108. World Bank (2018b) Strong but not broadly shared growth—Mozambique poverty report. World Bank, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  109. Zhang J, Smith KR (1996) Hydrocarbon emissions and health risks from cookstoves in developing countries. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 6(2):147–161

    Google Scholar 

  110. Zulu LC, Richardson RB (2013) Charcoal, livelihoods, and poverty reduction: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Energy Sustain Dev 17(2):127–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Zulu LC (2010) The forbidden fuel: charcoal, urban woodfuel demand and supply dynamics, community forest management and woodfuel policy in Malawi. Energy Policy 38(7):3717–3730

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This chapter is an output of the project: A Political-Economic Analysis of Electricity Grid Access Histories and Futures in Mozambique (POLARIZE), at the University of York. POLARIZE is funded as part of The Applied Research Programme on Energy for Economic Growth (EEG) led by Oxford Policy Management. The programme is funded by the UK Government, through UK Aid. The Applied Research Programme on Energy and Economic Growth (EEG) produces cutting edge research on the links between energy and economic growth, working closely with policy makers in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia to build more sustainable, efficient, reliable and equitable energy systems. EEG is a five-year programme, led by Oxford Policy Management (OPM) and funded by the UK Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office. For more information visit: www.energyeconomicgrowth.org.

The views expressed in this chapter do not necessarily reflect the UK government's official policies. This chapter is an expansion and adaptation of an earlier working paper for Oxford Policy Management’s Energy Insight Series: Cotton, M.D., Kirshner, J.D. and Salite, D.L.J., 2019. The political economy of electricity access: Lessons from Mozambique. Oxford Policy Management, Oxford.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Cotton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cotton, M., Kirshner, J., Salite, D. (2021). The Politics of Electricity Access and Environmental Security in Mozambique. In: Asif, M. (eds) Energy and Environmental Security in Developing Countries. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63654-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63654-8_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63653-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63654-8

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics