Skip to main content

A Situation-Specific Theory of Heart Failure Self-Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Situation Specific Theories: Development, Utilization, and Evaluation in Nursing

Abstract

The situation-specific theory of heart failure (HF) self-care, developed in 2008 and revised in 2016 is used worldwide by clinicians and researchers. Central to this theory is the description of self-care as a naturalistic decision-making process involving the choice of behaviors that maintain physiologic stability (maintenance), symptom perception, and the response to symptoms when they occur (management).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Riegel B, Dickson VV. A situation-specific theory of heart failure self-care. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2008;23(3):190–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu L, Eisen HJ. Epidemiology of heart failure and scope of the problem. Cardiol Clin. 2014;32(1):1–8. vii

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lam CSP, Arnott C, Beale AL, et al. Sex differences in heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(47):3859–3868c.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Heidenreich PA, Albert NM, Allen LA, et al. Forecasting the impact of heart failure in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Heart Fail. 2013;6(3):606–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zambroski CH, Moser DK, Bhat G, Ziegler C. Impact of symptom prevalence and symptom burden on quality of life in patients with heart failure. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2005;4:198–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jurgens C, Moser D, Armola R, Carlson B, Sethares K, Riegel B. Symptom clusters of heart failure. Res Nurs Health. 2009;32(5):551–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mulligan K, Mehta PA, Fteropoulli T, et al. Newly diagnosed heart failure: change in quality of life, mood, and illness beliefs in the first 6 months after diagnosis. Br J Health Psychol. 2012;17(3):447–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Krumholz H, Amatruda J, Smith G, et al. Randomized trial of an education and support intervention to prevent readmission of patients with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(1):83–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;127(1):e6–e245.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee CS, Moser DK, Lennie TA, Tkacs NC, Margulies KB, Riegel B. Biomarkers of myocardial stress and systemic inflammation in patients who engage in heart failure self-care management. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011;26(4):321–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee CS, Suwanno J, Riegel B. The relationship between self-care and health status domains in Thai patients with heart failure. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009;8(4):259–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Riegel B, Moser DK, Anker SD, et al. State of the science: promoting self-Care in persons with heart failure: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2009;120(12):1141–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rich MW, Beckham V, Wittenberg C, Leven CL, Freedland KE, Carney RM. A multidisciplinary intervention to prevent the readmission of elderly patients with congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(18):1190–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Riegel B, Thomason T, Carlson B, et al. Implementation of a multidisciplinary disease management program for heart failure patients. Congest Heart Fail. 1999;5(4):164–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Riegel B, Carlson B, Moser DK, Sebern M, Hicks FD, Roland V. Psychometric testing of the self-care of heart failure index. J Card Fail. 2004;10(4):350–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee C, Carlson B, Riegel B. Heart failure self-care improves economic outcomes, but only when self-care confidence is high. J Card Fail. 2007;13(6):S75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Riegel B, Driscoll A, Suwanno J, et al. Heart failure self-care in developed and developing countries. J Card Fail. 2009;15(6):508–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chriss PM, Sheposh J, Carlson B, Riegel B. Predictors of successful heart failure self-care maintenance in the first three months after hospitalization. Heart Lung. 2004;33(6):345–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dickson VV, Deatrick JA, Riegel B. A typology of heart failure self-care management in non-elders. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2008;7(3):171–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Matarese M, Lommi M, De Marinis MG, Riegel B. A systematic review and integration of concept analyses of self-care and related concepts. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2018;50(3):296–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Riegel B, Jaarsma T. Stromberg a. a middle-range theory of self-care of chronic illness. Adv Nurs Sci. 2012;35(3):194–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Riegel B, Jaarsma T, Lee CS, Stromberg A. Integrating symptoms into the middle-range theory of self-care of chronic illness. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2019;42(3):206–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Woo MA, Yadav SK, Macey PM, Fonarow GC, Harper RM, Kumar R. Brain metabolites in autonomic regulatory insular sites in heart failure. J Neurol Sci. 2014;346(1-2):271–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dewey J. What does pragmatism mean by practical? J Philos Psychol Scient Methods. 1908;5(4):85–99.

    Google Scholar 

  25. James W. Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking. New York: Longmans, Green & Co; 1907.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. Mixed methodology: combining qualitative and quantitative approaches, vol. 46. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hartrick Doane G, Varcoe C. Toward compassionate action: pragmatism and the inseparability of theory/practice. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2005;28(1):81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dickson V, Deatrick J, Riegel B. A typology of heart failure self-care management in non-elders. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2008;7:171–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dickson V, Deatrick J, Goldberg L, Riegel B. A mixed methods study exploring the factors that facilitate and impede heart failure self-care. J Card Fail. 2006;12(6):S124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Riegel B, Dickson VV, Kuhn L, Page K, Worrall-Carter L. Gender-specific barriers and facilitators to heart failure self-care: a mixed methods study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47(7):888–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Im EO. Development of situation-specific theories: an integrative approach. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2005;28(2):137–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vellone E, Riegel B, D’Agostino F, et al. Structural equation model testing the situation-specific theory of heart failure self-care. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69(11):2481–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Riegel B, Dickson VV, Topaz M. Qualitative analysis of naturalistic decision making in adults with chronic heart failure. Nurs Res. 2013;62(2):91–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lipshitz R, Klein G, Orasanu J, Salas E. Taking stock of naturalistic decision making. J Behav Decis Mak. 2001;14:331–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Endsley M. The role of situation awareness in naturalistic decision making. In: Klein CZG, editor. Naturalistic decision making. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 1996. p. 269–84.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Dickson VV, Riegel B. Are we teaching what patients need to know? Building skills in heart failure self-care. Heart Lung. 2009;38(3):253–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Riegel B, Dickson VV, Faulkner KM. The situation-specific theory of heart failure self-care: revised and updated. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016;31(3):226–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lam C, Smeltzer SC. Patterns of symptom recognition, interpretation, and response in heart failure patients: an integrative review. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2013;28(4):348–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Herber OR, Kastaun S, Wilm S, Barroso J. From qualitative meta-summary to qualitative meta-synthesis: introducing a new situation-specific theory of barriers and facilitators for self-care in patients with heart failure. Qual Health Res. 2019;29(1):96–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Dickson VV, Chyun D, Caridi C, Gregory JK, Katz S. Low literacy self-care management patient education for a multi-lingual heart failure population: results of a pilot study. Appl Nurs Res. 2016;29:122–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Riegel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Riegel, B., Dickson, V.V. (2021). A Situation-Specific Theory of Heart Failure Self-Care. In: Im, EO., Meleis, A.I. (eds) Situation Specific Theories: Development, Utilization, and Evaluation in Nursing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63223-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63223-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63222-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63223-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics