Abstract
This paper introduces skew-elliptical cluster processes. In contrast to the simple Gaussian isotropic structure of the distribution of the “children” events of a Thomas process, we propose an anisotropic structure by allowing the choice of a flexible covariance matrix and incorporating skewness or ellipticity parameters into the structure. Since the theoretical pair correlation functions of these processes are complex and analytically incomplete, and therefore the estimation of the parameters is computationally intensive, we propose reasonable approximations of the theoretical pair correlation functions of these cluster processes, which allow for a simpler parameter estimation. We present the estimation of their parameters using the minimum contrast method. For a data application, we use a fraction of the full redwood dataset. Our analysis shows that an elliptical cluster process can describe this point pattern better than a common Thomas process, since it is able to statistically model the non-circular shapes of the clusters in the data. The skew-elliptical cluster processes can be very meaningful for analyzing complex datasets in the field of spatial point processes since they provide more flexibility to detect interesting characteristics of the data.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arellano-Valle, R. B., & Azzalini, A. (2006). On the unification of families of skew-normal distributions. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 33, 561–574.
Arellano-Valle, R. B., & Genton, M. G. (2005). On fundamental skew distributions. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 96, 93–116.
Arellano-Valle, R. B., & Genton, M. G. (2010a). Multivariate unified skew-elliptical distributions. Chilean Journal of Statistics, 1, 17–33.
Arellano-Valle, R. B., & Genton, M. G. (2010b). Multivariate extended skew-t distributions and related families. Metron, 68, 2001–234
Arnold, B. C., & Beaver, R. J. (2000). Some skewed multivariate distributions. American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences, 20, 27–38.
Arnold, B. C., & Beaver, R. J. (2002). Skewed multivariate models related to hidden truncation and/or selective reporting. TEST, 11, 7–54.
Azzalini, A., & Capitanio, A. (1999). Statistical applications of the multivariate skew normal distributions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 61, 579–602.
Azzalini, A., & Capitanio, A. (2014). The skew-normal and related families. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Azzalini, A., & Dalla Valle, A. (1996). The multivariate skew-normal distribution. Biometrika, 83, 715–726.
Baddeley, A. J., & Turner, R. (2005). SPATSTAT: An R package for analyzing spatial point patterns. Journal of Statistical Software, 12, 1–42.
Baddeley, A. J., Rubak, E., & Turner, R. (2015). Spatial point patterns: Methodology and applications with R. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.
Castelloe, J. M. (1998). Issues in reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo and composite EM analysis, applied to spatial Poisson cluster processes. Ph.D. thesis, University of Iowa (1998)
Cressie, N. A. C. (1993). Statistics for spatial data. New York, NY: Wiley (1993)
Dao, N. A., & Genton, M. G. (2014). A Monte Carlo adjusted goodness-of-fit test for parametric models describing spatial point patterns. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 23, 497–517.
Dickey, J. M. (1966). On a multivariate generalization of the Behrens–Fisher distribution. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 37, 763.
Dickey, J. M. (1968). Three multidimensional-integral identities with Bayesian applications. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 39, 1615–1627
Diggle, P. J. (2003). Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns. London: Arnold.
Erdélyi, A., Magnus, W., Oberhettinger, F., & Tricomi, F. G. (1953). Higher transcendental functions. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
González-Farías, G., Domíniguez-Molina, J. A., & Gupta, A. K. (2004). The closed skew-normal distribution. In M. G. Genton (Ed.), Skew-elliptical distributions and their applications: A journey beyond normality (pp. 25–42). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Gupta, A. K., Aziz, M. A., & Ning, W. (2013). On some properties of the unified skew normal distribution. Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice, 7, 480–495.
Gupta, A. K., González-Farías, G., & Domíniguez-Molina, J. A. (2004). A multivariate skew normal distribution. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 89, 181–190.
Illian, J., Penttinen, A., Stoyan, H., & Stoyan, D. (2008). Statistical analysis and modelling of spatial point patterns. Wiley, Statistics in Practice.
Liseo, B., & Loperfido, N. (2003). A Bayesian interpretation of the multivariate skew-normal distribution. Statistics and Probability Letters, 61, 395–401.
McQuarrie, D. A. (1976). Statistical mechanics. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Møller, J., & Toftaker, H. (2014). Geometric anisotropic spatial point pattern analysis and Cox processes. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 41, 414–435.
Møller, J., & Waagepetersen, R. P. (2003). Statistical inference and simulation for spatial point processes. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.
Neyman, Y., Scott, E. L.: A theory for the spatial distribution of galaxies. Astrophysics Journal, 116, 144–163 (1952)
Neyman, Y., & Scott, E. L. (1958). Statistical approach to problems of cosmology. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 20, 1–43.
Neyman, Y., Scott, E. L. (1972). Processes of clustering and applications. In P. A. W. Lewis (Ed.), Stochastic processes (pp. 646–681). New York, NY: Wiley.
Neyman, Y., Scott, E. L., & Shane, C. D. (1953). On the spatial distribution of galaxies: A specific model. Astrophysics Journal, 117, 92–133.
Ohser, J. (1983). On estimators for the reduced second moment measure of point processes. Statistics: A Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 14, 63–71.
Penttinen, A., Stoyan, D., & Henttonen, H. (1992). Marked point processes in forest statistics. Forest Science, 38, 806–824.
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Ripley, B. D. (1976). The second-order analysis of stationary point processes. Journal of Applied Probability, 13, 255–266.
Ripley, B. D. (1988). Statistical inference for spatial processes. Australia: Cambridge University Press.
Stoyan, D., & Stoyan, H. (2006). Estimating pair correlation functions of planar cluster processes. Biometrical Journal, 38, 259–271.
Strauss, D. J. (1975). A model for clustering. Biometrika, 63, 467–475.
Tanaka, U., Ogata, Y., & Stoyan, D. (2008). A model selection and estimation of the Neyman–Scott type spatial cluster models. Biometrical Journal, 50, 43–57.
Thomas, M. (1949). A generalization of Poisson’s binomial limit for use in ecology. Biometrika, 36, 18–25.
Wolfram Research. (2020). Mathematica version 12.1. Champaign, IL, USA (2020). https://www.wolfram.com/mathematica
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Professor Reinaldo Arellano-Valle and a reviewer for their useful suggestions and comments. The authors also acknowledge the Texas A&M University Brazos cluster that contributed to the research reported here. The work of the second author was supported by King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Table of Acronyms
Acronym | Complete words |
---|---|
AGOF | Adjusted goodness-of-fit |
cdf | Cumulative distribution function |
CP | Cluster process |
CSR | Complete spatial randomness |
df | Degrees of freedom |
EST | Extended skew-t |
GOF | Goodness-of-fit |
MCM | Minimum contrast method |
pcf | Pair correlation function |
Probability density function | |
SPP | Spatial point pattern |
SUE | Unified skew-elliptical |
SUN | Unified skew-normal |
TP | Thomas process |
Skew-Elliptical-Normal Cluster Processes
According to the transformation in (1), the joint distribution f R,Θ(r, θ) of (R, Θ) is
Elliptical-Normal Cluster Process
For a different parametrization, σ 1 ≡ σ and σ 2 = c σ σ with c σ > 0, the pdf f d(r) can be rewritten as follows:
Circular-Normal Cluster Process
Here, σ 1 = σ 2. We provide the pdf of R, f R(r) = f d(r) in the following:
Skew-Normal Cluster Process
Following the transformation defined in (1),
where \(c_0=2\sigma ^2/(1+\alpha ^2_1 + \alpha ^2_2)\), \(c_1=1+\alpha ^2_1(1-2/\pi ) + \alpha ^2_2\), and \(c_2=1 + \alpha ^2_1+\alpha ^2_2(1-2/\pi )\). The pdf, f d(r), is analytically complete only in the following two cases. First, \(\alpha ^2_1=\alpha ^2_2\), i.e., (i) α T = α(1, 1), (ii) α T = α(−1, −1), (iii) α T = α(1, −1), or (iv) α T = α(−1, 1), assuming that α > 0. Consequently, c 1 = c 2,
where \(\mbox{BesselI}_0(x)=\sum _{n=0}^{\infty } (x/2)^{2n}/(n!)^{2}\) is a modified Bessel function of the first kind.
Second, suppose that α = (0, α)T or α = (α, 0)T. Then,
Skew-Elliptical-t Cluster Processes
For x = (x 1, x 2)T,
where T 1(⋅;ν) denotes the cdf of the univariate t-distribution with ν degrees of freedom. According to the transformation in (1), the joint distribution of (R, Θ) is
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dao, N.A., Genton, M.G. (2021). Skew-Elliptical Cluster Processes. In: Ghosh, I., Balakrishnan, N., Ng, H.K.T. (eds) Advances in Statistics - Theory and Applications. Emerging Topics in Statistics and Biostatistics . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62900-7_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62900-7_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62899-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62900-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)