Skip to main content

On the Use of Decision Diagrams for Finding Repetition-Free Longest Common Subsequences

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Optimization and Applications (OPTIMA 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12422))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 426 Accesses

Abstract

We consider the repetition-free longest common subsequence (RFLCS) problem, where the goal is to find a longest sequence that appears as subsequence in two input strings and in which each character appears at most once. Our approach is to transform a RFLCS instance to an instance of the maximum independent set (MIS) problem which is subsequently solved by a mixed integer linear programming solver. To reduce the size of the underlying conflict graph of the MIS problem, a relaxed decision diagram is utilized. An experimental evaluation on two benchmark instance sets shows the advantages of the reduction of the conflict graphs in terms of shorter total computation times and the number of instances solved to proven optimality. A further advantage of the created relaxed decision diagrams is that heuristic solutions can be effectively derived. For some instances that could not be solved to proven optimality, new state-of-the-art results were obtained in this way.

This project is partially funded by the Doctoral Program “Vienna Graduate School on Computational Optimization”, Austrian Science Foundation (FWF) Project No. W1260-N35. Furthermore, this work was also supported by project CI-SUSTAIN funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (PID2019-104156GB-I00).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adi, S.S., et al.: Repetition-free longest common subsequence. Discret. Appl. Math. 158(12), 1315–1324 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Aho, A., Hopcroft, J., Ullman, J.: Data Structures and Algorithms. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1983)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bergman, D., Cire, A.A., van Hoeve, W.J., Hooker, J.N.: Decision diagrams for optimization. In: OŚullivan, B., Wooldridge, M. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence: Foundations, Theory, and Algorithms. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42849-9

  4. Blum, C., Blesa, M.J.: Construct, merge, solve and adapt: application to the repetition-free longest common subsequence problem. In: Chicano, F., Hu, B., García-Sánchez, P. (eds.) EvoCOP 2016. LNCS, vol. 9595, pp. 46–57. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30698-8_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Blum, C., Blesa, M.J.: A comprehensive comparison of metaheuristics for the repetition-free longest common subsequence problem. J. Heuristics 24(3), 551–579 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10732-017-9329-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blum, C., et al.: Solving longest common subsequence problems via a transformation to the maximum clique problem. Technical report. AC-TR-20-003 (2020). Submitted to Computers & Operations Research

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bonizzoni, P., Vedova, G.D., Dondi, R., Pirola, Y.: Variants of constrained longest common subsequence. Inf. Process. Lett. 110(20), 877–881 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Brisk, P., Kaplan, A., Sarrafzadeh, M.: Area-efficient instruction set synthesis for reconfigurable system-on-chip designs. In: Proceedings of DAC 2004 - The 41st Annual Design Automation Conference. pp. 395–400. IEEE Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Castelli, M., Beretta, S., Vanneschi, L.: A hybrid genetic algorithm for the repetition free longest common subsequence problem. Oper. Res. Lett. 41(6), 644–649 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, Y.C., Chao, K.M.: On the generalized constrained longest common subsequence problems. J. Comb. Optim. 21(3), 383–392 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Chowdhury, S.R., Hasan, M.M., Iqbal, S., Rahman, M.S.: Computing a longest common palindromic subsequence. Fundamenta Informaticae 129(4), 329–340 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Cire, A.A., Hoeve, W.V.: Multivalued decision diagrams for sequencing problems. Oper. Res. 61(6), 1411–1428 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Gusfield, D.: Algorithms on Strings, Trees, and Sequences: Computer Science and Computational Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Hooker, J.N.: Decision diagrams and dynamic programming. In: Gomes, C., Sellmann, M. (eds.) CPAIOR 2013. LNCS, vol. 7874, pp. 94–110. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38171-3_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Jiang, T., Lin, G.-H., Ma, B., Zhang, K.: The longest common subsequence problem for arc-annotated sequences. In: Giancarlo, R., Sankoff, D. (eds.) CPM 2000. LNCS, vol. 1848, pp. 154–165. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45123-4_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Jiang, T., Lin, G., Ma, B., Zhang, K.: A general edit distance between RNA structures. J. Comput. Biol. 9(2), 371–388 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kruskal, J.B.: An overview of sequence comparison: time warps, string edits, and macromolecules. SIAM Rev. 25(2), 201–237 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith, T., Waterman, M.: Identification of common molecular subsequences. J. Mol. Biol. 147(1), 195–197 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Storer, J.A.: Data Compression: Methods and Theory. Computer Science Press, Inc., Rockville (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tsai, Y.T.: The constrained longest common subsequence problem. Inf. Process. Lett. 88(4), 173–176 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Horn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Horn, M., Djukanovic, M., Blum, C., Raidl, G.R. (2020). On the Use of Decision Diagrams for Finding Repetition-Free Longest Common Subsequences. In: Olenev, N., Evtushenko, Y., Khachay, M., Malkova, V. (eds) Optimization and Applications. OPTIMA 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12422. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62867-3_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics