Skip to main content

Fact Checking on Knowledge Graphs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Data Science for Fake News

Part of the book series: The Information Retrieval Series ((INRE,volume 42))

  • 1612 Accesses

Abstract

Fact checking, which verifies whether a given statement is true, could play a vital role in fake news detection. For example, for a given piece of news, a potential solution could involve a series of steps, including extracting statements from the news via text parsing, checking the validity of the extracted statements (i.e., fact checking), and classifying the news as fake if some statements have been confirmed to be false and performing further fake news detection processes otherwise. Considering that knowledge graphs are a popular way of representing knowledge, which could be used for verifying or counter-verifying statements, several solutions have been proposed that make use of knowledge graphs for fact checking. In this chapter, recent studies on fact checking with the help of knowledge graphs are reviewed, and three representative solutions, namely, Knowledge Linker, PredPath, and Knowledge Stream, are introduced with some details. Specifically, Knowledge Linker utilizes the semantic proximity metrics for mining knowledge graphs, PredPath employs the link prediction method and introduces a newly defined metric, and Knowledge Stream models the fact-checking problem as an optimization problem and uses flow theory for solving the problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abedjan, Z., Naumann, F.: Synonym analysis for predicate expansion. In: Extended Semantic Web Conference, pp. 140–154. Springer, New York, (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adamic, L.A., Adar, E.: Friends and neighbors on the web. Soc. Netw. 25(3), 211–230 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Adamic, L.A., Glance, N.: The political blogosphere and the 2004 US election: divided they blog. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery, pp. 36–43 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ahuja, R.K., Magnanti, T.L., Orlin, J.B., Weihe, K.: Network flows: theory, algorithms and applications. ZOR-Methods Models Oper. Res. 41(3), 252–254 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aiello, L.M., Barrat, A., Schifanella, R., Cattuto, C., Markines, B., Menczer, F.: Friendship prediction and homophily in social media. ACM Trans. Web 6(2), 1–33 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barabási, A.L., Albert, R.: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439), 509–512 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Bollacker, K., Tufts, P., Pierce, T., Cook, R.: A platform for scalable, collaborative, structured information integration. In: International Workshop on Information Integration on the Web (IIWeb’07), pp. 22–27 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bonatti, P.A., Decker, S., Polleres, A., Presutti, V.: Knowledge graphs: new directions for knowledge representation on the semantic web (dagstuhl seminar 18371). Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bordes, A., Usunier, N., Garcia-Duran, A., Weston, J., Yakhnenko, O.: Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2787–2795 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cheong, S.H., Si, Y.W.: Force-directed algorithms for schematic drawings and placement: a survey. Inf. Visual. 19(1), 65–91 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ciampaglia, G.L., Shiralkar, P., Rocha, L.M., Bollen, J., Menczer, F., Flammini, A.: Computational fact checking from knowledge networks. PloS ONE 10(6), e0128193 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Conover, M.D., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., Gonçalves, B., Menczer, F., Flammini, A.: Political polarization on twitter. In: Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Flanagin, A.J., Metzger, M.J.: Perceptions of internet information credibility. Journal. Mass Commun. Quart. 77(3), 515–540 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Galárraga, L.A., Teflioudi, C., Hose, K., Suchanek, F.: AMIE: association rule mining under incomplete evidence in ontological knowledge bases. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 413–422 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. He, Q., Chen, B., Argawal, D.: Building the LinkedIn knowledge graph. In: LinkedIn (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hoffart, J., Suchanek, F.M., Berberich, K., Lewis-Kelham, E., De Melo, G., Weikum, G.: Yago2: exploring and querying world knowledge in time, space, context, and many languages. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, pp. 229–232 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hogan, A., Blomqvist, E., Cochez, M., d’Amato, C., de Melo, G., Gutierrez, C., Gayo, J.E.L., Kirrane, S., Neumaier, S., Polleres, A., et al.: Knowledge graphs (2020). Preprint. arXiv:2003.02320

    Google Scholar 

  18. Howell, L., et al.: Digital wildfires in a hyperconnected world. WEF Rep. 3(2013), 15–94 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kamada, T., Kawai, S., et al.: An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Inf. Process. Lett. 31(1), 7–15 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Katz, L.: A new status index derived from sociometric analysis. Psychometrika 18(1), 39–43 (1953)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lao, N., Cohen, W.W.: Relational retrieval using a combination of path-constrained random walks. Mach. Learn. 81(1), 53–67 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Lehmann, J., Isele, R., Jakob, M., Jentzsch, A., Kontokostas, D., Mendes, P.N., Hellmann, S., Morsey, M., Van Kleef, P., Auer, S., et al.: DBpedia–a large-scale, multilingual knowledge base extracted from Wikipedia. Seman. Web 6(2), 167–195 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U.K., Seifert, C.M., Schwarz, N., Cook, J.: Misinformation and its correction: continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychol. Sci. Publ. Int. 13(3), 106–131 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liben-Nowell, D., Kleinberg, J.: The link-prediction problem for social networks. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 58(7), 1019–1031 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lu, C., Laublet, P., Stankovic, M.: Travel attractions recommendation with knowledge graphs. In: European Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, pp. 416–431. Springer, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Luper, S.: The epistemic closure principle (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Manola, F., Miller, E., McBride, B., et al.: RDF Primer. W3C Recommend. 10(1–107), 6 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Markines, B., Menczer, F.: A scalable, collaborative similarity measure for social annotation systems. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, pp. 347–348 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nickel, M., Murphy, K., Tresp, V., Gabrilovich, E.: A review of relational machine learning for knowledge graphs. Proceedings of the IEEE 104(1), 11–33 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Noy, N., Gao, Y., Jain, A., Narayanan, A., Patterson, A., Taylor, J.: Industry-scale knowledge graphs: lessons and challenges. Queue 17(2), 48–75 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Paulheim, H.: Knowledge graph refinement: a survey of approaches and evaluation methods. Seman. Web 8(3), 489–508 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Quinlan, J.R.: C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., Burlington (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Raimond, Y., Ferne, T., Smethurst, M., Adams, G.: The BBC world service archive prototype. J. Web Semant. 27, 2–9 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Schneider, E.W.: Course modularization applied: the interface system and its implications for sequence control and data analysis (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Shadbolt, N., O’Hara, K.: Linked data in government. IEEE Intern. Comput. 17(4), 72–77 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shewhart, W.A., Wilks, S.S.: Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Shi, B., Weninger, T.: Discriminative predicate path mining for fact checking in knowledge graphs. Knowl.-Based Syst. 104, 123–133 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Shi, C., Kong, X., Huang, Y., Philip, S.Y., Wu, B.: Hetesim: a general framework for relevance measure in heterogeneous networks. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 26(10), 2479–2492 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shiralkar, P., Flammini, A., Menczer, F., Ciampaglia, G.L.: Finding streams in knowledge graphs to support fact checking. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), pp. 859–864. IEEE, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Shrivastava, S.: Bring rich knowledge of people, places, things and local businesses to your apps. Bing blogs (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Simas, T., Rocha, L.M.: Distance closures on complex networks. Netw. Sci. 3(2), 227–268 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Singhal, A.: Introducing the knowledge graph: things, not strings. Official google blog 16 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Stadler, C., Lehmann, J., Höffner, K., Auer, S.: Linkedgeodata: a core for a web of spatial open data. Seman. Web 3(4), 333–354 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sun, Y., Han, J., Yan, X., Yu, P.S., Wu, T.: PathSim: meta path-based top-k similarity search in heterogeneous information networks. Proc. VLDB Endowm. 4(11), 992–1003 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sun, Y., Norick, B., Han, J., Yan, X., Yu, P.S., Yu, X.: Pathselclus: Integrating meta-path selection with user-guided object clustering in heterogeneous information networks. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data 7(3), 1–23 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Vrandečić, D., Krötzsch, M.: Wikidata: a free collaborative knowledgebase. Commun. ACM 57(10), 78–85 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zubiaga, A., Aker, A., Bontcheva, K., Liakata, M., Procter, R.: Detection and resolution of rumours in social media: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 51(2), 1–36 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Luo, W., Long, C. (2021). Fact Checking on Knowledge Graphs. In: Data Science for Fake News. The Information Retrieval Series, vol 42. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62696-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62696-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62695-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62696-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics