Skip to main content

Development of Unit Process Datasets

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Life Cycle Inventory Analysis

Abstract

The development of unit process datasets is fundamental for any Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) study. Unit processes developed are not always of the quality desired, which impedes their usability and influences the overall credibility of the studied system. This chapter is based on the relevant LCA standards and guidelines and streamlines the detailed procedures of unit process development from a practical point of view. It aims to serve as a brief, structured, and practical guidance and suggests “basic requirements,” i.e., what is necessarily required to produce a unit process dataset with reasonable data quality as well as sufficient and transparent documentation. Detailed recommendations are provided for self-checking, sensitivity analysis for improving the overall data quality, data quality evaluation, documentation, reviews, and development of tools that facilitate the development and application of unit processes. The chapter is meant to inform and aid experienced LCA practitioners from industry, policy, regulatory organizations, consultancy, and academia in unit process development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Unit process datasets can be separated into foreground and background datasets. Foreground processes are directly part of the value chain of products or services in the focus of the LCA study, while the background datasets represent all up- and down-stream processes connected to the foreground datasets.

  2. 2.

    https://github.com/bsteubing/lca-global-sensitivity-analysis

  3. 3.

    https://github.com/aleksandra-kim/gsa_framework

  4. 4.

    https://evelynegroen.github.io/Code/globalsensitivity.html

References

  • Andrae ASG (2009) Global life cycle impact assessments of material shifts: the example of a lead-free electronics industry. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrianandraina, Ventura A, Senga Kiessé T et al (2015) Sensitivity analysis of environmental process modeling in a life cycle context: a case study of hemp crop production. J Ind Ecol 19:978–993

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Astudillo MF, Treyer K, Bauer C et al (2016) Life cycle inventories of electricity supply through the lens of data quality: exploring challenges and opportunities. Int J Life Cycle Assess:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azadi P, Brownbridge G, Mosbach S et al (2015) Simulation and life cycle assessment of algae gasification process in dual fluidized bed gasifiers. Green Chem 17:1793–1801

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baitz et al (2014) GaBi database & modelling principles 2014. Available at: http://www.gabi-software.com/uploads/media/GaBi_Modelling_Principles_2014.pdf

  • Caduff M, Huijbregts M, Koehler A et al (2014) Scaling relationships in life cycle assessment

    Google Scholar 

  • Cucurachi S, Borgonovo E, Heijungs R (2016) A protocol for the global sensitivity analysis of impact assessment models in life cycle assessment. Risk Anal 36:357–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Curran MA (2012) Life cycle assessment handbook: a guide for environmentally sustainable products. Scrivener Publishing, Salem

    Google Scholar 

  • Earles JM, Halog A (2011) Consequential life cycle assessment: a review. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:445–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall T (1999) System expansion and allocation in life cycle assessment: with implications for wastepaper management. Technical Environmental Planning, Chalmers University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus H et al (2007) Overview and methodology, Data v2.0, ecoinvent report No. 1. Dübendorf

    Google Scholar 

  • Groen EA, Bokkers EAM, Heijungs R, de Boer IJM (2017) Methods for global sensitivity analysis in life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:1125–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guinée J (2006) Handbook on life cycle assessment: operational guide to the ISO standards. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinée JB (2015) Life Cycle Impact Assessment, LCA Compendium – The Complete World of Life Cycle Assessment. Chapter 2 Selection of Impact Categories and Classification of LCI Results to Impact Categories

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermacher F (2012) Admitted uncertainty instead of hidden bias: the case for consequential life cycle assessment. Working paper 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauschild et al (2018) Life cycle assessment - theory and practice. Available at: https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783319564746

  • Huang N, Wang H, Fan C et al (2012) LCA data quality assessment and control based on uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Acta Sci Circumstantiae 32:1529–1536

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • International Organisation for Standardization (2006a) Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines (ISO 14044)

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organisation for Standardization (ISO) (2006b) Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework (ISO 14040)

    Google Scholar 

  • JRC EC (2018) Product environmental footprint category rules guidance

    Google Scholar 

  • JRC EC IES (2010a) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) handbook: specific guide for Life Cycle Inventory data sets. EUR 24709 EN

    Google Scholar 

  • JRC EC IES (2010b) General guide for life cycle assessment – detailed guidance

    Google Scholar 

  • Klöpffer (2012) The critical review of life cycle assessment studies according to ISO 14040 and 14044

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacirignola M, Meany BH, Padey P, Blanc I (2014) A simplified model for the estimation of life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of enhanced geothermal systems. Geotherm Energy 2:8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacirignola M, Blanc P, Girard R et al (2017) LCA of emerging technologies: addressing high uncertainty on inputs’ variability when performing global sensitivity analysis. Sci Total Environ 578:268–280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lifset R (2012) Toward meta-analysis in life cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 16:S1–S2

    Google Scholar 

  • Marini C, Blanc I (2014) Towards prospective life cycle assessment: How to identify key parameters inducing most uncertainties in the future? Application to photovoltaic systems installed in Spain. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Springer, pp 691–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutel CL, Hellweg S (2009) Regionalized life cycle assessment: computational methodology and application to inventory databases. Environ Sci Technol 43:5797–5803

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mutel CL, Pfister S, Hellweg S (2012) GIS-based regionalized life cycle assessment: how big is small enough? methodology and case study of electricity generation. Environ Sci Technol 46:1096–1103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mutel CL, De Baan L, Hellweg S (2013) Two-step sensitivity testing of parametrized and regionalized life cycle assessments: methodology and case study. Environ Sci Technol 47:5660–5667

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative (2011) Global guidance principles for life cycle assessment databases. A basis for greener processes and products “Shonan Guidance Principle”

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H (2017) Guidelines for WebLCA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei W, Larrey-Lassalle P, Faure T et al (2015) How to conduct a proper sensitivity analysis in life cycle assessment: taking into account correlations within LCI data and interactions within the LCA calculation model. Environ Sci Technol 49:377–385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weidema BP (2003) Market information in life cycle assessment. Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidema B, Wenzel H, Petersen C, Hansen K (2004) The product, functional unit and reference flows in LCA. Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidema BP, Ekvall T, Heijungs R (2009) Guidelines for Consequential and Hybrid LCA – Deliverable D18 of work package 5 of the CALCAS project

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidema BP, Bauer C, Hischier R et al (2013) Overview and methodology. Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3. Ecoinvent, St Gallen

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamagni A, Guinée J, Heijungs R et al (2012) Lights and shadows in consequential LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:904–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karin Treyer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zhang, X., Wang, H., Treyer, K. (2021). Development of Unit Process Datasets. In: Ciroth, A., Arvidsson, R. (eds) Life Cycle Inventory Analysis . LCA Compendium – The Complete World of Life Cycle Assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62270-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics