Abstract
The development of unit process datasets is fundamental for any Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) study. Unit processes developed are not always of the quality desired, which impedes their usability and influences the overall credibility of the studied system. This chapter is based on the relevant LCA standards and guidelines and streamlines the detailed procedures of unit process development from a practical point of view. It aims to serve as a brief, structured, and practical guidance and suggests “basic requirements,” i.e., what is necessarily required to produce a unit process dataset with reasonable data quality as well as sufficient and transparent documentation. Detailed recommendations are provided for self-checking, sensitivity analysis for improving the overall data quality, data quality evaluation, documentation, reviews, and development of tools that facilitate the development and application of unit processes. The chapter is meant to inform and aid experienced LCA practitioners from industry, policy, regulatory organizations, consultancy, and academia in unit process development.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Unit process datasets can be separated into foreground and background datasets. Foreground processes are directly part of the value chain of products or services in the focus of the LCA study, while the background datasets represent all up- and down-stream processes connected to the foreground datasets.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
References
Andrae ASG (2009) Global life cycle impact assessments of material shifts: the example of a lead-free electronics industry. Springer, London
Andrianandraina, Ventura A, Senga Kiessé T et al (2015) Sensitivity analysis of environmental process modeling in a life cycle context: a case study of hemp crop production. J Ind Ecol 19:978–993
Astudillo MF, Treyer K, Bauer C et al (2016) Life cycle inventories of electricity supply through the lens of data quality: exploring challenges and opportunities. Int J Life Cycle Assess:1–13.
Azadi P, Brownbridge G, Mosbach S et al (2015) Simulation and life cycle assessment of algae gasification process in dual fluidized bed gasifiers. Green Chem 17:1793–1801
Baitz et al (2014) GaBi database & modelling principles 2014. Available at: http://www.gabi-software.com/uploads/media/GaBi_Modelling_Principles_2014.pdf
Caduff M, Huijbregts M, Koehler A et al (2014) Scaling relationships in life cycle assessment
Cucurachi S, Borgonovo E, Heijungs R (2016) A protocol for the global sensitivity analysis of impact assessment models in life cycle assessment. Risk Anal 36:357–377
Curran MA (2012) Life cycle assessment handbook: a guide for environmentally sustainable products. Scrivener Publishing, Salem
Earles JM, Halog A (2011) Consequential life cycle assessment: a review. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:445–453
Ekvall T (1999) System expansion and allocation in life cycle assessment: with implications for wastepaper management. Technical Environmental Planning, Chalmers University of Technology
Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus H et al (2007) Overview and methodology, Data v2.0, ecoinvent report No. 1. Dübendorf
Groen EA, Bokkers EAM, Heijungs R, de Boer IJM (2017) Methods for global sensitivity analysis in life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:1125–1137
Guinée J (2006) Handbook on life cycle assessment: operational guide to the ISO standards. Springer, Dordrecht
Guinée JB (2015) Life Cycle Impact Assessment, LCA Compendium – The Complete World of Life Cycle Assessment. Chapter 2 Selection of Impact Categories and Classification of LCI Results to Impact Categories
Habermacher F (2012) Admitted uncertainty instead of hidden bias: the case for consequential life cycle assessment. Working paper 1–15
Hauschild et al (2018) Life cycle assessment - theory and practice. Available at: https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783319564746
Huang N, Wang H, Fan C et al (2012) LCA data quality assessment and control based on uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Acta Sci Circumstantiae 32:1529–1536
International Organisation for Standardization (2006a) Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines (ISO 14044)
International Organisation for Standardization (ISO) (2006b) Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework (ISO 14040)
JRC EC (2018) Product environmental footprint category rules guidance
JRC EC IES (2010a) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) handbook: specific guide for Life Cycle Inventory data sets. EUR 24709 EN
JRC EC IES (2010b) General guide for life cycle assessment – detailed guidance
Klöpffer (2012) The critical review of life cycle assessment studies according to ISO 14040 and 14044
Lacirignola M, Meany BH, Padey P, Blanc I (2014) A simplified model for the estimation of life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of enhanced geothermal systems. Geotherm Energy 2:8
Lacirignola M, Blanc P, Girard R et al (2017) LCA of emerging technologies: addressing high uncertainty on inputs’ variability when performing global sensitivity analysis. Sci Total Environ 578:268–280
Lifset R (2012) Toward meta-analysis in life cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 16:S1–S2
Marini C, Blanc I (2014) Towards prospective life cycle assessment: How to identify key parameters inducing most uncertainties in the future? Application to photovoltaic systems installed in Spain. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Springer, pp 691–706
Mutel CL, Hellweg S (2009) Regionalized life cycle assessment: computational methodology and application to inventory databases. Environ Sci Technol 43:5797–5803
Mutel CL, Pfister S, Hellweg S (2012) GIS-based regionalized life cycle assessment: how big is small enough? methodology and case study of electricity generation. Environ Sci Technol 46:1096–1103
Mutel CL, De Baan L, Hellweg S (2013) Two-step sensitivity testing of parametrized and regionalized life cycle assessments: methodology and case study. Environ Sci Technol 47:5660–5667
UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative (2011) Global guidance principles for life cycle assessment databases. A basis for greener processes and products “Shonan Guidance Principle”
Wang H (2017) Guidelines for WebLCA
Wei W, Larrey-Lassalle P, Faure T et al (2015) How to conduct a proper sensitivity analysis in life cycle assessment: taking into account correlations within LCI data and interactions within the LCA calculation model. Environ Sci Technol 49:377–385
Weidema BP (2003) Market information in life cycle assessment. Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Copenhagen
Weidema B, Wenzel H, Petersen C, Hansen K (2004) The product, functional unit and reference flows in LCA. Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Copenhagen
Weidema BP, Ekvall T, Heijungs R (2009) Guidelines for Consequential and Hybrid LCA – Deliverable D18 of work package 5 of the CALCAS project
Weidema BP, Bauer C, Hischier R et al (2013) Overview and methodology. Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3. Ecoinvent, St Gallen
Zamagni A, Guinée J, Heijungs R et al (2012) Lights and shadows in consequential LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:904–918
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zhang, X., Wang, H., Treyer, K. (2021). Development of Unit Process Datasets. In: Ciroth, A., Arvidsson, R. (eds) Life Cycle Inventory Analysis . LCA Compendium – The Complete World of Life Cycle Assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62270-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62270-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62269-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62270-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)