Abstract
Fever of unknown origin (FUO) is a prolonged febrile status without a known etiology despite accurate evaluation and diagnostic testing. It can be due to infection (21–54%), malignancies (6–31%), and/or inflammatory diseases (13–24%). Infection can be diagnosed in about 69.2% of the cases by noninvasive methods. Radiological imaging modalities (US, CT, and MRI) are often the first diagnostic imaging in the workup of patients with FUO. However, in order to identify the site of infection as the cause of FUO, it is often necessary to use nuclear medicine imaging, such as 67Ga-citrate scintigraphy, labeled autologous leukocyte (WBC) scintigraphy, or [18F]FDG PET/CT. The 67Ga-citrate scan shows quite low sensitivity (67%) and specificity (78%) for infectious diagnosis of FUO. Labeled WBC scintigraphy has higher sensitivity (60–85% and 96% for 111In-oxine-WBC and for 99mTc-HMPAO-WBC, respectively) and specificity (78–94% for 111In-oxine-WBC and 92% for 99mTc-HMPAO-WBC, respectively). By mirroring glucose metabolism, [18F]FDG accumulates equally well into inflammatory and neoplastic cells; this feature constitutes the pathophysiologic basis to perform [18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with FUO. The main advantages of [18F]FDG PET/CT are the high-quality imaging, short time consuming, and high diagnostic accuracy, especially in the spine and in chronic low-grade infections. Because of its high negative-predictive value, [18F]FDG PET/CT is considered the diagnostic procedure of choice for patients with FUO with low or intermediate probability of infection. Labeled WBC scintigraphy is instead the diagnostic procedure of choice in patients with FUO with high probability of infectious origin.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Konecny P, Davidson RN. Pyrexia of unknown origin in the 1990s: time to redefine. Br J Hosp Med. 1996;56:21–4.
Kouijzeri IJE, Mulders-Manders CM, Bleeker-Rovers CP, et al. Fever of unknown origin: the value of FDG-PET/CT. Semin Nucl Med. 2018;48:100–7.
Tabak F, Mert A, Celik AD, et al. Fever of unknown origin in Turkey. Infection. 2003;31:417–20.
Bleeker-Rovers CP, Vos FJ, de Kleijn EM, et al. A prospective multi-center study on fever of unknown origin: the yield of a structured diagnostic protocol. Medicine (Baltimore). 2007;86:26–38.
Mourad O, Palda V, Detsky AS. A comprehensive evidence-based approach to fever of unknown origin. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:545–51.
Peters AM. Nuclear medicine imaging in fever of unknown origin. Q J Nucl Med. 1999;43:61–73.
Gaeta GB, Fusco FM, Nardiello S. Fever of unknown origin: a systematic review of the literature for 1995-2004. Nucl Med Commun. 2006;27:205–11.
Corstens FH, van der Meer JW. Nuclear medicine’s role in infection and inflammation. Lancet. 1999;354:765–70.
Cascini GL, de Palma D, Matteucci F, et al. Fever of unknown origin, infection of subcutaneous devices, brain abscesses and endocarditis. Nucl Med Commun. 2006;27:213–22.
Palestro CJ. The current role of gallium imaging in infection. Semin Nucl Med. 1994;24:128–41.
Knockaert DC, Mortelmans LA, De Roo MC, Bobbaers HJ. Clinical value of gallium-67 scintigraphy in evaluation of fever of unknown origin. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;18:601–5.
Meller J, Altenvoerde G, Munzel U, et al. Fever of unknown origin: prospective comparison of [18F]FDG imaging with a double-head coincidence camera and gallium-67 citrate SPET. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000;27:1617–25.
Kjaer A, Lebech AM. Diagnostic value of 111In-granulocyte scintigraphy in patients with fever of unknown origin. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:140–4.
MacSweeney JE, Peters AM, Lavender JP. Indium labelled leucocyte scanning in pyrexia of unknown origin. Clin Radiol. 1990;42:414–7.
Gutfilen B, Lopes de Souza SA, Martins FP, et al. Use of 99mTc-mononuclear leukocyte scintigraphy in nosocomial fever. Acta Radiol. 2006;47:699–704.
Dumarey N, Egrise D, Blocklet D, et al. Imaging infection with 18F-FDG-labeled leukocyte PET/CT: initial experience in 21 patients. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:625–32.
de Kleijn EM, Oyen WJ, Corstens FH, van der Meer JW. Utility of indium-111-labeled polyclonal immunoglobulin G scintigraphy in fever of unknown origin. The Netherlands FUO Imaging Group. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:484–9.
Lind P, Langsteger W, Koltringer P, et al. Immunoscintigraphy of inflammatory processes with a technetium-99m-labeled monoclonal antigranulocyte antibody (MAb BW 250/183). J Nucl Med. 1990;31:417–23.
Becker W, Goldenberg DM, Wolf F. The use of monoclonal antibodies and antibody fragments in the imaging of infectious lesions. Semin Nucl Med. 1994;24:42–153.
Meller J, Ivancevic V, Conrad M, et al. Clinical value of immunoscintigraphy in patients with fever of unknown origin. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:1248–53.
Bleeker-Rovers CP, de Kleijn EM, Corstens FH, et al. Clinical value of FDG PET in patients with fever of unknown origin and patients suspected of focal infection or inflammation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:29–37.
Bleeker-Rovers CP, Vos FJ, Mudde AH, et al. A prospective multi-centre study of the value of FDG-PET as part of a structured diagnostic protocol in patients with fever of unknown origin. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:694–703.
Blockmans D, Knockaert D, Maes A, et al. Clinical value of [18F]fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography for patients with fever of unknown origin. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:191–6.
Balink H, Collins J, Bruyn G, Gemmel F. [18F]FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of fever of unknown origin. Clin Nucl Med. 2009;34:862–8.
Kei PL, Kok TY, Padhy AK, et al. [18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with fever of unknown origin: a local experience. Nucl Med Commun. 2010;31:788–92.
Jasper N, Däbritz J, Frosch M, et al. Diagnostic value of [18F]-FDG PET/CT in children with fever of unknown origin or unexplained signs of inflammation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:136–45.
Dong MJ, Zhao K, Liu ZF, et al. A meta-analysis of the value of fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/PET-CT in the evaluation of fever of unknown origin. Eur J Radiol. 2001;80:834–44.
Federici L, Blondet C, Imperiale A, et al. Value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with fever of unknown origin and unexplained prolonged inflammatory syndrome: a single centre analysis experience. Int J Clin Pract. 2010;64:55–60.
Ferda J, Ferdova E, Zahlava J, et al. Fever of unknown origin: a value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT with integrated full diagnostic isotropic CT imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2010;73:518–25.
Sheng JF, Sheng ZK, Shen XM, et al. Diagnostic value of fluorine-18 fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with fever of unknown origin. Eur J Intern Med. 2011;22:112–6.
Pelosi E, Skanjeti A, Penna D, et al. Role of integrated PET/CT with [18F]-FDG in the management of patients with fever of unknown origin: a single-centre experience. Radiol Med (Torino). 2011;116:809–20.
Pedersen TI, Roed C, Knudsen LS, et al. Fever of unknown origin: a retrospective study of 52 cases with evaluation of the diagnostic utility of FDG-PET/CT. Scand J Infect Dis. 2012;44:18–23.
Crouzet J, Boudousq V, Lechiche C, et al. Place of 18F-FDG-PET with computed tomography in the diagnostic algorithm of patients with fever of unknown origin. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31:1727–33.
Kim YJ, Kim SI, Hong KW, et al. Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with fever of unknown origin. Intern Med J. 2012;42:834–7.
Manohar K, Mittal BR, Jai S, et al. F-18 FDG-PET/CT in evaluation of patients with fever of unknown origin. Jpn J Radiol. 2013;31:320–7.
Tokmak H, Ergonul O, Demirkol O, et al. Diagnostic contribution of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in fever of unknown origin. Int J Infect Dis. 2014;19:53–8.
Buch-Olsen KM, Andersen RV, Hess S, et al. 18F-FDG-PET/CT in fever of unknown origin: clinical value. Nucl Med Commun. 2014;35:955–60.
Gafter-Gvili A, Raibman S, Grossman A, et al. [18F]FDG-PET/CT for the diagnosis of patients with fever of unknown origin. QJM. 2015;108:289–98.
Pereira AM, Husmann L, Sah BR, et al. Determinants of diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with fever of unknown origin. Nucl Med Commun. 2016;37:57–65.
Keidar Z, Gurman-Balbir A, Gaitini D, et al. Fever of unknown origin: the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1980–5.
Kjaer A, Lebech AM, Eigtved A, Højgaard L. Fever of unknown origin: prospective comparison of diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET and 111In-granulocyte scintigraphy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:622–6.
Hung BT, Wang PW, Su YJ, et al. The efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 67Ga SPECT/CT in diagnosing fever of unknown origin. Int J Infect Dis. 2017;62:10–7.
Signore A, Jamar F, Israel O, et al. Clinical indications, image acquisition and data interpretation for white blood cells and anti-granulocyte monoclonal antibody scintigraphy: an EANM procedural guideline. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:1816–31.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Imaging in Patients with Fever of Unknown Origin
Clinical Cases
10.1.1 Case 10.1
10.1.1.1 Background
A 65-year-old man with fever, pain in the epigastric region, and jaundice. The CT scan of the abdomen showed a rather diffuse enlargement in size of the pancreas, without clear signs of focal lesion(s) (Fig. 10.15a). MRI confirmed the increase of pancreas size, but also visualized a focal lesion (about 3 cm in size) in the head of pancreas (Fig. 10.15b).
Based on these findings, the patient was referred for [18F]FDG PET/CT for suspected pancreatic cancer. Contrary to expectation, the [18F]FDG PET/CT scan only showed diffuse, mildly increased uptake of the pancreas parenchyma (Fig. 10.15c). Based on this pattern, the hypothesis of pancreatic cancer was ruled out, as the findings were consistent with pancreatitis. The final diagnosis was autoimmune pancreatitis.
10.1.1.2 Suspected Site of Disease
Pancreas.
10.1.1.3 Radiopharmaceutical Activity
[18F]FDG, 270 MBq.
10.1.1.4 Imaging
[18F]FDG PET/CT acquired 60 min post injection, including CT scout view (120 kV, 10 mA), whole-body CT scan (140 kV, 80 mA), and PET (3 min/FOV). Images were reconstructed with and without attenuation correction using the low-dose transmission CT scan.
10.1.1.5 Conclusion/Teaching Point
[18F]FDG PET/CT ruled out the presence of neoplastic disease of pancreas and identified the origin of FUO and jaundice as autoimmune pancreatitis.
10.1.2 Case 10.2
(Nuclear Medicine Department, University “La Sapienza”, Rome, Italy
).
10.1.2.1 Background
A 31-year-old woman with autosomic dominant hyper-IgE syndrome (a rare form of congenital, non-X-linked severe immune deficiency) was referred for remittent FUO. Medical history included right nephrectomy at the age of 8 years because of abscess, as well as abdominal abscesses at multiple sites and recurrent bronchopneumonia; the patient was kept on chronic antibiotic therapy.
MRI of the upper (coronal T2-STIR images in Fig. 10.16a) showed multiple focal roundish lesions in the liver parenchyma with regular wall and inhomogeneous fluid content; numerous foci of lung parenchymal consolidation and bronchiectasis on the basal region of the right lung were also detected. These findings were consistent with the clinical suspicion of multiple abscess localizations.
99mTc-HMPAO-WBC scintigraphy was performed to better characterize the focal lesions detected on MRI. The scan showed mild but increasing over time accumulation of labeled leukocytes in the antero-basal region of the right lung and in the upper region of the liver (Fig. 10.16b), matching the MRI findings and confirming the diagnosis of multiple abscess localizations in the liver and in the lower lobe of right lung.
10.1.2.2 Suspected Site of Infection
Lung and liver.
10.1.2.3 Radiopharmaceutical Activity
99mTc-HMPAO-WBC scintigraphy: acquisition of planar imaging at 1 h, 4 h, and 20 h.
10.1.2.4 Conclusion/Teaching Point
99mTc-HMPAO-WBC scintigraphy detected multiple sites of labeled leukocyte accumulation matching the MRI findings, therefore confirming the diagnosis of multiple abscess localizations in the liver and in the lower lobe of right lung.
10.1.3 Case 10.3
10.1.3.1 Background
A 56-year-old man with prior diagnosis of lung infection (but without certain etiology), undergoing long-lasting antibiotic treatment. Fever and coughing persisted despite antimicrobial therapy; moreover, lumbar back pain appeared.
The patient was referred for [18F]FDG PET/CT to evaluate the presence and extension of lung infection. The PET/CT scan showed diffuse, increased [18F]FDG uptake in pulmonary parenchyma, bilaterally (Fig. 10.17). PET images showed, furthermore, increased [18F]FDG uptake in the lumbar spine, corresponding to L4–L5. The findings were consistent with the persistence of lung infection and appearance of infection in the lumbar spine. A subsequent MRI scan confirmed lumbar L4–L5 spondylodiscitis. Change in the antibiotic treatment plan resulted in rapid improvement of the patient’s clinical conditions.
10.1.3.2 Suspected Site of Infection
Lungs.
10.1.3.3 Radiopharmaceutical Activity
[18F]FDG, 184 MBq.
10.1.3.4 Imaging
[18F]FDG PET/CT acquired 60 min post injection, including CT scout view (120 kV, 10 mA), whole-body CT scan (140 kV, 80 mA), and PET (3 min/FOV). Images were reconstructed with and without attenuation correction using the low-dose transmission CT scan.
10.1.3.5 Conclusion/Teaching Point
The [18F]FDG PET/CT findings confirmed the persistence of pulmonary infection with appearance of septic embolism in the spine. Based on these findings, the patient was classified as “non-responder” to antibiotic treatment; subsequent change of the antimicrobial agent resulted in improved clinical status.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lazzeri, E., Zanca, R., Sollini, M. (2021). Nuclear Medicine Imaging of Fever of Unknown Origin. In: Lazzeri, E., et al. Radionuclide Imaging of Infection and Inflammation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62175-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62175-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62174-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62175-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)