Skip to main content

Nuclear Medicine Imaging of Fever of Unknown Origin

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Radionuclide Imaging of Infection and Inflammation

Abstract

Fever of unknown origin (FUO) is a prolonged febrile status without a known etiology despite accurate evaluation and diagnostic testing. It can be due to infection (21–54%), malignancies (6–31%), and/or inflammatory diseases (13–24%). Infection can be diagnosed in about 69.2% of the cases by noninvasive methods. Radiological imaging modalities (US, CT, and MRI) are often the first diagnostic imaging in the workup of patients with FUO. However, in order to identify the site of infection as the cause of FUO, it is often necessary to use nuclear medicine imaging, such as 67Ga-citrate scintigraphy, labeled autologous leukocyte (WBC) scintigraphy, or [18F]FDG PET/CT. The 67Ga-citrate scan shows quite low sensitivity (67%) and specificity (78%) for infectious diagnosis of FUO. Labeled WBC scintigraphy has higher sensitivity (60–85% and 96% for 111In-oxine-WBC and for 99mTc-HMPAO-WBC, respectively) and specificity (78–94% for 111In-oxine-WBC and 92% for 99mTc-HMPAO-WBC, respectively). By mirroring glucose metabolism, [18F]FDG accumulates equally well into inflammatory and neoplastic cells; this feature constitutes the pathophysiologic basis to perform [18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with FUO. The main advantages of [18F]FDG PET/CT are the high-quality imaging, short time consuming, and high diagnostic accuracy, especially in the spine and in chronic low-grade infections. Because of its high negative-predictive value, [18F]FDG PET/CT is considered the diagnostic procedure of choice for patients with FUO with low or intermediate probability of infection. Labeled WBC scintigraphy is instead the diagnostic procedure of choice in patients with FUO with high probability of infectious origin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Konecny P, Davidson RN. Pyrexia of unknown origin in the 1990s: time to redefine. Br J Hosp Med. 1996;56:21–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kouijzeri IJE, Mulders-Manders CM, Bleeker-Rovers CP, et al. Fever of unknown origin: the value of FDG-PET/CT. Semin Nucl Med. 2018;48:100–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tabak F, Mert A, Celik AD, et al. Fever of unknown origin in Turkey. Infection. 2003;31:417–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bleeker-Rovers CP, Vos FJ, de Kleijn EM, et al. A prospective multi-center study on fever of unknown origin: the yield of a structured diagnostic protocol. Medicine (Baltimore). 2007;86:26–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mourad O, Palda V, Detsky AS. A comprehensive evidence-based approach to fever of unknown origin. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:545–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Peters AM. Nuclear medicine imaging in fever of unknown origin. Q J Nucl Med. 1999;43:61–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gaeta GB, Fusco FM, Nardiello S. Fever of unknown origin: a systematic review of the literature for 1995-2004. Nucl Med Commun. 2006;27:205–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Corstens FH, van der Meer JW. Nuclear medicine’s role in infection and inflammation. Lancet. 1999;354:765–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cascini GL, de Palma D, Matteucci F, et al. Fever of unknown origin, infection of subcutaneous devices, brain abscesses and endocarditis. Nucl Med Commun. 2006;27:213–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Palestro CJ. The current role of gallium imaging in infection. Semin Nucl Med. 1994;24:128–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Knockaert DC, Mortelmans LA, De Roo MC, Bobbaers HJ. Clinical value of gallium-67 scintigraphy in evaluation of fever of unknown origin. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;18:601–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Meller J, Altenvoerde G, Munzel U, et al. Fever of unknown origin: prospective comparison of [18F]FDG imaging with a double-head coincidence camera and gallium-67 citrate SPET. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000;27:1617–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kjaer A, Lebech AM. Diagnostic value of 111In-granulocyte scintigraphy in patients with fever of unknown origin. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:140–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. MacSweeney JE, Peters AM, Lavender JP. Indium labelled leucocyte scanning in pyrexia of unknown origin. Clin Radiol. 1990;42:414–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gutfilen B, Lopes de Souza SA, Martins FP, et al. Use of 99mTc-mononuclear leukocyte scintigraphy in nosocomial fever. Acta Radiol. 2006;47:699–704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dumarey N, Egrise D, Blocklet D, et al. Imaging infection with 18F-FDG-labeled leukocyte PET/CT: initial experience in 21 patients. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:625–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. de Kleijn EM, Oyen WJ, Corstens FH, van der Meer JW. Utility of indium-111-labeled polyclonal immunoglobulin G scintigraphy in fever of unknown origin. The Netherlands FUO Imaging Group. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:484–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lind P, Langsteger W, Koltringer P, et al. Immunoscintigraphy of inflammatory processes with a technetium-99m-labeled monoclonal antigranulocyte antibody (MAb BW 250/183). J Nucl Med. 1990;31:417–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Becker W, Goldenberg DM, Wolf F. The use of monoclonal antibodies and antibody fragments in the imaging of infectious lesions. Semin Nucl Med. 1994;24:42–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Meller J, Ivancevic V, Conrad M, et al. Clinical value of immunoscintigraphy in patients with fever of unknown origin. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:1248–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bleeker-Rovers CP, de Kleijn EM, Corstens FH, et al. Clinical value of FDG PET in patients with fever of unknown origin and patients suspected of focal infection or inflammation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:29–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bleeker-Rovers CP, Vos FJ, Mudde AH, et al. A prospective multi-centre study of the value of FDG-PET as part of a structured diagnostic protocol in patients with fever of unknown origin. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:694–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Blockmans D, Knockaert D, Maes A, et al. Clinical value of [18F]fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography for patients with fever of unknown origin. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:191–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Balink H, Collins J, Bruyn G, Gemmel F. [18F]FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of fever of unknown origin. Clin Nucl Med. 2009;34:862–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kei PL, Kok TY, Padhy AK, et al. [18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with fever of unknown origin: a local experience. Nucl Med Commun. 2010;31:788–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jasper N, Däbritz J, Frosch M, et al. Diagnostic value of [18F]-FDG PET/CT in children with fever of unknown origin or unexplained signs of inflammation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:136–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dong MJ, Zhao K, Liu ZF, et al. A meta-analysis of the value of fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/PET-CT in the evaluation of fever of unknown origin. Eur J Radiol. 2001;80:834–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Federici L, Blondet C, Imperiale A, et al. Value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with fever of unknown origin and unexplained prolonged inflammatory syndrome: a single centre analysis experience. Int J Clin Pract. 2010;64:55–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ferda J, Ferdova E, Zahlava J, et al. Fever of unknown origin: a value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT with integrated full diagnostic isotropic CT imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2010;73:518–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sheng JF, Sheng ZK, Shen XM, et al. Diagnostic value of fluorine-18 fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with fever of unknown origin. Eur J Intern Med. 2011;22:112–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pelosi E, Skanjeti A, Penna D, et al. Role of integrated PET/CT with [18F]-FDG in the management of patients with fever of unknown origin: a single-centre experience. Radiol Med (Torino). 2011;116:809–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pedersen TI, Roed C, Knudsen LS, et al. Fever of unknown origin: a retrospective study of 52 cases with evaluation of the diagnostic utility of FDG-PET/CT. Scand J Infect Dis. 2012;44:18–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Crouzet J, Boudousq V, Lechiche C, et al. Place of 18F-FDG-PET with computed tomography in the diagnostic algorithm of patients with fever of unknown origin. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31:1727–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim YJ, Kim SI, Hong KW, et al. Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with fever of unknown origin. Intern Med J. 2012;42:834–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Manohar K, Mittal BR, Jai S, et al. F-18 FDG-PET/CT in evaluation of patients with fever of unknown origin. Jpn J Radiol. 2013;31:320–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tokmak H, Ergonul O, Demirkol O, et al. Diagnostic contribution of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in fever of unknown origin. Int J Infect Dis. 2014;19:53–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Buch-Olsen KM, Andersen RV, Hess S, et al. 18F-FDG-PET/CT in fever of unknown origin: clinical value. Nucl Med Commun. 2014;35:955–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gafter-Gvili A, Raibman S, Grossman A, et al. [18F]FDG-PET/CT for the diagnosis of patients with fever of unknown origin. QJM. 2015;108:289–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pereira AM, Husmann L, Sah BR, et al. Determinants of diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with fever of unknown origin. Nucl Med Commun. 2016;37:57–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Keidar Z, Gurman-Balbir A, Gaitini D, et al. Fever of unknown origin: the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1980–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kjaer A, Lebech AM, Eigtved A, Højgaard L. Fever of unknown origin: prospective comparison of diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET and 111In-granulocyte scintigraphy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:622–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hung BT, Wang PW, Su YJ, et al. The efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 67Ga SPECT/CT in diagnosing fever of unknown origin. Int J Infect Dis. 2017;62:10–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Signore A, Jamar F, Israel O, et al. Clinical indications, image acquisition and data interpretation for white blood cells and anti-granulocyte monoclonal antibody scintigraphy: an EANM procedural guideline. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:1816–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Lazzeri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Imaging in Patients with Fever of Unknown Origin

Fig. 10.1
figure 1

[18F]FDG PET/CT in a patient with FUO: the coronal sections (CT, left; PET, middle; fused PET/CT, right) show increased [18F]FDG uptake in the right cervical, axillary, and mediastinal lymph nodes. The spleen is markedly increased in size. Lymph node biopsy demonstrated that a lymphoma was responsible for fever

Fig. 10.2
figure 2

[ 18F]FDG PET/CT in a patient with FUO: the transaxial sections (CT, upper left; PET, upper right; fused PET/CT, lower left; MIP, lower right) show increased [18F]FDG uptake in the head of pancreas head. Final diagnosis was acute pancreatitis

Fig. 10.3
figure 3

[ 18F]FDG PET/C in a patient with FUO: (a) the coronal sections (CT, left; PET, middle; fused PET/CT, right) show diffuse, markedly increased [18F]FDG uptake in the spleen and liver that are also enlarged in size (especially the spleen). (b) The transaxial midthoracic sections (CT, left; PET, middle; fused PET/CT, right) show irregularly increased [18F]FDG uptake in the right lung, where the low-dose CT image demonstrates the presence of cavitations, as well as broncho-hilar and centrolobular opacities; enlarged lymph nodes are also present both above and below the diaphragm. Final diagnosis was diffuse tubercular infection

Fig. 10.4
figure 4

[18F]FDG PET/CT in a patient with FUO: (a) the sagittal sections (CT, left; PET, middle; fused PET/CT, right) show increased [18F]FDG uptake in the wall of thoracic aorta. (b) The coronal sections (CT, left; PET, middle; fused PET/CT, right) show increased [18F]FDG uptake, greater than liver uptake, in the epiaortic vessels and bilateral succlavia. Final diagnosis was acute Takayasu vasculitis

Fig. 10.5
figure 5

[18F]FDG PET/CT in a patient with FUO who had been submitted to surgery of the lumbar spine with implantation of metallic hardware: (a) the sagittal sections (from left to right: CT; PET; fused PET/CT; MIP) and the transaxial sections (b) (CT, upper left; PET, upper right; fused PET/CT, lower left; MIP image, lower right) show increased [18F]FDG uptake in posterior tissues near to the vertebral implant. This post-surgical infection was responsible for fever

Fig. 10.6
figure 6

99mTc-HMPAO-WBC scintigraphy in a patient with FUO: the planar anterior and posterior views at 2 h (upper panel) and 24 (bottom panel) clearly show an area of reduced accumulation of labeled leukocytes in the lumbar vertebral region (L3–L5). MRI confirmed the presence of spine infection, as suspected on the basis of the scintigraphic pattern, as the cause of fever

Fig. 10.7
figure 7

[18F]FDG PET/CT in a patient with FUO: (a) the coronal slices (CT, left; PET, middle; fused PET/CT, right) show markedly increased [18F]FDG uptake in the mid-portion of right lung. (b) The transaxial sections (CT, left; PET, middle; fused PET/CT, right) localize such area of focally increased tracer uptake in the posterior region of right lung. The low-dose CT images show diffuse ground-glass opacities corresponding to the areas of increased [18F]FDG uptake. Fever was due to bacterial pneumonia

Fig. 10.8
figure 8figure 8

[18F]FDG PET/CT in a patient with FUO: (a) the transaxial sections (CT, left; PET, middle; fused PET/CT, right) show increased [18F]FDG uptake at the left sacroiliac joint, with involvement also of the adjacent iliopsoas muscle. (b) and (c): Two coronal sections in different planes visualize extension of the infection along the whole anterior portion of the iliopsoas muscle. (d) Sagittal sections better visualize markedly increased [18F]FDG uptake involving simultaneously the left sacroiliac joint and the left iliopsoas muscle. Final diagnosis was fever caused by infection of the left sacroiliac joint with soft tissue involvement

Fig. 10.9
figure 9figure 9

[18F]FDG PET/CT in a patient with FUO: the tomographic images (shown in (a, coronal), (b, sagittal), and (c, transaxial)) shows a well-defined focus of markedly increased [18F]FDG uptake located between the quadriceps and the sartorius muscles, with a central area with reduced/absent uptake; there is no involvement of the femoral bone (CT, left; PET, middle; fused PET/CT, right). The low-dose CT images confirm the presence of a mass with mildly reduced and inhomogeneous density. Histology of a biopsy sample from the mass revealed the presence of sarcoma

Fig. 10.10
figure 10

[18F]FDG PET/CT in a patient with FUO who had been submitted to implantation of a cardiac pacemaker. Increased [18F]FDG uptake was observed in the subcutaneous pacemaker task and around the initial portion of the lead (transaxial CT, upper left; PET, upper right; fused PET/CT, lower left; MIP image, lower right). These findings indicate infection of the pacemaker task as the cause of fever

Fig. 10.11
figure 11

[18F]FDG PET/CT in a patient with FUO who had been submitted to implantation of a prosthetic aortic valve. Increased [18F]FDG uptake was observed at the prosthetic aortic valve, well identified by the metallic artifact in the low-dose CT component of the scan (transaxial CT, upper left; PET, upper right; fused PET/CT, lower left; MIP image, lower right). These findings indicate infective endocarditis as the cause of fever

Fig. 10.12
figure 12

[18F]FDG PET/CT in a patient with FUO: (a) the coronal sections (CT, left; PET, middle; fused PET/CT, right) show markedly increased [18F]FDG uptake involving at many mediastinal lymph nodes that appear as bilateral peri-hilar consolidations. In addition, transaxial sections of the lower limbs (b) show increased tracer uptake at multiple subcutaneous nodules. Flare of sarcoidosis was responsible for fever

Fig. 10.13
figure 13

[18F]FDG PET/CT in a patient with FUO: the sagittal sections (CT, left; PET, middle; fused PET/CT, right) show moderately increased [18F]FDG uptake at the nasopharynx, suggesting acute nasopharyngitis. These PET/CT findings turned out to be false positive, since acute nasopharyngitis was not present; the moderately increased [ 18F]FDG uptake was probably due to a nonspecific inflammatory condition

Fig. 10.14
figure 14

[18F]FDG PET/CT in a patient with FUO: coronal sections (from left to right: CT, PET, fused PET/CT, MIP image) showing markedly increased [18F]FDG uptake in the bone marrow. Final diagnosis was myelodysplasia as the cause of fever

Clinical Cases

10.1.1 Case 10.1

10.1.1.1 Background

A 65-year-old man with fever, pain in the epigastric region, and jaundice. The CT scan of the abdomen showed a rather diffuse enlargement in size of the pancreas, without clear signs of focal lesion(s) (Fig. 10.15a). MRI confirmed the increase of pancreas size, but also visualized a focal lesion (about 3 cm in size) in the head of pancreas (Fig. 10.15b).

Fig. 10.15
figure 15

(a) Abdominal CT showing diffuse enlargement of pancreas, with a somewhat inhomogeneous parenchyma. (b) Abdominal MRI showing the increase of contrast enhancement of the head and body of pancreas. (c) Transaxial sections of [18F]FDG PET/CT (CT, upper left; PET, upper right; fused PET/CT, lower left; MIP image, lower right), showing diffuse, mildly increased tracer uptake in the whole pancreas. These findings are consistent with pancreatitis

Based on these findings, the patient was referred for [18F]FDG PET/CT for suspected pancreatic cancer. Contrary to expectation, the [18F]FDG PET/CT scan only showed diffuse, mildly increased uptake of the pancreas parenchyma (Fig. 10.15c). Based on this pattern, the hypothesis of pancreatic cancer was ruled out, as the findings were consistent with pancreatitis. The final diagnosis was autoimmune pancreatitis.

10.1.1.2 Suspected Site of Disease

Pancreas.

10.1.1.3 Radiopharmaceutical Activity

[18F]FDG, 270 MBq.

10.1.1.4 Imaging

[18F]FDG PET/CT acquired 60 min post injection, including CT scout view (120 kV, 10 mA), whole-body CT scan (140 kV, 80 mA), and PET (3 min/FOV). Images were reconstructed with and without attenuation correction using the low-dose transmission CT scan.

10.1.1.5 Conclusion/Teaching Point

[18F]FDG PET/CT ruled out the presence of neoplastic disease of pancreas and identified the origin of FUO and jaundice as autoimmune pancreatitis.

10.1.2 Case 10.2

(Nuclear Medicine Department, University “La Sapienza”, Rome, Italy

).

10.1.2.1 Background

A 31-year-old woman with autosomic dominant hyper-IgE syndrome (a rare form of congenital, non-X-linked severe immune deficiency) was referred for remittent FUO. Medical history included right nephrectomy at the age of 8 years because of abscess, as well as abdominal abscesses at multiple sites and recurrent bronchopneumonia; the patient was kept on chronic antibiotic therapy.

MRI of the upper (coronal T2-STIR images in Fig. 10.16a) showed multiple focal roundish lesions in the liver parenchyma with regular wall and inhomogeneous fluid content; numerous foci of lung parenchymal consolidation and bronchiectasis on the basal region of the right lung were also detected. These findings were consistent with the clinical suspicion of multiple abscess localizations.

Fig. 10.16
figure 16

(a) Coronal MR images in two different planes showing focal lesions in the upper portion of liver, associated with “honeycomb-type” changes in the anterior and basal regions of right lung; both changes are consistent with infection. (b) 99mTc-HMPAO-WBC scintigraphy (anterior and posterior planar whole-body views acquired at 3 h and 24 h) showing abnormal accumulation of labeled leukocytes at the base of right lung and upper liver, increasing over time and matching the MRI findings. The overall imaging results indicated the presence of multiple abscesses in right lung and liver

99mTc-HMPAO-WBC scintigraphy was performed to better characterize the focal lesions detected on MRI. The scan showed mild but increasing over time accumulation of labeled leukocytes in the antero-basal region of the right lung and in the upper region of the liver (Fig. 10.16b), matching the MRI findings and confirming the diagnosis of multiple abscess localizations in the liver and in the lower lobe of right lung.

10.1.2.2 Suspected Site of Infection

Lung and liver.

10.1.2.3 Radiopharmaceutical Activity

99mTc-HMPAO-WBC scintigraphy: acquisition of planar imaging at 1 h, 4 h, and 20 h.

10.1.2.4 Conclusion/Teaching Point

99mTc-HMPAO-WBC scintigraphy detected multiple sites of labeled leukocyte accumulation matching the MRI findings, therefore confirming the diagnosis of multiple abscess localizations in the liver and in the lower lobe of right lung.

10.1.3 Case 10.3

10.1.3.1 Background

A 56-year-old man with prior diagnosis of lung infection (but without certain etiology), undergoing long-lasting antibiotic treatment. Fever and coughing persisted despite antimicrobial therapy; moreover, lumbar back pain appeared.

The patient was referred for [18F]FDG PET/CT to evaluate the presence and extension of lung infection. The PET/CT scan showed diffuse, increased [18F]FDG uptake in pulmonary parenchyma, bilaterally (Fig. 10.17). PET images showed, furthermore, increased [18F]FDG uptake in the lumbar spine, corresponding to L4–L5. The findings were consistent with the persistence of lung infection and appearance of infection in the lumbar spine. A subsequent MRI scan confirmed lumbar L4–L5 spondylodiscitis. Change in the antibiotic treatment plan resulted in rapid improvement of the patient’s clinical conditions.

Fig. 10.17
figure 17

[18F]FDG PET/CT: the transaxial sections (CT, upper left; PET, upper right; fused PET/CT, lower left; MIP image, lower right) show markedly increased [18F]FDG uptake in both lungs (upper and middle lobes of right lung, upper lobe of left lung) associated with irregularly shaped consolidation areas detected in the low dose CT scan. Increased [18F]FDG uptake was also noted in the lumbar spine (see MIP image; tomographic images not shown here). These findings, obtained after prolonged antibiotic therapy, classified the patient as “no responder” to the antibiotic regimen employed and led to change the antimicrobial agent

10.1.3.2 Suspected Site of Infection

Lungs.

10.1.3.3 Radiopharmaceutical Activity

[18F]FDG, 184 MBq.

10.1.3.4 Imaging

[18F]FDG PET/CT acquired 60 min post injection, including CT scout view (120 kV, 10 mA), whole-body CT scan (140 kV, 80 mA), and PET (3 min/FOV). Images were reconstructed with and without attenuation correction using the low-dose transmission CT scan.

10.1.3.5 Conclusion/Teaching Point

The [18F]FDG PET/CT findings confirmed the persistence of pulmonary infection with appearance of septic embolism in the spine. Based on these findings, the patient was classified as “non-responder” to antibiotic treatment; subsequent change of the antimicrobial agent resulted in improved clinical status.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lazzeri, E., Zanca, R., Sollini, M. (2021). Nuclear Medicine Imaging of Fever of Unknown Origin. In: Lazzeri, E., et al. Radionuclide Imaging of Infection and Inflammation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62175-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62175-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62174-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62175-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics