Skip to main content

Administration of Water Resources Management: Key Facts About Water Resources in Poland

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Management of Water Resources in Poland

Part of the book series: Springer Water ((SPWA))

  • 222 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter reviews and evaluates institutional solutions related to water management. It indicates which institutions have been responsible for water management in Poland in the last dozen or so years and what institutional changes have been introduced since 2018. The study identifies the main problems that over recent years have resulted from water management by various institutions responsible for key issues regarding water quantity and quality. The main problems related to proper water management in Poland include lack of uniform interpretation of water law, lack of a coherent information system, and access to information by both water management employees and water users. In order to deal with these problems, first of all, there should be conducted a series of training for both employees and stakeholders regarding a uniform interpretation of water law. A full assessment of the water management reform implementation in Poland and of all the changes introduced after 2018 will be possible in about 2 or 3 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dieperink C, Raadgever GT, Driessen PPJ, Smit AAH, van Rijswick HFM (2012) Ecological ambitions and complications in the regional implementation of the Water Framework Directive in the Netherlands. Water Policy 14:160–173. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2011.223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Carrozza Ch (2011) Italian water services reform from 1994 to 2008: decisional rounds and local modes of governance. Water Policy 13(6):751–768. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2011.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sánchez-Martínez MT, Salas-Velasco M, Rodríguez-Ferrero N (2012) Who manages Spain’s water resources? The political and administrative division of water management. Int J Water Resour Dev 28(1):27–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2012.640610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bielsa J, Cazcarro I (2015) Implementing integrated water resources management in the Ebro River Basin: from theory to facts. Sustainability 7:441–464. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7010441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Metz F, Glaus A (2019) Article integrated water resources management and policy integration: lessons from 169 years of flood policies in Switzerland. Water 11:1173. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11061173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dombrowsky I, Hagemann N, Houdret A (2014) The river basin as a new scale for water governance in transition countries? A comparative study of Mongolia and Ukraine. Environ Earth Sci 72(12):4705–4726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3308-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yara O, Uliutina O, Golovko L, Andrushchenko L (2018) The EU Water Framework Directive: challenges and prospects for implementation in Ukraine. Eur J Sustain Dev 7(2):175–182. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n2p175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Biswas S, Vacik H, Swanson ME, Sirajul Haque SM (2012) Evaluating integrated watershed management using multiple criteria analysis—a case study at Chittagong Hill Tracts in Bangladesh. Environ Monit Assess 184:2741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2148-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Frey K, Ramirez DRC (2018) Multi-level network governance of disaster risks: the case of the Metropolitan Region of the Aburra Valley (Medellin, Colombia). J Environ Plann Manag. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.2063.2017

  10. Zhou W, Mu R (2019) Exploring coordinative mechanisms for environmental governance in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: an ecology of games framework. Sustainability 11:3119. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shomar B, Darwish M, Rowell C (2014) What does integrated water resources management from local to global perspective mean? Qatar as a case study, the very rich country with no water. Water Resour Manage 28:2781–2791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0636-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shahraki AS, Shahraki J, Monfared SA (2019) An integrated water resources management considering agricultural demands and the assessment of different scenarios in Hirmand Catchment, Iran. Water Resour 46(308). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807819020143

  13. De Loë R (2008) Invited commentary: Canada needs a national water strategy. Can Water Resour J 33(4):309–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hurlbert M, Andrews E (2018) Deliberative democracy in Canadian watershed governance. Water Altern 11(1):163–186

    Google Scholar 

  15. Araral E, Wang Y (2013) Water Governance 2.0. A review and second generation research agenda. Water Resour Manag 27(11):3945–3957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0389-x

  16. Danilov-Danilyan VI, Demin AP, Pryazhinskaya VG, Pokidysheva IV (2015a) Markets of water and water management services in the world and the Russian Federation: Part I. Water Resour 42(2):260–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Danilov-Danilyan VI, Demin AP, Pryazhinskaya VG, Pokidysheva IV (2015b) Markets of water and water management services in the world and the Russian Federation: Part II. Water Resour 42(3):378–388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Huntjens P, Pahl-Wostl C, Grin J (2010) Climate change adaptation in European river basins. Reg Environ Changes 10:263–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-009-0108-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Grecksch K (2013) Adaptive capacity and regional water governance in north-western Germany. Water Policy 15(5):794–815. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2013.124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bozzola M, Swanson T (2014) Policy implications of climate variability on agriculture: water management in the Po river basin, Italy. Environ Sci Policy 43:26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Priscoli JD (2004) What is public participation in water resources management and why it is important? International Water Resources Association. Water Int 29(2):2–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bruch C, Jansky L, Nakayama M, Salewicz KA (eds) (2005) Public participation in the governance of international freshwater resources. Unites Nations University Press, Tokyo-New York-Paris

    Google Scholar 

  23. Drenovak-Ivanovic M (2015) The development of the right to public participation in environmental matters as a new concept of administrative decision making in Serbia. Transylvanian Rev Adm Sci 44E(2015):74–90

    Google Scholar 

  24. Warner JF (2006) More sustainable participation? Multi-stakeholder platforms for integrated catchment management. Water Resour Dev 22(1):15–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900620500404992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Watson N (2015) Factors influencing the frames and approaches of host organizations for collaborative catchment management in England. Soc Nat Resour Int J 28(4):360–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.945059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Biswas AK (2008) Integrated water resources management: Is it working? Int J Water Resour Dev 24:5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900620701871718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Global Water Partnership. Effective water governance. Stockholm, Sweden (2002). https://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/4995/TEC+7.pdf?sequence=1

  28. Blomquist W, Schlager E (2005) Political pitfalls of integrated watershed management. Soc Nat Resour 18:101–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920590894435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gallego-Ayala J (2013) Trends in integrated water resources management research: a literature review. Water Policy 15:628–647. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2013.149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Suhardiman D, Clement F, Bharati L (2015) Integrated water resources management in Nepal: key stakeholders’ perceptions and lessons learned. Int J Water Resour Dev 31:284–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2015.1020999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Armitage D, de Loë R, Plummer R (2012) Environmental governance and its implications for conservation practice. Conserv Lett 5:245–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00238.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Becker G, Huitema D, Aerts JCJH (2015) Prescriptions for adaptive comanagement: the case of flood management in the German Rhine basin. Ecol Soc 20(3). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07562-200301

  34. Miłaszewski R (ed) Zintegrowane systemy zarządzania w gospodarce wodnej. Rozprawy Naukowe, 69, Politechnika Białostocka, Białystok (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gromiec M (2011) Projekt polityki państwa a diagnoza stanu gospodarki wodnej. Rocznik Ochrony Środowiska 13:283–301

    Google Scholar 

  36. Iwanicki J, Kindler J, Kundzewicz ZW (2014) Zagrożenia związane z wodą. Nauka 1/2014:63–76. https://www.pan.poznan.pl/nauki/N_114_06_Iwanicki.pdf

  37. Kindler J, Iwanicki J, Kundzewicz ZW, Matczak P, Miłaszewski R, Żelazo J (2014) Institutional hazards. Nauka, 1/2014:173–195. https://www.portalwiedzy.pan.pl/images/2014/nauka_20141/N114-11-Kindler.pdf

  38. Kubiak-Wójcicka K (2019) Long-term variability of runoff of Vistula river in 1951–2015. In: Air and water—components of the environment” conference proceedings, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, pp 109–120. https://doi.org/10.24193/AWC2019_11

  39. Environment. Central Statistical Office, Warsaw (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Główny Urząd Statystyczny (GUS). https://stat.gov.pl/

  41. Kubiak-Wójcicka K, Marszelewski M (2012) Definitions and evolutions of the terms “flowing and stagnant waters” in the context of the proprietorship of the lakes in Poland. Limnol Rev 12:189–195. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10194-012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Projekt polityki wodnej państwa do roku 2010 (z uwzględnieniem etapu 2016) (2010) Krajowy Zarząd Gospodarki Wodnej. https://gwppl.org/data/uploads/warsztaty-konsultacje/dokumenty_krajowe/Projekt_Polityki_wodnej_panstwa_do_roku_2030_z_uwzglednieniem_etapu_2016.pdf

  43. https://www.kzgw.gov.pl/index.php/pl/jednostki-organizacyjne/mapa-obszarow-dzialania

  44. Ayre M, Nettle R (2015) Doing integration in catchment management research: insights into a dynamic learning process. Environ Sci Policy 47:18–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ćosić Flajsig G, Belaj M, Carleuša B (2017) Combined approach to surface water management. Gradevinar 69(8) 617–631. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.2063.2017

  46. Fan L, Wang H, Lai W, Wang Ch (2015) Administration of water resources in Beijing: problems and countermeasures. Water Policy 17:563–580. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2014.407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Thiel A (2015) Constitutional state structure and scalar re-organization of natural resource governance: the transformation of polycentric water governance in Spain, Portugal and Germany. Land Use Policy 45:176–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Bakker K, Cook C (2011) Water governance in Canada: innovation in the context of fragmentation. Int J Water Resour Dev 27:275–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kampa E, Kranz N, Hansen W (2003) Public participation in River Basin management in Germany: from borders to natural boundaries. Report of Workpackage 4 of the Harmoni COP Project. Ecologic, Institute for International and European Environmental Policy, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  50. Albrecht J (2013) The Europeanization of water law by the Water Framework Directive: a second chance for water planning in Germany. Land Use Policy 30:381–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.04.009

  51. Voulvoulis N, Arpon KD, Giakoumis T (2017) The EU Water Framework Directive: from great expectations to problems with implementation. Sci Total Environ 575:358–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Keskitalo ECH (2015) Actors’ perceptions of issues in the implementation of the first round of the Water Framework Directive: examples from the water management and forestry sectors in Southern Sweden. Water 7:2202–2213. https://doi.org/10.3390/w7052202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Benson D, Lorenzoni I (2016) Climate change adaptation, flood risks and policy coherence in integrated water resources management in England. Reg Environ Changes. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-0959-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. van den Brink M, Meijerink S (2006) Implementing policy innovations. Resource dependence, struggle for discursive hegemony and institutional inertia in the Dutch river policy domain. Working Paper Series. https://hdl.handle.net/2066/45540

  55. McDonnell RA (2008) Challenges for integrated water resources management: how do we provide the knowledge to support truly integrated thinking? Int J Water Resour Dev 24:131–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900620701723240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Mees H, Suykens C, Crabé A (2017) Evaluating conditions for Integrated Water Resource Management at sub-basin scale. A comparison of the Flemish sub-basin boards and Walloon river contracts. Environ Policy Gov 27:59–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Franzen F, Hammer M, Balfors B (2015) Institutional development for stakeholder participation in local water management—an analysis of two Swedish catchments. Land Use Policy 43:217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Stiller S, Meijerink S (2016) Leadership within regional climate change adaptation networks: the case of climate adaptation officers in Northern Hesse, Germany. Reg Environ Changes 16:1543–1555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0886-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katarzyna Kubiak-Wójcicka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kubiak-Wójcicka, K. (2021). Administration of Water Resources Management: Key Facts About Water Resources in Poland. In: Zeleňáková, M., Kubiak-Wójcicka, K., Negm, A.M. (eds) Management of Water Resources in Poland . Springer Water. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61965-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics