Skip to main content

Part of the book series: EcoProduction ((ECOPROD))

  • 1392 Accesses

Abstract

The base of knowledge related to supply chain (SC) research is dynamically expanding. The growing trend of publishing scientific papers on the subject is observable, which indicates that the supply chain concept is in the centre of attention of scientists and researchers. It can be assumed that the tendency will continue. This proves the expansive nature of research in the analysed area. The goal of the chapter to present the classify trends and development directions of supply chains. The goal is of cognitive and conceptual character and the research implemented benefits from text mining method. Research is necessary from academic perspective, not only to organize the knowledge but also to identify future research potential. To achieve the research goal, an original methodology was designed by selecting research methods and tools to answer comprehensively to the research questions. The importance of research results for the development of supply chain, management and quality science is indisputable. Research to be conducted strives to prove that heterogeneity, multi-facetedness and multi-directionality of research on supply chain is a difficult but definable phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdi A, Abdi A, Akbarpour N (2020) Innovative approaches to design and address green supply chain network with simultaneous pick-up and split deliver. J Cleaner Prod 250, In Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballouki I, Douimi M, Ouzizi L (2017) Decision support tool for supply chain configuration considering new product re-design: an agent-based approach. J Adv Manuf Syst 16(4):291–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltacioglu T, Baltacioglu A, Kaplan E, Kaplan D, Oznur M, Oznur Y, Kaplan Y (2007) A new framework for service supply chains. Serv Indust J 27:105–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beamon BM (1999) Designing the green supply chain. Logist Inform Manag 12(4):332–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatnagar K (2012) Customer-oriented global supply chains: concepts for effective management. Hershey, Pennsylvania, Information Science Reference

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourlakis W (2004) Food supply chains management. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Buła P, Ziębicki B (2011) Organizational flexibility as a challenge of contemporary management. Determinants and methods of measurement. Acta Commercii 11:171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Duan L, Zhang W (2020) Effect of user involvement in supply chain cloud innovation: a game theoretical model and analysis. J Global Inform Manag 28(1):23–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colicchia C, Strozzi F (2012) Supply Chain risk management: a new methodology for a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Manage: Int J 17(4):403–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousins PD, Lawson B, Petersen KJ (2019) Investigating green supply chain management practices and performance The moderating roles of supply chain ecocentricity and traceability. Int J Oper Product Manag 39(5):767–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cozzolino A, Rossi S, Conforti A (2012) Agile and lean principles in the humanitarian supply chain: the case of the united nations world food programme. J Humanitarian Logist Supply Chain Manag 2(1):16–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis DF, Davis-Sramek B, Golicic SL (2019) Constrained choice in supply chain relationships: the effects of regulatory institutions. Int J Logist Manag 30(4):1101–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durach CF, Machuca JAD (2018) A matter of perspective—the role of interpersonal relationships in supply chain risk management. Int J Oper Product Manag 38(10):1866–1887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (2002) Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ergun O, Karakus G, Keskinocak P, Swann J, Villarreal M (2009) Humanitarian supply chain management – an overview. Models Algorithms Optim Logistics

    Google Scholar 

  • Frei R, Jack L, Krzyzaniak S (2020) Sustainable reverse supply chains and circular economy in multichannel retail returns, Business Strategy and the Environment, In Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Green K, Morton B, New S (1998) Green purchasing and supply policies: do they improve companies’ environmental performance? Supply Chain Manag: Int J 3(2):89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green BN, Johnson CD, Adams A (2006) Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. J Chiropractic Med 5(3):101–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Green KW Jr, Zelbst PJ, Meacham J, Bhadauria VS (2012) Green supply chain management practices: impact on performance. Supply Chain Manag: Int J 17(3):290–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grzybowska K (2012) Supply chain sustainability—analysing the enablers. In: Golinska P, Romano CA (Eds), environmental issues in supply chain management—new trends and applications, Springer, 25–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Grzybowska K, Hoffa P (2015) Approving with application of an electronic bulletin board, as a mechanism of coordination of actions in complex systems. In: Omatu S, Malluhi QM, Rodríguez Gonzalez S, Bocewicz G, Bucciarelli E, Giulioni G, Iqba F (Eds.), Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence, 12th International Conference Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 373, 357–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Grzybowska K, Hoffa-Dąbrowska P (2017) Analysis of the survival of complex systems with an actions coordination mechanism, In: Bajo J et al (eds) Highlights of Practical Applications of Cyber-Physical Multi-Agent Systems. Communications in Computer and Information Science, Springer International Publishing, 722, 197–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Guide VDR, Jayaraman V, Linton JD (2003) Building contingency planning for closed-loop supply chains with product recovery. J Oper Manag 21:259–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffa-Dąbrowska P, Grzybowska K, JPE, de Souza (2020) Sustainable Supply Chain: a content analysis based on published case studies, in press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández JE, Lyons AC, Poler R, Mula J, Goncalves R (2014) A reference architecture for the collaborative planning modelling process in multi-tier Supply Chain networks: a Zachman-based approach. Product Plann Control 25(13–14):1118–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini-Motlagh S, Ebrahimi S, Zirakpourdehkordi R (2020) Coordination of dual-function acquisition price and corporate social responsibility in a sustainable closed-loop supply chain. J Cleaner Product 251, In Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hult GTM (2003) An integration of thoughts on knowledge management. Decis Sci 34(2):189

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia F, Zhang T, Chen L (2020) Sustainable supply chain Finance: Towards a research agenda. J Cleaner Product 243, In Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur R, Awasthi A, Grzybowska K (2020) Evaluation of key skills supporting industry 4.0—a review of literature and practice. In Grzybowska K, Awasthi A, Sawhney R (eds), Sustainable logistics and production in industry 4.0, EcoProduction (Environmental Issues in Logistics and Manufacturing). Springer, Cham, 19–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Konecka S, Łupicka A, Grzybowska K (2018) Disruptions in supply chains with special reference to road transport processes. Innovation Management and Education Excellence Through Vision 2020, I–XI, 3841–3849

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A (1992) Supply contracts and manufacturing decisions. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, Graduate School of Industrial Administration, p 15213

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson B, Potter A, Pil FK (2019) Supply chain disruptions: the influence of industry and geography on firm reaction speed. Int J Oper Product Manag 39(9/10):1076–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lejarza F, Baldea M (2019) Closed-loop optimal operational planning of supply chains with fast product quality dynamics. Comput Chem Eng 132, In Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lv Q (2017) Supply Chain coordination game model based on inventory information sharing. J Interdisciplinary Math 20(1):35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mardani A, Kannan D, Hooker RE (2020) Evaluation of green and sustainable supply chain management using structural equation modelling: a systematic review of the state of the art literature and recommendations for future research. J Cleaner Product 249, In Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mentzer JT, DeWitt W, Keebler JS, Min S, Nix NW, Smith CD, Zacharia ZG (2001) Defining supply chain management. J Busin Logist 22(2):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Min J, Zhou YW, Zhao J (2010) An inventory model for deteriorating items under stock-dependent demand and two-level trade credit. Appl Math Model 34(11):3273–3285

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney A (2006) Supply chain network economics: dynamics of prices, flows and profits. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Novais L, Maqueira JM, Ortiz-Bas A (2019) A systematic literature review of cloud computing use in supply chain integration. Comput Ind Eng 129:296–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Piya S, Shamsuzzoha A, Khadem M (2020) An approach for analysing supply chain complexity drivers through interpretive structural modelling. Int J Logistics Res Appl 23(4):311–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers DS, Tibben-Lembke R (2001) An examination of reverse logistics practices. J Bus Logistics 22(2):129–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyerr E, Harrison C (2020) Developing resilient supply chains: lessons from high-reliability organisations. Supply Chain Manage: Int J 25(1):77–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahin A (2010) SSCM: service supply chain management. Int J Logistics Syst Manage 6(1):60–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamsi J, Urban AS, Imran M, Trizio LD, Manna L (2019) Metal halide perovskite nanocrystals: synthesis, post-synthesis modifications, and their optical properties. Chem Rev 119:3296

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock JR (1992) Reverse logistics, Oak Brook, IL: Council of Logistics Management

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock JR (1998) Development and implementation of reverse logistics programs. In: annual conference proceedings, Oak Brook, IL: Council of Logistics Management, 579–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Strozzi F, Colicchia C, Creazza A, Noè C (2017) Literature review on the “Smart Factory” concept using bibliometric tools. Int J Prod Res 55(22):6572–6591

    Google Scholar 

  • Surana A, Kumara S, Greaves M, Raghavan UN (2005) Supply-chain networks: a complex adaptive systems perspective. Int J Prod Res 43:20:4235–4265

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirkolaee EB, Mardani A, Dashtian Z, Soltani M, Weber GW (2020) A novel hybrid method using fuzzy decision making and multi-objective programming for sustainable-reliable supplier selection in two-echelon supply chain design. J Clean Prod 250:119517

    Google Scholar 

  • von Falkenhausen, Fleischmann M, Bode C (2019) How to find the right supply chain strategy? An analysis of contingency variables. Decis Sci 504:726–755

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu S, Zhang X, Feng L, Yang W (2020) Disruption risks in supply chain management: a literature review based on bibliometric analysis. Int J Prod Res https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1717011

  • Zhan Y, Tan KH (2020) An analytic infrastructure for harvesting big data to enhance supply chain performance. Eur J Operat Res

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Zhang M (2020) Mitigation of bullwhip effect in closed-loop supply chain based on fuzzy robust control approach. Complexity, 1085870

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q, Sarkis J (2004) Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. J Oper Manage 22:265–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimon D, Tyan J, Sroufe R (2019) Implementing sustainable supply chain management: reactive, cooperative, and dynamic models. Sustain 11:7227

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Support for this research has been provided by 0812-SBAD-4170.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katarzyna Grzybowska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Grzybowska, K., Stachowiak, A. (2020). Classification of Trends and Supply Chains Development Directions. In: Golinska-Dawson, P., Tsai, KM., Kosacka-Olejnik, M. (eds) Smart and Sustainable Supply Chain and Logistics – Trends, Challenges, Methods and Best Practices. EcoProduction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61947-3_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics