Abstract
Humans tend to seek out pleasant social relationships, to build kinship and to establish a sense of belonging to a social group. Sociability, as a quality, is based on the need of people to affiliate and interact with others. As suggested by a vast body of literature, fulfilling the requirements of sociability is one of the key functions of the public realm. This study builds upon research into the design of public spaces by addressing the tangible parameters of Sociability. A multi-faceted concept, Sociability is a result of a combination of factors, tangible and intangible, that brings the community together by creating spaces we move through and linger within. Sociable public spaces play host to a variety of related activities that encourages people to come together and interact, irrespective of age, ethnicity, cultural or economic disparity; thus, resonating with one of the three pillars of sustainable development, Social Sustainability. The pillar that holds the community together, Social Sustainability has associations with wide-ranging, multi-dimensional concepts, tied together by the common thread of social network. While there is a wide array of research attempting to clearly define Social Sustainability, investigations into tangible urban design parameters that would aid in realizing the aspects of Social Sustainability are still in its nascent stages. This paper draws parallels between the tangible parameters of Sociability of the public realm and the sub-themes of Social Sustainability, hence establishing that achieving Sociability takes us one step closer towards enabling Social Sustainability.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bramley G, Dempsey N et al (2009) Social sustainability and urban form: evidence from five British cities. Environ Planning 41(9):2125–2142
Chan EL (2008) Critical factors for improving social sustainability of urban renewal projects. Social Indicators Res 243–256
Characteristics and Guidelines of Great Public Spaces (2017) Retrieved from American Planning Association: https://www.planning.org/greatplaces/spaces/characteristics.htm
Chiu R (2003) Social sustainability, sustainable development and housing development: the experience of Hong Kong. In: Forrest R, Lee J (eds) Housing and social change: east-west perspectives. Routledge, London
Fergas J (2000) Psychology of social interaction: interpersonal behavior
Gehl J (2011) Life between buildings. Island Press, Washington DC
Habitat, U. Public Spaces and Sustainable Urban Development
Hernandez NE (1986) Sociability and outdoor urban open spaces. KansasStae University thesis
Hodgson N (2005). Social sustainability assessment framework. WACOSS.
Huffman R (n.d.) The value of urban open space. Urban Land
Lang J (1994) Urban design: American experience. Van nostrand Reinhold
Lofland LH (1998) The public realm: exploring the city’s quintessential social territory. Aldine de Gruyter, New York
Lennard SH (1995) The public realm and the good city. Retrieved January 2017, from Making Cities Livable LLC: https://www.livablecities.org
Marcus CC, Francis C (1997) People places: design guidelines for urban open space. Wiley, London
Martinez-Mendoza R (2001) Analyzing urban spaces: a comparative study of sociability in two plazas in Santiago De Queretaro City, Mexico. Texas Tech University
Masoud M, Rastbin S (2011) Evaluation of social capital, considering sociability and walkability in urban fabrics: the case of Isfahan City. Asian Social Science, Iran
McKenzie S (2004) Social sustainability: towards some definitions. Hawke Research Institute working paper series
Mehta V (2013) The streets: The Quintessential Social Public Space
Mehta V (2014) Evaluating public space. J Urban Design 53–88
Nicola Dempsey GB (2009) The social dimension of sustainable development: defining urban social sustainability. Wiley InterScience
Polese M, Stren R. (2000) The social sustainability of cities: diversity and the management of change. University of Toronto Press
Pongsmas N (2004) Configuration of public space and social sustainability of urban neighbourhood: a case study of the city of San Diego at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Ph.D. thesis, Texas Tech University
PPS (n.d.) Great public spaces. Retrieved January 2017, from Project for Public Spaces: https://www.pps.org/
Sathish A, Pujara T (2018) Understanding the public realm & qualities of successful urban public spaces. In: Public realm as a tool for urban social sustainability. Unpublished Post-Graduatethesis, IIT Roorkee, pp 23–28
Sennett R (2013) The public realm. In: Watson GB (ed) The Blackwell city reader. Wiley
Simmel G (1949) The sociology of sociability. Am J Sociol 254–261
Sociability (n.d.) Retrieved Mar 2017, from Psychology wiki: https://psychology.wikia.com
Talen E, Ellis C (2002). Beyond relativism: reclaiming the search for good city form. J Planning Educ Res 36–49
Talebi J (2005) Social relations in urban space. Lett Social Sci 161–180
Tsouroufor HB (2000) Healthy urban planning: a WHO guide to planning for people. World Health Organization, Regional Office
Whyte WH (1980) The social life of small urban spaces. PPS, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sathish, A., Pujara, T. (2021). Sociability—A Precursor to Social Sustainability. In: Iyer-Raniga, U. (eds) Sustainability in the Built Environment in the 21st Century: Lessons Learned from India and the Region. SDRAP 2019. Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61891-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61891-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61890-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61891-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)