Abstract
The problem of consciousness is one of the first that most intimately concerns man, though it was the last to be approached by science. It is possible that the mystery of consciousness is that in order to be explained, it is necessary to face very diverse and complex issues. It is the purpose of this chapter to review the main problems that hinder the study of consciousness, the approaches from which the various disciplines have approached it, and the most radical and groundbreaking solutions that have been found. For this, a journey is carried out through three fundamental difficulties: the problem of reality, the problem of dualism, and the problem of the subjective quality of experience, as radical solutions to each of these problems are the conscious realism of Donald Hoffman, the model of the objective orchestrated reduction of Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff, the principle of synchronicity of Carl G. Jung, the new consciousness-collapse of the wave function model of David Chalmers, and the neurophenomenology of Francisco Varela. We conclude by highlighting the intrinsic difficulty in objectifying the phenomenon of consciousness, the state of immature science reflected in the apparent antagonism of theoretical proposals, and, finally, that the progressive integration and complementarity between some theoretical approaches could yield results in a promising paradigm shift which would allow further progress in clarifying the ontological and epistemological foundations of consciousness.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See however [9].
References
Dennett D. Contenido y conciencia. Barcelona: Gedisa; 1996. p. 55.
Crick F. La búsqueda científica del alma: una revolucionaria hipótesis para el siglo XXI. Madrid: Debate; 1994. p. XI.
Llinás R. El cerebro y el mito del yo. El papel de las neuronas en el pensamiento y el comportamiento humano. Barcelona: Belacqua; 2003. p. 131.
McGinn C. The mysterious flame: conscious minds in a material world. New York: Oxford Books; 1999.
Chalmers D. How can we construct a science of consciousness? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013;1303:25–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12166.
Turing A. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind. 1950;59(236):433–60.
Arana J. La conciencia inexplicada. Ensayo sobre los límites de la comprensión naturalista de la mente. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva; 2015. p. 151.
Wittgenstein L. Investigaciones filosóficas. Barcelona: Crítica; 2008. p. 245.
Cowey A, Stoerig P. Blindsight in monkeys. Nature. 1995;373:247–9.
Chalmers D. The conscious mind: in search of a fundamental theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996.
Searle J. El misterio de la conciencia. Paidós: Barcelona; 2000.
Dietrich A. Introduction to consciousness. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2007. p. 1–61.
Searle J. The rediscovery of the mind. Massachusetts: MIT Press; 1992. p. 127–31.
James W. The principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt & Co; 1890. p. 224–5.
Aznar-Casanova J. La consciencia: la interfaz polinómica de la subjetividad. Madrid: Pirámide; 2017. p. 291.
Simons D, Chabris CF. Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception. 1999;28(9):1059–74.
Ramachandran V. Lo que el cerebro nos dice: los misterios de la mente humana al descubierto. Barcelona: Paidós; 2012. p. 62–80.
Churchland PM. Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes. J Philos. 1981;LXXVIII:67–90.
La Mettrie JO. Histoire naturelle de l'ame. Oxford: aux dépends de l'auteur; 1747.
Berkeley G. Principios del conocimiento humano. Madrid: Aguilar; 1980.
Bergson H. La evolución creadora. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe; 1973.
Varela F. De cuerpo presente: las licencias cognitivas y la experiencia humana. Gedisa: Barcelona; 1992.
Hameroff S, Penrose R. Consciousness in the universe. A review of the ‘Orch OR’ theory. Phys Life Rev. 2014;11(1):39–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2013.08.002.
Hameroff S. Quantum computation in brain microtubules? The Penrose-Hameroff ‘Orch OR’ model of consciousness. Phil Trans R Soc Lond A. 1998;356:1869–96.
Penrose R. Shadows of the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1994. p. 367.
Kodukula SP. New hypothesis on consciousness-brain as quantum processor-synchronization of quantum mechanics and relativity. Int J Theor Phys. 2019;7(2):31–43.
Hoffman D, Prakash C. Objects of consciousness. Front Psychol. 2014;577(5):1–22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00577.
Hoffman D. The interface theory of perception: natural selection drives true perception to swift extinction. In: Tarr M, Leonardis A, Schiele B, editors. Object categorization: computer and human vision perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. p. 48–165.
Descartes R. Meditaciones metafísicas. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe; 1990.
Ryle G. The concept of mind. Hutchison: Londres; 1949.
Penfield W. El misterio de la mente. Estudio crítico de la consciencia y del cerebro humano. Madrid: Pirámide; 1977. p. 123.
Eccles J. A unitary hypothesis of mind-brain interactions in the cerebral cortex. Proc R Soc Lond B. 1990;240:433–51.
Humphrey N. How to solve the mind-body problem. J Conscious Stud. 2000;7(4):5–20.
Broad CD. The mind and its place in nature. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1925. p. 61.
Martínez PC. What is understood by “neural correlate” in mind-brain relations. In: Gargiulo PA, Mesones-Arroyo HL, editors. Psychiatry and Neuroscience Update update: from translational research to a humanistic approach, vol. 3. Switzerland: Springer; 2019. p. 73–81.
Chalmers D. What is a neural correlate of consciousness? In: Metzinger T, editor. Neural correlates of consciousness. Massachusetts: MIT Press; 2000. p. 17–40.
Miller G. What is the biological basis of consciousness? Science. 2005;309:79.
Binder MD. Correlation. In: Binder MD, Hirokawa N, Windhorst U, editors. Encyclopedia of neuroscience. Berlin: Springer; 2009. p. 890.
Racionero L. Oriente y Occidente. Barcelona: Anagrama; 1993. p. 64.
Leibniz GW. Monadología. Madrid: Alhambra; 1986.
Jung CG. La interpretación de la naturaleza y la psique. Barcelona: Paidós; 2003. p. 35.
Dennett D, Kinsbourne M. Time and the observer: the where and when of consciousness in the brain. Behav Brain Sci. 1992;15:183–247.
Pöppel E. Lost in time: a historical frame, elementary processing units and the 3-second window. Acta Neurobiol Exp. 2004;64:295–301.
Gray C, Singer W. Stimulus-specific neuronal oscillations in orientation columns of cat visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:1698–702.
Chalmers D. Facing up to the problem of consciousness. J Conscious Stud. 1995a;2(3):200–19.
Chalmers D, McQueen K. Consciousness and the collapse of the wave function. A lecture given by David Chalmers at Göttingen University: Göttingen; 2014.
Tononi G, Koch C. Consciousness: here, there and everywhere? Phil Trans R Soc B. 2015;370:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0167.
Rorty R. Contemporary philosophy of mind. Synthese. 1982;53:323–48.
Levine J. Materialism and qualia: the explanatory gap. Pac Philos Q. 1983;64(4):354–61.
Pinker S. How the mind works. New York: W.W. Norton & Co; 1997. p. 546.
Dennett D. Consciousness explained. Boston: MIT Press; 1991.
Flanagan O. Consciousness reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1992.
Jackendoff R. Consciousness and the computational mind. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1987.
Goswami A. Creative evolution: a physicist resolution between Darwin and intelligent design. Wheaton: Quest Books; 2008.
Husserl E. Investigaciones lógicas. Madrid: Alianza Editorial; 1985.
Nagel T. What is it like to be a bat? Philos Rev. 1974;83(4):435–50.
Varela F. Neurophenomenology: a methodological approach remedy for the hard problem. J Conscious Stud. 1996;3(4):330–49.
Revonsuo A. Consciousness, dreams and virtual realities. Philos Psychol. 1995;8:35–58.
Van Loon A, Bailenson J, Zaki J, Bostick J, Willer R. Virtual reality perspective-taking increases cognitive empathy for specific others. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202442.
Glattfelder JB. Subjective consciousness: what am I? In: Glattfelder JB, editor. Information – consciousness – reality: how a new understanding of the universe can help answer age-old questions of existence. Switzerland: Springer; 2019. p. 395–449.
Pastor-Gómez J. Mecánica cuántica y cerebro: una revisión crítica. Rev Neurol. 2002;35(1):87–94.
Davidson D. Ensayos sobre acciones y sucesos. Barcelona: Crítica; 1995. p. 265.
Edelman G, Tononi G. Reentry and the dynamic core: neural correlates of conscious experience In: Metzinger T, editor. Neural correlates of consciousness. Massachusetts: MIT Press; 2000. pp. 139–52.
Goñi-Sáez F, Tirapu-Ustárroz J. El problema mente-cerebro (I): fundamentos ontoepistemológicos. Rev Neurol. 2016;63(3):130–9.
García-Castro J. Nuevas teorías sobre la consciencia. eNeurobiologia. 2019;10(24):1–12. doi:www.uv.mx/eneurobiologia/vols/2019/24/24.html.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
García Castro, J.A. (2021). Radical Solutions to the Ontological and Epistemological Problems of Consciousness. In: Gargiulo, P.Á., Mesones Arroyo, H.L. (eds) Psychiatry and Neuroscience Update. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61721-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61721-9_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61720-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61721-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)