Abstract
University–industry collaborations (UICs) play an important role in open innovation that can lead to the development of new products, processes, and services for society. Industries participate in UICs to expand their knowledge base, share risks on long-term problems, enhance their design thinking skills, and extend their ability to conduct experiments. Universities are attracted to UICs to secure more funding for research, field-test emerging laboratory science, and enhance research-led teaching. UICs are increasingly being supported by government funding agencies whose societal aims include enhancing employment, improving workforce skills, and expanding industrial growth. There are many challenges facing UICs that arise primarily from bringing together different organization cultures with diverse and often competing expectations. Major UIC programs that involve a large number of R&D projects bring additional challenges, including the definition of strategic program goals and the need for experience and management skills necessary for a large, temporary, multicultural organization. Many of these challenges have been studied within a major UIC program based in Portugal. The collaboration, presented as a case study in this chapter, involved an investment of €74m over 6 years and comprised 44 individual R&D projects with over 500 researchers. The research discussed in this chapter presents several outcomes from the case study and shares many of the lessons learned and practices that can be adopted in future UIC programs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ankrah A, Al-Tabbaa O (2015) Universities–industry collaboration: a systematic review. Scand J Manag 31(3):387–408
Artto K, Martinsuo M, Gemünden HG, Murtoaro J (2009) Foundations of program management: a bibliometric view. Int J Proj Manag 27(1):1–18
Artto K, Kulvik I, Poskela J, Turkulainen V (2011) The integrative role of the project management office in the front end of innovation. Int J Proj Manag 29(4):408–421
Axelos (2011) Managing successful programmes. Axelos Global Best Practice, London
Badewi A (2016) The impact of project management (PM) and benefits management (BM) practices on project success: towards developing a project benefits governance framework. Int J Proj Manag 34(4):761–778
Barnes TA, Pashby IR, Gibbons AM (2006) Managing collaborative R&D projects development of a practical management tool. Int J Proj Manag 24(5):395–404
Bruneel J, D’Este P, Salter A (2010) Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Res Policy 39(7):858–868
Chawla DS (2018) International collaborations growing fast. In: Nature Index. https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/international-collaborations-growing-exponentially. Accessed Friday 22nd May 2020
Chronéer D, Bergquist B (2012) Managerial complexity in process industrial R&D projects: a Swedish study. Proj Manag J 43(2):21–36
Cooke-Davies TJ, Crawford LH, Lechler TG (2009) Project management systems: moving project management from an operational to a strategic discipline. Proj Manag J 40(1):110–123
D’Este P, Perkmann M (2011) Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. J Technol Transf 36(3):316–339
Du J, Leten B, Vanhaverbeke W (2014) Managing open innovation projects with science-based and market-based partners. Res Policy 43(5):828–840
Enberg C (2012) Enabling knowledge integration in competitive R&D projects – the management of conflicting logics. Int J Proj Manag 30(7):771–780
Eskerod P, Riis E (2009) Project management models as value creators. Proj Manag J 40(1):4–18
Fernandes G, O’Sullivan D (2020) Benefits management in university-industry collaboration programs. Int J Proj Manag (in press). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.10.002
Fernandes G, Ward S, Araújo M (2014) Developing a framework for embedding useful project management improvement initiatives in organisations. Proj Manag J 45(4):81–108
Fernandes G, Pinto EB, Machado RJ, Araújo M, Pontes A (2015) A program and project management approach for collaborative university-industry R&D funded contracts. Proc Comp Sci 64:1065–1074
Fernandes, G, Machado, RJ, Pinto EB, Araújo M, Pontes A (2016) A quantitative study to assess a program and project management approach for collaborative university-industry R&D funded contracts. In: 22nd ICE/IEEE international technology management conference Norwegian University of Science and Technology, pp 1–10
Fernandes G, Pinto EB, Araújo M, Machado RJ (2017) Planning benefits realisation in a collaborative university-industry R&D funded program. In: 2017 International conference on engineering, technology and innovation (ICE/ITMC), Madeira Portugal, pp 1037–1045
Fernandes G, Moreira S, Pinto EB, Araújo M, Machado RJ (2019a) A framework for managing collaborative university-industry R&D projects within a program – a qualitative study. EURAM 2019 Conference, Lisboa, 26–28 June: 1–40
Fernandes G, Barbosa J, Pinto EB, Araújo M, Machado RJ (2019b) Applying a method for measuring the performance of university-industry R&D collaborations: case study analysis. Proc Comp Sci 164:424–432
Fernandes G, Pinto EB, Araújo M, Machado RJ (2020a) The roles of a Program and Project Management Office to support collaborative university-industry R&D. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell 31(5–6):583–608
Fernandes G, O’Sullivan D, Pinto EB, Araújo M, Machado RJ (2020b) Value of project management in university–industry R&D collaborations. Int J Proj Manag Bus 14(4):819–843
Fernandes G, Araújo M, Andrade R, Pinto EB, Tereso A, Machado RJ (2020c) Critical factors for benefits realisation in collaborative university-industry R&D programs. Int J Proj Organ Manag 12(1):1–30
Huang MH, Chen DZ (2017) How can academic innovation performance in university–industry collaboration be improved? Technol Forecast Soc Chang 123:210–215
Jenner S (2014) Managing benefits: optimising the return from investments. APMG-International, London
König B, Diehl K, Tscherning K, Helming K (2013) A framework for structuring interdisciplinary research management. Res Policy 42(1):261–272
Lundmark E, Klofsten M (2014) Linking individual-level knowledge sourcing to project-level contributions in large R&D-driven product-development projects. Proj Manag J 45(6):73–82
Lycett M, Rassau A, Danson J (2004) Program management: a critical review. Int J Proj Manag 22(4):289–299
Molina-Morales FX, Martínez-Fernández MT (2010) Social networks: effects of social capital on firm innovation. J Small Bus Manag 48(2):258–279
Müller R, Glückler J, Aubry M (2013) A relational typology of project management offices. Proj Manag J 44(1):59–76
Musawir A, Serra CEM, Zwikael O, Ali I (2017) Project governance, benefit management, and project success: towards a framework for supporting organisational strategy implementation. Int J Proj Manag 35(8):1658–1672
Nishimura J, Okamuro H (2018) Internal and external discipline: the effect of project leadership and government monitoring on the performance of publicly funded R&D consortia. Res Policy 47(5):840–853
Nomakuchi T, Takahashi M (2015) A study about project management for industry-university cooperation dilemma. Proc Comp Sci 64:47–54
Nsanzumuhire SU, Groot W (2020) Context perspective on university-industry collaboration processes: a systematic review of literature. J Clean Prod 120861
Pellegrinelli S (2002) Shaping context: the role and challenge for programmes. Int J Proj Manag 20(3):229–233
Pellegrinelli S (2011) What’s in a name: project or programme? Int J Proj Manag 29(2):232–240
Pellegrinelli S, Partington D, Hemingway C, Mohdzain Z, Shah M (2007) The importance of context in program management: an empirical review of program practices. Int J Proj Manag 25(1):41–55
Perkmann M, King Z, Pavelin S (2011) Engaging excellence? Effects of faculty quality on university engagement with industry. Res Policy 40(4):539–552
Project Management Institute (PMI) (2017) The standard for program management, 4th edn. Project Management Institute, Pennsylvania
Rohrbeck R, Arnold H (2006) Making university-industry collaboration work – a case study on the Deutsche Telekom laboratories contrasted with findings in literature. In: ISPIM annual conference – network innovation, pp 1–11
Ross DT, Schoman KE (1977) Structured analysis for requirements definition. IEEE Trans Softw Eng SE-3(1):6–15
Sánchez AM, Perez MP (2002) R&D project efficiency management in the Spanish industry. Int J Proj Manag 20(7):545–560
Shao J, Müller R (2011) The development of constructs of program context and program success: a qualitative study. Int J Proj Manag 29(8):947–959
Smith K (2005) Measuring innovation. In: Fagerberg J, Mowery DC, Nelson RR (eds) The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 148–177
Thomas J, Mullaly M (2008) Researching the value of project management. Project Management Institute, Pennsylvania
vom Brocke J, Lippe S (2015) Managing collaborative research projects: a synthesis of project management literature and directives for future research. Int J Proj Manag 33(5):1022–1039
Ward J, Taylor P, Bond P (1996) Evaluation and realisation of IS/IT benefits: an empirical study of current practice. Eur J Inf Syst 4(4):214–225
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fernandes, G., O’Sullivan, D. (2021). Managing a Major University–Industry Collaboration R&D Program. In: Fernandes, G., Dooley, L., O’Sullivan, D., Rolstadås, A. (eds) Managing Collaborative R&D Projects. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61605-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61605-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61604-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61605-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)