Abstract
The use of Internet platforms such as open innovation platforms is a quite new strategy in innovation management that marks a rethinking from classical principles of coordination in innovation processes. Instead of relying exclusively on the internal expertise of their own researchers and developers, companies are increasingly integrating external problem-solvers (often supported by so-called innovation intermediaries) into their innovation processes. As an alternative to conducting traditional research or commissioning engineering service providers or academics with third-party contracts, a large, undefined network of actors are openly invited to participate in the innovative project (known as the “broadcast search” principle). Participants who know an answer to the problem respond by providing solutions—despite never being commissioned to do so by a manager. This procedure offers completely new potential and opportunities for knowledge and technology transfer and gives access to the knowledge held by third parties in new ways.
This chapter draws on an earlier publication by the authors in Piller and Hilgers (2013).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antons, D., & Piller, F. T. (2015). Opening the black box of “Not Invented Here”: Attitudes, decision biases, and behavioral consequences. Academy of Management Perspectives,29(2), 193–217.
Bogers, M., Zobel, A. K., Afuah, A., Almirall, E., Brunswicker, S., Dahlander, L., … Hagedoorn, J. (2017). The open innovation research landscape: Established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis. Industry and Innovation, 24(1), 8–40.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly,35(1), 128–152.
Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. M. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy,39(6), 699–709.
Diener, K., & Piller, F. T. (2019). The market for open innovation. The 2020 open innovation accelerator survey (3rd, totally revised ed.). Raleigh, NC: Lulu.
Füller, J., Matzler, K., Hutter, K., & Hautz, J. (2012). Consumers’ creative talent: Which characteristics qualify consumers for open innovation projects? An exploration of asymmetrical effects. Creativity and Innovation Management,21(3), 247–262.
Hannen, J., Antons, D., Piller, F., Salge, T. O., Coltman, T., & Devinney, T. M. (2019). Containing the Not-Invented-Here Syndrome in external knowledge absorption and open innovation: The role of indirect countermeasures. Research Policy,48(9), 103822.
Hayek, F. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review,35, 519–530.
Howe, J. (2006, June). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired (14): 1–5.
Hussinger, K., & Wastyn, A. (2016). In search for the not-invented-here syndrome: The role of knowledge sources and firm success. R&D Management,46(S3), 945–957.
Jeppesen, L. B., & Lakhani, K. R. (2010). Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organization Science,21(5), 1016–1033.
Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal,45(6), 1183–1194.
Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. (1982). Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups. R&D Management,12(1), 7–20.
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal,27(2), 131–150.
Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ogawa, S., & Piller, F. T. (2006). Reducing the risks of new product development. MIT Sloan Management Review,47(2), 65.
Pechmann, A., Piller, F. T., & Schuhmacher, G. (2010). Transfer of knowledge & technology from science into industry: An explorative study of the German material sciences. Verlag des Forschungszentrums Jülich.
Piller, F. T., & Hilgers, D. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook technology transfer: New methods to transfer academic research into industrial practice (Original: Praxishandbuch Technologietransfer: Innovative Methoden zum Transfer wissenschaftlicher Ergebnisse in die industrielle Anwendung). Düsseldorf: Symposion Publishing.
Piller, F. T., Möslein, K., Ihl, C., & Reichwald, R. (2017). Interaktive Wertschöpfung kompakt: Open Innovation, Individualisierung und neue Formen der Arbeitsteilung. New York and Berlin: Springer.
Piller, F. T., & West, J. (2014). Firms, users, and innovation: An interactive model of coupled open innovation. In H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), New Frontiers in Open Innovation (pp. 29–49). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pollok, P., Lüttgens, D., & Piller, F. T. (2019). Attracting solutions in crowdsourcing contests: The role of knowledge distance, identity disclosure, and seeker status. Research Policy,48(1), 98–114.
Schenk, E., Guittard, C., & Pénin, J. (2019). Open or proprietary? Choosing the right crowdsourcing platform for innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,144, 303–310.
Schmidthuber, L., Piller, F. T., Bogers, M., & Hilgers, D. (2019). Opening up Social Innovation: Investigating citizen participation in open government platforms. R&D Management,49(3), 343–355.
Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man. Social and rational. Mathematical essays on rational human behavior in a social setting. New York: Wiley.
Simon, H. A. (1991). Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science,2(1), 125–134.
Stuart, T. E., & Podolny, J. M. (1996). Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management Journal,17(S1), 21–38.
Thomke, S. H. (2003). Experimentation matters: Unlocking the potential of new technologies for innovation. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Von Hippel, E. (1994). “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science,40(4), 429–439.
Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation. Journal für Betriebswirtschaft,55(1), 63–78.
Von Hippel, E. (2016). Free innovation. Boston: MIT Press.
West, J., & Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging external sources of innovation: A review of research on open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management,31(4), 814–831.
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review,27(2), 185–203.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Piller, F., Hilgers, D., Ihl, C., Schmidthuber, L. (2021). Using Open Innovation Platforms for Technology Transfer. In: Mietzner, D., Schultz, C. (eds) New Perspectives in Technology Transfer. FGF Studies in Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61477-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61477-5_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61476-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61477-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)