Skip to main content

A Hobby Out of Control: Festschrift for Teresa Amabile

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creativity at Work
  • 831 Accesses

Abstract

This contribution to the Festschrift for Teresa Amabile describes the importance of intrinsic motivation for creativity and looks back at how the concept of intrinsic motivation has changed over the years. Early on the connection to creativity was vague and non-experimental, but then Amabile developed methods with good controls and in turn was able to avoid the ambiguities of earlier research. The present chapter puts intrinsic motivation into a larger context where it works with various other components of the creative process, including cognition. It also touches on the Consensual Assessment Technique. This in turn leads to a discussion of the value of creative products. These offer very different information from that obtained when focusing on the creative process, and often nothing can be said about how creativity comes about (i.e., the underlying mechanism) by looking only at the outcome or product. Another concern is raised, namely about generalizations from any one group of judges involved in judging creative products. This chapter concludes by acknowledging the very broad and positive impact that Amabile has had on creativity research.

An earlier version of this chapter was presented at Harvard Business School August 14, 2019.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acar, S., & Runco, M. A. (2019). Divergent thinking: New methods, recent research, and extended theory. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13, 153–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/aca0000231.

  • Albert, R. S., & Runco, M. A. (1990). Observations, gaps, and conclusions. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1990). Within you, without you: The social psychology of creativity, and beyond. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 61–19). Norwood, NJ: Albex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (2019). The art of (creative) thought: Graham Walls on the creative process. In V. P. Glaveanu (Ed.), The creativity reader (pp. 15–32). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anastasi, A. (1982). Psychological testing (5th ed.). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. (1995). No rootless flower: An ecology of creativity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chand, I., & Runco, M. A. (1992). Problem finding skills as components in the creative process. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramond, B. (1993). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: From design through establishment of predictive validity. In R. F. Subotnik & K. D. Arnold (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 229–254). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessey, B. A. (1994). The consensual assessment technique: An examination of the relationship between ratings of product and process creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 193–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D., Runco, M. A., & Raina, M. K. (2003). Parents and teachers’ implicit theories of children’s creativity: A cross-cultural perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 427–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinho, F. E. (2019, July 22). Having a whale of a time. Los Angeles Times. https://enewspaper.latimes.com/desktop/latimes/default.aspx?pubid=50435180-e58e-48b5-8e0c-236bf740270e.

  • Plucker, J., Runco, M. A., & Lim, W. (2006). Predicting ideational behavior from divergent thinking and discretionary time on task. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1959). Toward a theory of creativity. In H. H. Anderson (Ed.), Creativity and its cultivation (pp. 69–82). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenson, D. L., & Runco, M. A. (1992). The psychoeconomic approach to creativity. New Ideas in Psychology, 10, 131–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubenson, D. L., & Runco, M. A. (1995). The psychoeconomic view of creative work in groups and organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 4, 232–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1989). The creativity of children’s art. Child Study Journal, 19, 177–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (Ed.). (1991). Divergent thinking. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1993). Operant theories of insight, originality, and creativity. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (Ed.). (2013). Divergent thinking and creative potential. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2014a). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2014b). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice (rev ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2018). Authentic creativity: Mechanisms, definitions, and empirical efforts. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Kaufman (Eds.), The nature of human creativity (pp. 246–263). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2020). Behavioral view of creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritizker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (3rd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 66–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., McCarthy, K. A., & Svensen, E. (1994). Judgments of the creativity of artwork from students and professional artists. Journal of Psychology, 128, 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Smith, W. R. (1992). Interpersonal and intrapersonal evaluations of creative ideas. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruscio, J., Whitney, D. M., & Amabile, T. M. (1998). Looking inside the fishbowl of creativity: Verbal and behavioral predictors of creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1103_4.

  • Tan, C. (2016). Creativity and confucius. Journal of Genius and Eminence, 1, 79–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark A. Runco .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Runco, M.A. (2020). A Hobby Out of Control: Festschrift for Teresa Amabile. In: Reiter-Palmon, R., Fisher, C.M., Mueller, J.S. (eds) Creativity at Work. Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61311-2_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics