Skip to main content

Analysis of Term Reuse, Term Overlap and Extracted Mappings Across AgroPortal Semantic Resources

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW 2020)

Abstract

Ontologies in agronomy facilitate data integration, information exchange, search and query of agronomic data, and other knowledge-intensive tasks. We have developed AgroPortal, an open community-based repository of agronomy and related domains semantic resources. From a corpus of ontologies, terminologies, and thesauri taken from AgroPortal, we have generated, extracted and analyzed more than 400,000 mappings between concepts based on: (i) reuse of the same URI between concepts in different resources –term reuse; (ii) lexical similarity of concept names and synonyms –term overlap; and (iii) declared mappings properties between concepts –extracted mappings. We developed an interactive visualization of each mapping construct separately and combined which helps users identify most prominent ontologies, relevant thematic clusters, areas of a domain that are not well covered, and pertinent ontologies as background knowledge. By comparing the size of the semantic resources to the number of their mappings, we found that most of them have under 5% of their terms mapped. Our results show the need of an ontology alignment framework in AgroPortal where mappings between semantic resources will be assembled, compared, analysed and automatically updated when semantic resources evolve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We prefer here the term “construct” to “type” which is used in our work with another meaning: to quality the mapping (exact match, close match, same as, etc.).

  2. 2.

    The most frequent case of reuse concern classes/concepts, however any object identified by an URI can be reused from one semantic resource to the other (e.g., owl:Class, owl:Individual, rdfs:Property, skos:Concept).

  3. 3.

    The NCBO BioPortal technology can be reused and customized for deploying other ontology repositories e.g., AgroPortal or EcoPortal. Since 2019, the generic technology is branded as OntoPortal (https://ontoportal.org).

  4. 4.

    See https://github.com/agroportal/documentation/wiki/Mappings for details.

  5. 5.

    E.g., the following call returns all the mappings between the Agronomy and Plant Ontology: http://data.agroportal.lirmm.fr/mappings?ontologies=AGRO,PO.

  6. 6.

    https://github.com/agroportal/ontology_mapping_harvester.

  7. 7.

    Our mapping dataset is publicly available at https://bit.ly/3gFJ2DD.

References

  1. Ghazvinian, A., Noy, F.N., Musen, M.A.: How orthogonal are the OBO Foundry ontologies? J. Biomed. Semant. 2(2), S2 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-1480-2-S2-S2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Annane, A., Bellahsene, Z., Azouaou, F., Jonquet, C.: Building an effective and efficient background knowledge resource to enhance ontology matching. Web Semant. 51, 51–68 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology Matching. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38721-0

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Faria, D., Jiménez-Ruiz, E., Pesquita, C., Santos, E., Couto, F.M.: Towards annotating potential incoherences in bioportal mappings. In: Mika, P., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8797, pp. 17–32. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11915-1_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghazvinian, A., Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: Creating mappings for ontologies in biomedicine: simple methods work. In: American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium, AMIA’09, Washington, USA, pp. 198–202 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ghazvinian, A., Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: From mappings to modules: using mappings to identify domain-specific modules in large ontologies. In: 6th International Conference on Knowledge Capture, K-CAP’11, Banff, Canada, pp. 33–40 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ghazvinian, A., Noy, N.F., Jonquet, C., Shah, N., Musen, M.A.: What four million mappings can tell you about two hundred ontologies. In: Bernstein, A., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5823, pp. 229–242. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04930-9_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Jonquet, C.: Ontology repository and ontology-based services – challenges, contributions and applications to biomedicine & agronomy. HDR Manuscript,University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jonquet, C., et al.: AgroPortal: a vocabulary and ontology repository for agronomy. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, pp. 126–143 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jupp, S., Liener, T., Sarntivijai, S., Vrousgou, O., Burdett, T., Parkinson, H.: OxO a gravy of ontology mapping extracts. In: 8th International Conference on Biomedical Ontology, ICBO’17, Newcastle, UK, 2137, p. 2 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kamdar, M.R., Tudorache, T., Musen, M.A.: Investigating term reuse and overlap in biomedical ontologies. In: 6th International Conference on Biomedical Ontology, ICBO’15 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kamdar, M.R., Tudorache, T., Musen, M.A.: A systematic analysis of term reuse and term overlap across biomedical ontologies. Semant. web 8(6), 853–871 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Laadhar, A., Abrahao, E., Jonquet, C.: Investigating one million XRefs in thirthy ontologies from the OBO world. In: 11th International Conference on Biomedical Ontologies, ICBO’20. Bozen-Bolzano, Italy (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Matteis, L., et al.: Crop ontology: vocabulary for crop-related concepts. In: 1st International Work. on Semantics for Biodiversity, Montpellier, France, pp. 37–46 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ngo, D.H., Bellahsene, Z.: YAM++ : a multi-strategy based approach for ontology matching task. In: Teije, A., et al. (eds.) EKAW 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7603, pp. 421–425. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33876-2_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Noy, N.F., et al.: BioPortal: ontologies and integrated data resources at the click of a mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 37(ws), 170–173 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pathak, J., Chute, C.G.: Debugging mappings between biomedical ontologies: preliminary results from the NCBO bioportal mapping repository. In: International Conference on Biomedical Ontology, Buffalo, USA, pp. 95–98 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Poveda Villalón, M., Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Gómez-Pérez, A.: The landscape of ontology reuse in linked data. Ontology Engineering in a Data-driven World, OEDW’12 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Till, M., Kutz, O., Codescu, M.: Ontohub: a semantic repository for heterogeneous ontologies. In: Theory Day in Computer Science, DACS’14, Bucharest, Romania, p. 2 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vandenbussche, P.Y., Atemezing, G.A., Poveda-Villalón, M., Vatant, B.: Linked Open Vocabularies (LOV): a gateway to reusable semantic vocabularies on the Web. Semant. Web 8(3), 437–452 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wilkinson, M.D., et al.: The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3(1), 1–9 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was achieved with support of the AGRO Labex (ANR-10-LABX-0001), the NUMEV Labex (ANR-10-LABX-20) and the Data to Knowledge in Agronomy and Biodiversity (D2KAB – www.d2kab.org) project that received funding from the French National Research Agency (ANR-18-CE23-0017).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Amir Laadhar or Clement Jonquet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Laadhar, A., Abrahão, E., Jonquet, C. (2020). Analysis of Term Reuse, Term Overlap and Extracted Mappings Across AgroPortal Semantic Resources. In: Keet, C.M., Dumontier, M. (eds) Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. EKAW 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12387. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61244-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61244-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61243-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61244-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics