Skip to main content

Cross-Course and Multi-course Sentiment Classification of Student Posts

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Brain Function Assessment in Learning (BFAL 2020)

Abstract

Affective Computing is one of the most active research topics in education. Increased interest in emotion recognition through text channels makes sentiment analysis (i.e., the Natural Language Processing task of determining the valence in texts) a state-of-the-practice tool. Considering the domain-dependent nature of sentiment analysis as well as the heterogeneity of the educational domain, development of robust sentiment classifiers requires an in-depth understanding of the effect of the teaching-learning context on model performance. This work investigates machine learning-based sentiment classification on datasets comprised of student posts in forums, pertaining to two different academic courses. Different dataset configurations were tested, aiming to compare performance: i) between single-course and multi-course classifiers, ii) between in-course and cross-course classification. A sentiment classifier was built for each course, exhibiting a fair performance. However, classification performance dramatically decreased, when the two models were transferred between courses. Additionally, classifiers trained on a mixture of courses underperformed single-course classifiers. Findings suggested that sentiment analysis is a course-dependent task and, as a rule of thumb, less but course-specific information results in more effective models than more but non-specialized information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://studio.azureml.net/.

References

  1. Picard, R.W.: Affective computing. MIT media laboratory perceptual computing section technical report No. 321. Cambridge, MA 2139 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., Perry, R.P.: Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: a program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educ. Psychol. 37(2), 91–105 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blanchette, I., Richards, A.: The influence of affect on higher level cognition: a review of research on interpretation, judgement, decision making and reasoning. Cogn. Emot. 24(4), 561–595 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930903132496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lepper, M.R., Chabay, R.W.: Socializing the intelligent tutor: bringing empathy to computer tutors. In: Learning Issues for Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 242–257. Springer, New York, NY (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yadegaridehkordi, E., Noor, N.F.B.M., Ayub, M.N.B., Affal, H.B., Hussin, N.B.: Affective computing in education: a systematic review and future research. Comput. Educ. 142, 103649 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Luneski, A., Konstantinidis, E., Bamidis, P.D.: Affective medicine. A review of affective computing efforts in medical informatics. Methods Inf. Med. 49(3), 207–218 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bamidis, P.D., Papadelis, C., Kourtidou-Papadeli, C., Pappas, C., Vivas, B.A.: Affective computing in the era of contemporary neurophysiology and health informatics. Interact. Comput. 16(4), 715–721 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, B.: Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Synth. Lect. Hum. Lang. Technol. 5(1), 1–167 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2200/S00416ED1V01Y201204HLT016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohammad, S.M.: Sentiment analysis: detecting valence, emotions, and other affectual states from text. In: Meiselman, H.L. (ed.) Emotion Measurement, pp. 201–237. Woodhead Publishing-Elsevier, Sawston, Cambridge (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Read, J.: Using emoticons to reduce dependency in machine learning techniques for sentiment classification. In: Proceedings of the ACL Student Research Workshop, pp. 43–48 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wen, M., Yang, D., Rose, C.: Sentiment analysis in MOOC discussion forums: what does it tell us?. In: Stamper, J., Pardos, Z., Mavrikis, M., McLaren, B.M. (eds.) Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, pp. 130–137, London (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dolianiti, F.S., Iakovakis, D., Dias, S.B., Hadjileontiadou, S., Diniz, J.A., Hadjileontiadis, L.: Sentiment analysis techniques and applications in education: a survey. In: Tsitouridou, M., Diniz, J.A., Mikropoulos, T.A. (eds.) TECH-EDU 2018. CCIS, vol. 993, pp. 412–427. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20954-4_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Bakharia, A.: Towards cross-domain MOOC forum post classification. In: Proceedings of the Third ACM Conference Learning @ Scale - L@S 2016, pp. 253–256 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wei, X., Lin, H., Yang, L., Yu, Y.: A convolution-LSTM-based deep neural network for cross-domain MOOC forum post classification. Information 8(3), 92 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dolianiti, F.S., Iakovakis, D., Dias, S.B., Hadjileontiadou, S.J., Diniz, J.A., Natsiou, G., Tsitouridou, M., Bamidis, P.D., Hadjileontiadis, L.J.: Sentiment analysis on educational datasets: a comparative evaluation of commercial tools. Educ. J. Univ. Patras UNESCO Chair 6(1), 262–273 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Balahur, A., Turchi, M., Steinberger, R., Ortega, J.M.P., Jacquet, G., Küçük, D., Zavarela, V., El Ghali, A.: Resource creation and evaluation for multilingual sentiment analysis in social media texts. In: Proceedings of Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pp. 4265–4269. ELRA, Reykjavik, Iceland (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hayes, A.F., Krippendorff, F.: Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Commun. Methods Measures 1(1), 77–89 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chawla, N., Bowyer, K.W., Hall, L.O., Kegelmeyer, W.P.: SMOTE: synthetic minority oversampling technique. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 16, 321–357 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Saleh, M.R., Martín-Valdivia, M.T., Montejo-Ráez, A., Ureña-López, L.A.: Experiments with SVM to classify opinions in different domains. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(12), 14799–14804 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rifkin, R., Klautau, A.: In defense of one-vs-all classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 5(Jan), 101–141 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Aue, A., Gamon, M.: Customizing sentiment classifiers to new domains: a case study. In: Proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, vol. 1, no. 3.1, pp. 2–1 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Foteini Dolianiti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dolianiti, F. et al. (2020). Cross-Course and Multi-course Sentiment Classification of Student Posts. In: Frasson, C., Bamidis, P., Vlamos, P. (eds) Brain Function Assessment in Learning. BFAL 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12462. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60735-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60735-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60734-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60735-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics