Skip to main content

Can We Detect Irony in Speech Using Phonetic Characteristics Only? – Looking for a Methodology of Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Speech and Computer (SPECOM 2020)

Abstract

The current paper aims to investigate the perception of Russian ironic laboratory speech and to develop a methodological basis for the further research on perceptually relevant acoustic cues of irony. On the first stage of analysis we created short monologues and dialogues including ironic and homonymous non-ironic sentences. Two Russian native male speakers read this material. The recording was accomplished in a sound booth. Then, randomized fragments of the recordings were suggested to native listeners in an auditory perception experiment. The mean intensity, duration of the stressed vowel and F0 range in the reliably identified target fragments were analyzed, as well as functional intonation models in terms of the system suggested by E. Bryzgunova. The results showed that the listeners are able to detect irony without any contextual or lexical marker of it. The acoustic analysis of the reliably identified stimuli demonstrated the difference in intensity level and stressed vowel duration between ironic and non-ironic utterances. The obtained results allow creating a methodology of data collection and validation for the construction of ironic speech corpus and its analysis. They may also have applications in teaching Russian as a second language, human-machine communication and improving natural language processing systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arkhipetskaia, M.V.: Intonatsionnye frazeologizmy so znacheniem emotsionalnogo otritsaniia. Ph.D. thesis, Saint Petersburg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Attardo, S.: Irony as relevant inappropriateness. J. Pragmatics 32(6), 793–826 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baturskaia, L.A.: Intonatsionnoe otritsanie v dialogicheskoi rechi. Ph.D. thesis, Kiev (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Braun, A., Schmiedel, A.: The phonetics of ambiguity: a study on verbal irony. In: Cultures and Traditions of Wordplay and Wordplay Research, pp. 111–136. De Gruyter, Berlin (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bryant, G., Fox Tree, J.: Is there an ironic tone of voice? Lang. Speech 48, 257–277 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Grice, H.P.: Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haverkate, H.: A speech act analysis of irony. J. Pragmatics 14, 77–109 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kodzasov, S.V.: Issledovaniia v oblasti russkoi prosodii. Iazyki slavianskikh kultur, Moscow (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kreuz, J.R., Roberts, R.: Two cues for verbal irony: hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice. Metaphor Symb. Act. 10, 21–31 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Niebuhr, O.: Rich Reduction: sound-segment residuals and the encoding of communicative functions along the hypo-hyper scale. In: 7th Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics, pp. 11–24, St. Petersburg, Russia (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sharrer, L., Christman, U.: Voice modulations in German ironic speech. Lang. Speech 54(4), 435–465 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Simpson, P.: ‘That’s not ironic, that’s just stupid!’: towards an eclectic account of the discourse of irony. In: The Pragmatics of Humour Across Discourse Domains, pp. 33–50. John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sperber, D.: Verbal irony: pretense or echoic mention? J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 113, 130–136 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shutova, T.A.: Semantika otritsaniia i sposoby ee implitsitnogo vyrazheniia v russkom iazyke. Ph.D. thesis, Saint Petersburg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson, D., Sperber, D.: On verbal irony. Lingua 87(1-2), 53–76 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, X.: English Rhetoric. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the RFBR grant № 20-012-00552.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uliana Kochetkova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Skrelin, P., Kochetkova, U., Evdokimova, V., Novoselova, D. (2020). Can We Detect Irony in Speech Using Phonetic Characteristics Only? – Looking for a Methodology of Analysis. In: Karpov, A., Potapova, R. (eds) Speech and Computer. SPECOM 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12335. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60276-5_52

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60276-5_52

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60275-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60276-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics