Skip to main content

Comparative Analysis of Three Kinds of Laser SLAM Algorithms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithms and Architectures for Parallel Processing (ICA3PP 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12453))

Abstract

With the development of artificial intelligence, the application of robots is also rapidly increasing. How to autonomously navigate and complete complex tasks for robots in an unknown environment is a hot spot in the research domain of simultaneous positioning and map construction (SLAM) algorithms. To better study and apply three common laser SLAM algorithms, by building a SLAM environment on the ROS robot platform, Hector SLAM, Gmapping, and Cartographer algorithms were used to conduct actual indoor mapping experiments. All three algorithms can achieve effective indoor two-bit mapping construction. By comparing and analyzing the three SLAM algorithms, the mapping accuracy of the Cartographer algorithm is significantly better than Hector SLAM and Gmapping algorithms. Meantime, the Cartographer algorithm has better robustness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bonin-Font, F., Ortiz, A., Oliver, G.: Visual navigation for mobile robots: a survey. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 53, 263 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-008-9235-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kalogeiton, V.S., Ioannidis, K., Sirakoulis, GCh., Kosmatopoulos, E.B.: Real-time active SLAM and obstacle avoidance for an autonomous robot based on stereo vision. Cybern. Syst. 50(3), 239–260 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Durrant-Whyte, H., Bailey, T.: Simultaneous localization and mapping: part I. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 13(2), 99–110 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2006.1638022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bailey, T., Durrant-Whyte, H.: Simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM): part II. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 13(3), 108–117 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2006.1678144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jiang, B., Bishop, A.N., Anderson, B.D.O., Drake, S.P.: Optimal path planning and sensor placement for mobile target detection. Automatica 60, 127–139 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Siagian, C., Chang, C.K., Itti, L.: Autonomous mobile robot localization and navigation using a hierarchical map representation primarily guided by vision. J. Field Robot. 31(3), 408–440 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aladrén, A., López-Nicolás, G., Puig, L., Guerrero, J.J.: Navigation assistance for the visually impaired using RGB-D sensor with range expansion. IEEE Syst. J. 10(3), 922–932 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2014.2320639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chainago, V.M., Jati, A.N., Setianingsih, C.: Development of non-platform mobile robot for simultaneous localization and mapping using ROS. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Aerospace Electronics and Remote Sensing Technology (ICARES), Yogyakarta, Indonesia, pp. 1–6 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/icares.2019.8914356

  9. Yagfarov, R., Ivanou, M., Afanasyev, I.: Map comparison of lidar-based 2D SLAM algorithms using precise ground truth. In: 2018 15th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision (ICARCV), Singapore, pp. 1979–1983 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/icarcv.2018.8581131

  10. Garulli, A., Giannitrapani, A., Rossi, A., et al.: Mobile robot SLAM for line-based environment representation. In: Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fox, D., Burgard, W., Thrun, S.: Markov localization for mobile robots in dynamic environments. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 11, 391–427 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thrun, S.: Probabilistic algorithms in robotics. AI Mag. 21(4), 3–109 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Montemerlo, M., Thrun, S., Koller, D., Wegbreit, B.: FastSLAM 2.0: an improved particle filtering algorithm for simultaneous localization and mapping that provably converges (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eliazar, A.: DP-SLAM. Duke University, Durham (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Savaria, D.T., Balasubramanian, R.: V-SLAM: Vision-based simultaneous localization and map building for an autonomous mobile robot. In: 2010 IEEE Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems (MFI), Salt Lake City, UT. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yan, M., Hehua, J., Pingyuan, C.: Research on localization and mapping for lunar rover based on RBPF-SLAM. In: 2009 International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics, IHMSC 2009, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, pp. 306–311. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kundu, A.S., Mazumder, O., Dhar, A., Bhaumik, S.: Occupancy grid map generation using 360° scanning xtion pro live for indoor mobile robot navigation. In: 2016 IEEE First International Conference on Control, Measurement and Instrumentation (CMI), Kolkata, pp. 464–468 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/cmi.2016.7413791

  18. Ramaithitima, R., Whitzer, M., Bhattacharya, S., Kumar, V.: Automated creation of topological maps in unknown environments using a swarm of resource-constrained robots. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 1(2), 746–753 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2016.2523600

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work is supported by the National Key Research and Development Plan of China under Grant No. 2016YFB0501801, National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61170026, the National Standard Research Project under Grant No. 2016BZYJ-WG7-001, the Key Research and Development Plan of Jiang Xi province under Grant No. 20171ACE50022 and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiang Xi province under Grant No. 20171BAB202011, the science aánd technology research project of Jiang Xi Education Department under Grant Nos. GJJ180730, GJJ180727, GJJ181520, and the Science and Technology project of Jingdezhen under Grant Nos. 20182GYZD011-01, 20192GYZD008-01, 2019GYZD008-03, and the Open Research Project of the State Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology, Zhejiang University, China (No. ICT 20025).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xin Liu or Hua Huang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Liu, X., Lin, Y., Huang, H., Qiu, M. (2020). Comparative Analysis of Three Kinds of Laser SLAM Algorithms. In: Qiu, M. (eds) Algorithms and Architectures for Parallel Processing. ICA3PP 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12453. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60239-0_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics