Skip to main content

Abstract

The growing appreciation for the diversity of water values—ranging from the spiritual to the economic—highlights the challenge of making water management decisions that do justice to different and often conflicting values. Water ethics offers a systematic approach to making water management decisions consistent with society’s values, while at the same time holding up the values themselves for critical examination. While the term “water ethics” is rarely encountered in the water literature, water governance best practice reflects key normative value principles including integrity, stewardship, social and environmental justice, ecosystem services and rights of nature. The added value of a systematic approach to water ethics is to render existing norms of water governance more explicit and identify value gaps and synergies. This has been the focus of a recent initiative to formulate a Water Ethics Charter, building on earlier work by UNESCO and the Botin Foundation, and a parallel campaign by Indigenous water protectors to elicit international recognition of culturally diverse ontologies of water. As climate change brings keener awareness of values-based water conflicts, there will be a growing need for new tools of mediation and resolution. The developing field of water ethics can contribute to new solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.fmyn.org/event/orme-dam-victory-days/.

  2. 2.

    The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), a division of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention at the US Department of Health and Human Services.

  3. 3.

    See Llamas (2012) and Delli Priscoli (2012) for an overview of the 2010 seminar.

  4. 4.

    Following the Rio + 20 meetings in 2012, the United Nations launched a “Harmony with Nature” website featuring examples of national legislation aimed at protecting nature, https://harmonywithnatureun.org/.

  5. 5.

    The ethics of water exploitation is often couched in terms of freedom from national-level environmental regulations in favor of more easily captured local regulatory bodies. For example, the 2016 Platform of the US Republican Party states, “We must never allow federal agencies to seize control of state waters, watersheds, or groundwater. State waters, watersheds, and groundwater must be the purview of the sovereign states….We firmly believe environmental problems are best solved by giving incentives for human ingenuity and the development of new technologies, not through top-down, command-and-control regulations that stifle economic growth and cost thousands of jobs.”

  6. 6.

    A second edition of this book was published in 2019 (Groenfeldt 2019).

  7. 7.

    https://www.waterintegritynetwork.net.

  8. 8.

    https://waterethics.org/the-water-ethics-charter/.

  9. 9.

    https://www.iwa-network.org/projects/water-wise-cities/#the_17_iwa_principles_for_water-wise_cities.

  10. 10.

    https://washcharter.wordpress.com.

  11. 11.

    The full text is available on the website of the International River Foundation, https://riverfoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/THE-BRISBANE-DECLARATION.pdf.

  12. 12.

    This definition is taken from the 2010 Echuca Declaration, which can be found at https://culturalflows.com.au.

  13. 13.

    https://canadians.org/bluecommunities.

  14. 14.

    Agroecology in France: Changing production models to combine economic and environmental performance: https://agriculture.gouv.fr/changing-production-models-combine-economic-and-environmental-performance

  15. 15.

    See the website of the “Berlin Water Table” (https://berliner-wassertisch.net/), or download the English text of the Berlin Water Charter at https://berliner-wassertisch.net/assets/Charta/Berlin_Water_Charter2015.pdf.

  16. 16.

    https://www.greenpeace.org/international/act/detox/.

  17. 17.

    https://chm.pops.int.

References

  • Acreman MC, Ferguson AJD (2010) Environmental flows and the European water framework directive. Freshw Biol 55(1):32–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altieri M (1985) Agroecology: the science of sustainable agriculture. Westview Press, Boulder CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthington AH, Bhaduri A, Bunn SE, Jackson SE, Tharme RE, Tickner D, Young B, Acreman M, Baker N, Capon S, Horne AC, Kendy E, McClain ME, Poff NL, Richter BD, Ward S (2018) The brisbane declaration and global action agenda on environmental flows. Front Environ Sci 6(45). http://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00045/full

  • Bakker K (2010) Privatizing water: governance failure and the world’s urban water crisis. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow M, Clarke T (2002) Blue gold: the fight to stop the corporate theft of the world’s water. The New Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow M (2013) Blue future: protecting water for people and the planet forever. The New Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow M (2016) Boiling point: government neglect, corporate abuse and Canada’s water crisis. ECW Press, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett R (2014) The values-driven organization: Unleashing human potential for performance and profit. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Behnam M, Rasche A (2009) Are strategists from Mars and ethicists from Venus? Strategizing as ethical reflection. J Bus Ethics 84:79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berliner Wassertisch (2015) Berlin water charter. https://berliner-wassertisch.net/assets/Charta/Berlin_Water_Charter2015.pdf

  • Bloomberg Editorial Board (2018) Trump is wrong to weaken clean water rules. Bloomberg Opinion. https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2018-12-17/clean-water-rule-under-trump-administration-attack

  • Blue Communities Project (2016) Blue Communities Project Guide. https://canadians.org/bluecommunities

  • Boelens R, Hoogesteger J, Rodriguez de Francisco JC (2014) Commoditizing water territories: the clash between Andean water rights cultures and payment for environmental services policies. Capitalism Nat Socialism 25(3):84–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boelens RA, Vos JMC, Perreault T (2018) Introduction: the multiple challenges and layers of water justice struggles. In Water Justice. Cambridge University Press, pp 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd D (2017) The rights of nature: a legal revolution that could save the world. ECW Press, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Brelet C, Selborne J (2004) Best ethical practice in water use. World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology/UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruil J, Anderson C, Bernhart A, Pimbert M (2019) Strengthening FAO's commitment to agroecology. Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience (CAWR), Coventry University, UK. https://www.agroecologynow.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/coventry-fao-agroecology-Feb7.pdf

  • Business for Water Stewardship (2018). https://businessforwater.org/

  • CAPNET (2016) Ecosystem functions and services in integrated water resources management. Cap-Net UNDP, Brazil. https://www.cap-net.org/training-material/ecosystem-functions-and-services-in-integrated-water-resources-management/

  • Casey J (2016) Agroecology and the sustainable development goals. Food Chain 6(2):47–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chibba M, Nakashima D, Boelens R (eds) (2006) Water and indigenous peoples. UNESCO, Paris. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001453/145353e.pdf

  • Clark A (2018) The poisoned city: flint’s water and the American urban tragedy. Metropolitan Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Craft J (2013) A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 2004–2011. J Bus Ethics 117:221–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COMEST (2018) Water ethics: ocean freshwater coastal areas, commission on ethics of science and technology. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Delli Priscoli J (2012) Introduction. Water Policy 14(Suppl. 1):3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delli Priscoli J, Dooge J, Llamas R (2004) Water and ethics: overview. UNESCO International Hydrological Programme & World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology, Series on Water and Ethics, Essay 1. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • de Schutter O (2011) Agroecology: a path to realizing the right to food. Food First Backgrounder 17(2):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon L, Sellers C, Underhill V, Shapiro N, Ohayon JL, Sullivan M, Brown P, Harrison J, Wylie S, “EPA Under Siege” Writing Group (2018) The environmental protection agency in the early Trump administration: prelude to regulatory capture. Am J Public Health 108(S2):S89–S94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dublin Principles (1992) Dublin statement on water and sustainable development. In: International conference on water and the environment. Dublin, Ireland. www.wmo.int/pages/prog/hwrp/documents/english/icwedece.html

  • Dyson M, Bergkamp G, Scanlon J (eds) (2003) Flow: the essentials of environmental flows. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. www.waterandnature.org

  • Espeland WN (1998) The struggle for water: Politics, rationality and identity in the American Southwest. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkenmark M (1977) UN water conference: agreement on goals and action plan. Ambio 6(4):222–227

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2018) Scaling up agroecology initiative. Transforming food and agricultural systems in support of the SDGs: a proposal prepared for the international symposium on agroecology. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome. www.fao.org/3/I9049EN/i9049en.pdf

  • Feldman DL (1991) Water resources management: in search of an environmental ethic. Johns Hopkins University Press , Baltimore, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • France-Libertés, (2017) No more sacrifice zones! for alternatives to our predatory natural resources model. France-Libertés, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrick DE, Hall JW, Dobson A, Damania R, Grafton RQ, Hope R, Hepburn C, Bark R, Boltz F, De Stefano L, O’Donnell E (2017) Valuing water for sustainable development. Sci 358(6366):1003–1005

    Google Scholar 

  • Grappi S, Romani S, Barbarossa C (2017) Fashion without pollution: how consumers evaluate brands after an NGO campaign aimed at reducing toxic chemicals in the fashion industry. J Cleaner Prod 149:1164–1173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasso M (2019) Oily politics: a critical assessment of the oil and gas industry’s contribution to climate change. Energy Res Soc Sci 50:106–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenpeace (2018) Destination zero: seven years of detoxing the clothing industry. Greenpeace Germany report. www.greenpeace.org/international/publication/17612/destination-zero/

  • Groenfeldt D (2013) Water ethics: a values approach to solving the water crisis. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Groenfeldt D (2019) Water ethics: a values approach to solving the water crisis, 2nd edn. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Härlin D (2017) The Berlin water charter: water ethics from an activist’s viewpoint. In: Ziegler R, Groenfeldt D (eds) Global water ethics: towards a global ethics charter. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris H (2008) Promoting ethical reflection in the teaching of business ethics. Bus Ethics: A Eur Rev 17(4):379–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris L, Rodina L, Shah S, McKenzie S, Wilson N (2017) Water justice: key concepts, debates and research agendas. In: Holifield R, Chakraborty J, Walker G (eds) Handbook of environmental justice. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • HLPW (2017) Bellagio principles on valuing water. High Level Panel on Water. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/15591Bellagio_principles_on_valuing_water_final_version_in_word.pdf

  • HLPW (2018) Making every drop count: an agenda for water action. High level panel on water outcome document. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/17825HLPW_Outcome.pdf

  • Hoekstra AY (2013) The water footprint of modern consumer society. Routledge, Abingdon and New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra AY (2015) The water footprint: the relation between human consumption and water use. In: Antonelli M, Greco F (eds) The water we eat. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16393-2_3. https://waterfootprint.org/media.org/media/downloads/Hoekstra-2015_1.pdf

  • Hoekstra AY, Chapagain AK, Aldaya MM, Mekonnen MM (2011) The water footprint assessment manual: setting the global standard. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry GJ (2018) Why the liberal world order will survive. Ethics Int Aff 32(1):17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iorns Magallanes CJ (2019) From rights to responsibilities using legal personhood and guardianship for rivers. In: Martin B, Te Aho L, Humphries-Kil M (eds) Responsibility: law and governance for living well with the earth. Routledge, London & New York, pp 216–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallhoff A (2017) Transcending water conflicts: an ethics of water cooperation In: Ziegler R, Groenfeldt D (eds) Global water ethics: towards a global ethics charter. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney RL (1992) Value-focused thinking: a path to creative decision-making. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirshen P, Aytur S, Hecht J, Walker A, Burdick D, Jones S, Fennessey N, Bourdeau R, Mather L (2018) Integrated urban water management applied to adaptation to climate change. Urban Clim 24:247–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Quesne T, Kendy E, Weston D (2010) The implementation challenge: taking stock of government policies to protect and restore environmental flows. WWF- UK, Godalming, Surrey

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Strat A (2010) Paris: an example of how local authorities can regain control of water management. Transnational Institute. www.tni.org/en/article/paris-local-authorities-regain-control-of-water-management

  • Liu J, Dorjderem A, Fu J, Lei X, Liu H, Macer D, Qiao Q, Sun A, Tachiyama K, Yu L, Zheng Y (2011) Water ethics and water resource management. In: UNESCO Ethics and Climate Change in Asia and the Pacific (ECCAP) Project Working Group 14 Report, UNESCO, Bangkok. https://philpapers.org/archive/LIUWEA.pdf

  • Llamas MR (2012) Foreword: the role of the Botín foundation to support the analysis of issues on water ethics. Water Policy 14(S1):1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llamas MR, Martínez-Cortina L, Mukherj A (eds) (2009) Water ethics: Marcelino Botín Water Forum 2007. CRC Press/Balkema, Leiden, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobina E (2017) Water remunicipalisation: between pendulum swings and paradigm advocacy. In: Bell S, Allen A, Hofmann P, Teh T-H (eds) Urban Water Trajectories. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp 149–161

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald DA (2018) Remunicipalization: the future of water services? Geoforum 91:47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mölders T (2014) Multifunctional agricultural policies: pathways towards sustainable rural development? Int J Sociol Agric Food 21(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash RF (1989) The rights of nature: a history of environmental ethics. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Netherlands Enterprise Agency (2016) Reinventing multifunctionality: combining goals, sharing means, linking interests. Netherlands Enterprise Agency, The Hague. https://english.rvo.nl/sites/default/files/2016/03/Reinventing%20Multifunctionality.pdf

  • O’Donnell EL, Talbot-Jones J (2018) Creating legal rights for rivers: lessons from Australia, New Zealand, and India. Ecol Soc 23(1):7. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09854-230107

  • OECD (2015) OECD principles on water governance. Centre for Entrepreneurship, SMEs, Regions and Cities, Paris. https://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy/OECD-Principles-on-Water-Governance.pdf

  • Ozbay O (2018) The politics of the water commons. In: Erdogan E, Yuce N, Ozbay O (eds) The politics of the commons: from theory to struggle. SEHAK, Istanbul, p 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Craps M, Dewulf A, Mostert E, Tabara D, Taillieu T (2007) Social learning and water resources management. Ecol Soc 12(2):5. www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art5/

  • Petts GE (2009) Instream flow science for sustainable river management. J Am Water Resour Assoc 45(5):1071–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Matthews JH (2013) Environmental flows in the Anthropocene: past progress and future prospects. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5(6):667–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postel S (1997) Last oasis: facing water scarcity. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Postel S, Richter B (2003) Rivers for life: managing water for people and nature. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty J (2002) Agri-culture: reconnecting people. Land and Nature, Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocha J (2019) Bolsonaro government plans mega-projects in the Brazilian amazon. Truthout. https://truthout.org/articles/bolsonaro-government-reveals-plan-to-develop-the-unproductive-amazon/

  • Rosset PM, Altieri MA (2017) Agroecology: science and politics. Practical Action Publishing, Rugby, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein EP (2016) Why Flint matters. J Am Water Works Assoc 108(7):36–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STWI (2014) Sweden textile water Initiative guidelines for the sustainable water use in the production and manufacturing processes of textiles. https://stwi.se/guidelines/

  • Sultana F (2018) Water justice: why it matters and how to achieve it. Water Int 43(4):483–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sym A (2017) Water ethics and water stewardship. In: Ziegler R, Groenfeldt D (eds) Global water ethics: towards a global ethics charter. Routledge, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Selborne J (2000) The ethics of freshwater use: a survey. Report of the Commission on the Ethics of Science and Technology (COMEST). UNESCO, Paris. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001220/122049e.pdf

  • Taylor KS, Moggridge BJ, Poelina A (2016) Australian indigenous water policy and the impacts of the ever-changing political cycle. Australas J Water Resour 20(2):132–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson PB (2015) Agricultural ethics: then and now. Agric Hum Values 32(1):77–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2009) Water security and ecosystem services: the critical connection. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1948) Universal declaration of human rights, United Nations, New York. https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/

  • United Nations (2008) United nations declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples. United Nations, New York. https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf

  • Voyles TB (2015) Wastelanding: legacies of Uranium mining in Navajo country. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner J (2012) Water and the commons imaginary. Curr Anthropol 53(5):617–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Water Council (2012) Post forum highlights, 6th world water forum, Marseille. https://www.worldwatercouncil.org/en/publications/post-forum-highlights-marseille-2012

  • Werhane P, Moriarty B (2009) Moral imagination and management decision making, business roundtable institute for corporate ethics. Charlottesville, VA, www.corporate-ethics.org/pdf/moral_imagination.pdf

  • Whyte K (2017) The dakota access pipeline, environmental injustice, and US colonialism. Red Ink: an Int J Indigenous Lit, Arts, Humanit 19(1, Spring 2017):154–169. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2925513

  • Willow AJ (2019) Understanding extractivism: culture and power in nature resource disputes. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • WIN (2016) Water Integrity Global Outlook 2016. Water Integrity Network, Berlin. www.waterintegritynetwork.net/wigo/

  • Ziegler R, Gerten D, Döll P (2017) Safe, just and sufficient space: the planetary boundary for human water use in a more-than-human world. In: Ziegler R, Groenfeldt D (eds) Global Water Ethics, pp 109–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler R, Groenfeldt D (eds) (2017) Global water ethics: towards a global ethics charter. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwarteveen M, Boelens R (2014) Defining, researching and struggling for water justice: some conceptual building blocks for research and action. Water Int 39(2):143–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Groenfeldt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Groenfeldt, D. (2021). Water Ethics. In: Bogardi, J.J., et al. Handbook of Water Resources Management: Discourses, Concepts and Examples. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60147-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics