Abstract
Root-finding for a univariate polynomial is four millennia old and still highly important for Computer Algebra and various other fields. Subdivision root-finders for a complex univariate polynomial are known to be highly efficient and practically promising. The recent one by Becker et al. [2] competes for user’s choice and is nearly optimal for dense polynomials represented in monomial basis, but [18] proposes and analyzes further significant acceleration, which becomes dramatic for polynomials admitting their fast evaluation (e.g., sparse ones). Here and in the companion paper [19], we present some of these results and algorithms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The first such root-finder, of [16], is nearly optimal also for the task of numerical factorization of a polynomial into the product of its linear factors, having independent importance.
- 2.
Throughout the paper we count m times a root of multiplicity m and handle it as a cluster of m roots whose diameter is smaller than the tolerance to the output approximation errors.
- 3.
Schönhage was seeking a factor of p(x) with root set made up of the roots of p(x) lying in that disc; he only approximated the power sums \(s_h\) for positive h.
- 4.
- 5.
With this order of its components the vector \(\mathbf{s}_*\) turns into the vector of discrete Fourier transform (DFT) at q points (upon a reviewer request we recall its celebrated fast solution FFT in the Appendix). Here and hereafter we assume that \(\mathbf{v}\) denotes a column vector, while \(\mathbf{v}^T\) denotes its transpose.
- 6.
- 7.
Clearly, we can only improve our approximation of the integer \(s_0\) by the Cauchy sum \(s_0^*\) if we drop its imaginary part \(\mathfrak {I}(s_0^*)\). The power sum \(s_0\) of the roots in a well-isolated disc is only slightly closer to \(\mathfrak {R}(s_0^*)\) than to \(s_0^*\) but can be dramatically closer when some or all roots lie on the boundary circle of an input disc (see [18, Section 3.7]).
- 8.
One can extend the algorithm by applying Algorithm 1a to a disc \(D(0, \theta )\) for smaller \(\theta >1\) and modifying bound (13) accordingly.
- 9.
A polynomial p has no roots in a closed disc D(0, 1) if and only if \(p_\mathrm{rev}\) has precisely d roots in the open disc D(0, 1); similar property holds for Cauchy sums \(s_0^*\) (see [18]).
References
Baur, W., Strassen, V.: On the complexity of partial derivatives. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 22, 317–330 (1983)
Becker, R., Sagraloff, M., Sharma, V., Yap, C.: A near-optimal subdivision algorithm for complex root isolation based on the Pellet test and Newton iteration. J. Symb. Comput. 86, 51–96 (2018), Proceedings version. In: ACM ISSAC, pp. 71–78 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsc.2017.03.009
Bini, D.A., Fiorentino, G.: Design, analysis, and implementation of a multiprecision polynomial rootfinder. Numer. Algorithms 23, 127–173 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019199917103
Bini, D., Pan, V.Y.: Graeffe’s, Chebyshev-like, and Cardinal’s processes for splitting a polynomial into factors. J. Complex. 12, 492–511 (1996)
Bini, D.A., Robol, L.: Solving secular and polynomial equations: a multiprecision algorithm. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 272, 276–292 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2013.04.037
Erdős, P., Turán, P.: On the distribution of roots of polynomials. Ann. Math 2(51), 105–119 (1950)
Gerasoulis, A.: A fast algorithm for the multiplication of generalized Hilbert matrices with vectors. Math. Comput. 50(181), 179–188 (1988)
Henrici, P.: Applied and Computational Complex Analysis, Vol. 1: Power Series, Integration, Conformal Mapping, Location of Zeros. Wiley, New York (1974)
Householder, A.S.: Dandelin, Lobachevskii, or Graeffe? Amer. Math. Mon. 66, 464–466 (1959). https://doi.org/10.2307/2310626
Imbach, R., Pan, V.Y.: New progress in univariate polynomial root-finding. In: Proceedings of ACM-SIGSAM ISSAC 2020, pp. 249–256, July 20–23, 2020, Kalamata, Greece, ACM Press, New York (2020). ACM ISBN 978-1-4503-7100-1/20/07. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373207.3403979
Imbach, R., Pan, V.Y., Yap, C.: Implementation of a near-optimal complex root clustering algorithm. In: Davenport, J.H., Kauers, M., Labahn, G., Urban, J. (eds.) ICMS 2018. LNCS, vol. 10931, pp. 235–244. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96418-8_28
Kobel, A., Rouillier, F., Sagralo, M.: Computing real roots of real polynomials... and now for real! In: Proceedings of the ACM on International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation (ISSAC 2016), pp. 301–310. ACM Press, New York (2016) https://doi.org/10.1145/2930889.2930937
Linnainmaa, S.: Taylor expansion of the accumulated rounding errors. BIT 16, 146–160 (1976)
Pan, V.Y.: Approximation of complex polynomial zeros: modified quadtree (Weyl’s) construction and improved Newton’s iteration. J. Complex. 16(1), 213–264 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1006/jcom.1999
Pan, V.Y.: Structured Matrices and Polynomials: Unified Superfast Algorithms. Birkhäuser/Springer, Boston/New York (2001) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0129-8
Pan, V.Y.: Univariate polynomials: nearly optimal algorithms for factorization and rootfinding. J. Symb. Comput. 33(5), 701–733, : Proceedings version. ACM STOC 1995, 741–750 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1006/jsco.2002.0531
Pan, V.Y.: Old and new nearly optimal polynomial root-Finding. In: England,M., Koepf, W., Sadykov, T.M., Seiler, W.M., Vorozhtsov, E.V. (eds.) CASC2019. LNCS, vol. 11661, pp, 393–411. Springer, Nature Switzerland (2019) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26831-2
Pan, V.Y.: New Acceleration of Univariate Polynomial Root-finders, August 2020. arXiv: 1805.12042
Pan, V.Y.: Acceleration of subdivision root-finding for sparse polynomials. to appear. In: Boulier, F., England, M., Sadikov, T.M., Vorozhtsov, E.V. (eds.) CASC 2020. Springer Nature, Switzerland (2020)
Pan, V.Y., Zhao, L.: Real root isolation by means of root radii approximation. In: Gerdt, V.P., Koepf, W., Seiler, W.M., Vorozhtsov, E.V. (eds.), CASC 2015. LNCS, vol. 9301, pp. 347–358. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). arXiv:1501.05386
Renegar, J.: On the worst-case arithmetic complexity of approximating zeros of polynomials. J. Complex. 3(2), 90–113 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-064X(87)90022-7
Schönhage, A.: The fundamental theorem of algebra in terms of computational complexity. Math. Dept., Univ. Tübingen, Germany (1982)
Weyl, H.: Randbemerkungen zu Hauptproblemen der Mathematik. II. Fundamentalsatz der Algebra und Grundlagen der Mathematik. Mathematische Zeitschrift 20, 131–151 (1924)
Acknowledgements
This research has been supported by NSF Grants CCF–1563942 and CCF–1733834 and PSC CUNY Award 69813 00 48. We also thank the reviewers for thoughtful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix A. Discrete Fourier transform (DFT)
Appendix A. Discrete Fourier transform (DFT)
DFT(\(\mathbf{p}\)) outputs the vector of the values \(p(\zeta ^j)=\sum _{i=0}^{d-1}p_i\zeta ^{ij}\) of a polynomial \(p(x)=\sum _{i=0}^{d-1}p_ix^i\) on the set \(\{1,\zeta ,\ldots ,\zeta ^{d-1}\}\). The fast Fourier transform (FFT) algorithm, for \(d=2^h\) recursively splits p(x):
This reduces DFT\(_d\) for p(x) to two DFT\(_{d/2}\) (for \(p_0(y)\) and \(p_1(y)\)) at a cost of d multiplications of \(p_1(y)\) by x, for \(x=\zeta ^i\), \(i=0,1,\ldots ,d-1\), and of the pairwise addition of the d output values to \(p_0(\zeta ^{2i})\). Since \(\zeta ^{i+d/2}=-\zeta ^i\) for even d, we perform multiplication only d/2 times, that is, \(f(d)\le 2f(d/2)+1.5d\) if f(k) ops are sufficient for DFT\(_k\). Recursively we obtain the following estimate.
Theorem 3
For \(d=2^h\) and a positive integer h, the DFT\(_d\) only involves \(f(d)\le 1.5dh=1.5d\log _2d\) arithmetic operations.
Inverse DFT is the converse problem of interpolation to a polynomial p(x) from its values at the dth roots of unity. At the cost of performing d divisions, this task can be reduced to DFT (see, e.g., [15, Theorem 2.2.2]).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Luan, Q., Pan, V.Y., Kim, W., Zaderman, V. (2020). Faster Numerical Univariate Polynomial Root-Finding by Means of Subdivision Iterations. In: Boulier, F., England, M., Sadykov, T.M., Vorozhtsov, E.V. (eds) Computer Algebra in Scientific Computing. CASC 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12291. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60026-6_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60026-6_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60025-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60026-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)