Skip to main content

Faster Numerical Univariate Polynomial Root-Finding by Means of Subdivision Iterations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Algebra in Scientific Computing (CASC 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12291))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Root-finding for a univariate polynomial is four millennia old and still highly important for Computer Algebra and various other fields. Subdivision root-finders for a complex univariate polynomial are known to be highly efficient and practically promising. The recent one by Becker et al.  [2] competes for user’s choice and is nearly optimal for dense polynomials represented in monomial basis, but  [18] proposes and analyzes further significant acceleration, which becomes dramatic for polynomials admitting their fast evaluation (e.g., sparse ones). Here and in the companion paper  [19], we present some of these results and algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The first such root-finder, of   [16], is nearly optimal also for the task of numerical factorization of a polynomial into the product of its linear factors, having independent importance.

  2. 2.

    Throughout the paper we count m times a root of multiplicity m and handle it as a cluster of m roots whose diameter is smaller than the tolerance to the output approximation errors.

  3. 3.

    Schönhage was seeking a factor of p(x) with root set made up of the roots of p(x) lying in that disc; he only approximated the power sums \(s_h\) for positive h.

  4. 4.

    Otherwise  [17] focuses on deflation, and only half-page  [17, Section 6.3] overlaps with us.

  5. 5.

    With this order of its components the vector \(\mathbf{s}_*\) turns into the vector of discrete Fourier transform (DFT) at q points (upon a reviewer request we recall its celebrated fast solution FFT in the Appendix). Here and hereafter we assume that \(\mathbf{v}\) denotes a column vector, while \(\mathbf{v}^T\) denotes its transpose.

  6. 6.

    Unlike paper  [22], this result is deduced in [18] from Theorem 2, which is also the basis for probabilistic support of correctness of Cauchy root-counter in  [18].

  7. 7.

    Clearly, we can only improve our approximation of the integer \(s_0\) by the Cauchy sum \(s_0^*\) if we drop its imaginary part \(\mathfrak {I}(s_0^*)\). The power sum \(s_0\) of the roots in a well-isolated disc is only slightly closer to \(\mathfrak {R}(s_0^*)\) than to \(s_0^*\) but can be dramatically closer when some or all roots lie on the boundary circle of an input disc (see  [18, Section 3.7]).

  8. 8.

    One can extend the algorithm by applying Algorithm 1a to a disc \(D(0, \theta )\) for smaller \(\theta >1\) and modifying bound (13) accordingly.

  9. 9.

    A polynomial p has no roots in a closed disc D(0, 1) if and only if \(p_\mathrm{rev}\) has precisely d roots in the open disc D(0, 1); similar property holds for Cauchy sums \(s_0^*\) (see   [18]).

References

  1. Baur, W., Strassen, V.: On the complexity of partial derivatives. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 22, 317–330 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Becker, R., Sagraloff, M., Sharma, V., Yap, C.: A near-optimal subdivision algorithm for complex root isolation based on the Pellet test and Newton iteration. J. Symb. Comput. 86, 51–96 (2018), Proceedings version. In: ACM ISSAC, pp. 71–78 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsc.2017.03.009

  3. Bini, D.A., Fiorentino, G.: Design, analysis, and implementation of a multiprecision polynomial rootfinder. Numer. Algorithms 23, 127–173 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019199917103

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bini, D., Pan, V.Y.: Graeffe’s, Chebyshev-like, and Cardinal’s processes for splitting a polynomial into factors. J. Complex. 12, 492–511 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bini, D.A., Robol, L.: Solving secular and polynomial equations: a multiprecision algorithm. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 272, 276–292 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2013.04.037

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Erdős, P., Turán, P.: On the distribution of roots of polynomials. Ann. Math 2(51), 105–119 (1950)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Gerasoulis, A.: A fast algorithm for the multiplication of generalized Hilbert matrices with vectors. Math. Comput. 50(181), 179–188 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Henrici, P.: Applied and Computational Complex Analysis, Vol. 1: Power Series, Integration, Conformal Mapping, Location of Zeros. Wiley, New York (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Householder, A.S.: Dandelin, Lobachevskii, or Graeffe? Amer. Math. Mon. 66, 464–466 (1959). https://doi.org/10.2307/2310626

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Imbach, R., Pan, V.Y.: New progress in univariate polynomial root-finding. In: Proceedings of ACM-SIGSAM ISSAC 2020, pp. 249–256, July 20–23, 2020, Kalamata, Greece, ACM Press, New York (2020). ACM ISBN 978-1-4503-7100-1/20/07. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373207.3403979

  11. Imbach, R., Pan, V.Y., Yap, C.: Implementation of a near-optimal complex root clustering algorithm. In: Davenport, J.H., Kauers, M., Labahn, G., Urban, J. (eds.) ICMS 2018. LNCS, vol. 10931, pp. 235–244. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96418-8_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Kobel, A., Rouillier, F., Sagralo, M.: Computing real roots of real polynomials... and now for real! In: Proceedings of the ACM on International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation (ISSAC 2016), pp. 301–310. ACM Press, New York (2016) https://doi.org/10.1145/2930889.2930937

  13. Linnainmaa, S.: Taylor expansion of the accumulated rounding errors. BIT 16, 146–160 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Pan, V.Y.: Approximation of complex polynomial zeros: modified quadtree (Weyl’s) construction and improved Newton’s iteration. J. Complex. 16(1), 213–264 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1006/jcom.1999

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Pan, V.Y.: Structured Matrices and Polynomials: Unified Superfast Algorithms. Birkhäuser/Springer, Boston/New York (2001) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0129-8

  16. Pan, V.Y.: Univariate polynomials: nearly optimal algorithms for factorization and rootfinding. J. Symb. Comput. 33(5), 701–733, : Proceedings version. ACM STOC 1995, 741–750 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1006/jsco.2002.0531

  17. Pan, V.Y.: Old and new nearly optimal polynomial root-Finding. In: England,M., Koepf, W., Sadykov, T.M., Seiler, W.M., Vorozhtsov, E.V. (eds.) CASC2019. LNCS, vol. 11661, pp, 393–411. Springer, Nature Switzerland (2019) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26831-2

  18. Pan, V.Y.: New Acceleration of Univariate Polynomial Root-finders, August 2020. arXiv: 1805.12042

  19. Pan, V.Y.: Acceleration of subdivision root-finding for sparse polynomials. to appear. In: Boulier, F., England, M., Sadikov, T.M., Vorozhtsov, E.V. (eds.) CASC 2020. Springer Nature, Switzerland (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pan, V.Y., Zhao, L.: Real root isolation by means of root radii approximation. In: Gerdt, V.P., Koepf, W., Seiler, W.M., Vorozhtsov, E.V. (eds.), CASC 2015. LNCS, vol. 9301, pp. 347–358. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). arXiv:1501.05386

  21. Renegar, J.: On the worst-case arithmetic complexity of approximating zeros of polynomials. J. Complex. 3(2), 90–113 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-064X(87)90022-7

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Schönhage, A.: The fundamental theorem of algebra in terms of computational complexity. Math. Dept., Univ. Tübingen, Germany (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Weyl, H.: Randbemerkungen zu Hauptproblemen der Mathematik. II. Fundamentalsatz der Algebra und Grundlagen der Mathematik. Mathematische Zeitschrift 20, 131–151 (1924)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been supported by NSF Grants CCF–1563942 and CCF–1733834 and PSC CUNY Award 69813 00 48. We also thank the reviewers for thoughtful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victor Y. Pan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A.  Discrete Fourier transform (DFT)

Appendix A.  Discrete Fourier transform (DFT)

DFT(\(\mathbf{p}\)) outputs the vector of the values \(p(\zeta ^j)=\sum _{i=0}^{d-1}p_i\zeta ^{ij}\) of a polynomial \(p(x)=\sum _{i=0}^{d-1}p_ix^i\) on the set \(\{1,\zeta ,\ldots ,\zeta ^{d-1}\}\). The fast Fourier transform (FFT) algorithm, for \(d=2^h\) recursively splits p(x):

$$\begin{aligned} p(x)&=p_0(y)+xp_1(y), \text{ where } y=x^2, \\ p_0(y)&=p_0+p_2x^2+\cdots +p_{d-2}x^{d-2},~ p_1(y)&=x(p_1+p_3x^2+\cdots +p_{d-1}x^{d-2}). \end{aligned}$$

This reduces DFT\(_d\) for p(x) to two DFT\(_{d/2}\) (for \(p_0(y)\) and \(p_1(y)\)) at a cost of d multiplications of \(p_1(y)\) by x, for \(x=\zeta ^i\), \(i=0,1,\ldots ,d-1\), and of the pairwise addition of the d output values to \(p_0(\zeta ^{2i})\). Since \(\zeta ^{i+d/2}=-\zeta ^i\) for even d, we perform multiplication only d/2 times, that is, \(f(d)\le 2f(d/2)+1.5d\) if f(k) ops are sufficient for DFT\(_k\). Recursively we obtain the following estimate.

Theorem 3

For \(d=2^h\) and a positive integer h, the DFT\(_d\) only involves \(f(d)\le 1.5dh=1.5d\log _2d\) arithmetic operations.

Inverse DFT is the converse problem of interpolation to a polynomial p(x) from its values at the dth roots of unity. At the cost of performing d divisions, this task can be reduced to DFT (see, e.g.,  [15, Theorem 2.2.2]).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Luan, Q., Pan, V.Y., Kim, W., Zaderman, V. (2020). Faster Numerical Univariate Polynomial Root-Finding by Means of Subdivision Iterations. In: Boulier, F., England, M., Sadykov, T.M., Vorozhtsov, E.V. (eds) Computer Algebra in Scientific Computing. CASC 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12291. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60026-6_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60026-6_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60025-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60026-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics