Skip to main content

Role of Digital Technologies, Robotics, and Augmented Realities

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Cultural Heritage Analysis
  • 2954 Accesses

Abstract

Several examples testify how the evolution in applied technologies to cultural heritage has improved significantly in the last decades in terms of accuracy and reliability of measurement, restitution, and management of the acquired data. This evolution is not always accompanied by the simplification of procedures, lowering of costs, and, more importantly, awareness-raising of the identity value of the investigated asset.

In this article, some case studies where different types of technologies have been used are presented together with a recent study of applied robotics in cultural heritage. The aim is to construct an exhaustive picture of the technologies currently in use within the complex conservation process. To follow, a series of urgent reflections are introduced in order to stimulate, contribute, and increase the necessary interdisciplinary and intercultural debate on the issue of safeguarding cultural assets as a driving force for civil progress, paying particular attention to 3D digital survey.

Above all, the paper expands the issue to a wider analysis of the general and progressive anthropological transformations produced on human society by the speed of technological innovation. Finally, the paper will attempt to verify how much and what role the identity values expressed by cultural heritage will still exercise on technologically globalized cities and societies of the twenty-first century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

AI:

Artificial Intelligence

CHARISMA:

Cultural Heritage Advanced Research Infrastructures SMA

CIPA:

Scientific Committee on Heritage Documentation

CNR:

Italian National Research Council

DARIAH:

Digital Research Infrastructure for the Arts and Humanities

EPOCH:

European Research Network on Excellence in Processing Open Cultural Heritage

EU:

European Union

HUL:

Historic Urban Landscape

ICOMOS:

International Council on Monuments and Sites

ICT:

Information and Communication Technology

IoG:

Internet of Games

IoT:

Internet of Things

JPI:

Joint Programming Initiative on Cultural Heritage

SDGs:

United Nations Sustainable Development Goals

SEAV:

Spanish Society of Virtual Archaeology

SfM:

Structure for Motion

UAV:

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

UNESCO:

United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization

References

  1. Salonia P (2003) Strumenti informatici innovativi di ausilio alla conservazione del patrimonio storico-architettonico: problemi di organizzazione, diffusione e gestione dati. In: Rossi M, Salonia P (eds) Comunicazione multimediale per i beni culturali. Addison-Wesley, Milan, pp 25–52

    Google Scholar 

  2. Drap P, Sgrenzaroli M, Canciani M, Cannata G, Seinturier J Laser scanning and close range photogrammetry: towards a single measuring tool dedicated to architecture and archaeology. In: Proc. 19th international symposium of the International Committee for Architectural Photogrammetry (Antalya, 30 September–04 October 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guarnieri A, Remondino F, Vettore A Photogrammetry and ground-based laser scanning: assessment of metric accuracy of the 3D model of Pozzoveggiani church. In: Proc. the Olympic spirit in surveying – International Federation of Surveyors working week (Athens, 22–27 May 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Salonia P, Negri A, Valdarnini L, Scolastico S, Bellucci V Quick photogrammetric systems applied to documentation of cultural heritage: the example of Aosta roman city wall, in Cooperation to save the world’s Cultural Heritage. In: Proc. 20th international symposium of the International Committee for Architectural Photogrammetry (Turin, 26 September–1 October 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Salonia P, Negri A, Valdarnini L, Scolastico S, Bellucci V Innovative quick photogrammetric systems for 3D cultural heritage documentation: the Appia Antica Project. In: Forte M (ed) Proc. the reconstruction of archaeological landscapes through digital technologies 2nd Italy-United States workshop, BAR international series 1379 (Rome, 3–5 November 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Appolonia L, Moltedo L, Picco R, Salonia P Innovative systems for assisted analysis and diagnosis. In: Proc. 21st international symposium of the International Committee for Architectural Photogrammetry (Athens, 1–6 October 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Salonia P, Scolastico S, Bellucci V, Marcolongo A, Letti Messina T 3D survey technologies for reconstruction, analysis and diagnosis in the conservation process of cultural heritage. In: Proc. 21st international symposium of the International Committee for Architectural Photogrammetry (Athens, 1–6 October 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. CENOBIUM. www.cenobium.isti.cnr.it/index.php

  9. Salonia P, Scolastico S, Marcolongo A, Letti Messina T, Pozzi A Three focal photogrammetry application for multi-scale and multi-level cultural heritage survey, documentation and 3D reconstruction. In: Proc. 22nd international symposium of the International Committee for Architectural Photogrammetry (Kyoto, 11–15 October 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Filas Regione Lazio. www.futouring.com/

  11. Salonia P, Letti Messina T, Marcolongo A, Appolonia L Photo scanner 3D survey for monitoring historical monuments. The case history of Porta Praetoria in Aosta. In: Proc. 23rd international symposium of the International Committee for Architectural Photogrammetry (Prague, 12–16 September 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Studio di pre-fattibilità Pietrobon & Rossi Engineering s.r.l. : Tecnologie digitali per il restauro dei templi confuciani della provincia cinese dell’Hunan, OICE Progetto&Pubblico, vol February, p 11 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. CNR: Relazioni degli Istituti – Patrimonio Culturale (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. ROVINA. www.rovina-project.eu/

  15. Stachniss C, Burgard W (2012) Particle filters for robot navigation. Found Trends Robot 3(4):211–282. https://doi.org/10.1561/2300000013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bogoslavskyi I, Vysotska O, Sarafin J, Grisetti G, Stachniss C Efficient trasversability analysis for mobile robots using the kinect sensor. In: Proc. European conference on mobile robots (Barcelona, 25–27 September 2013), pp 158–163

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kummerle R, Grisetti G, Strasdat H, Konoligie K, Burgard W A general framework for graph optimization. In: Proc. IEEE international conference on robotics & automation (Shanghai 9–13 May 2011), pp 3607–3613

    Google Scholar 

  18. Grisetti G, Kummerle R, Ni K Robust optimization of factor graphs by using condensed measurements. In: Proc. international conference on intelligent robots and systems (Vilamoura, 7–12 October 2012), pp 581–588

    Google Scholar 

  19. Basso F, Pretto A, Menegatti E Unsupervised intrinsic and extrinsic calibration of a camera- depth sensor couple. In: Proc. IEEE international conference on robotics & automation (Hong Kong, 31 May–7 June 2014), pp 6244–6249

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tedaldi A, Pretto A, Menegatti E A robust and easy to implement method for IMU calibration without external equipments. In: Proc. IEEE international conference on robotics & automation (Hong Kong, 31 May–7 June 2014), pp 3042–3049

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vergauwen M, Van Gool L (2006) Web-based 3D reconstruction service. Mach Vis Appl 17(6):411–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Moons T, Van Gool L, Vergauwen M (2009) 3D reconstruction from multiple images part 1: principles. Found Trends Comput Graph Vis 4(4):287–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hermans A, Floros G, Leibe B Dense 3D semantic mapping of indoor scenes from RGB- D images. In: Proc. IEEE international conference on robotics & automation, Hong Kong 31 May–7 June 2014, pp 2631–2638

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stachniss C, Burgard W. www.rovina-project.eu/del/del-1-1.pdf

  25. Goody JR (ed) (2000) Il potere della tradizione scritta, Bollati Boringhieri. Feltrinelli, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  26. McLuahnl M (ed) (1967) Gli strumenti del comunicare. Il Saggiatore, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brusaporci S (2013) Modellazione e rappresentazione digitale per i beni architettonici. In: Brusaporci S (ed) Modelli complessi per il patrimonio architettonico-urbano. Gangemi, Rome, pp 18–24

    Google Scholar 

  28. Benjamin W (ed) (2000) L’opera d’arte nell’epoca della sua riproducibilità tecnica. Einaudi Ed., Torino. Benjamin W (1969) The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In: Arendt H (ed) Illuminations. Schocken Books, York, pp 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  29. ICOMOS. www.icomos.org/charters/nara-e.pdf

  30. Wang N (1999) Rethinking authenticity in tourism experience. Ann Tour Res 26(2):349–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Greenwood DJ (1977) Culture by the pound: an anthropological perspective on tourism as cultural commoditization. In: Smith VL (ed) Hosts and guests. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp 129–139

    Google Scholar 

  32. Silverman H (2015) Heritage and authenticity. In: Waterton E, Watson S (eds) Handbook of contemporary heritage research. Palgrave Macmillian, New York, pp 69–88

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Dant T (1999) Material culture in the social world: values, activities, lifestyles. Open University Press, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  34. Malafouris L (2004) The cognitive basis of material engagement: where brain, body and culture conflate. In: DeMarrais E, Gosden C, Renfrew C (eds) Rethinking materiality: the engagement of mind with the material world. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge, pp 53–62

    Google Scholar 

  35. Forte M (2014) Archaeology. New perspectives and challenges. The example of Catalhoyuk. Near Eastern Archaeol 2:1–29. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3285.0568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Forte M (2008) La villa di Livia, un percorso di ricerca di archeologia virtuale. Erma di Bretschneider, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  37. Galeazzi F, Di Giuseppantonio Di Franco P, Dell’Unto N (2010) 3D cybermaps of Western Han mural tombs, cyber-archaeology. BAR international series 2177, pp 97–108

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kenderdine S, Forte M, Camporesi C (2012) Rhizome of Western Han: an omnispatial theatre for archaeology. In: Mingquan Z, Romanowska I, Wu Z, Xu P, Verhagen P (eds) Proc. revive the past. computer applications and quantitative methods in archaeology – 39th international conference. Pallas Publications, Amsterdam, pp 141–158

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kenderdine S, Shaw J, Kocsis A Dramaturgies of PLACE: evaluation, embodiment and performance in PLACE-Hampi. In: Proc. international conference on advances in computer entertainment technology (Athens, 29–31 October 2009), pp 249–256

    Google Scholar 

  40. Levy T, Petrovic V, Wypych T, Gidding A, Knabb K, Hernandez D, Smith NG, Schlulz JP, Savage SH, Kuester F, Ben-Yosef E, Buitenhuys C, Barrett CJ, Najjar M, DeFanti T (2010) On-site digital archaeology 3.0 and cyber-archaeology: into the future of the past – new developments, delivery and the creation of a data avalanche, cyber-archaeology. BAR international series 2177. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp 135–53

    Google Scholar 

  41. ICOMOS. www.icomos.org/charters/venice_e.pdf

  42. Brandi C (1977) Teoria del restauro. Einaudi, Turin

    Google Scholar 

  43. Alberti Leon Battista OG (1966) L’architettura (De re aedificatoria) (ed: Portoghesi P). Il Polifilo, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  44. London Charter. http://www.londoncharter.org

  45. Niccolucci F, Beacham R, Hermon S, Denard H (2010) Five years after: the London Charter revisited. In: Artusi A, Joly M, Lucet G, Pitzalis D, Ribes A (eds) the 11th international symposium on virtual reality, archaeology, and cultural heritage. Eurographics Association, pp 101–104

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wurman RS (2011) To dream the waking dream in new ways. In: Brockman J (ed) How is the internet changing the way you think. Atlantic Books, London, p 24

    Google Scholar 

  47. Europeana Collections. https://www.europeana.eu/portal/en

  48. Arches. https://www.archesproject.org

  49. Cyark. www.cyark.org

  50. Rekrei. https://projectmosul.org

  51. Herculaneum Conservation Project. www.herculaneum.org

  52. ICOMOS. www.icomos.org/charters/charters.pdf https://www.icomos.org/en/charters-and-texts/179-articles-en-francais/ressources/charters-and-standards/387-principles-for-the-recording-of-monuments-groups-of-buildings-and-sites-1996

  53. Dacos M. https://tcp.hypotheses.org/318

  54. Grande A. http://sevilleprinciples.com

  55. CIPA. https://www.cipaheritagedocumentation.org/cipa_ottawa/, https://www.isprs-ann-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/IV-2-W2/

  56. Michael Culture Association. www.michael-culture.eu

  57. EPOCH. http://epoch-net.org

  58. 3D-ICONS. http://3dicons-project.eu

  59. European Commission. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/92569/factsheet/en

  60. DARIAH-EU. www.dariah.eu

  61. Cultural Heritage: a challenge for Europe. http://jpi-ch.eu

  62. SEARCH. www.ub.edu/searchproject/the-project/the-7th-framework-programme/

  63. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en

  64. E-RIHS. www.e-rihs.eu

  65. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/societal-challenges

  66. UNESCO. https://whc.unesco.org

  67. ICOMOS. www.icomos.org/images/DOCUMENTS/Secretariat/2015/GA_2014_results/GA2014_Symposium_FlorenceDeclaration_IT_final_20150318.pdf

  68. ICOMOS. www.icomos.org/en

  69. UNESCO. https://whc.unesco.org/archive/convention-en.pdf

  70. ICAR. www.icar.beniculturali.it/biblio/pdf/Studi/franceschini.pdf

  71. MIBACT. www.beniculturali.it/mibac/export/MiBAC/sito-MiBAC/Contenuti/Norme-e-Pareri/Evidenza/visualizza_asset.html_1095508472.html

  72. Twenge JT (2019) More time on technology, less happiness? Associations between digital-media use and psychological well-being. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 28(4):372–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Turk V (2017) Understanding generation alpha. WIRED Consulting

    Google Scholar 

  74. Presa Diretta. www.presadiretta.rai.it/dl/portali/site/puntata/ContentItem-60e66850-8f0b-4f3b-807a-9068b533638b.html

  75. We are social. https://wearesocial.com/blog/2018/01/global-digital-report-2018

  76. Galimberti U (2000) Psiche e techne. L’uomo nell’età della tecnica. Feltrinelli Ed., Milano

    Google Scholar 

  77. Ratti C, Claudel M (2016) The city of tomorrow: sensors, networks, hackers, and the future of urban life. Yale University Press, Yale

    Google Scholar 

  78. Settis S (2014) Se Venezia muore. Einaudi, Turin

    Google Scholar 

  79. Calvino I (1972) Le città invisibili. Einaudi, Turin

    Google Scholar 

  80. Turnbridge JE, Ashworth GJ (1996) Dissonant heritage: the management of the past as a resource in conflict. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  81. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/1680083746

  82. UNESCO. https://whc.unesco.org/uploads/activities/documents/activity-646-2.pdf

  83. UNESCO. https://whc.unesco.org/en/hul/

  84. UNESCO. www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/themes/culture-and-development/hangzhou-congress

  85. ICOMOS. https://www.icomos.org/images/DOCUMENTS/Secretariat/2015/GA_2014_results/GA2014_Symposium_FlorenceDeclaration_EN_final_20150318.pdf

  86. United Nations. www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/cities/

  87. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/policy/themes/urban-development/agenda/pact-of-amsterdam.pdf

  88. United Nations. http://habitat3.org/wp-content/uploads/NUA-English.pdf

  89. Bauman Z (2005) Fiducia e paura nella citta? Bruno Mondadori, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  90. Carta M (2010) Dalla Carta di Machu Picchu all’agenda per le città del XXI secolo. In: Lima AI (ed) Per un’architettura come ecologia umana. Studiosi a confronto. Jaca Book, Milan, pp 204–215

    Google Scholar 

  91. Settis S. www.ilgiornaledellarte.com/articoli/2012/10/114543.html

  92. De Carli S. www.vita.it/it/interview/2017/06/09/nella-societa-ipercomplessa-la-strategia-e-saltare-le-separazioni/119/

  93. Paolo di Teodoro F (2015) La lettera a Leone X di raffaello e Baldassar Castiglione: un nuovo manoscritto. Annali della Scuola Nomale Superiore di Pisa serie 5 7(1):119–168

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Salonia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional information

This chapter organizes and expands the concepts expressed by the Author in previous printed papers related to some speeches presented during two Conferences at the University Federico II of Naples:

- Salonia P, Patrimonio, Conoscenza, Tecnologie. Certezze o necessità di ripensamento critico? In Patrimonio culturale: tecniche innovative per il Progetto di Conservazione (edited by Rosa Anna Genovese). Proc. International Conference Patrimonio culturale, Città metropolitana, Paesaggio. Metodologie e tecniche innovative per la Conservazione ed il Restauro; Napoli, 2015; Ed. Giannini

- Salonia P, Homo Digitalis e Patrimonio Storico: quale Futuro per la Memoria? In Patrimonio e città storiche come poli di integrazione sociale e culturale, Sostenibilità e Tecnologie Innovative. Esperienze internazionali di conservazione a confronto (edited by Rosa Anna Genovese). Proc. International Conference; Napoli, 2018; Ed. Giannini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Salonia, P. (2022). Role of Digital Technologies, Robotics, and Augmented Realities. In: D'Amico, S., Venuti, V. (eds) Handbook of Cultural Heritage Analysis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60016-7_50

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics