Skip to main content

Environmental Bioethics, Sustainable Development and Social Responsibility in Higher Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integrating Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development

Abstract

Background: Environmental bioethics seeks to promote human health concurrently with the preservation of the environment, which, together with higher education (HE) seeks to achieve competencies focused on sustainable development (SD), social responsibility (SR) and maintenance of bioethical and environmental principles. Objective: To contribute to the reflection and articulation between the principles of environmental bioethics and their repercussions in HE, SD and SR. Methodology: Multivariate and exploratory analysis, cross-sectional design, with a quantitative and qualitative approach. Sample: professors from southern Brazil, random sampling, non-probabilistic for convenience (openepi = 95% CI (%), n = 1400 professors). Approved by the Research Ethics Committees of HCPA and UFP, and CAAE 550666168.0000.5327, Plataforma Brasil. Results: The statistical analysis used was Factor Analysis (FA) and Principal Component Retention (PCR) with Varimax® rotation. The FA produced 6 PCs, categorised and interpreted using Qualitative Content Analysis by Bardin, and the MAXQDA® software, making it possible to highlight the most relevant information generated by the sample. Conclusions: Environmental bioethics and HE have common objectives that interact with human health and the ecosystem. Therefore, it is prudent to work on these aspects in complementary programs that address bioethical principles such as justice, equity, solidarity and dignity and that seek to promote well-being, quality of life, equity, inclusion, sustainability and social justice, encouraging SD and SR, residing in this juxtaposition the social importance of this work. The programs that advocate the bioethical approach in their actions must be worked together, and not in isolation, because, if worked individually, they do not characterise the comprehensive character recommended by the bioethical principles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bardin L (2009) Análise de conteúdo [Content analysis]. Edições 70, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan D (2015) Bioethics: its past and future. Global bioethics: what for? UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlotto IN, Dinis MAP (2017) Bioética e Promoção da Saúde Docente na Educação Superior: Uma Interface Necessária [Bioethics and the Health Promotion of Professors in university: A Necessary Interface]. Revista Saber & Educar 23:168–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.17346/se.vol23.291

  • Carlotto IN, Dinis MAP (2018a) Bioethics, health promotion and sustainability: interfaces in higher education. BMC Health Serv Res 18(2):684

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlotto IN, Dinis MAP (2018b) Building bridges between bioethics and ecological models of health promotion in higher education. Nuevas aportaciones sociológicas: género, psicología y sociedad. Colección Herramientas universitárias, Editorial GEDISA. CUICIID 2018 (Congreso Universitario Internacional sobre la comunicación en la profesión y en la Universidad. de hoy: Contenidos, Investigación, Innovación y Docencia), Madri, Espanha. Available in: http://www.seeci.net/cuiciid/. ISBN 978-84-17690-16-8 y Depósito legal B-28043-2018, pp 275–282

  • Carlotto IN, Dinis MAP (2018c) Bioethics as a paradigm for health promotion in the university: a cross-sectional study. UNESCO Chair in Bioethics 13th World Conference Bioethics, Medical Ethics and Health Law. UNESCO, Jerusalem, Israel. https://ethics-2018.isas.co.il/wp-content/uploads/sites/35/2018/12/Ethics-2018-Abstract-book.pdf

  • Carlotto IN, Dinis MAP (2019a) Tecnologias da informação e comunicação (TICs) na promoção da saúde: considerações bioéticas [Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in health promotion: bioethical considerations]. Revista Saber & Educar 25. https://doi.org/10.17346/se.vol24.306

  • Carlotto IN, Dinis MAP (2019b) Bioethical Reflections on the UN 2030 Agenda and its Repercussions for Professors’ Health. Universities and Sustainable Communities: Meeting the Goals of the Agenda 2030, World Sustainability Series, Springer Nature, Switzerland, pp 737–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30306-8_44

  • Dooris M (2006) Health promoting settings: future directions. Promot Educ 13(4–6):50–52, 68–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooris M (2009) Holistic and sustainable health improvement: the contribution of the settings-based approach to health promotion. Perspectives in Public Health 129:29–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757913908098881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dooris M, Doherty S, Orme J (2017) The application of salutogenesis in universities. The Handbook of Salutogenesis. Springer, England, pp 237–245

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fiore R (2016) Bioethics: environmental. Encycl Glob Bioeth. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fragnière A (2016) Ecological limits and the meaning of freedom: a defense of liberty as non-domination. De Ethica, J Philos Theol Appl Eth 3(3):33–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gluchman V (2015) UNESCO Chairs in Bioethics and their future task. Global bioethics: what for? UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellegers A, Ramsey P (1973) The patient as person. The Explorations in medical ethics, New Haven, Connecticut

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameton A, Pierce J (2001) Environment and health: 8. Sustainable health care and emerging ethical responsibilities. CMAJ 164(3):365–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Junges JR (2006) Bioética: hermenêutica e casuística [Bioethics: hermeneutics and casuistry]. Loyola, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • MAXQDA (2018) The art of data analysis. https://www.maxqda.com/?utm_expid=.HYL6SEWUQaqlYvgzfnwOzA.0&utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.maxqda.com%2Fwhat-is-maxqda. Last Accessed 18 Aug 2019

  • Potter VR (1971) Bioethics, bridge to the future. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter VR (1988) Global bioethics: building on the Leopold legacy. Michigan State University Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Prodanov CC (2013) Metodologia do trabalho científico: métodos e técnicas da pesquisa e do trabalho acadêmico [Methodology of scientific work: methods and techniques of research and academic work]. Feevale, Novo Hamburgo

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.gbif.org/tool/81287/r-a-language-and-environment-for-statistical-computing. Last Accessed 16 July 2017

  • Real de Asúa D, Herreros B (2016) Why dedicate yourself to bioethics? Seven reasons to get you started. Revista Clínica Española 216:271–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rce.2015.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richie C (2014) A brief history of environmental bioethics. Virtual Mentor 16(9):749–752. https://doi.org/10.1001/virtualmentor.2014.16.9.mhst2-1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanz EJ (2016) Day to day bioethics: Beyond the experts. Revista Clínica Española 216:255–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rce.2016.03.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Semplici S (2015) The imperative of sharing. Global bioethics: what for? UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Siqueira-Batista R, Gomes AP, Motta LCS, Rennó L, Lopes TC, Miyadahira R, Vidal SV, Cotta RMM (2015) (Bio)ética e Estratégia Saúde da Família: mapeando problemas [(Bio) Ethics and Family Health Strategy: Mapping Problems]. Saúde e Sociedade 24:02–16. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902015000100009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton-Jean M (2015) Twentieth anniversary of the International Bioethics Committee. Global bioethics: what for? UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsouros A, Dowding G, Thompson J, Dooris M, WHO (World Health Organization). Regional Office for Europe (1998) Health promoting universities: concept, experience and framework for. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoboli ELCP (2010) Relación clínica y problemas éticos en atención primaria, São Paulo, Brasil [Clinical relationship and ethical problems in primary care, São Paulo, Brazil]. Atención Primaria 42:406–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2010.01

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivaní Nadir Carlotto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Carlotto, I.N., Pereira, R.C.S., Dinis, M.A.P. (2021). Environmental Bioethics, Sustainable Development and Social Responsibility in Higher Education. In: Leal Filho, W., Tortato, U., Frankenberger, F. (eds) Integrating Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59975-1_37

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics