Skip to main content

Mining Sustainability Practices in Latin America

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integrating Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development

Abstract

The mining sector is considered one of those that generate strong environmental, social and economic impacts. As a result, mining companies aware of their activities’ impacts have chosen to plan and execute strategies to have long-term sustainable positive results, innovating and investing in technology to improve their critical processes and activities. The incorporation of the sustainability concept in the mining industry could be considered as the development of its activities efficiently and effectively, optimizing resources, creating wealth for the whole society by applying strategies to mitigate environmental and social impacts, enhancing the environment where their mining projects operate. This research identifies in the literature the key elements that form the sustainable operations of a mining company through techniques of systematic literature review. This paper identifies and examines the current dominant practices in the mining industry in Latin America. To achieve this objective, a multidimensional framework is applied to analyze and classify the implementation of these activities in three different angles: the types of corporate sustainability activities, the issues addressed, and the step of the value chain concerned. The research adopts a content analysis of sustainability reports from the main mining companies in Latin America. The results show that the predominant practices are found in corporate sustainability management (type), have a social approach (issue) and are directly related to the production process (value chain step). Finally, it describes sustainability-based projects that these companies are developing to build a sustainable operations strategic vision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aragón-Correa JA, Hurtado-Torres N, Sharma S, García-Morales VJ (2008) Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: a resource-based perspective. J Environ Manag 86(1):88–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapple W, Moon J (2005) Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia: a seven-country study of CSR web site reporting. Bus Soc 44(4):415–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho CH, Michelon G, Patten DM (2012) Enhancement and obfuscation through the use of graphs in sustainability reports: an international comparison, sustain. Account Manag Policy J 3(1):74–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Coetzee CM, Van Staden CJ (2011) Disclosure responses to mining accidents: South African evidence. Account Forum 35(4):232–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan C, Rankin M (1996) Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively?: an analysis of environmental disclosures by firms prosecuted successfully by the environmental protection authority. Account Audit Account J 9(2):50–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan C, Rankin M, Tobin J (2002) An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983–1997: a test of legitimacy theory. Account Audit Account J 15(3):312–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dery FX, Idemudia U, Gruber JS, Kayira J (2019) Identifying and clarifying environmental policy best practices for the mining industry—a systematic review. J Clean Product 222:922–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudka S, Adriano DC (1997) Environmental impacts of metal ore mining and processing: a review. J Environ Qual 26(3):516–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escanciano C, Fernández B, Suárez A (2010) Organización de la actividad preventiva y gestión de la seguridad y salud laboral en la minería española: experiencia de las empresas certificadas ISO 9001. Dirección Organ 40:86–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Fifka MS (2013) Corporate responsibility reporting and its determinants in comparative perspective—a review of the empirical literature and a meta-analysis. Bus Strategy Environ 22(1):1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun CJ, Gardberg NA, Barnett M (2000) Opportunity platforms and safety nets: corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Bus Soc Rev 105(1):85–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friese S (2011) Using ATLAS.ti for analyzing the financial crisis data [67 paragraphs]. For Qual Soc Res 12(1), Art. 39

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuisz-Kehrbach SK (2015) A three-dimensional framework to explore corporate sustainability activities in the mining industry: current status and challenges ahead. Resour. Policy 46(1):101–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giurco D, Cooper C (2012) Minería y sostenibilidad: haciendo las preguntas correctas. Minero Ing 29:3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey PC (2005) The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: a risk management perspective. Acad Manag Rev 30(4):777–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes CM, Kneipp JM, Kruglianskas I, Barbieri Da Rosa LA, Bichueti RS (2014) Management for sustainability in companies of the mining sector: an analysis of the main factors related with the business performance. J Clean Product 84(1):84–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes CM, Kneipp JM, Kruglianskas I, Barbieri Da Rosa LA, Bichueti RS (2015) Management for sustainability: an analysis of the key practices according to the business size. Ecol Ind 52:116–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guenther E, Hoppe H, Poser C (2007) Environmental corporate social responsibility of firms in the mining and oil and gas industries: current status quo of reporting following GRI guidelines. Greener Manag Int 53:7–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie J, Abeysekera I (2006) Content analysis of social, environmental reporting: what is new? J Hum Resour Cost Account 10(2):114–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guziana B, Dobers P (2013) How sustainability leaders communicate corporate activities of sustainable development. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 20(4):193–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart SL (1995) A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Acad Manag Rev 20(4):986–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ihlen Ø, Roper J (2014) Corporate reports on sustainability and sustainable development: ‘we have arrived.’ Sustain Dev 22(1):42–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Mining (2019) https://www.icmm.com/en-gb/metals-and-minerals. Accessed 10 Dec 2019

  • Jenkins H (2004) Corporate social responsibility and the mining industry: conflicts and constructs. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 11(1):23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins H, Yakovleva N (2006) Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure. J Clean Prod 14(3–4):271–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laufer WS (2003) Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. J Bus Ethics 43(3):253–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLellan BC, Corder GD, Giurco DP, Ishihara KN (2012) Renewable energy in the minerals industry: a review of global potential. J Clean Prod 32:32–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne MJ, Gray R (2007) Future prospects for corporate sustainability reporting. Unerman J (ed) Sustainability accounting and accountability. Routledge, London, pp 184–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker LD (2005) Social and environmental accountability research: a view from the commentary box. Account Audit Account J 18(6):842–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino C, Lodhia S (2012) Climate change accounting and the Australian mining industry: exploring the links between corporate disclosure and the generation of legitimacy. J Clean Prod 36:68–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez F, Sanchez L (2009) Assessing the evolution of sustainability reporting in the mining sector. Environ Manag 43(6):949–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Kramer MR (2002) The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harv Bus Rev 80(12):56–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Kramer MR (2006) Strategy & society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harv Bus Rev 84(12):78–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranangen H, Lindman Å (2017) A path towards sustainability for the Nordic mining industry. J Clean Product 151:43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo MV, Fouts PA (1997) A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Acad Manag J 40(3):534–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S, Henriques I (2005) Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strateg Manag J 26(2):159–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S, Vredenburg H (1998) Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strateg Manag J 19(8):729–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava P (1995) The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Acad Manag Rev 20(4):936–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Geological Survey (2019) Mineral commodity summaries 2019: U.S. Geological Survey, 200p. https://doi.org/10.3133/70202434

  • Ventura J, Saenz CS (2015) Beyond corporate social responsibility. Towards a model for managing sustainable mining operations, qualitative research based upon best practices. Soc Responsib J 11(3):605–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Vintró C, Sanmiquel L, Freijo M (2014) Environmental sustainability in the mining sector: evidence from Catalan companies. J Clean Product 84(1):155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinhofer G, Busch T (2013) Corporate strategies for managing climate risks. Bus Strategy Environ 22(2):121–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirth H, Kulczycka J, Hausner J, Koński M (2016) Corporate social responsibility: communication about social and environmental disclosure by large and small copper mining companies. Resour. Policy 49:53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yongvanich K, Guthrie J (2007) Legitimation strategies in Australian mining extended performance reporting. J Hum Resour Costing Account 11(3):156–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alejandra Mallqui .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mallqui, A., de Lima, E.P., Bortoluzzi, S.C. (2021). Mining Sustainability Practices in Latin America. In: Leal Filho, W., Tortato, U., Frankenberger, F. (eds) Integrating Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59975-1_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics