Skip to main content

Microgrids and Local Markets

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Microgrids

Part of the book series: Power Systems ((POWSYS))

Abstract

Today’s electricity grids are being challenged by profound changes in operational conditions, shifting from centralized generation, served by transmission and distribution networks, to one with embedded distributed energy resources (DERs). Without appropriate operational and control layers, DERs can impose power quality and stability challenges. Conversely, coordinated and controlled use of DERs can provide substantial benefits for networks such as deferring or avoiding investments in the electricity network, and providing ancillary services. There are currently limited opportunities for DERs to provide these additional benefits to networks, or to be rewarded for providing these benefits. The increasing penetration of DERs aligned with grid digitization are changing electricity grids from a centralized structure to a decentralized one with geographically distributed generation resources. Due to various barriers, it is challenging to design a centralized market that could serve customers in distributed locations. The concept of the local market is an auspicious option to manage DERs locally and to handle local problems associated with the integration of DERs. Microgrids could provide a framework for establishing local markets in order to actively involve prosumers and consumers in a local energy system through financial incentives. The microgrid is a promising approach to help DERs to participate in different markets and to access the value from the services they provide to broader grids. Local markets in microgrids improve microgrid customers’ and operators’ capacity to access the economic values of controlling their distributed energies. This chapter reviews the concept of local markets for microgrids. In particular, different definitions of local markets are reviewed, and benefits and services which can be provided by local market are discussed. Then, three different models for local markets are presented, followed by a discussion on market settlement methods in local markets. Case studies are employed to demonstrate different attributes of local markets. The chapter is concluded with remarks and challenges for microgrids markets that can be explored in future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pudjianto, D., Ramsay, C., & Strbac, G. (2007). Virtual power plant and system integration of distributed energy resources. IET Renewable Power Generation, 1(1), 10–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Eftekharnejad, S., et al. (2013). Impact of increased penetration of photovoltaic generation on power systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 28(2), 893–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Energy Networks Australia, AEMO, Interim Report: Required Capabilities and Recommended Actions. Technical Report, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Morales, J. M., et al. (2013). Integrating renewables in electricity markets: Operational problems (Vol. 205, pp. 1–13). Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hirsch, A., Parag, Y., & Guerrero, J. (2018). Microgrids: A review of technologies, key drivers, and outstanding issues. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 90, 402–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jimeno, J., et al. (2011). Architecture of a microgrid energy management system. European Transactions on Electrical Power, 21(2), 1142–1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Koirala, B. P., et al. (2016). Local alternative for energy supply: Performance assessment of integrated community energy systems. Energies, 9(12), 981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mengelkamp, E., et al. Trading on local energy markets: A comparison of market designs and bidding strategies. in 14 th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM). IEEE, June 2017. Dresden, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ton, D. T., & Smith, M. A. (2012). The US department of energy's microgrid initiative. The Electricity Journal, 25(8), 84–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ilieva, I., et al. Design characteristics of a smart grid dominated local market. in CIRED Workshop. IEEE, June 2016, Helsinki, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lamparter, S., S. Becher, and J.-G. Fischer. An agent-based market platform for smart grids. in Proceedings of the 9 th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems: industry track. May 2010, Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cox, W. and T. Considine, Energy, micromarkets, and microgrids. Grid-Interop 2011, December 2011, Phoenix, AZ, USA: p. 1-8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bremdal, B.A., P. Olivella, and J. Rajasekharan. EMPOWER: A network market approach for local energy trade. in 2017 IEEE Manchester PowerTech. IEEE, June 2017, Manchester, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Munné-Collado, Í., et al. (2019). Local and micro power markets. In Micro and local power markets (pp. 37–96). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Da Silva, P. G., Ilić, D., & Karnouskos, S. (2013). The impact of smart grid prosumer grouping on forecasting accuracy and its benefits for local electricity market trading. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 5(1), 402–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hvelplund, F. (2006). Renewable energy and the need for local energy markets. Energy, 31(13), 2293–2302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Olivella-Rosell, P., et al. (2018). Optimization problem for meeting distribution system operator requests in local flexibility markets with distributed energy resources. Applied Energy, 210, 881–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Melton, R. (2015). Pacific northwest smart grid demonstration project technology performance report volume 1: Technology performance. Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Holmberg, D. G., et al. (2016). Transactive energy application landscape scenarios. Technical Report.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kok, J.K., C.J. Warmer, and I. Kamphuis. PowerMatcher: multiagent control in the electricity infrastructure. in Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems. July 2005. Ultrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rahimiyan, M., & Baringo, L. (2015). Strategic bidding for a virtual power plant in the day-ahead and real-time markets: A price-taker robust optimization approach. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 31(4), 2676–2687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lane, C. W., et al. (2013). Costing consumer preferences for a micro energy market. Center for nation reconstruction and capacity development, Technical Report.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jogunola, O., et al. (2017). State-of-the-art and prospects for peer-to-peer transaction-based energy system. Energies, 10(12), 2106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ela, E., et al. (2017). Electricity markets and renewables: A survey of potential design changes and their consequences. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 15(6), 70–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pavlovic, M., et al., SGAM business layer for a local flexibility market. in CIRED Workshop. June 2016. Helsinki, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, C., et al. A flex-market design for flexibility services through DERs. in IEEE PES ISGT Europe. IEEE, October, 2013. Copenhagen, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Torbaghan, S.S., et al. Local market framework for exploiting flexibility from the end users. in 13 th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM). IEEE, June 2016, Porto, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Morstyn, T., Teytelboym, A., & McCulloch, M. D. (2018). Designing decentralized markets for distribution system flexibility. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 34(3), 2128–2139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vicente-Pastor, A., et al. (2018). Evaluation of flexibility Markets for Retailer–DSO–TSO coordination. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 34(3), 2003–2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Olivella-Rosell, P., et al. (2018). Local flexibility market design for aggregators providing multiple flexibility services at distribution network level. Energies, 11(4), 822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mengelkamp, E., et al. (2018). Designing microgrid energy markets: A case study: The Brooklyn microgrid. Applied Energy, 210, 870–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nunna, H. K., & Srinivasan, D. (2017). Multiagent-based transactive energy framework for distribution systems with smart microgrids. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 13(5), 2241–2250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Faqiry, M. N., & Das, S. (2016). Double-sided energy auction in microgrid: Equilibrium under price anticipation. IEEE Access, 4, 3794–3805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Li, P., Zan, P., & Xu, H. (2016). Integrated energy exchange scheduling for multi-microgrid system with electric vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 7(4), 1762–1774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Park, S., et al. (2016). Contribution-based energy-trading mechanism in microgrids for future smart grid: A game theoretic approach. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 63(7), 4255–4265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang, H., et al. (2016). Reinforcement learning in energy trading game among smart microgrids. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 63(8), 5109–5119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Park, S., et al. (2017). Event-driven energy trading system in microgrids: Aperiodic market model analysis with a game theoretic approach. IEEE Access, 5, 26291–26302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang, H., & Huang, J. (2016). Incentivizing energy trading for interconnected microgrids. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 9(4), 2647–2657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Paudel, A., et al. (2018). Peer-to-peer energy trading in a prosumer-based community microgrid: A game-theoretic model. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 66(8), 6087–6097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Liu, N., et al. (2017). Energy-sharing model with price-based demand response for microgrids of peer-to-peer prosumers. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 32(5), 3569–3583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kirpes, B., et al. (2019). Design of a microgrid local energy market on a blockchain-based information system. Information Technology, 61(2-3), 87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mengelkamp, E., Schlund, D., & Weinhardt, C. (2019). Development and real-world application of a taxonomy for business models in local energy markets. Applied Energy, 256, 113913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Richter, M. (2012). Utilities’ business models for renewable energy: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(5), 2483–2493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Chen, T., Pourbabak, H., & Su, W. (2019). Electricity market reform. In The energy internet (pp. 97–121). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Cornélusse, B., et al. (2019). A community microgrid architecture with an internal local market. Applied Energy, 242, 547–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Khorasany, M., Y. Mishra, and G. Ledwich. Distributed market clearing approach for local energy trading in transactive market. in IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM). IEEE, August 2018. Portland, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Shamsi, P., et al. (2015). Economic dispatch for an agent-based community microgrid. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 7(5), 2317–2324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Luo, J., W. Su, and A.Q. Huang. Bit-energy: An innovative bitcoin-style distributed transactional model for a competitive electricity market. in IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM). IEEE, July 2017. Chicago, IL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sousa, T., et al. (2019). Peer-to-peer and community-based markets: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 104, 367–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kirchhoff, H., & Strunz, K. (2019). Key drivers for successful development of peer-to-peer microgrids for swarm electrification. Applied Energy, 244, 46–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Tushar, W., et al. (2019). A motivational game-theoretic approach for peer-to-peer energy trading in the smart grid. Applied Energy, 243, 10–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Tushar, W., et al. (2018). Peer-to-peer energy trading with sustainable user participation: A game theoretic approach. IEEE Access, 6, 62932–62943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Long, C., et al. (2017). Feasibility of peer-to-peer energy trading in low voltage electrical distribution networks. Energy Procedia, 105, 2227–2232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Khorasany, M., Mishra, Y., & Ledwich, G. (2019). Two-step market clearing for local energy trading in feeder-based markets. The Journal of Engineering, 2019(18), 4775–4779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Paudel, A. and G.H. Beng. A hierarchical peer-to-peer energy trading in community microgrid distribution systems. in IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM). IEEE, August 2018. Portland, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Khorasany, M., Mishra, Y., & Ledwich, G. (2019). Hybrid trading scheme for peer-to-peer energy trading in transactive energy markets. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 14(2), 245–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Munné-Collado, Í., P. Olivella-Rosell, and A. Sumper, Power Market Fundamentals. Micro and Local Power Markets. Wiley, 2019: p. 1.35.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Bhattacharjee, S. and S.B. Raha. Double auction bidding based economics for a microgrid model. in Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies (i-PACT). IEEE, April 2017. Vellore, India.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Tushar, W., et al. (2016). Energy storage sharing in smart grid: A modified auction-based approach. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 7(3), 1462–1475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Khorasany, M., Y. Mishra, and G. Ledwich. Auction based energy trading in transactive energy market with active participation of prosumers and consumers. in Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference (AUPEC). IEEE, November 2017. Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  62. El-Baz, W., Tzscheutschler, P., & Wagner, U. (2019). Evaluation of energy market platforms potential in microgrids: Scenario analysis based on a double-sided auction. Frontiers in Energy Research, 7, 41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Khorasany, M., Mishra, Y., & Ledwich, G. (2019). Design of auction-based approach for market clearing in peer-to-peer market platform. The Journal of Engineering, 2019(18), 4813–4818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Pourbabak, H., et al. (2017). A novel consensus-based distributed algorithm for economic dispatch based on local estimation of power mismatch. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 9(6), 5930–5942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Zou, X. (2009). Double-sided auction mechanism design in electricity based on maximizing social welfare. Energy Policy, 37(11), 4231–4239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Stiglitz, J.E., Whither socialism?. MIT press. 1996. (1).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Boyd, S., et al. (2011). Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Foundations and Trends® in Machine learning, 3(1), 1–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Samadi, P., et al. Optimal Real-Time Pricing Algorithm Based on Utility Maximization for Smart Grid. in 1 st IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications. IEEE, October 2010. Gaithersburg, MD, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Khorasany, M., Mishra, Y., & Ledwich, G. (2020). A decentralised bilateral energy trading system for peer-to-peer electricity markets. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 67(6), 5930–5942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Khorasany, M., et al. (2020). Transactive energy market for energy Management in Microgrids: The Monash microgrid case study. Energies, 13(8), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Icons in Figs. 6.1 and 6.3 to 6.6 are made by Freepik, Eucalyp, Pixel Perfect, and Smashicons from www.flaticon.com.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohsen Khorasany .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Khorasany, M., Razzaghi, R. (2021). Microgrids and Local Markets. In: Anvari-Moghaddam, A., Abdi, H., Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B., Hatziargyriou, N. (eds) Microgrids. Power Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59750-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59750-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-59749-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-59750-4

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics