Skip to main content

The Performance of Active-Contour and Region Growing Methods Against Noises in the Segmentation of Computed-Tomography Scans

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
International Youth Conference on Electronics, Telecommunications and Information Technologies

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Physics ((SPPHY,volume 255))

Abstract

Lung cancer is a prevalent cancer that needs early diagnosis because of its deadly repercussion. Computer systems with certain image processing techniques should be used to increase the speed and accuracy of lung cancer detection. Because of high resolution and low noise, CT images are normally used to process medical images. However, the inevitable noise is introduced in CT images, because of uncertain statistics in physical measurements in CT images. In general, speckle noise, Gaussian noise, and salt and pepper noise occurred primarily in MRI, CT scan, and ultrasound images. In this article, we compared the performance of two segmentation algorithms, the region growing algorithm with the combination of Watershed and Active Contour algorithms, which are more applicable and efficient against the speckle noise and Gaussian noise in medical CT images. Results show that the proposed approach is more effective in segmentation of lung nodules and can be a valuable aid for physicians working in the daily routine of oncology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. Ma et al., The prognostic value of long noncoding RNAs in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 8(34), 57755 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Navada, P. Lai, A. Schwartz, G. Kalemkerian, Temporal trends in small cell lung cancer: analysis of the national surveillance, epidemiology, and end-results (SEER) database, J. Clin. Oncol. 24(18_suppl), 7082–7082 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Sher, G.K. Dy, A.A. Adjei, Small cell lung cancer, in Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 355–367. Elsevier (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. M.A. Drift et al., Progress in standard of care therapy and modest survival benefits in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer patients in the Netherlands in the last 20 years. J. Thorac. Oncol. 7(2), 291–298 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D.B. Zhen et al., A phase I trial of cabozantinib and gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer. Invest. New Drugs 34(6), 733–739 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M.O. Hubbard, P. Fu, S. Margevicius, A. Dowlati, P.A. Linden, Five-year survival does not equal cure in non–small cell lung cancer: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results–based analysis of variables affecting 10-to 18-year survival. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 143(6), 1307–1313 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Janssen-Heijnen, F. Van Erning, D. De Ruysscher, J. Coebergh, H. Groen, Variation in causes of death in patients with non-small cell lung cancer according to stage and time since diagnosis. Ann. Oncol. 26(5), 902–907 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. B.J. Flehinger, M. Kimmel, M.R. Melamed, The effect of surgical treatment on survival from early lung cancer: implications for screening. Chest 101(4), 1013–1018 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. E.F. Patz Jr., S. Rossi, D.H. Harpole Jr., J.E. Herndon, P.C. Goodman, Correlation of tumor size and survival in patients with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer. Chest 117(6), 1568–1571 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Shah, S. Sabanathan, J. Richardson, A. Mearns, C. Goulden, Results of surgical treatment of stage I and II lung cancer. J. Cardiovascu. Surg. 37(2), 169–172 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. Sobue et al., Survival for clinical stage I lung cancer not surgically treated Comparison between screen-detected and symptom-detected cases. Cancer 69(3), 685–692 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. F. Shariaty, M. Mousavi, Application of CAD systems for the automatic detection of lung nodules. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked 15, 100173 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. Shariaty, M. Baranov, E. Velichko, Radiomics: extracting more Features using Endoscopic Imaging. in 2019 IEEE International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Photonics, pp. 181–194 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. Shariaty, V. Davydov, V. Yushkova, A. Glinushkin, V.Y. Rud, Automated pulmonary nodule detection system in computed tomography images based on active-contour and SVM classification algorithm. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1410(1), 012075 (2019). IOP Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Senthilraja, P. Suresh, M. Suganthi, Noise reduction in computed tomography image using WB–filter. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 5(3), 243–247 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. I. Kumar, H. Bhadauria, J. Virmani, J. Rawat, Reduction of speckle noise from medical images using principal component analysis image fusion, in 2014 9th International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems (ICIIS), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Diwakar, M. Kumar, A review on CT image noise and its denoising. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 42, 73–88 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. B. Goyal, S. Agrawal, B. Sohi, Noise issues prevailing in various types of medical images. Biomed. Pharmacol. J. 11(3), 1227 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. H. Lu, T. Hsiao, X. Li, Z. Liang, Noise properties of low-dose CT projections and noise treatment by scale transformations, in 2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No. 01CH37310), vol. 3, pp. 1662–1666. IEEE (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. Michel-González, M.H. Cho, S.Y. Lee, Geometric nonlinear diffusion filter and its application to X-ray imaging. Biomed. Eng. Online 10(1), 47 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Q. Wang et al., Segmentation of lung nodules in computed tomography images using dynamic programming and multidirection fusion techniques1. Acad. Radiol. 16(6), 678–688 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J. Kalpathy-Cramer et al., A comparison of lung nodule segmentation algorithms: methods and results from a multi-institutional study. J. Digit. Imaging 29(4), 476–487 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Y. Tan, L.H. Schwartz, B. Zhao, Segmentation of lung lesions on CT scans using watershed, active contours, and Markov random field. Med. Phys. 40(4), 043502 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Y. Gu et al., Automated delineation of lung tumors from CT images using a single click ensemble segmentation approach. Pattern Recogn. 46(3), 692–702 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. F. Shariaty, S. Hosseinlou, V.Y. Rud, Automatic lung segmentation method in computed tomography scans. J. Phys: Conf. Ser. 1236(1), 012028 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Y. Tan, L.H. Schwartz, B. Zhao, Segmentation of lung lesions on CT scans using watershed, active contours, and Markov random field, Med. Phys. 40(4), 043502 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  27. P. Felzenszwalb, D. Huttenlocher, Distance transforms of sampled functions, Cornell University (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  28. T. Kubota, A.K. Jerebko, M. Dewan, M. Salganicoff, A. Krishnan, Segmentation of pulmonary nodules of various densities with morphological approaches and convexity models. Med. Image Anal. 15(1), 133–154 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. T.F. Chan, L.A. Vese, Active contours without edges. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 10(2), 266–277 (2001)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. P. Getreuer, Chan-vese segmentation. Image Processing On Line 2, 214–224 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. M. Kass, A. Witkin, D. Terzopoulos, Snakes: active contour models, in Proceedings 1st International Conference on Computer Vision, vol. 259, p. 268 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  32. S. Kamdi, R. Krishna, Image segmentation and region growing algorithm. Int. J. of Comput. Technol. Electron. Eng. (IJCTEE) 2, 103–107 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mojtaba Mousavi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mousavi, M., Shariaty, F., Orooji, M., Velichko, E. (2021). The Performance of Active-Contour and Region Growing Methods Against Noises in the Segmentation of Computed-Tomography Scans. In: Velichko, E., Vinnichenko, M., Kapralova, V., Koucheryavy, Y. (eds) International Youth Conference on Electronics, Telecommunications and Information Technologies. Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol 255. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58868-7_63

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics