Skip to main content

Can a Web Accessibility Checker Be Enhanced by the Use of AI?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computers Helping People with Special Needs (ICCHP 2020)

Abstract

There has been a proliferation of automatic web accessibility checkers over the years designed to make it easier to assess the barriers faced by those with disabilities when using online interfaces and content. The checkers are often based on tests that can be made on the underlying website code to see whether it complies with the W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). However, as the type of code needed for the development of sophisticated interactive web services and online applications becomes more complex, so the guidelines have had to be updated with the adoption of new success criteria or additional revisions to older criteria. In some instances, this has led to questions being raised about the reliability of the automatic accessibility checks and whether the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) could be helpful. This paper explores the need to find new ways of addressing the requirements embodied in the WCAG success criteria, so that those reviewing websites can feel reassured that their advice (regarding some of the ways to reduce barriers to access) is helpful and overcomes issues around false positive or negatives. The methods used include image recognition and natural language processing working alongside a visual appraisal system, built into a web accessibility checker and reviewing process that takes a functional approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://web2access.org.uk/.

  2. 2.

    https://www.w3.org/WAI/test-evaluate/conformance/wcag-em/.

  3. 3.

    https://reactjs.org/.

  4. 4.

    https://pa11y.org/.

  5. 5.

    https://pathmind.com/wiki/word2vec.

  6. 6.

    https://www.alexa.com/topsites.

  7. 7.

    https://slack.com/intl/en-gb/.

References

  1. W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/. Accessed 15 Apr 2020

  2. Wald, M., Angkananon, K.: Development and testing of a Thai website accessibility evaluation tool. Int. J. Electron. Commun. Eng. 10(5) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. W3C WCAG 2.1 What’s new in WCAG 2.1. https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-21/. Accessed 15 Apr 2020

  4. Abou-Zahra, S., Brewer, J., Cooper, M.: Artificial Intelligence (AI) for web accessibility: is conformance evaluation a way forward? In: Proceedings of the Internet of Accessible Things, pp. 1–4 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. UK Government Legislation Public Sector Bodies (Websites and Mobile Applications) (No.2) Accessibility Regulations (2018). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2018/852/contents/made. Accessed 15 Apr 2020

  6. Norman, D.A., Draper, S.W.: User Centered System Design; New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., USA (1986)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Duran, M.: What we found when we tested tools on the world’s least-accessible webpage (2017). https://accessibility.blog.gov.uk/2017/02/24/what-we-found-when-we-tested-tools-on-the-worlds-least-accessible-webpage/. Accessed 12 June 2020

  8. Sen, S.: Artificial Intelligence and Web Accessibility (Unpublished Master’s thesis) (2019). https://shaunaksen.github.io/AI-for-Web-Accessibility/. Accessed 15 Apr 2020

  9. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781 (2013)

  10. Kusner, M., Sun, Y., Kolkin, N., Weinberger, K.: From word embeddings to document distances. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 957–966, June 2015

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nielsen, J.: Why you only need to test with 5 users (2000). https://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-you-only-need-to-test-with-5-users/. Accessed 15 Apr 2020

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. A. Draffan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Draffan, E.A. et al. (2020). Can a Web Accessibility Checker Be Enhanced by the Use of AI?. In: Miesenberger, K., Manduchi, R., Covarrubias Rodriguez, M., Peňáz, P. (eds) Computers Helping People with Special Needs. ICCHP 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12376. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58796-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58796-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58795-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58796-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics