Skip to main content

An Experience with the Application of Three NLP Tools for the Analysis of Natural Language Requirements

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC 2020)

Abstract

We report on the experience made with three Natural Language Processing analysis tools, aimed to compare their performance in detecting ambiguity and under-specification in requirements documents, and to compare them with respect to other qualities like learnability, usability, and efficiency. Two industrial tools, Requirements Scout and QVscribe, and an academic one, QuARS, are compared.

Work partially funded by MIUR project PRIN 2017FTXR7S IT MaTTerS (Methods and Tools for Trustworthy Smart Systems).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arora, C., Sabetzadeh, M., Briand, L., Zimmer, F.: Automated checking of conformance to requirements templates using natural language processing. IEEE Trans. on Softw. Eng. 41(10), 944–968 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cunningham, H.: Gate, a general architecture for text engineering. Comput. Humanit. 36(2), 223–254 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Femmer, H.: Requirements quality defect detection with the Qualicen requirements Scout. In: Joint Proceedings of 23rd International Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ 2018). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2075. CEUR-WS.org (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ferrari, A., Gori, G., Rosadini, B., Trotta, I., Bacherini, S., Fantechi, A., Gnesi, S.: Detecting requirements defects with NLP patterns: an industrial experience in the railway domain. Empirical Softw. Eng. 23(6), 3684–3733 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-018-9596-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gnesi, S., Lami, G., Trentanni, G.: An automatic tool for the analysis of natural language requirements. Comput. Syst. Sci. Eng. 20(1), 1–17 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kenney, O., Cooper, M.: Automating requirement quality standards with QVscribe. In: Joint Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ 2020). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2584. CEUR-WS.org (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Fantechi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Arrabito, M., Fantechi, A., Gnesi, S., Semini, L. (2020). An Experience with the Application of Three NLP Tools for the Analysis of Natural Language Requirements. In: Shepperd, M., Brito e Abreu, F., Rodrigues da Silva, A., Pérez-Castillo, R. (eds) Quality of Information and Communications Technology. QUATIC 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1266. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58793-2_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58793-2_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58792-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58793-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics