Skip to main content

Environmental Side of Fourth Industrial Revolution: The Positive and Negative Effects of I4.0 Technologies

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Smart Materials, Technologies, and Devices

Abstract

The pursuit of environmental sustainability goals is become an important issue for private companies, not only to fulfil national and international regulation, but also because it is demonstrated that being environment friendly may help companies to gain competitive advantage toward competitors, enhancing their position in the market and developing the resources and capabilities useful to growth in the long term.

Technological innovations cover an important role to drive companies toward environmental sustainability. In particular, Industry 4.0 technologies have been considered a relevant tool to assist environmental sustainability decisions, as they allow a better strategic alignment between the information technologies employed and organizational goals (de Sousa Jabbour et al., Technol Forecast Soc Chang 132:18–25, 2018).

Despite the interest on the topic is growing (Bonilla et al., Sustainability 10(10):3740, 2018; de Sousa Jabbour et al., Technol Forecast Soc Chang 132:18–25, 2018), a clear understanding of Industry 4.0 technologies’ effect on companies’ environmental strategy remains significantly understudied.

Existing studies are mostly focused on the positive effect of the new paradigm, but it is also important to highlight that some innovations may impose unpredictable costs on society, and their transformative nature can make it difficult to anticipate their overall effect once diffused (Binder M, Witt U (2011) As innovations drive economic growth, do they also raise well-being? Papers on economics and evolution). This chapter tries to shed the light on the topic by identifying the possible positive and negative effects of different Industry 4.0 technologies on natural environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aragón-Correa JA, Sharma S (2003) A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Acad Manag Rev 28(1):71–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal P (2005) Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strateg Manag J 26(3):197–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beier G, Niehoff S, Ziems T, Xue B (2017) Sustainability aspects of a digitalized industry-A comparative study from China and Germany. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 4(2):227–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Beier G, Niehoff S, Xue B (2018) More sustainability in industry through industrial internet of things? Appl Sci 8(2):219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder M, Witt U (2011) As innovations drive economic growth, do they also raise well-being? Papers on economics and evolution

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonilla SH, Silva HR, Terra da Silva M, Franco Gonçalves R, Sacomano JB (2018) Industry 4.0 and sustainability implications: a scenario-based analysis of the impacts and challenges. Sustainability 10(10):3740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calza F, Parmentola A, Tutore I (2020) Big data and natural environment. How does different data support different green strategies? Sustain Futur 2:100029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Chiang RH, Storey RH (2012) Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact. MIS Q 36(4):1165–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chukalov K (2017) Horizontal and vertical integration, as a requirement for cyber-physical systems in the context of Industry 4.0. Int Sci J Indust 40 2(4):155–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordeiro JJ, Tewari M (2015) Firm characteristics, industry context, and investor reactions to environmental CSR: a stakeholder theory approach. J Bus Ethics 130(4):833–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Sousa Jabbour ABL, Jabbour CJC, Foropon C, Godinho Filho M (2018) When titans meet – can Industry 4.0 revolutionise the environmentally-sustainable manufacturing wave? The role of critical success factors. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 132:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte (2017) Using autonomous robots to drive supply chain innovation. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/manufacturing/us-manufacturing-autonomous-robots-supply-chain-innovation.pdf

  • Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Papadopoulos T, Childe SJ, Shibin KT, Wamba SF (2017) Sustainable supply chain management: framework and further research directions. J Clean Prod 142:1119–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzion D, Aragon-Correa JA (2016) Big data, management, and sustainability: strategic opportunities ahead. Organ Environ 29(2):147–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazen BT, Skipper JB, Ezell JD, Boone CA (2016) Big data and predictive analytics for supply chain sustainability: a theory-driven research agenda. Comput Ind Eng 101:592–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joppa LN (2017) The case for technology investments in the environment. Nature 552:325–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamble SS, Gunasekaran A, Gawankar SA (2018) Sustainable Industry 4.0 framework: a systematic literature review identifying the current trends and future perspectives. Process Saf Environ Prot 117:408–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellens K, Mertens R, Paraskevas D, Dewulf W, Duflou JR (2017) Environmental impact of additive manufacturing processes: does AM contribute to a more sustainable way of part manufacturing? Procedia CIRP 61:582–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiron D, Prentice PK, Ferguson RB (2014) The analytics mandate. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 55(4):1

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouhizadeh M, Sarkis J (2018) Blockchain practices, potentials, and perspectives in greening supply chains. Sustainability 10:3652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Bourhis F, Kerbrat O, Hascoet JY, Mognol P (2013) Sustainable manufacturing: evaluation and modeling of environmental impacts in additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(9–12):1927–1939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucivero F (2020) Big data, big waste? A reflection on the environmental sustainability of big data initiatives. Sci Eng Ethics 26:1009–1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00171-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDougall W (2014) Industrie 4.0 smart manufacturing for the future. Germany Trade and Invest

    Google Scholar 

  • Manyika J, Chui M, Brown B, Bughin J, Dobbs R, Roxburgh C, Hung Byers A (2011) Big data: the next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mashhadi AR, Behdad S (2018) Ubiquitous life cycle assessment (U-LCA): a proposed concept for environmental and social impact assessment of Industry 4.0. Manuf Lett 15:93–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra BSP, Dehuri S, Kim E (eds) (2016) Techniques and environments for big data analysis: parallel, cloud, and grid computing, vol 17. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller JM, Kiel D, Voigt KI (2018) What drives the implementation of Industry 4.0? The role of opportunities and challenges in the context of sustainability. Sustainability 10(1):247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogbemhe J, Mpofu K, Tlale NS (2017) Achieving sustainability in manufacturing using robotic methodologies. Procedia Manuf 8:440–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng Y, Lu B, Chen S (2018) Carbon-supported single atom catalysts for electrochemical energy conversion and storage. Adv Mater 30(48):1801995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkse J, Kolk A (2010) Challenges and trade-offs in corporate innovation for climate change. Bus Strateg Environ 19(4):261–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Van der Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9(4):97–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman AM, Verbeke A (1998) Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: an organizing framework. Strateg Manag J 19:363–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saucedo-Martínez JA, Pérez-Lara M, Marmolejo-Saucedo JA, Salais-Fierro TE, Vasant P (2018) Industry 4.0 framework for management and operations: a review. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 9(3):789–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SIENNA (2018) D4.1: state of the art review, WP4 – AI & robotics. https://www.sienna-project.eu/digitalAssets/787/c_787382-l_1-k_sienna-d4.1-state-of-the-art-review%2D%2Dfinal-v.04-.pdf

  • Stock T, Seliger G (2016) Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 40:536–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock T, Obenaus M, Kunz S, Kohl H (2018) Industry 4.0 as enabler for a sustainable development: a qualitative assessment of its ecological and social potential. Process Saf Environ Prot 118:254–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strange R, Zucchella A (2017) Industry 4.0, global value chains and international business. Multinatl Bus Rev 25(3):174–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Un (2018) The sustainable development goals report. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/report/2018/TheSustainableDevelopmentGoalsReport2018-EN.pdf

  • Vaidya S, Ambad P, Bhosle S (2018) Industry 4.0 – a glimpse. Procedia Manuf 20:233–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waibel MW, Steenkamp LP, Moloko N, Oosthuizen GA (2017) Investigating the effects of smart production systems on sustainability elements. Procedia Manuf 8:731–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wamba SF, Gunasekaran A, Akter S, Ren SJF, Dubey R, Childe SJ (2017) Big data analytics and firm performance: effects of dynamic capabilities. J Bus Res 70:356–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Wan J, Li D, Zhang C (2016) Implementing smart factory of Industrie 4.0: an outlook. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 12(1):3159805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WEF (2018) 8 Ways blockchain can be an environmental game-changer. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/09/8-ways-blockchain-can-be-an-environmental-game-changer/

  • Whitehead B, Andrews D, Shah A, Maidment G (2014) Assessing the environmental impact of data centres part 1: background, energy use and metrics. Build Environ 82:151–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.buildenv.2014.08.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams H, Wikström F (2011) Environmental impact of packaging and food losses in a life cycle perspective: a comparative analysis of five food items. J Clean Prod 19(1):43–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wixom BH, Yen B, Relich M (2013) Maximizing value from business analytics. MIS Q Exec 12(2):111–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf M, Serpanos D (2017) Safety and security of cyber-physical and Internet-of-Things systems. Proc IEEE 105(6). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2017.2699401

  • Zhou K, Liu T, Zhou L (2015) Industry 4.0: towards future industrial opportunities and challenges. In: 12th international conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery. IEEE, pp 2147–2152

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adele Parmentola .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Parmentola, A., Tutore, I., Costagliola Di Fiore, M. (2021). Environmental Side of Fourth Industrial Revolution: The Positive and Negative Effects of I4.0 Technologies. In: Hussain, C.M., Di Sia, P. (eds) Handbook of Smart Materials, Technologies, and Devices. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58675-1_84-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58675-1_84-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58675-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58675-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics