Skip to main content

Machine Learning: An Expert Thinking System

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Smart Materials, Technologies, and Devices

Abstract

Industry 4.0 makes it believable to collect and investigate data across machines, aiding more efficient and flexible processes to manufacture the parts with high quality at a low cost. The technologies which enable this are digital twin, big data analytics, autonomous robots, Internet of things, cybersecurity, cloud computing, augmented reality, and additive manufacturing. Thus, interconnected intelligent machines allow autonomous manufacturing using decentralized decision-making systems that cooperate with each other, making the manufacturing process more efficient. Machine maintenance can be categorized into three types, namely, predictive maintenance (supervised), run to failure (semi-supervised), and preventive maintenance (unsupervised). Self-diagnostic machines are an integral part of smart factories. Predictive maintenance is a proactive maintenance strategy that predicts failure. These predictions are based on data gathered through condition monitoring sensors using IoT, analyzed using big data, and predicted using machine learning algorithms. This can lead to major cost savings and increased availability of the systems, thus optimizing performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aghazadeh F, Tahan A, Thomas M (2018) Tool condition monitoring using spectral subtraction and convolutional neural networks in milling process. Int J Adv Manufact Technol 98:3217–3227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2420-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alur R (2015) Principles of cyber-physical systems. MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Arun A, Rameshkumar K, Unnikrishnan D, Sumesh A (2018) Tool condition monitoring of cylindrical grinding process using acoustic emission sensor. Mater Today Proc 5:11888–11899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat NN, Dutta S, Vashisth T, Pal S, Pal SK, Sen R (2016) Tool condition monitoring by SVM classification of machined surface images in turning. Int J Adv Manufact Technol 83:1487–1502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bicocchi N, Cabri G, Mandreoli F, Mecella M (2019) Dynamic digital factories for agile supply chains: an architectural approach. J Ind Inform Integr 15:111–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Blog (2017) Machine learning. https://expertsystem.com/machine-learning-definition/. Accessed 22 Oct 2020

  • Cai W, Zhang W, Hu X, Liu Y (2020) A hybrid information model based on long short-term memory network for tool condition monitoring. J Intell Manufact 31:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerquitelli T, Proto S, Ventura F, Apiletti D, Baralis E (2019) Towards a real-time unsupervised estimation of predictive model degradation. In: Proceedings of real-time business intelligence and analytics. United States Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen B, Wan J, Shu L, Li P, Mukherjee M, Yin B (2017) Smart factory of industry 4.0: key technologies, application case, and challenges. IEEE Access 6:6505–6519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elangovan M, Sugumaran V, Ramachandran KI, Ravikumar S (2011) Effect of SVM kernel functions on classification of vibration signals of a single point cutting tool. Expert Syst Appl 38:15202–15207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.05.081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Expert system (2020). https://www.expert.ai/

  • Griffor ER, Greer C, Wollman DA, Burns MJ (2017) Framework for cyber-physical systems: Special Publication (NIST SP),National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, volume 1, overview. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1500-201. Accessed 9 Aug 2021

  • Günther J, Pilarski PM, Helfrich G, Shen H, Diepold K (2014) First steps towards an intelligent laser welding architecture using deep neural networks and reinforcement learning. Proc Technol 15:474–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadfield-Menell D, Russell SJ, Abbeel P, Dragan A (2016) Cooperative inverse reinforcement learning. In: Advances in neural information processing systems. 29:3909–3917

    Google Scholar 

  • Harifi S, Khalilian M, Mohammadzadeh J, Ebrahimnejad S (2020) Optimization in solving inventory control problem using nature inspired Emperor Penguins Colony algorithm. J Intell Manuf 32:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher WG, Yu W (2018) A survey of deep learning: platforms, applications and emerging research trends. IEEE Access 6:24411–24432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnakumar P, Rameshkumar K, Ramachandran K (2018) Feature level fusion of vibration and acoustic emission signals in tool condition monitoring using machine learning classifiers. Int J Progn Health Manag 9:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Li D (2018) Study and application of the computing architecture of petrochemical cyber-physical system (PCPS). In: Eden MR, Ierapetritou MG, Towler GP (eds) Computer aided chemical engineering, vol 44. Elsevier, pp 2023–2028. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64241-7.50332-3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Li N, Chen Y, Kong D, Tan S (2017) Force-based tool condition monitoring for turning process using v-support vector regression. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91:351–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9735-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhusudana CK, Kumar H, Narendranath S (2017) Face milling tool condition monitoring using sound signal. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 8:1643–1653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-017-0637-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahdavinejad MS, Rezvan M, Barekatain M, Adibi P, Barnaghi P, Sheth AP (2018) Machine learning for Internet of Things data analysis: a survey. Digit Commun Netw 4:161–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanraj T, Shankar S, Rajasekar R, Sakthivel N, Pramanik A (2020) Tool condition monitoring techniques in milling process – a review. J Mater Res Technol 9:1032–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal KC, Nandy BD, Baidya A (2020) Fact-based expert system for supplier selection with ERP data. In: Algorithms in machine learning paradigms. Springer, pp 43–55

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Monostori L (2003) AI and machine learning techniques for managing complexity, changes and uncertainties in manufacturing. Eng Appl Artif Intell 16:277–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monostori L, Márkus A, Van Brussel H, Westkämpfer E (1996) Machine learning approaches to manufacturing. CIRP Ann 45:675–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naren R, Subhashini J (2020) Comparison of deep learning models for predictive maintenance. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, vol 2. IOP Publishing, p 022029

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayyar A, Puri V (2016) Smart farming: IoT based smart sensors agriculture stick for live temperature and moisture monitoring using Arduino, cloud computing & solar technology. In: Proceedings of the international conference on communication and computing systems (ICCCS-2016). pp 9781315364094–9781315364121

    Google Scholar 

  • Park S (2016) Development of innovative strategies for the Korean manufacturing industry by use of the Connected Smart Factory (CSF). Proc Comput Sci 91:744–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perera JCP (2020) Sustainability-based expert system for additive manufacturing and CNC machining

    Google Scholar 

  • Purnomo M, Hidayatuloh S (2020) Development of rule-based expert system for conceptualisation of poster design. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, vol 1. IOP Publishing, p 012019

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell SJ, Norvig P (2010) Artificial intelligence-a modern approach, third international edition. Pearson Education, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sakthivel N, Sugumaran V, Babudevasenapati S (2010a) Vibration based fault diagnosis of monoblock centrifugal pump using decision tree. Expert Syst Appl 37:4040–4049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakthivel N, Sugumaran V, Nair BB (2010b) Comparison of decision tree-fuzzy and rough set-fuzzy methods for fault categorization of mono-block centrifugal pump. Mech Syst Signal Process 24:1887–1906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakthivel N, Nair BB, Sugumaran V (2012) Soft computing approach to fault diagnosis of centrifugal pump. Appl Soft Comput 12:1574–1581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakthivel N, Nair BB, Elangovan M, Sugumaran V, Saravanmurugan S (2014) Comparison of dimensionality reduction techniques for the fault diagnosis of mono block centrifugal pump using vibration signals. Eng Sci Technol Int J 17:30–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergi BS, Popkova EG, Bogoviz AV, Litvinova TN (2019) Outlines of the context for industry 4.0 understanding industry 40: AI, the Internet of Things, and the future of work. Emerald Group Publishing 3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankar S, Mohanraj T, Pramanik A (2019a) Tool condition monitoring while using vegetable based cutting fluids during milling of inconel 625. J Adv Manuf Syst 18:563–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shankar S, Mohanraj T, Rajasekar R (2019b) Prediction of cutting tool wear during milling process using artificial intelligence techniques. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 32:174–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Z, Xie Y, Xue W, Chen Y, Fu L, Xu X (2020) Smart factory in Industry 4.0. Syst Res Behav Sci 37:607–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szarvas G, Farkas R, Busa-Fekete R (2007) State-of-the-art anonymization of medical records using an iterative machine learning framework. J Am Med Inform Assoc 14:574–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thangarasu S, Shankar S, Mohanraj T, Devandran K (2020) Tool wear prediction in hard turning of EN8 steel using cutting force and surface roughness with artificial neural network. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 234:329–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vercruyssen V, Meert W, Davis J (2020) “Now you see it, now you don’t!” Detecting suspicious pattern absences in continuous time seriesc. In: Proceedings of the 2020 SIAM international conference on data mining. SIAM, pp 127–135

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wang GF, Yang YW, Zhang YC, Xie QL (2014) Vibration sensor based tool condition monitoring using ν support vector machine and locality preserving projection. Sensors Actuators A Phys 209:24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2014.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Wan J, Zhang D, Li D, Zhang C (2016) Towards smart factory for industry 4.0: a self-organized multi-agent system with big data based feedback and coordination. Comput Netw 101:158–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolery LK, Grzymala-Busse J (1994) Machine learning for an expert system to predict preterm birth risk. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1:439–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wuest T, Weimer D, Irgens C, Thoben K-D (2016) Machine learning in manufacturing: advantages, challenges, and applications. Prod Manuf Res 4:23–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalazinsky A, Shveykin V, Titov V (2020) The expert system for improving the technological processes of composite manufacturing. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, vol 4. IOP Publishing, p 044115

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Xue W (2018) Review of tool condition monitoring methods in milling processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96:2509–2523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1768-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou C, Guo K, Yang B, Wang H, Sun J, Lu L (2019) Singularity analysis of cutting force and vibration for tool condition monitoring in milling. IEEE Access 7:134113–134124. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2941287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou CA et al (2020) Vibration singularity analysis for milling tool condition monitoring. Int J Mech Sci 105254:166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu N, Song B, Lu Y, Li Y, Zhu Z (2020) Research on equipment fault prediction expert system based on big data dimension reduction. In: Journal of Physics: conference series, vol 3. IOP Publishing, p 032045

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Mohanraj .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Mohanraj, T., Yerchuru, J., Aravind, R.S.N., Yameni, R. (2021). Machine Learning: An Expert Thinking System. In: Hussain, C.M., Di Sia, P. (eds) Handbook of Smart Materials, Technologies, and Devices. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58675-1_29-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58675-1_29-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58675-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58675-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics