Skip to main content

Holistic Guidelines for Selecting and Adapting BPM Maturity Models (BPM MMs)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Process Management Forum (BPM 2020)

Abstract

BPM maturity models (MMs) help organizations accomplish the BPM capabilities paramount for organizational success. Although much literature deals with how to design MMs, little knowledge exists of how organizations use BPM MMs. Moreover, the academic literature about MMs is scattered, making it hard for practitioners to learn from academia. Our purpose is to offer a holistic journey to guide organizations through three phases of BPM MM use, namely (1) choosing one out of many MMs that fits the organization’s context, (2) tailoring the MM to particular needs, and (3) advising during and after a maturity assessment. Starting from a synthesis of known guidelines, a framework for BPM MM adaption is presented with evidence of its applicability when organizations are conducting maturity assessments. The analysis calls for research to derive specific guidelines for different contexts, e.g., for different levels of maturity and/or when maturity assessments are driven by consultants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ‘HIPs’ was an acronym used to refer to high impact processes. These are processes that are so critical, that if they failed, they would pose a significant risk (reputational, financial, regulatory) to the bank.

References

  1. Pöppelbuß, J., Röglinger, M.: What makes a useful maturity model? A framework of general design principles for maturity models and its demonstration in business process management. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems, pp. Paper28 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tarhan, A., Turetken, O., Reijers, H.A.: Business process maturity models: a systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 75, 122–134 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Looy, A., Poels, G., Snoeck, M.: Evaluating business process maturity models. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 18, 1 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Röglinger, M., Pöppelbuß, J., Becker, J.: Maturity models in business process management. Bus. Process Manag. J. 18, 328–346 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Niehaves, B., Poeppelbuss, J., Plattfaut, R., Becker, J.: BPM capability development – a matter of contingencies. Bus. Process Manag. J. 20, 90–106 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bucher, T., Winter, R.: Taxonomy of business process management approaches. In: vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.) Handbook on Business Process Management 2. International Handbooks on Information Systems, pp. 93–114. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01982-1_5

  7. De Bruin, T., Freeze, R., Kaulkarni, U., Rosemann, M.: Understanding the main phases of developing a maturity assessment model. In: Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS), pp. 8–19 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. BPM&O: Status Quo Prozessmanagement 2010/2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Van Looy, A., De Backer, M., Poels, G., Snoeck, M.: Choosing the right business process maturity model. Inf. Manag. 50, 466–488 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Salah, D., Paige, R., Cairns, P.: An evaluation template for expert review of maturity models. In: Jedlitschka, A., Kuvaja, P., Kuhrmann, M., Männistö, T., Münch, J., Raatikainen, M. (eds.) PROFES 2014. LNCS, vol. 8892, pp. 318–321. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13835-0_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Mettler, T.: Maturity assessment models: a design science research approach. Int. J. Soc. Syst. Sci. 3, 81–98 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Becker, J., Knackstedt, K., Pöppelbuß, J.: Developing maturity models for IT management: a procedure model and its application. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 1, 213–222 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. De Bruin, T., Rosemann, M.: Towards a business process management maturity model. In: ECIS 2005 Proceedings of the Thirteenth European Conference on Information Systems (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Van Looy, A., De Backer, M., Poels, G.: Defining business process maturity. A journey towards excellence. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excellence 22, 1119–1137 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hammer, M.: The process audit. Harv. Bus. Rev. 85, 111 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rohloff, M.: Case study and maturity model for business process management implementation. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference, BPM 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fraser, M.D., Vaishnavi, V.K.: A formal specifications maturity model. Commun. ACM 40, 95–103 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Christiansson, M.-T., Van Looy, A.: Elements for tailoring a BPM maturity model to simplify its use. In: Carmona, J., Engels, G., Kumar, A. (eds.) BPM 2017. LNBIP, vol. 297, pp. 3–18. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65015-9_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Christiansson, M.-T., Rentzhog, O.: Lessons from the “BPO journey” in a public housing company: toward a strategy for BPO. Business Process Management Journal (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. de Bruin, T.: Business process management: theory on progression and maturity. Queensland University of Technology (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. de Bruin, T., Doebeli, G.: An organizational approach to BPM: the experience of an Australian transport provider. In: vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.) Handbook on Business Process Management 2. IHIS, pp. 741–759. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45103-4_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Mettler, T., Rohner, P.: Situational maturity models as instrumental artifacts for organizational design. In: Proceedings of the Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST) Conference. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wasana Bandara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bandara, W., Van Looy, A., Merideth, J., Meyers, L. (2020). Holistic Guidelines for Selecting and Adapting BPM Maturity Models (BPM MMs). In: Fahland, D., Ghidini, C., Becker, J., Dumas, M. (eds) Business Process Management Forum. BPM 2020. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 392. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58638-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58638-6_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58637-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58638-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics