Abstract
Logic has long been seen as a natural and universal human ability, as much as a series of skills that only “sane,” “educated,” and “civilized” men can master. The volume investigates this tension. It explores how various logical skills have been established as social norms and have been attributed, or denied, to some actors or groups in different spaces throughout history. Written by historians, philosophers, and sociologists, and drawing on several case studies, it examines how these skills were defined, taken as standards and identified in some individuals, while they were deemed missing in others. It studies how they have been mobilized in educational theories, practices, and policies. It examines the dynamics of valuation (i.e. assessment and valorization) and implementation of these skills across different epochs, ranging from the Middle Ages until the present day. It specifies the different conceptions of logic underpinning these approaches, as well as their social and political stakes. This introduction presents the approach adopted by the editors of the volume. Such approach is based on the view that anthropology, sociology, and history share a common project. The editors explain how they wish to promote a historical sociology and anthropology of logic while addressing the issue of logical skills. The contributions to the volume are summarized in the last section of this introduction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
“Homo Logicus I. Logic at the Edges of Humanity.” Florence (Italy): European University Institute, org. J. Brumberg-Chaumont and A. Romano (EHESS, Paris), with S. Van Damme (EUI, Florence). https://www.eui.eu/events/detail?eventid=121251, accessed 6/25/2020; “Homo Logicus II. The Infancy of Logic, Native Logics.” Paris (France): EHESS, org. J. Brumberg-Chaumont and A. Romano, with S. Van Damme and A. de Libera (Collège de France, Paris). https://www.ehess.fr/fr/colloque/homo-logicus-ii, accessed 6/25/2020; “Homo Logicus III. Sociology and Anthropology of Logic: Past and Present.” Vichy (France): UNILOG, org. J. Brumberg-Chaumont and C. Rosental. https://www.uni-log.org/start6.html, accessed 6/25/2020.
- 2.
We thank Sébastien Le Pipec for his help with English.
References
Brumberg-Chaumont, J. (2019). À l’école de la logique: L’essor d’une norme intellectuelle, sociale et anthropologique au XIIIe siècle. Habilitation thesis. Paris: École Pratique des Hautes Études.
Hoenen, M. (2010). From natural thinking to scientific reasoning: Concepts of logica naturalis and logica artificialis in late-medieval and early-modern though. Bulletin de Philosohie médiévale, 52, 81–116.
Lévy-Bruhl, L. 1926 (1910). How natives think (L.A. Clare, Trans.). London: G. Allen and Unwin.
Garin, E. (1960). La cultura fiorentina nella seconda metà del 300 e i “barbari britannici”. La Rassegna della Letteratura italiana, 64, 181–195.
Nye, A. (1990). Words of power: A feminist reading of the history of logic. London: Routledge.
Marmasse, G. (2012). La logique hégélienne et la vie. Archives de Philosophie, 75, 235–252.
Ficara, H. (2019). Hegel on the naturalness of logic: An account based on the preface to the second edition of the science of logic. Argumentation, 4(2), 47–57.
Da Costa, N., & French, S. (1995). Partial structures and the logic of the Azande. American Philosophical Quarterly, 32(4), 325–339.
Pratt, S. (2002). Native pragmatism: Rethinking the roots of American philosophy. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Bloor, D. 1991 (1976). Knowledge and social imagery. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1937). Witchcraft, oracles and magic among the Azande. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Winch, P. (1964). Understanding a primitive society. American Philosophical Quarterly, 1(4), 307–324.
Haack, S. (1978). Philosophy of logics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Varzi, A. (2002). On logical relativity. Philosophical Issues, 10, 197–219.
Kurtz, J. (2011). The discovery of Chinese logic. Leiden: Brill.
Rosental, C. (2008). Weaving self-evidence: A sociology of logic. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rosental, C. (2009). Démontrer en logique: une science expérimentale? Communications, 84, 33–43.
Boutier, J., Passeron, J. C., & Revel, J. (Eds.). (2006). Qu’est-ce qu’une discipline? Paris: Éditions de l’EHESS.
Passeron, J.-C. (2006). Le raisonnement sociologique: Un espace non poppérien de l’argumentation. Paris: Albin Michel.
Garfinkel, H. (1984). Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Lynch, M. (1985). Art and artifact in laboratory science: A study of shop work and shop talk in a research laboratory. London: Routledge.
Erdmann, B. (1923). Logik. Berlin: W. de Gruyter.
Sigwart, C. (1889). Logik. Tübingen: H. Laupp.
Lakatos, I. (1976). In J. Worrall & E. Zahar (Eds.), Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Livingston, E. (1986). The ethnomethodological foundations of mathematics. London: Routledge.
Rosental, C. (2003). Certifying knowledge: The sociology of a logical theorem in artificial intelligence. American Sociological Review, 68, 623–644.
Greiffenhagen, C. (2014). The materiality of mathematics: Presenting mathematics at the blackboard. British Journal of Sociology, 65(3), 502–528.
Boudon, R. (1994). The art of self-persuasion: The social explanation of false beliefs (M. Slater, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Spenner, K. I. (1983). Deciphering Prometheus: Temporal changes in the skill level of work. American Sociological Review, 48, 824–837.
Attewell, P. (1990). What is skill? Work and Occupations, 17(4), 422–448.
Collins, R. (1976). Conflict sociology. New York: Academic Press.
Collins, R. (1979). The credential society. New York: Academic Press.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Lahire, B. (2008). La nature du cognitif en questions. In B. Lahire & C. Rosental (Eds.), La Cognition au prisme des sciences sociales (pp. 55–105). Paris: Éditions des Archives Contemporaines.
Kusch, M. (2000). The sociology of philosophical knowledge. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Shenefelt, M., & White, H. (2013). If A, then B: How the world discovered logic. New York: Columbia University Press.
Shank, M. H (1988). Unless you believe you shall not understand: logic, university and society in late medieval Vienna. Princeton : Princeton University Press.
Marenbon, J. (2008). The Latin tradition of logic to 1100. In D. M. Gabbay & J. Woods (Eds.), Handbook of the history of logic, vol. II, mediaeval and renaissance logic (pp. 1–63). Amsterdam: North Holland.
Grévin, B. (2008). Rhétorique du pouvoir médiéval. Les Lettres de Pierre de la Vigne et la formation du langage politique européen, xiiie-xve siècles. Rome: Ecole Française de Rome.
Ahmed, A. (2013). Logic in the Khayrābādī School of India: A preliminary exploration. In M. Cook, N. Haider, et al. (Eds.), Law and tradition in classical Islamic thought (pp. 227–243). New York: Palgrave.
El-Rouhayeb, K. (2019). The development of Arabic logic. Basel: Schwabe.
Ganeri, J. (2001). Introduction: Indian logic and the colonization of reason. In J. Ganeri (Ed.), Indian logic: A reader (pp. 1–25). Richmond: Curzon Press.
Ganeri, J. (2011). The lost age of reason. In Philosophy in early modern India 1450–1700. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vidyabhusana, S. (1909). History of the mediaeval schools of Indian logic. Calcutta: Calcutta University.
Vidyabhusana, S. (1921). A history of Indian logic: Ancient, mediaeval and modern schools. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Erismann, C. (2017). Logic in Byzantium. In A. Kardellis & N. Siniossoglou (Eds.), The Cambridge intellectual history of Byzantium (pp. 362–380). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Manekin, C. (2011). Logic in medieval Jewish culture. In G. Freudenthal (Ed.), Science in medieval Jewish cultures (pp. 113–136). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brumberg-Chaumont, J. (2018). L’Europe de la Logique: une introduction. Workshop “L’Europe de la Logique: les traditions aristotéliciennes médiévales et modernes en contextes”, Paris, Collège de France (with A. de Libera et A. Romano). Retrieved June 25, 2020, from https://www.college-de-france.fr/site/alain-de-libera/symposium-2018-05-14-09h15.htm
Brumberg-Chaumont, J. (Forthcoming). L’Europe de la Logique. Les traditions artistotéliciennes médiévales et modernes en contextes. Studia artistarum. Turnhout: Brepols.
Brumberg-Chaumont, J. (2019). À l’Est (et au Far-Ouest) de la logique, rien de nouveau. In C. Koenig-Pralong, M. Meliadò, & Z. Radeva (Eds.), The territories of philosophy in modern historiography (pp. 49–62). Turnhout: Brepols.
Anellis, I. (2011). Did Principia Mathematica Precipitate a “Fregean Revolution”? Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies, 31, 131–150.
Masson-Oursel, P. (1917a). Études de logique comparée. Évolution de la Logique indienne. Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger, 83, 453–469.
Masson-Oursel, P. (1917b). Études de logique comparée. Évolution de la Logique chinoise. Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger, 84, 59–76.
Masson-Oursel, P. (1918). Études de logique comparée. Confrontations et analyse comparative. Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger, 85, 148–166.
EU Commission. (2019). Brochure. Key Competences of Lifelong Learning. Retrieved June 25, 2020, from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/297a33c8-a1f3-11e9-9d01-01aa75ed71a1/language-en; “Critical Thinking Across the European Higher Education Curricula Project”, support by the Erasmus+ program (http://crithinkedu.utad.pt/).
Ennis, R. (2013). Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum. In D. Mohammed & M. Lewiński (Eds.), Virtues of Argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22–26 May 2013 (pp. 1–16). Windsor, ON: University of Windsor. Retrieved June 25, 2020, from https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=http://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=2014&context=ossaarchive.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brumberg-Chaumont, J., Rosental, C. (2021). Introduction. Logical Skills: Social-Historical Perspectives. In: Brumberg-Chaumont, J., Rosental, C. (eds) Logical Skills. Studies in Universal Logic. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58446-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58446-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58445-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58446-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)