Skip to main content

Sedation Scales and Discharge Criteria: How Do They Differ? Which One to Choose? Do They Really Apply to Sedation?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pediatric Sedation Outside of the Operating Room

Abstract

Assessing the depth of sedation in children is critically important to determine whether the goals of sedation are met without exposing the patient to the risk of adverse outcomes. In Cravero’s model of pediatric sedation, the patient’s state ranges from fully awake undergoing a painful procedure without sedation or analgesia to apnea, hypoxia, and death from oversedation. Clearly, having the sedated child’s state in the goal zone is important, and objective tools to assess sedation depth are necessary to standardize depth of sedation. Additionally, having objective assessment scales available to rate a child’s readiness for discharge from a sedation recovery area is also important, as premature discharge may lead to adverse events and even death. This chapter will review commonly used pediatric sedation scales, focusing on procedural sedation. Then methods of sedation assessment using processed EEG will be reviewed and compared to pediatric sedation scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cravero JP, Blike GT, Surgenor SD, Jensen J. Development and validation of the Dartmouth Operative Conditions Scale. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:1614–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cote CJ, Karl HW, Notterman DA, et al. Adverse sedation events in pediatrics: analysis of medications used for sedation. Pediatrics. 2000;106:633–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Prochaska G, Tait AR. Prolonged recovery and delayed side effects of sedation for diagnostic imaging studies in children. Pediatrics. 2000;105(3):e42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Tait AR. Adverse events and risk factors associated with sedation of children by non-anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg. 1997;85:1207–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cote CJ, Wilson S. The work group on sedation. Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: an update. Pediatrics. 2006;118:2587–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaplan RF, Cravero JP, Yaster M, Cote C. Sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures outside the operating room, chap. 48. In: Cote CJ, Lerman J, Todres ID, editors. A practice of anesthesia for infants and children. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2009. p. 1023–48.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Reeves ST, Havidich JE, Tobin DP. Conscious sedation of children with propofol is anything but conscious. Pediatrics. 2004;114:e74–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cravero JP, Beach ML, Blike GT, et al. The incidence and nature of adverse events during pediatric sedation/anesthesia with propofol for procedures outside the operating room: a report from the pediatric sedation research consortium. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:795–804.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ramsay MA, Savege TM, Simpson BR, Goodwin R. Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone. BMJ. 1974;2:656–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. De Jonghe B, Cook D, Appere-De-Vecchi C, et al. Using and understanding sedation scoring systems: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2000;26(3):275–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, et al. Validity and reliability of the observer’s assessment of alertness/sedation scale: study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990;10:244–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shannon M, Albers G, Burkhart K, et al. Safety and efficacy of flumazenil in the reversal of benzodiazepine-induced conscious sedation. J Pediatr. 1997;131:582–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Madan R, Kapoor I, Balachander S, et al. Propofol as a sole agent for pediatric day care diagnostic ophthalmic procedures: comparison with halothane anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2001;11:671–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Tait AR, et al. Depth of sedation in children undergoing computed tomography: validity and reliability of the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS). Br J Anaesth. 2002;88:241–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sadhasivam S, Ganesh A, Robison A, et al. Validation of the bispectral index monitor for measuring the depth of sedation in children. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:383–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ambuel B, Hamlett KW, Marx CM, Blumer JL. Assessing distress in pediatric intensive care environments: the COMFORT scale. J Pediatr Psychol. 1992;17:95–109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhong L, Shen K, Zhai S, et al. Application of sedation-agitation scale in conscious sedation before bronchoscopy in children. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98:e14035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Tait AR, Watcha MF, Sadhasivam S, Friesen RH. Effect of age and sedative agent on the accuracy of bispectral index in detecting depth of sedation in children. Pediatrics. 2007;120:e461–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Haberland CM, Baker S, Liu H. Bispectral index monitoring of sedation depth in pediatric dental patients. Anesth Prog. 2011;58:66–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mason KP, Michna E, Zurakowski D, et al. Value of bispectral index monitor in differentiating between moderate and deep Ramsay sedation scores in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2006;16:1226–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Tait AR. A comparison of observational and objective measures to differentiate depth of sedation in children from birth to 18 years of age. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:389–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Davidson AJ. Monitoring the anaesthetic depth in children—an update. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2007;20:236–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Giordano V, Deindl P, Goeral K, et al. The power of N-PASS, aEEG, and BIS in detecting different levels of sedation in neonates: A preliminary study. Paediatr Anaesth. 2018;28:1096–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheung YM, Scoones GP, Hoeks SE, et al. Evaluation of the aepEX™ monitor of hypnotic depth in pediatric patients receiving propofol-remifentanil anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013;23:891–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Robinson BR, Berube M, Barr J, et al. Psychometric analysis of subjective sedation scales in critically ill adults. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(9 Suppl 1):S16–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Green SM, Mason KP. Reformulation of the sedation continuum. JAMA. 2010;303:876–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mason KP, Burrows PE, Dorsey MM, et al. Accuracy of capnography with a 30 foot nasal cannula for monitoring respiratory rate and end-tidal CO2 in children. J Clin Monit Comput. 2000;16:259–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lightdale JR, Goldmann DA, Feldman HA, et al. Microstream capnography improves patient monitoring during moderate sedation: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2006;117:e1170–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Waugh JB, Epps CA, Khodneva YA. Capnography enhances surveillance of respiratory events during procedural sedation: a meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2011;23:189–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Aldrete JA, Kroulik D. A postanesthetic recovery score. Anesth Analg. 1970;49:924–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Aldrete JA. The post-anesthesia recovery score revisited. J Clin Anesth. 1995;7:89–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Ludomirsky A, et al. Can we improve the assessment of discharge readiness?: a comparative study of observational and objective measures of depth of sedation in children. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:218–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Steward DJ. A simplified scoring system for the postoperative recovery room. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1975;22:111–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Finkel JC, Cohen IT, Hannallah RS, et al. The effect of intranasal fentanyl on the emergence characteristics after sevoflurane anesthesia in children undergoing surgery for bilateral myringotomy tube placement. Anesth Analg. 2001;92:1164–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Bevan JC, Veall GR, Macnab AJ, et al. Midazolam premedication delays recovery after propofol without modifying involuntary movements. Anesth Analg. 1997;85:50–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sury MR, Bould MD. Defining awakening from anesthesia in infants: a narrative review of published descriptions and scales of behavior. Paediatr Anaesth. 2011;21:364–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dean B. Andropoulos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Andropoulos, D.B. (2021). Sedation Scales and Discharge Criteria: How Do They Differ? Which One to Choose? Do They Really Apply to Sedation?. In: Mason, MD, K.P. (eds) Pediatric Sedation Outside of the Operating Room. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58406-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58406-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58405-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58406-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics