Skip to main content

Two Algorithms for Additive and Fair Division of Mixed Manna

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
KI 2020: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (KI 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12325))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We consider a fair division model in which agents have positive, zero and negative utilities for items. For this model, we analyse one existing fairness property (EFX) and three new and related properties (EFX\(_0\), EFX\(^3\) and EF1\(^3\)) in combination with Pareto-optimality. With general utilities, we give a modified version of an existing algorithm for computing an EF1\(^3\) allocation. With \(-\alpha /0/\alpha \) utilities, this algorithm returns an EFX\(^3\) and PO allocation. With absolute identical utilities, we give a new algorithm for an EFX and PO allocation. With \(-\alpha /0/\beta \) utilities, this algorithm also returns such an allocation. We report some new impossibility results as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aleksandrov, M., Aziz, H., Gaspers, S., Walsh, T.: Online fair division: analysing a food bank problem. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth IJCAI 2015, Buenos Aires, Argentina, July 25–31, 2015, pp. 2540–2546 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amanatidis, G., Birmpas, G., Filos-Ratsikas, A., Hollender, A., Voudouris, A.A.: Maximum Nash welfare and other stories about EFX. CoRR abs/2001.09838 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amanatidis, G., Birmpas, G., Markakis, V.: Comparing approximate relaxations of envy-freeness. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2018, Stockholm, Sweden, July 13–19, 2018, pp. 42–48 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aziz, H., Caragiannis, I., Igarashi, A., Walsh, T.: Fair allocation of indivisible goods and chores. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-19, pp. 53–59. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, July 7 2019

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aziz, H., Moulin, H., Sandomirskiy, F.: A polynomial-time algorithm for computing a Pareto optimal and almost proportional allocation. CoRR abs/1909.00740 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aziz, H., Rey, S.: Almost group envy-free allocation of indivisible goods and chores. In: Bessiere, C. (ed.) Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-20, pp. 39–45. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, July 2020. main track

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barman, S., Krishnamurthy, S.K., Vaish, R.: Finding fair and efficient allocations. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on EC 2018, pp. 557–574. ACM, New York (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barman, S., Krishnamurthy, S.K., Vaish, R.: Greedy algorithms for maximizing Nash social welfare. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, AAMAS 2018, Stockholm, Sweden, July 10–15, 2018, pp. 7–13 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bogomolnaia, A., Moulin, H., Sandomirskiy, F., Yanovskaia, E.: Dividing BADS under additive utilities. Soc. Choice Welfare 52(3), 395–417 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Bogomolnaia, A., Moulin, H., Sandomirskiy, F., Yanovskaya, E.: Competitive division of a mixed manna. Econometrica 85(6), 1847–1871 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Brams, S.J., Taylor, A.D.: Fair Division - From Cake-Cutting to Dispute Resolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Budish, E.: The combinatorial assignment problem: approximate competitive equilibrium from equal incomes. J. Polit. Econ. 119(6), 1061–1103 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Caragiannis, I., Kaklamanis, C., Kanellopoulos, P., Kyropoulou, M.: The efficiency of fair division. Theory Comput. Syst. 50(4), 589–610 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Caragiannis, I., Kurokawa, D., Moulin, H., Procaccia, A.D., Shah, N., Wang, J.: The unreasonable fairness of maximum Nash welfare. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on EC 2016, Maastricht, The Netherlands, July 24–28, 2016, pp. 305–322 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chevaleyre, Y., Dunne, P., Endriss, U., Lang, J., Lemaitre, M., Maudet, N., Padget, J., Phelps, S., Rodrguez-Aguilar, J., Sousa, P.: Issues in multiagent resource allocation. Informatica 30, 3–31 (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Dobzinski, S., Vondrák, J.: Communication complexity of combinatorial auctions with submodular valuations. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. SODA 2013, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, USA, pp. 1205–1215 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dubins, L.E., Spanier, E.H.: How to cut a cake fairly. Am. Math. Monthly 68(11), 1–17 (1961)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Foley, D.K.: Resource allocation and the public sector. Yale Econ. Essays 7(1), 45–98 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hugo, S.: The problem of fair division. Econometrica 16, 101–104 (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kyropoulou, M., Suksompong, W., Voudouris, A.: Almost envy-freeness in group resource allocation. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2019, pp. 400–406. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, August 2019

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lipton, R.J., Markakis, E., Mossel, E., Saberi, A.: On approximately fair allocations of indivisible goods. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on EC, New York, NY, USA, May 17–20, 2004, pp. 125–131 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Moulin, H.: Fair Division and Collective Welfare. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Pareto, V.: Cours d’Économie politique. Professeur á l’Université de Lausanne. vol. I. pp. 430 1896. vol. II. pp. 426. F. Rouge, Lausanne (1897)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Plaut, B., Roughgarden, T.: Almost envy-freeness with general valuations. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2018, New Orleans, LA, USA, January 7–10, 2018, pp. 2584–2603 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sandomirskiy, F., Segal-Halevi, E.: Fair division with minimal sharing. CoRR abs/1908.01669 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Young, H.P.: Equity - In Theory and Practice. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1995)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Aleksandrov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

A A Complete Version of Algorithm 1

A A Complete Version of Algorithm 1

For reasons of space, we presented a short version of Algorithm 1 in the main text. We present in here a complete version of it.

figure d

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Aleksandrov, M., Walsh, T. (2020). Two Algorithms for Additive and Fair Division of Mixed Manna. In: Schmid, U., Klügl, F., Wolter, D. (eds) KI 2020: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. KI 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12325. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58285-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58285-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58284-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58285-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics