Abstract
In the macrofield of human–computer interaction, human–robot interaction (HRI) is a relatively new and unexplored field of study. As several efforts have been made in robotics to expand the range of functionalities of hardware and software, perhaps the hardest challenge is to ensure good usability and fluid interaction for users. With regard to remote operated robots, these aspects are unrelated and the interaction features may be taken into account at an advanced design stage. Nevertheless, when it comes to humanoid robots, interaction features are the keypoint, therefore the design of the latter should be driven by UX and UCD practices. The actual fact is that too little attention is paid to these issues or, at best, the latter are approached by IT’s point of view, who are in charge of the software development. In conjunction, a team of engineers take care of the mechanical parts and, in the most highly developed project, the appearance is curated by industrial designers. Given the importance of the interaction features, the design process should be rearranged in favour of the last-mentioned phase. However, the team in charge of this task should be composed of industrial designers, that we can consider as UI designers, along with UX expert. This study applies UX practices to the design process of a humanoid robot, providing practical guidance and guidelines to put in place usability testing during the various stages of development. Regarding testing, only user satisfaction is often investigated. Instead, the present approach includes an adaptation of typical elements of the web design area, such as learnability, efficiency, memorability and errors.
C. Porfirione, A. Vacanti and F. Burlando—Work developed under the tutorship of Professor Niccolò Casiddu.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Destephe, M., et al.: Walking in the uncanny valley: importance of the attractiveness on the acceptance of a robot as a working partner. Front. Psychol. 6, 204 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00204
Yanco, H.A., et al.: Beyond Usability Evaluation: Analysis of Human-Robot Interaction at a Major Robotics Competition. Human–Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. (2011)
Albert, W., Tullis, T.: Measuring the User Experience: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics. Newnes, Oxford (2013)
Barnum, C.M.: Usability Testing Essentials: Ready, Set…Test! Elsevier, Amsterdam (2010)
Vincent, J., et al.: Social Robots from a Human Perspective. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)
Polak, R.F., et al.: Differences between young and older users when interacting with a humanoid robot: a qualitative usability study for rehabilitation. Ann. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 61, e499 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2018.05.1163 (ScienceDirect)
Hass, C.: A practical guide to usability testing’. consumer informatics and digital health: solutions for health and health care. In: Edmunds, M., et al. (eds.), pp. 107–24. Springe, Heidelberg (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96906-0_6
Turner, C.W., et al.: Determining usability test sample size. Int. Encycl. Ergon. Hum. Factors 3, 3084–3088 (2006)
Schmettow, M.: Sample size in usability studies. Commun. ACM 55(4), 64–70 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133824
Nielsen, J., Landauer, T.K.: A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’93, pp. 206–213. ACM Press (1993). https://doi.org/10.1145/169059.169166
Hwang, W., Salvendy, G.: Number of people required for usability evaluation: the 10±2 rule. Commun. ACM 53(5), 130–133 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1735223.1735255
McDonald, S.: Studying actions in context: a qualitative shadowing method for organizational research. Qual. Res. 5(4), 455–473 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794105056923 (SAGE Publications)
Holtzblatt, K., Beyer, H.: Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1997)
Di Pascale, M.: Manuale di sopravvivenza per UX designer: Guida pratica alla progettazione. HOEPLI EDITORE, Milan (2019)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Casiddu, N., Burlando, F., Porfirione, C., Vacanti, A. (2021). Humanoid Robotics: Guidelines for Usability Testing. In: Karwowski, W., Ahram, T., Etinger, D., Tanković, N., Taiar, R. (eds) Human Systems Engineering and Design III. IHSED 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1269. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58282-1_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58282-1_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58281-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58282-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)