Skip to main content

Challenges and Constraints for Government Agencies Supporting Firm Level Innovation: Some Reflections from South Africa

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Entrepreneurship, Technology Commercialisation, and Innovation Policy in Africa
  • 362 Accesses

Abstract

Support for technology based start-ups, often termed new technology based firms, (NTBs), initially seen solely as a concern for developed countries, is currently spreading very rapidly in developing countries. Institutions that support the development of the capacities of start-ups to innovate by providing funding are now widely accepted as integral to the National Systems of Innovation (NSI). The main focus of the chapter is an examination of one possible institutional form for the support for start-ups: namely support provided directly by a governmental agency. The paper draws largely from the “lived experience” of one such institution—namely the Technology Innovation Agency (TIA) in South Africa—in order to highlight some of the challenges and constraints that developing countries are likely to face in attempting to develop start-ups by providing funding and support for innovation to such firms through the mechanism of a government agency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This section draws on a recent World Bank publication, Grover et al. (2019), Chap. “The Readiness of Innovation Systems for the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) in Sub-Saharan Africa”.

    This study utilises longitudinal data sets of company performance from Brazil, Côte d’Ivoire, Ethiopia, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Mexico, South Africa, Thailand, Tunisia, and Turkey.

  2. 2.

    Half the firms that experienced a high-growth event in the previous three years are likely to exit the market altogether in the following 3–6 years; less than 15% are likely to repeat a high-growth episode, Grover et al. (2019).

  3. 3.

    This section of the paper draws on Cirera and Maloney (2017).

  4. 4.

    There has been a tendency for policy makers to identify best-practice institutions based in countries such as Israel, Singapore and Finland and then attempt to emulate them. While the experiences of these countries are valuable, their contexts are radically different: in the broader environment within which the firms operate, in the capacities, that firms have to innovate and, most importantly, in governmental capacities.

  5. 5.

    Supports programmes are increasingly available and have spread to most African countries (Disrupt Africa 2017). These include even a number of the poorer and smaller countries. 159 African tech start-ups are said to have raised funding in excess of US$195 million in 2017. While this is still a small number, the rate of growth is impressive—a 51% increase on the previous year (Disrupt Africa 2017). The top three countries were South Africa, Nigeria and Kenya. Ghana and Egypt were also significant. In terms of sectors, finance received the most funding and e-commerce had the most significant growth (Disrupt Africa 2017).

  6. 6.

    There is some evidence that government-owned funds are less effective in providing capital to start-up than are government-supported venture capital funds—the funds-of-funds approach. “There are significant differences between government ownership and government support of venture capital firms, broadly suggesting that support outperforms ownership” (Brander et al. 2010: 13). Interestingly, a modest amount of government support for a private fund may result in such a fund performing better than a private VC. Significant support has the opposite effect (Brander et al. 2010: 12).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Kaplan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kaplan, D. (2021). Challenges and Constraints for Government Agencies Supporting Firm Level Innovation: Some Reflections from South Africa. In: Daniels, C., Dosso, M., Amadi-Echendu, J. (eds) Entrepreneurship, Technology Commercialisation, and Innovation Policy in Africa. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58240-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics