Skip to main content

Flexible Integration of Blockchain with Business Process Automation: A Federated Architecture

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 386))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Blockchain technology enables various business transactions to be performed in an immutable and transparent manner. Within the business process management community, blockchain technology has been positioned as a way to better support the execution of inter-organisational business processes, where the entities involved may not completely trust each other. However, the architectures proposed thus far in the literature for blockchain-enabled business process management can be described as “heavy-weight”, since they promote the blockchain platform as the monolithic focal point of all business logic and process operations. We propose an alternative: a federated and flexible architecture that leverages the capabilities of blockchain, but without overloading the functionalities of the blockchain platform with those already extant in Business Process Management Systems (BPMSs). We illustrate its benefits, and demonstrate its feasibility, through the implementation of a prototype.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.ethereum.org/.

  2. 2.

    https://www.hyperledger.org/projects/fabric.

  3. 3.

    https://github.com/yawlfoundation/yawl.

  4. 4.

    https://github.com/hyperledger/fabric-sdk-java.

References

  1. Androulaki, E., Barger, A., Bortnikov, V., Cachin, C., et al.: Hyperledger Fabric: a distributed operating system for permissioned blockchains. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth EuroSys Conference, p. 30. ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Astigarraga, T., et al.: Empowering business-level blockchain users with a rules framework for smart contracts. In: Pahl, C., Vukovic, M., Yin, J., Yu, Q. (eds.) ICSOC 2018. LNCS, vol. 11236, pp. 111–128. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03596-9_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Buterin, V.: Ethereum: a next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform (2014). https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/White-Paper

  4. Cachin, C.: Architecture of the hyperledger blockchain fabric. In: Distributed Cryptocurrencies and Consensus Ledgers, vol. 310, p. 4 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Christidis, K., Devetsikiotis, M.: Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things. IEEE Access 4, 2292–2303 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. García-Bañuelos, L., Ponomarev, A., Dumas, M., Weber, I.: Optimized execution of business processes on blockchain. In: Carmona, J., Engels, G., Kumar, A. (eds.) BPM 2017. LNCS, vol. 10445, pp. 130–146. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65000-5_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Hull, R., Batra, V.S., Chen, Y.-M., Deutsch, A., Heath III, F.F.T., Vianu, V.: Towards a shared ledger business collaboration language based on data-aware processes. In: Sheng, Q.Z., Stroulia, E., Tata, S., Bhiri, S. (eds.) ICSOC 2016. LNCS, vol. 9936, pp. 18–36. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46295-0_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. López-Pintado, O., García-Bañuelos, L., Dumas, M., Weber, I., Ponomarev, A.: Caterpillar: a business process execution engine on the ethereum blockchain. Softw. Pract. Exp. 49(7), 1162–1193 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mendling, J., Hafner, M.: From inter-organizational workflows to process execution: generating BPEL from WS-CDL. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3762, pp. 506–515. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11575863_70

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Mendling, J., Weber, I., van der Aalst, W., vom Brocke, J., et al.: Blockchains for business process management - challenges and opportunities. ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst. 9(1), 41–416 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Narendra, N.C., Norta, A., Mahunnah, M., Ma, L., Maggi, F.M.: Sound conflict management and resolution for virtual-enterprise collaborations. Serv. Oriented Comput. Appl. 10(3), 233–251 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11761-015-0183-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Norta, A.: Creation of smart-contracting collaborations for decentralized autonomous organizations. In: Matulevičius, R., Dumas, M. (eds.) BIR 2015. LNBIP, vol. 229, pp. 3–17. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21915-8_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Norta, A., Grefen, P., Narendra, N.C.: A reference architecture for managing dynamic inter-organizational business processes. Data Knowl. Eng. 91, 52–89 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sturm, C., Szalanczi, J., Schönig, S., Jablonski, S.: A lean architecture for blockchain based decentralized process execution. In: Daniel, F., Sheng, Q.Z., Motahari, H. (eds.) BPM 2018. LNBIP, vol. 342, pp. 361–373. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11641-5_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Szabo, N.: Formalizing and securing relationships on public networks. First Monday 2(9) (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  16. ter Hofstede, A., van der Aalst, W., Adams, M., Russell, N. (eds.): Modern Business Process Automation: YAWL and Its Support Environment. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03121-2

  17. Underwood, S.: Blockchain beyond bitcoin. Commun. ACM 59(11), 15–17 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Weber, I., Gramoli, V., Ponomarev, A., Staples, M., et al.: On availability for blockchain-based systems. In: 2017 IEEE 36th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS), pp. 64–73 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Weber, I., Xu, X., Riveret, R., Governatori, G., Ponomarev, A., Mendling, J.: Untrusted business process monitoring and execution using blockchain. In: La Rosa, M., Loos, P., Pastor, O. (eds.) BPM 2016. LNCS, vol. 9850, pp. 329–347. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45348-4_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Xu, X., Weber, I., Staples, M., Zhu, L., et al.: A taxonomy of blockchain-based systems for architecture design. In: ICSA, pp. 243–252. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yasaweerasinghelage, R., Staples, M., Weber, I.: Predicting latency of blockchain-based systems using architectural modelling and simulation. In: ICSA, pp. 253–256. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Adams .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Adams, M., Suriadi, S., Kumar, A., ter Hofstede, A.H.M. (2020). Flexible Integration of Blockchain with Business Process Automation: A Federated Architecture. In: Herbaut, N., La Rosa, M. (eds) Advanced Information Systems Engineering. CAiSE 2020. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 386. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58135-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58135-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58134-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58135-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics