Skip to main content

Landscape Ecological Structure in a Suburban Area: Case Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cultural Heritage—Possibilities for Land-Centered Societal Development

Part of the book series: Environmental History ((ENVHIS,volume 13))

Abstract

Suburban areas of Polish agglomerations are areas of dynamic structural and spatial changes, which results in adopting some new functions such as residential functions, and in some cases abandoning previous agricultural functions. These changes are mostly turbulent, uncontrolled and with little reversibility, often as a result of lack of coherent comprehensive spatial planning in suburban areas. A high volume of anthropogenic processes affects existing spatial and environmental structures. As a result environmentally valuable areas often shrink which may introduce local ecological imbalance. The results of such imbalance are difficult to measure. However, results can usually be predicted to be twofold: heterogenic mosaic landscapes, commonly chaotic in structure or recurring single function landscapes. Landscape shaping based on nature conservation is a valuable concept as it is not only a way of protecting environmental structures but also helps building better designed living spaces for the residents of suburbs. This paper aims at characterising and analysing the types of ecological structures of landscape (ecological-spatial models) in suburban communities. The research was conducted in selected suburb communities of the Krakow Metropolitan area which are associated with prevailing agricultural areas. Recommendations for landscape shaping have been given for each ecological-spatial model of landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Index of adjustment of agricultural production space (IAAPS), developed by IUNG in Puławy.

References

  • Antrop M, Van Eetvelde V (2017) Landscape perspectives: the holistic nature of landscape. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1183-6

  • Bogdanowski J (1990) Metoda jednostek i wnętrz architektoniczno-krajobrazowych (JARK WAK) w studiach i projektowaniu. Kraków: Politechnika Krakowska

    Google Scholar 

  • Busko M, Szafranska B (2018) Analysis of changes in land use patterns pursuant to the conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural use in the context of the sustainable development of the malopolska region. Sustainability (Switzerland) 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010136

  • Campos-Campos O, Cruz-Cárdenas G, Aquino RJC, Moncayo-Estrada R, Machuca MAV, Meléndez LAÁ (2018) Historical delineation of landscape units using physical geographic characteristics and land use/cover Change. Open Geosci 10(1):45–57. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2018-0004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chmielewski TJ, Chmielewski S (2015) Podstawowe przyrodnicze jednostki przestrzenne, a spójność i stabilność ekologiczna systemów krajobrazowych [The basic natural spatial units, versus ecological connectivity and stability of landscape systems] (3):145–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Chmielewski TJ, Kułak A (2014) Struktura fizjonomiczna krajobrazu. In Struktura środowiska przyrodniczego, a fizjonomia krajobrazu. Instytut Geografii i Gospodarki Przestrzennej; Uniwersytet Jagielloński, pp 33–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Chmielewski TJ, Kułak A (2016) Ekotony w krajobrazie i krajobraz ekotonów: nowe wyzwania dla uznanej koncepcji. Prace Komisji Krajobrazu Kulturowego 31:25–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Chmielewski TJ, Myga-Piątek U, Solon J (2015) Typologia Aktualnych Krajobrazów Polski. Przeglad Geograficzny 87(3):377–408. https://doi.org/10.7163/PrzG.2015.3.0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuman T, Romportl D (2010) Multivariate classification analysis of cultural landscapes: an example from the Czech Republic. Landsc Urban Plan 98(3–4):200–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.08.003

  • Cosgrove DE (2008) Geography and vision seeing, imagining and represeninc the world. Match Studio Projects

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe (2000) European Landscape Convention, Florence 2000. European Treaty Ser (176):1–7. https://rm.coe.int/1680080621

  • Hettner A (1928) Die Oberflächenformen des Festlandes: Probleme und Methoden der Morphologie. Teubner, Leipzig

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kondracki J (1955) Problematyka Fizyczno-Geograficznej Regionalizacji Polski. Przegląd Geograficzny 27:298–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondracki J (1959) Typy środowiska i podział regionalny. In: Z badań środowiska geograficznego w powiecie mrągowskim. Pr. Geogr. Inst. Geogr. PAN, pp 91–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondracki J (1998) Geografia regionalna Polski. Wydaw. Naukowe PWN, Warszawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell ST (2010) Multifunctional urban agriculture for sustainable land use planning in the United States. Sustainability 2(8):2499–2522. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2082499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matuszkiewicz JM (1993) Krajobrazy roślinne i regiony geobotaniczne Polski. Prace Geograficzne IGiPZ PAN 158:107

    Google Scholar 

  • Matuszkiewicz JM (2008) Geobotanical regionalization of Poland. https://www.igipz.pan.pl/Regiony-geobotaniczne-zgik.html

  • Michalik-Śnieżek M, Chmielewski S, Chmielewski TJ (2019) An introduction to the classification of the physiognomic landscape types: methodology and results of testing in the area of Kazimierz Landscape Park (Poland). Phys Geogr 40(4):384–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2018.1551009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mok HF, Williamson VG, Grove JR, Burry K, Barker SF, Hamilton AJ (2014) Strawberry fields forever? Urban agriculture in developed countries: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 34(1):21–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0156-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mücher CA, Klijn JA, Wascher DM, Schaminéecd JHJ (2010) A new European Landscape Classification (LANMAP): a transparent, flexible and user-oriented methodology to distinguish landscapes. Ecol Indicators 10(1):87–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.03.018

  • Ostaszewska K (2002) Geografia Krajobrazu. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostaszewska K (2006) Models of Landscape units—utopia or necessity. Miscellanea Geographica 12:5–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piorr A, Ravetz J, Tosics I (2011) Peri-Urbanisation in Europe: towards European policies to sustain urban-rural futures. In: Forest & landscape. University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, pp 30–42. http://forskningsbasen.deff.dk/Share.external?sp=Sac92f938-1fd0-4556-b96e-2697a0e87707&sp=Sku

  • Prus B, Bacior S, Dudzinska M (2018) Identification of spatial-settling status of rural areas of southern Poland a case study. Eng Rural Dev 17:439–444. https://doi.org/10.22616/ERDev2018.17.N020

  • Richling A (2005) Krajobraz naturalny, pierwotny, kulturowy i potencjalny. In: Geografia fizyczna Polski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa, pp. 294–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Simensen T, Halvorsen R, Erikstad L (2018) Methods for landscape characterisation and mapping: a systematic review. Land Use Policy 75(October 2017):557–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.022

  • Solecka I, Bothmer D, Głogowski A (2019) Recognizing landscapes for the purpose of sustainable development—experiences from Poland. Sustainability 11(12):3429. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solecka I, Raszka B, Krajewski P (2018) Landscape analysis for sustainable land use policy: a case study in the municipality of Popielów, Poland. Land Use Policy 75(September 2016):116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.021

  • Soto S, Pintó J (2010) Delineation of natural landscape units for Puerto Rico. Appl Geogr 30(4):720–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.01.010

  • Specht K, Siebert R, Thomaier S (2016) Perception and acceptance of agricultural production in and on urban buildings (ZFarming): a qualitative study from Berlin, Germany. Agricult Hum Values 33(4):753–769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-015-9658-z

  • Sroka W (2018) Conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural purposes in selected Polish Metropolitan Areas. Acta Scientarum Polonorum 17(2):97–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Office in Krakow (2018) Statistical Vademecum of Regional Civil Servant

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven JTA, Soons MB, Janssen R, Omtzigt N (2008) An operational landscape unit approach for identifying key landscape connections in wetland restoration. J Appl Ecol 45(5):1496–1503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01534.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Żarska B (2006) Modele ekologiczno przestrzenne i zasady kształtowania krajobrazu gmin wiejskich. Wydawnictwo SGGW, Warszawa

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the editor and the reviewers for their valuable comments and detailed suggestions to improve the paper. Further, we also acknowledge the support by the National Science Centre, Poland under project no. 2016/21/D/HS4/00264.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renata Różycka-Czas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Różycka-Czas, R., Czesak, B., Sroka, W. (2022). Landscape Ecological Structure in a Suburban Area: Case Study. In: Hernik, J., Walczycka, M., Sankowski, E., Harris, B.J. (eds) Cultural Heritage—Possibilities for Land-Centered Societal Development. Environmental History, vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58092-6_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics