Skip to main content

Happiness as a Quality of Life Component for Active Ageing in Colombia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Active Ageing and Quality of Life

Abstract

Population ageing is one of the most significant recent demographic developments. It is seen both as a success of national policy and socioeconomic development and a challenge for society, which is consequently required to seek the improvement of people’s living conditions. Old age is individually experienced within a genetic and cultural framework. We hence frame active, successful and healthy ageing in terms of remaining active, committed to life, and socially participative. In this context, the aim of this study was to explore how the concept of happiness is an indicator of the quality of life of older people. A quantitative, analytical, cross-sectional study was carried out in three cities in Colombia (Medellín, Barranquilla, and Pasto), including a total of 1514 people, who were selected on a probabilistic basis. We used the Lima Happiness Scale to measure the main outcome. In total, 85.6% of the population considered themselves to be happy, and the remaining 14.4% were indifferent or somewhat unhappy. After adjusting for demographic variables (age and gender) and sociodemographic variables, health and lifestyle, we found a positive association between satisfaction with quality of life and happiness (prevalence ratio (PR) = 4.94, 95% CI 3.30–7.39). It is not sufficient to merely accumulate years. They need to be lived with the maximum possible quality, with material and intangible conditions that provide wellbeing and can be assimilated as happiness. This is what comprises quality of life. Wellbeing and happiness appear to have a natural affinity, and intangible or subjective aspects related to wellbeing must be taken into account for the material and objective aspects of living conditions to be satisfied. Enjoying life makes people happy. As such, happiness is a component of quality of life that is associated active ageing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alarcón, R. (2001). Relationships between happiness and gender, age and marital status. Revista de Psicología, 19(1), 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alarcón, R. (2006). Desarrollo de una escala factorial para medir la felicidad. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 40(1), 99–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J., & Schofield, M. (2008). The Cambridge history of Hellenistic philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://www.filosofia.unimi.it/zucchi/NuoviFile/HellenisticPhilosophy.pdf

  • Allardt, E. (1998). Tener, amar, ser: una alternativa al modelo sueco de investigación sobre el bienestar. In M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), La calidad de vida (pp. 126–134). México D.F: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansa, M. M. (2008). Economía y felicidad: acerca de la relación entre bienestar material y bienestar subjetivo. Retrieved September 10, 2018, from http://meditacionypsicologia.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Ansa_Eceiza.pdf

  • Arredondo, N. H. L. (2012). Validacion en Colombia del cuestionario MOS de apoyo social. International Journal of Psychological Research, 5(1), 142–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthel, D. (1965). Functional evaluation: The barthel index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 16–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barra, E. (2014). Apoyo social, estrés y salud. Psicología y Salud, 14(2), 237–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellon Saameno, J. A., Delgado Sanchez, A., Luna del Castillo, J. D., & Lardelli Claret, P. (1996). Validity and reliability of the family Apgar family function test. Atencion Primaria, 18(6), 289–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beytía, P., & Calvo, E. (2011). ¿Cómo medir la felicidad? Claves de Políticas Públicas #4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobes, J., González, P., Bousoño, M., & Suarez, E. (1993). Desarrollo histórico del concepto de calidad de vida. Monografías de Psiquiatria, V(6), 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boladeras, M., Escobar, J., Maldonado, C. E., Delgado, C. J., & Castro, M. F. (2000). Calidad de vida y principios bioéticos. In Universidad El Bosque (Ed.), Bioética y calidad de vida. Bogotá: Ediciones El Bosque.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardona, D. (2010). Comparativo de la calidad de vida del adulto mayor. Medellín, 2008. Revista Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública, 28(2), 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardona, D., & Agudelo, H. B. (2005). Cultural construction of the concept o quality of life. Revista Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública, 23(1), 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardona, D., Segura, A. M., Segura, A., Muñoz, D. I., & Agudelo, M. C. (2019). La felicidad como predictor de funcionalidad familiar del adulto mayor en tres ciudades de Colombia. Hacia la Promoción de la Salud, 24(1), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.17151/hpsal.2019.24.1.9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuadra, H., & Florenzano, R. (2003). El bienestar subjetivo: hacia una psicología positiva. Revista de Psicología de la Universidad de Chile, XII(1), 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Departamento Nacional de Planeación. (2016). Primer diagnóstico de felicidad para Colombia. 2016. Retrieved September 10, 2017, from https://www.dnp.gov.co/Paginas/DNP%20revela%20primer%20diagn%C3%B3stico%20de%20felicidad%20para%20Colombia.aspx

  • Diener, E., Suh, E. R., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjetive well-being; Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diez del Corral, R. (2007). Sobre la eudemonia o felicidad humana. Revista Agustiniana, 220(2), 353–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ergin, I., & Mandiracioglu, A. (2015). Demographic and socioeconomic inequalities for self-rated health and happiness in elderly: The situation for Turkey regarding World Values Survey between 1990 and 2013. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 61(2), 224–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2015.06.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, R. (1998). Descripciones de la desigualdad: el enfoque sueco de la investigación sobre el bienestar. In M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), La calidad de vida (pp. 101–120). México D.F: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gfroerer, J., Penne, M., Pemberton, M., & Folsom, R. (2003). Substance abuse treatment need among older adults in 2020: The impact of the aging baby-boom cohort. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 69(2), 127–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2019). World happiness report 2019. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network. Retrieved June 4, 2019, from https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2019/#read

  • Kleinspehn-Ammerlahn, A., Kotter-Grün, D., & Smith, J. (2008). Self-perceptions of aging: Do subjective age and satisfaction with aging change during old age? The Journals of Gerontology, 63(6), 377–385. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/63.6.P377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, A., Di Fazio, R., Stones, M. J., & Hannah, T. E. (1992). Long- and short-term affective states in happiness: Age and sex comparisons. Social Indicators Research, 27, 293–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B., Floud, S., Pirie, K., Green, J., Peto, R., Beral, V., et al. (2016). Does happiness itself directly affect mortality? The prospective UK Million Women Study. The Lancet, 387(10021), 874–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01087-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A Measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(2), 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meléndez, J. C., Navarro, E., Oliver, A., & Tomas, J. M. (2009). La satisfacción vital en los mayores: factores sociodemográficos. Boletín de Psicología, 95, 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. (2017). Envejecimiento y vejez. Retrieved January 19, 2017, from https://www.minsalud.gov.co/proteccionsocial/promocion-social/Paginas/envejecimiento-vejez.aspx

  • Moyano, D. E., Flores, M. E., & Soromaa, H. (2010). Fiabilidad y validez de constructo del test MUNSH para medir felicidad, en población de adultos mayores chilenos. Universitas Psychologica, 10(2), 567–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oishi, S., & Graham, J. (2010). Social ecology lost and found in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 5(4), 356–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610374588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picchio, A. (2009). Condiciones de vida: perspectivas, análisis económico y políticas públicas. Revista de Economía Crítica, 7, 27–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos, A., García, M., & Miranda, M. (2016). El envejecimiento activo: importancia de su promoción para sociedades envejecidas. Revista Archivo Médico de Camagüey, 20(3), 330–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, M. (2018). Happiness in Latin America. Chapter 6: World Happiness Report 2018. Retrieved June 4, 2019, from https://s3.amazonaws.com/happiness-report/2018/CH6-WHR-lr.pdf

  • Sheik, J. I., & Yesavage, J. A. (1986). Geriatric depression scale: Recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clinical Gerontology, 5, 165–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherbourne, C. D., & Stewart, A. L. (1991). The MOS social support survey. Social Science & Medicine, 32(6), 705–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonfeld, L., King-Kallimanis, B. L., Duchene, D. M., Etheridge, R. L., Herrera, J. R., Barry, K. L., & Lynn, N. (2010). Screening and brief intervention for substance misuse among older adults: The Florida BRITE project. American Journal of Public Health, 100(1), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2008.149534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). El futuro del Estado de Bienestar. La Factoría, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steptoe, A., Deaton, A., & Stone, A. A. (2015). Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing. The Lancet, 385(9968), 640–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stones, M., Kozma, A., Hannah, T., & Mckim, W. A. (1991). The correlation coefficient and models of subjective wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 24(4), 317–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strodach, G. (1991). The philosophy of Epicurus: Letters, doctrines, and parallel passages from Lucretius. Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesch-Romer, C., Motel-Klingebiel, A., & Tomasik, M. (2008). Gender differences in subjective wellbeing: Comparing societies with respect to gender equality. Social Indicators Research, 85(2), 329–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2019). Sustainable development goals. Goal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. Retrieved March 20, 2018, from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/health/

  • Urzúa, A., & Caqueo, A. (2012). Calidad de vida: una revisión teórica del concepto. Terapia Psicológica, 30(1), 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2009). How do we assess how happy we are? Tenets, implications and tenability of three theories. In A. Krishna & B. Radcliff (Eds.), Happiness economics and politics (pp. 45–69). Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velarde-Jurado, E., & Avila-Figueroa, C. (2002). Evaluación de la calidad de vida. Salud Pública de México, 44(4), 349–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO Quality of Life Assessment Group. (1996). Que calidad de vida?/Grupo de la OMS sobre la calidad de vida. Foro mundial de la salud, 17(4), 385–387. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/55264.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (1995). The World Health Organization Quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the world health organization. Social Science & Medicine, 41(10), 1403–1409. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00112-k.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Doris Cardona-Arango .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cardona-Arango, D., Segura-Cardona, A., Muñoz-Rodríguez, D.I., Segura-Cardona, Á. (2021). Happiness as a Quality of Life Component for Active Ageing in Colombia. In: Rojo-Pérez, F., Fernández-Mayoralas, G. (eds) Handbook of Active Ageing and Quality of Life. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58031-5_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58031-5_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58030-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58031-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics